A comparative study on invasion, survival, modulation of oxidative burst, and nitric oxide responses of macrophages (HD11), and systemic infection in chickens by prevalent poultry Salmonella serovars
Poultry is a major reservoir for foodborne Salmonella serovars. Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Enteritidis, Salmonella Heidelberg, Salmonella Kentucky, and Salmonella Senftenberg are the most prevalent serovars in U.S. poultry. Information concerning the interactions between different Salmonella...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Foodborne pathogens and disease 2012-12, Vol.9 (12), p.1104-1110 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1110 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1104 |
container_title | Foodborne pathogens and disease |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | He, Haiqi Genovese, Kenneth J Swaggerty, Christina L Nisbet, David J Kogut, Michael H |
description | Poultry is a major reservoir for foodborne Salmonella serovars. Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Enteritidis, Salmonella Heidelberg, Salmonella Kentucky, and Salmonella Senftenberg are the most prevalent serovars in U.S. poultry. Information concerning the interactions between different Salmonella species and host cells in poultry is lacking. In the present study, the above mentioned Salmonella serovars were examined for invasion, intracellular survival, and their ability to modulate oxidative burst and nitric oxide (NO) responses in chicken macrophage HD11 cells. All Salmonella serovars demonstrated similar capacity to invade HD11 cells. At 24 h post-infection, a 36-43% reduction of intracellular bacteria, in log(10)(CFU), was observed for Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Heidelberg, Salmonella Kentucky, and Salmonella Senftenberg, whereas a significantly lower reduction (16%) was observed for Salmonella Enteritidis, indicating its higher resistance to the killing by HD11 cells. Production of NO was completely diminished in HD11 cells infected with Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Enteritidis, but remained intact when infected with Salmonella Heidelberg, Salmonella Kentucky, and Salmonella Senftenberg. Phorbol myristate acetate-stimulated oxidative burst in HD11 cells was greatly impaired after infection by each of the five serovars. When newly hatched chickens were challenged orally, a high rate (86-98%) of systemic infection (Salmonella positive in liver/spleen) was observed in birds challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Enteritidis, Salmonella Heidelberg, and Salmonella Kentucky, while only 14% of the birds were Salmonella Senftenberg positive. However, there was no direct correlation between systemic infection and in vitro differential intracellular survival and modulation of NO response among the tested serovars. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1089/fpd.2012.1233 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1446268903</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1239061048</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-4e293e7417d9a9d7936972cab6d14920a06ca378e86361e739b1930c4875b3ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1TAQhSMEoqWwZIu8LNLNxY_EiZdVeRSpEgtgHTn2hBoSO3iciPxC_hZOb2HLajya75yx5hTFS0aPjLbqzTDbI6eMHxkX4lFxzupalg3j9eP9LepSsIqdFc8Qv1PKFa-bp8UZF1Q2Qsnz4vcVMWGaddTJrUAwLXYjwRPnV40u-APBJa5u1eOBTMEuY-byOAwk_HL2JOqXiOlAtLfEuxSduZ8BiYBz8Ai445M2Mcx3-ltuL2_eMvb6pMANE0xZ4_wA5t7ceWLunPkBHkm_kTlCXg8-kTksY4ob-azHKXgYR00QYlh1xOfFk0GPCC8e6kXx9f27L9c35e2nDx-vr25LIxRPZQVcCWgq1lillW2UkKrhRvfSskpxqqk0WjQttFJIBvlGPVOCmqpt6l5oIy6Ky5PvHMPPBTB1k0Ozf8VDWLBjVSW5bBUV_0e5UFQyWrUZLU9ovhFihKGbo5t03DpGuz3mLsfc7THvqt361YP10k9g_9F_cxV_AKJupnM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1239061048</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative study on invasion, survival, modulation of oxidative burst, and nitric oxide responses of macrophages (HD11), and systemic infection in chickens by prevalent poultry Salmonella serovars</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>He, Haiqi ; Genovese, Kenneth J ; Swaggerty, Christina L ; Nisbet, David J ; Kogut, Michael H</creator><creatorcontrib>He, Haiqi ; Genovese, Kenneth J ; Swaggerty, Christina L ; Nisbet, David J ; Kogut, Michael H</creatorcontrib><description>Poultry is a major reservoir for foodborne Salmonella serovars. Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Enteritidis, Salmonella Heidelberg, Salmonella Kentucky, and Salmonella Senftenberg are the most prevalent serovars in U.S. poultry. Information concerning the interactions between different Salmonella species and host cells in poultry is lacking. In the present study, the above mentioned Salmonella serovars were examined for invasion, intracellular survival, and their ability to modulate oxidative burst and nitric oxide (NO) responses in chicken macrophage HD11 cells. All Salmonella serovars demonstrated similar capacity to invade HD11 cells. At 24 h post-infection, a 36-43% reduction of intracellular bacteria, in log(10)(CFU), was observed for Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Heidelberg, Salmonella Kentucky, and Salmonella Senftenberg, whereas a significantly lower reduction (16%) was observed for Salmonella Enteritidis, indicating its higher resistance to the killing by HD11 cells. Production of NO was completely diminished in HD11 cells infected with Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Enteritidis, but remained intact when infected with Salmonella Heidelberg, Salmonella Kentucky, and Salmonella Senftenberg. Phorbol myristate acetate-stimulated oxidative burst in HD11 cells was greatly impaired after infection by each of the five serovars. When newly hatched chickens were challenged orally, a high rate (86-98%) of systemic infection (Salmonella positive in liver/spleen) was observed in birds challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Enteritidis, Salmonella Heidelberg, and Salmonella Kentucky, while only 14% of the birds were Salmonella Senftenberg positive. However, there was no direct correlation between systemic infection and in vitro differential intracellular survival and modulation of NO response among the tested serovars.