Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: Can we avoid the glucose challenge test?
Objective To identify risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in patients who had either a normal or abnormal glucose tolerance test (GTT) after failing the initial glucose challenge test (GCT). If identified, consideration can be given to circumvent the glucose challenge test for those...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners 2013-06, Vol.25 (6), p.329-333 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 333 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 329 |
container_title | Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Crete, Joan E. Anasti, James N. |
description | Objective
To identify risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in patients who had either a normal or abnormal glucose tolerance test (GTT) after failing the initial glucose challenge test (GCT). If identified, consideration can be given to circumvent the glucose challenge test for those at risk.
Data sources
A chart review was performed on 557 patients with abnormal GCT, 278 had an abnormal GTT (cases), and 279 had normal GTT (controls). The following risk factors were extracted: patients’ age, body mass index (BMI), ethnicity, selected personal history, and family history. A primary logistic regression and secondary exploratory logistic regression were used to analyze the data.
Conclusions
Of the risk factors reviewed age, BMI, and prior history of GDM were predictive of GDM in the current pregnancy. Age 30–34 had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.25,3.05] and over 35 had an OR 3.87 CI [2.12,7.05]. BMI over 30 had an OR 1.95, CI [1.25,3.05] and prior GDM had an OR 2.82 CI [1.55,5.13]. The combination of age and BMI had a significant OR, but not a significant increase over individual risk factors.
Implications for practice
Screening by risk factors to circumvent glucose challenge testing may cause unnecessary testing and cost. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2012.00792.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1447497919</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1447497919</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4648-c2db30fae9e6dc7ce0a37f79b4f25c56a88f0811eaac6185c44399ec15a4c96c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEolXpX0CWuHBJ6o-JHSMhtEqhgKqCqiKOlteZ7Hrr3ZQ4Ybf_vk532wMX5uI5PO94NE-WEUYLlupsVTAFZa5KrQtOGS8oVZoXuxfZMRdc5VJzePnUV5U8yk5jXNFUGoTg8Do74sAULXV1nN2ce7vYdNFH0rVkgXGwg-82NpDG2zkOGMkaQ_DDGD-Q2m7IFon92_mGDEskizC6LiJxSxsCbhZIUmD49CZ71doQ8fTwnmS_vny-qb_mlz8uvtWzy9yBhCp3vJkL2lrUKBunHFIrVKv0HFpeulLaqmppxRha6ySrSgcgtEbHSgtOSydOsvf7uXd992dMP5u1jy6tazfYjdEwJYEBlBX8HwVQoJVmOqHv_kFX3dinkzwO1JIxpVSi3h6ocb7Gxtz1fm37e_N02gTAHth2YcA-3oZxi71Zog3D0tDkkFHK82RQUJnk5JOhKfbxEPMB75_HMmom-WZlJvlmkm8m-eZRvtmZ77PZVepSPt_nfRxw95y3_a2RSqjS_L66MOq6Pq9_cm6uxQMVwq1D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1769611777</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: Can we avoid the glucose challenge test?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Crete, Joan E. ; Anasti, James N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Crete, Joan E. ; Anasti, James N.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To identify risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in patients who had either a normal or abnormal glucose tolerance test (GTT) after failing the initial glucose challenge test (GCT). If identified, consideration can be given to circumvent the glucose challenge test for those at risk.
Data sources
A chart review was performed on 557 patients with abnormal GCT, 278 had an abnormal GTT (cases), and 279 had normal GTT (controls). The following risk factors were extracted: patients’ age, body mass index (BMI), ethnicity, selected personal history, and family history. A primary logistic regression and secondary exploratory logistic regression were used to analyze the data.
Conclusions
Of the risk factors reviewed age, BMI, and prior history of GDM were predictive of GDM in the current pregnancy. Age 30–34 had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.25,3.05] and over 35 had an OR 3.87 CI [2.12,7.05]. BMI over 30 had an OR 1.95, CI [1.25,3.05] and prior GDM had an OR 2.82 CI [1.55,5.13]. The combination of age and BMI had a significant OR, but not a significant increase over individual risk factors.
Implications for practice
Screening by risk factors to circumvent glucose challenge testing may cause unnecessary testing and cost.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2327-6886</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2327-6924</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1745-7599</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2327-6924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2012.00792.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24170598</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age ; Body Mass Index ; Confidence intervals ; Diabetes ; Diabetes, Gestational - diagnosis ; Diabetes, Gestational - etiology ; Female ; Glucose Tolerance Test ; Health risk assessment ; Humans ; Maternal Age ; Maternal Serum Screening Tests ; Nursing ; obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) ; Pregnancy ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; screening ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 2013-06, Vol.25 (6), p.329-333</ispartof><rights>2012 The Author(s) ©2012 American Association of Nurse Practitioners</rights><rights>American Association of Nurse Practitioners</rights><rights>2012 The Author(s) ©2012 American Association of Nurse Practitioners.</rights><rights>2013 American Association of Nurse Practitioners</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4648-c2db30fae9e6dc7ce0a37f79b4f25c56a88f0811eaac6185c44399ec15a4c96c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1745-7599.2012.00792.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1745-7599.2012.00792.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24170598$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crete, Joan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anasti, James N.</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: Can we avoid the glucose challenge test?</title><title>Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners</title><addtitle>Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners</addtitle><description>Objective
To identify risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in patients who had either a normal or abnormal glucose tolerance test (GTT) after failing the initial glucose challenge test (GCT). If identified, consideration can be given to circumvent the glucose challenge test for those at risk.
