A novel tool in laryngeal surgery: Preliminary results of the picosecond infrared laser

Objectives/Hypothesis Conventional lasers ablate tissue through photothermal, photomechanical, and/or photoionizing effects, which may result in collateral tissue damage. The novel nonionizing picosecond infrared laser (PIRL) selectively energizes tissue water molecules using ultrafast pulses to dri...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Laryngoscope 2013-11, Vol.123 (11), p.2770-2775
Hauptverfasser: Böttcher, Arne, Clauditz, Till S., Knecht, Rainald, Kucher, Stanislav, Wöllmer, Wolfgang, Wilczak, Waldemar, Krötz, Peter, Jowett, Nathan, Dalchow, Carsten V., Münscher, Adrian, Miller, R. J. Dwayne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives/Hypothesis Conventional lasers ablate tissue through photothermal, photomechanical, and/or photoionizing effects, which may result in collateral tissue damage. The novel nonionizing picosecond infrared laser (PIRL) selectively energizes tissue water molecules using ultrafast pulses to drive ablation on timescales faster than energy transport to minimize collateral damage to adjacent cells. Study Design Animal cadaver study. Methods Cuts in porcine laryngeal epithelium, lamina propria, and cartilage were made using PIRL and carbon dioxide (CO2) laser. Lateral damage zones and cutting gaps were histologically compared. Results The mean widths of epithelial (8.5 μm), subepithelial (10.9 μm), and cartilage damage zones (8.1 μm) were significantly lower for cuts made by PIRL compared with CO2 laser (p < 0.001). Mean cutting gaps in vocal fold (174.7 μm) and epiglottic cartilage (56.3 μm) were significantly narrower for cuts made by PIRL compared with CO2 laser (P < 0.01, P < 0.05). Conclusion PIRL ablation demonstrates superiority over CO2 laser in cutting precision with less collateral tissue damage. Level of Evidence N/A. Laryngoscope, 123:2770–2775, 2013
ISSN:0023-852X
1531-4995
DOI:10.1002/lary.24124