Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: Can we avoid the glucose challenge test?

Objective To identify risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in patients who had either a normal or abnormal glucose tolerance test (GTT) after failing the initial glucose challenge test (GCT). If identified, consideration can be given to circumvent the glucose challenge test for those...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners 2013-06, Vol.25 (6), p.329-333
Hauptverfasser: Crete, Joan E., Anasti, James N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 333
container_issue 6
container_start_page 329
container_title Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners
container_volume 25
creator Crete, Joan E.
Anasti, James N.
description Objective To identify risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in patients who had either a normal or abnormal glucose tolerance test (GTT) after failing the initial glucose challenge test (GCT). If identified, consideration can be given to circumvent the glucose challenge test for those at risk. Data sources A chart review was performed on 557 patients with abnormal GCT, 278 had an abnormal GTT (cases), and 279 had normal GTT (controls). The following risk factors were extracted: patients’ age, body mass index (BMI), ethnicity, selected personal history, and family history. A primary logistic regression and secondary exploratory logistic regression were used to analyze the data. Conclusions Of the risk factors reviewed age, BMI, and prior history of GDM were predictive of GDM in the current pregnancy. Age 30–34 had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.25,3.05] and over 35 had an OR 3.87 CI [2.12,7.05]. BMI over 30 had an OR 1.95, CI [1.25,3.05] and prior GDM had an OR 2.82 CI [1.55,5.13]. The combination of age and BMI had a significant OR, but not a significant increase over individual risk factors. Implications for practice Screening by risk factors to circumvent glucose challenge testing may cause unnecessary testing and cost.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2012.00792.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1447497919</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1447497919</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4648-c2db30fae9e6dc7ce0a37f79b4f25c56a88f0811eaac6185c44399ec15a4c96c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEolXpX0CWuHBJ6o-JHSMhtEqhgKqCqiKOlteZ7Hrr3ZQ4Ybf_vk532wMX5uI5PO94NE-WEUYLlupsVTAFZa5KrQtOGS8oVZoXuxfZMRdc5VJzePnUV5U8yk5jXNFUGoTg8Do74sAULXV1nN2ce7vYdNFH0rVkgXGwg-82NpDG2zkOGMkaQ_DDGD-Q2m7IFon92_mGDEskizC6LiJxSxsCbhZIUmD49CZ71doQ8fTwnmS_vny-qb_mlz8uvtWzy9yBhCp3vJkL2lrUKBunHFIrVKv0HFpeulLaqmppxRha6ySrSgcgtEbHSgtOSydOsvf7uXd992dMP5u1jy6tazfYjdEwJYEBlBX8HwVQoJVmOqHv_kFX3dinkzwO1JIxpVSi3h6ocb7Gxtz1fm37e_N02gTAHth2YcA-3oZxi71Zog3D0tDkkFHK82RQUJnk5JOhKfbxEPMB75_HMmom-WZlJvlmkm8m-eZRvtmZ77PZVepSPt_nfRxw95y3_a2RSqjS_L66MOq6Pq9_cm6uxQMVwq1D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1769611777</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: Can we avoid the glucose challenge test?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Crete, Joan E. ; Anasti, James N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Crete, Joan E. ; Anasti, James N.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To identify risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in patients who had either a normal or abnormal glucose tolerance test (GTT) after failing the initial glucose challenge test (GCT). If identified, consideration can be given to circumvent the glucose challenge test for those at risk. Data sources A chart review was performed on 557 patients with abnormal GCT, 278 had an abnormal GTT (cases), and 279 had normal GTT (controls). The following risk factors were extracted: patients’ age, body mass index (BMI), ethnicity, selected personal history, and family history. A primary logistic regression and secondary exploratory logistic regression were used to analyze the data. Conclusions Of the risk factors reviewed age, BMI, and prior history of GDM were predictive of GDM in the current pregnancy. Age 30–34 had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.25,3.05] and over 35 had an OR 3.87 CI [2.12,7.05]. BMI over 30 had an OR 1.95, CI [1.25,3.05] and prior GDM had an OR 2.82 CI [1.55,5.13]. The combination of age and BMI had a significant OR, but not a significant increase over individual risk factors. Implications for practice Screening by risk factors to circumvent glucose challenge testing may cause unnecessary testing and cost.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2327-6886</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2327-6924</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1745-7599</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2327-6924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2012.00792.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24170598</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age ; Body Mass Index ; Confidence intervals ; Diabetes ; Diabetes, Gestational - diagnosis ; Diabetes, Gestational - etiology ; Female ; Glucose Tolerance Test ; Health risk assessment ; Humans ; Maternal Age ; Maternal Serum Screening Tests ; Nursing ; obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) ; Pregnancy ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; screening ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 2013-06, Vol.25 (6), p.329-333</ispartof><rights>2012 The Author(s) ©2012 American Association of Nurse Practitioners</rights><rights>American Association of Nurse Practitioners</rights><rights>2012 The Author(s) ©2012 American Association of Nurse Practitioners.</rights><rights>2013 American Association of Nurse Practitioners</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4648-c2db30fae9e6dc7ce0a37f79b4f25c56a88f0811eaac6185c44399ec15a4c96c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1745-7599.2012.00792.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1745-7599.2012.00792.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24170598$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crete, Joan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anasti, James N.</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: Can we avoid the glucose challenge test?