Data sources
A chart review was performed on 557 patients with abnormal GCT, 278 had an abnormal GTT (cases), and 279 had normal GTT (controls). The following risk factors were extracted: patients’ age, body mass index (BMI), ethnicity, selected personal history, and family history. A primary logistic regression and secondary exploratory logistic regression were used to analyze the data.
Conclusions
Of the risk factors reviewed age, BMI, and prior history of GDM were predictive of GDM in the current pregnancy. Age 30–34 had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.25,3.05] and over 35 had an OR 3.87 CI [2.12,7.05]. BMI over 30 had an OR 1.95, CI [1.25,3.05] and prior GDM had an OR 2.82 CI [1.55,5.13]. The combination of age and BMI had a significant OR, but not a significant increase over individual risk factors.
Implications for practice
Screening by risk factors to circumvent glucose challenge testing may cause unnecessary testing and cost.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes, Gestational - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diabetes, Gestational - etiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glucose Tolerance Test</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Maternal Age</subject><subject>Maternal Serum Screening Tests</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN)</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>2327-6886</issn><issn>2327-6924</issn><issn>1745-7599</issn><issn>2327-6924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEolXpX0CWuHBJ6o-JHSMhtEqhgKqCqiKOlteZ7Hrr3ZQ4Ybf_vk532wMX5uI5PO94NE-WEUYLlupsVTAFZa5KrQtOGS8oVZoXuxfZMRdc5VJzePnUV5U8yk5jXNFUGoTg8Do74sAULXV1nN2ce7vYdNFH0rVkgXGwg-82NpDG2zkOGMkaQ_DDGD-Q2m7IFon92_mGDEskizC6LiJxSxsCbhZIUmD49CZ71doQ8fTwnmS_vny-qb_mlz8uvtWzy9yBhCp3vJkL2lrUKBunHFIrVKv0HFpeulLaqmppxRha6ySrSgcgtEbHSgtOSydOsvf7uXd992dMP5u1jy6tazfYjdEwJYEBlBX8HwVQoJVmOqHv_kFX3dinkzwO1JIxpVSi3h6ocb7Gxtz1fm37e_N02gTAHth2YcA-3oZxi71Zog3D0tDkkFHK82RQUJnk5JOhKfbxEPMB75_HMmom-WZlJvlmkm8m-eZRvtmZ77PZVepSPt_nfRxw95y3_a2RSqjS_L66MOq6Pq9_cm6uxQMVwq1D</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Crete, Joan E.</creator><creator>Anasti, James N.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Association of Nurse Practitioners</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: Can we avoid the glucose challenge test?</title><author>Crete, Joan E. ; Anasti, James N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4648-c2db30fae9e6dc7ce0a37f79b4f25c56a88f0811eaac6185c44399ec15a4c96c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes, Gestational - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diabetes, Gestational - etiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glucose Tolerance Test</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Maternal Age</topic><topic>Maternal Serum Screening Tests</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN)</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crete, Joan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anasti, James N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crete, Joan E.</au><au>Anasti, James N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: Can we avoid the glucose challenge test?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners</addtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>329</spage><epage>333</epage><pages>329-333</pages><issn>2327-6886</issn><issn>2327-6924</issn><issn>1745-7599</issn><eissn>2327-6924</eissn><abstract>Objective
To identify risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in patients who had either a normal or abnormal glucose tolerance test (GTT) after failing the initial glucose challenge test (GCT). If identified, consideration can be given to circumvent the glucose challenge test for those at risk.
Data sources
A chart review was performed on 557 patients with abnormal GCT, 278 had an abnormal GTT (cases), and 279 had normal GTT (controls). The following risk factors were extracted: patients’ age, body mass index (BMI), ethnicity, selected personal history, and family history. A primary logistic regression and secondary exploratory logistic regression were used to analyze the data.
Conclusions
Of the risk factors reviewed age, BMI, and prior history of GDM were predictive of GDM in the current pregnancy. Age 30–34 had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.25,3.05] and over 35 had an OR 3.87 CI [2.12,7.05]. BMI over 30 had an OR 1.95, CI [1.25,3.05] and prior GDM had an OR 2.82 CI [1.55,5.13]. The combination of age and BMI had a significant OR, but not a significant increase over individual risk factors.
Implications for practice
Screening by risk factors to circumvent glucose challenge testing may cause unnecessary testing and cost.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24170598</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1745-7599.2012.00792.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2327-6886 |
ispartof | Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 2013-06, Vol.25 (6), p.329-333 |
issn | 2327-6886 2327-6924 1745-7599 2327-6924 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1447497919 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Adult Age Body Mass Index Confidence intervals Diabetes Diabetes, Gestational - diagnosis Diabetes, Gestational - etiology Female Glucose Tolerance Test Health risk assessment Humans Maternal Age Maternal Serum Screening Tests Nursing obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) Pregnancy Retrospective Studies Risk Factors screening Young Adult |
title | Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: Can we avoid the glucose challenge test? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T05%3A57%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnosis%20of%20gestational%20diabetes%20mellitus:%20Can%20we%20avoid%20the%20glucose%20challenge%20test?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Nurse%20Practitioners&rft.au=Crete,%20Joan%20E.&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=329&rft.epage=333&rft.pages=329-333&rft.issn=2327-6886&rft.eissn=2327-6924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2012.00792.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1447497919%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1769611777&rft_id=info:pmid/24170598&rfr_iscdi=true |