</title><title>Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners</title><addtitle>Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners</addtitle><description>Objective To identify risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in patients who had either a normal or abnormal glucose tolerance test (GTT) after failing the initial glucose challenge test (GCT). If identified, consideration can be given to circumvent the glucose challenge test for those at risk. Data sources A chart review was performed on 557 patients with abnormal GCT, 278 had an abnormal GTT (cases), and 279 had normal GTT (controls). The following risk factors were extracted: patients’ age, body mass index (BMI), ethnicity, selected personal history, and family history. A primary logistic regression and secondary exploratory logistic regression were used to analyze the data. Conclusions Of the risk factors reviewed age, BMI, and prior history of GDM were predictive of GDM in the current pregnancy. Age 30–34 had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.25,3.05] and over 35 had an OR 3.87 CI [2.12,7.05]. BMI over 30 had an OR 1.95, CI [1.25,3.05] and prior GDM had an OR 2.82 CI [1.55,5.13]. The combination of age and BMI had a significant OR, but not a significant increase over individual risk factors. Implications for practice Screening by risk factors to circumvent glucose challenge testing may cause unnecessary testing and cost.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes, Gestational - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diabetes, Gestational - etiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glucose Tolerance Test</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Maternal Age</subject><subject>Maternal Serum Screening Tests</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN)</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>2327-6886</issn><issn>2327-6924</issn><issn>1745-7599</issn><issn>2327-6924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEolXpX0CWuHBJ6o-JHSMhtEqhgKqCqiKOlteZ7Hrr3ZQ4Ybf_vk532wMX5uI5PO94NE-WEUYLlupsVTAFZa5KrQtOGS8oVZoXuxfZMRdc5VJzePnUV5U8yk5jXNFUGoTg8Do74sAULXV1nN2ce7vYdNFH0rVkgXGwg-82NpDG2zkOGMkaQ_DDGD-Q2m7IFon92_mGDEskizC6LiJxSxsCbhZIUmD49CZ71doQ8fTwnmS_vny-qb_mlz8uvtWzy9yBhCp3vJkL2lrUKBunHFIrVKv0HFpeulLaqmppxRha6ySrSgcgtEbHSgtOSydOsvf7uXd992dMP5u1jy6tazfYjdEwJYEBlBX8HwVQoJVmOqHv_kFX3dinkzwO1JIxpVSi3h6ocb7Gxtz1fm37e_N02gTAHth2YcA-3oZxi71Zog3D0tDkkFHK82RQUJnk5JOhKfbxEPMB75_HMmom-WZlJvlmkm8m-eZRvtmZ77PZVepSPt_nfRxw95y3_a2RSqjS_L66MOq6Pq9_cm6uxQMVwq1D</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Crete, Joan E.</creator><creator>Anasti, James N.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Association of Nurse Practitioners</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: Can we avoid the glucose challenge test?</title><author>Crete, Joan E. ; Anasti, James N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4648-c2db30fae9e6dc7ce0a37f79b4f25c56a88f0811eaac6185c44399ec15a4c96c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes, Gestational - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diabetes, Gestational - etiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glucose Tolerance Test</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Maternal Age</topic><topic>Maternal Serum Screening Tests</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN)</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crete, Joan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anasti, James N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crete, Joan E.</au><au>Anasti, James N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: Can we avoid the glucose challenge test?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners</addtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>329</spage><epage>333</epage><pages>329-333</pages><issn>2327-6886</issn><issn>2327-6924</issn><issn>1745-7599</issn><eissn>2327-6924</eissn><abstract>Objective To identify risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in patients who had either a normal or abnormal glucose tolerance test (GTT) after failing the initial glucose challenge test (GCT). If identified, consideration can be given to circumvent the glucose challenge test for those at risk. Data sources A chart review was performed on 557 patients with abnormal GCT, 278 had an abnormal GTT (cases), and 279 had normal GTT (controls). The following risk factors were extracted: patients’ age, body mass index (BMI), ethnicity, selected personal history, and family history. A primary logistic regression and secondary exploratory logistic regression were used to analyze the data. Conclusions Of the risk factors reviewed age, BMI, and prior history of GDM were predictive of GDM in the current pregnancy. Age 30–34 had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.25,3.05] and over 35 had an OR 3.87 CI [2.12,7.05]. BMI over 30 had an OR 1.95, CI [1.25,3.05] and prior GDM had an OR 2.82 CI [1.55,5.13]. The combination of age and BMI had a significant OR, but not a significant increase over individual risk factors. Implications for practice Screening by risk factors to circumvent glucose challenge testing may cause unnecessary testing and cost.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24170598</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1745-7599.2012.00792.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2327-6886
ispartof Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 2013-06, Vol.25 (6), p.329-333
issn 2327-6886
2327-6924
1745-7599
2327-6924
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1447497919
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Adult
Age
Body Mass Index
Confidence intervals
Diabetes
Diabetes, Gestational - diagnosis
Diabetes, Gestational - etiology
Female
Glucose Tolerance Test
Health risk assessment
Humans
Maternal Age
Maternal Serum Screening Tests
Nursing
obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN)
Pregnancy
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
screening
Young Adult
title Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: Can we avoid the glucose challenge test?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T05%3A57%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnosis%20of%20gestational%20diabetes%20mellitus:%20Can%20we%20avoid%20the%20glucose%20challenge%20test?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Nurse%20Practitioners&rft.au=Crete,%20Joan%20E.&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=329&rft.epage=333&rft.pages=329-333&rft.issn=2327-6886&rft.eissn=2327-6924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2012.00792.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1447497919%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1769611777&rft_id=info:pmid/24170598&rfr_iscdi=true