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1535-3141</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1556-7125</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-7125</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2012.1233</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23067396</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cell Line ; Cell Survival ; Chickens ; Colony Count, Microbial ; defense mechanisms ; Down-Regulation ; drug effects ; growth & development ; immunology ; Intracellular Space ; Intracellular Space - microbiology ; macrophages ; Macrophages - drug effects ; Macrophages - immunology ; Macrophages - metabolism ; Macrophages - microbiology ; metabolism ; microbiology ; nitric oxide ; Nitric Oxide - metabolism ; pathogen survival ; pathogenicity ; pharmacology ; Poultry Diseases ; Poultry Diseases - immunology ; Poultry Diseases - microbiology ; reactive oxygen species ; Respiratory Burst ; Respiratory Burst - drug effects ; Salmonella ; Salmonella - growth & development ; Salmonella - immunology ; Salmonella - pathogenicity ; Salmonella Enteritidis ; Salmonella Heidelberg ; Salmonella Infections, Animal ; Salmonella Infections, Animal - immunology ; Salmonella Infections, Animal - microbiology ; Salmonella Kentucky ; Salmonella Senftenberg ; Salmonella Typhimurium ; serotypes ; Tetradecanoylphorbol Acetate ; Tetradecanoylphorbol Acetate - pharmacology ; United States</subject><ispartof>Foodborne pathogens and disease, 2012-12, Vol.9 (12), p.1104-1110</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-4e293e7417d9a9d7936972cab6d14920a06ca378e86361e739b1930c4875b3ac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-4e293e7417d9a9d7936972cab6d14920a06ca378e86361e739b1930c4875b3ac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23067396$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>He, Haiqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genovese, Kenneth J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swaggerty, Christina L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nisbet, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kogut, Michael H</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative study on invasion, survival, modulation of oxidative burst, and nitric oxide responses of macrophages (HD11), and systemic infection in chickens by prevalent poultry Salmonella serovars</title><title>Foodborne pathogens and disease</title><addtitle>Foodborne Pathog Dis</addtitle><description>Poultry is a major reservoir for foodborne Salmonella serovars. Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Enteritidis, Salmonella Heidelberg, Salmonella Kentucky, and Salmonella Senftenberg are the most prevalent serovars in U.S. poultry. Information concerning the interactions between different Salmonella species and host cells in poultry is lacking. In the present study, the above mentioned Salmonella serovars were examined for invasion, intracellular survival, and their ability to modulate oxidative burst and nitric oxide (NO) responses in chicken macrophage HD11 cells. All Salmonella serovars demonstrated similar capacity to invade HD11 cells. At 24 h post-infection, a 36-43% reduction of intracellular bacteria, in log(10)(CFU), was observed for Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Heidelberg, Salmonella Kentucky, and Salmonella Senftenberg, whereas a significantly lower reduction (16%) was observed for Salmonella Enteritidis, indicating its higher resistance to the killing by HD11 cells. Production of NO was completely diminished in HD11 cells infected with Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Enteritidis, but remained intact when infected with Salmonella Heidelberg, Salmonella Kentucky, and Salmonella Senftenberg. Phorbol myristate acetate-stimulated oxidative burst in HD11 cells was greatly impaired after infection by each of the five serovars. When newly hatched chickens were challenged orally, a high rate (86-98%) of systemic infection (Salmonella positive in liver/spleen) was observed in birds challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Enteritidis, Salmonella Heidelberg, and Salmonella Kentucky, while only 14% of the birds were Salmonella Senftenberg positive. However, there was no direct correlation between systemic infection and in vitro differential intracellular survival and modulation of NO response among the tested serovars.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cell Line</subject><subject>Cell Survival</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>defense mechanisms</subject><subject>Down-Regulation</subject><subject>drug effects</subject><subject>growth & development</subject><subject>immunology</subject><subject>Intracellular Space</subject><subject>Intracellular Space - microbiology</subject><subject>macrophages</subject><subject>Macrophages - drug effects</subject><subject>Macrophages - immunology</subject><subject>Macrophages - metabolism</subject><subject>Macrophages - microbiology</subject><subject>metabolism</subject><subject>microbiology</subject><subject>nitric oxide</subject><subject>Nitric Oxide - metabolism</subject><subject>pathogen survival</subject><subject>pathogenicity</subject><subject>pharmacology</subject><subject>Poultry Diseases</subject><subject>Poultry Diseases - immunology</subject><subject>Poultry Diseases - microbiology</subject><subject>reactive oxygen species</subject><subject>Respiratory Burst</subject><subject>Respiratory Burst - drug effects</subject><subject>Salmonella</subject><subject>Salmonella - growth & development</subject><subject>Salmonella - immunology</subject><subject>Salmonella - pathogenicity</subject><subject>Salmonella Enteritidis</subject><subject>Salmonella Heidelberg</subject><subject>Salmonella Infections, Animal</subject><subject>Salmonella Infections, Animal - immunology</subject><subject>Salmonella Infections, Animal - microbiology</subject><subject>Salmonella Kentucky</subject><subject>Salmonella Senftenberg</subject><subject>Salmonella Typhimurium</subject><subject>serotypes</subject><subject>Tetradecanoylphorbol Acetate</subject><subject>Tetradecanoylphorbol Acetate - pharmacology</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1535-3141</issn><issn>1556-7125</issn><issn>1556-7125</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1TAQhSMEoqWwZIu8LNLNxY_EiZdVeRSpEgtgHTn2hBoSO3iciPxC_hZOb2HLajya75yx5hTFS0aPjLbqzTDbI6eMHxkX4lFxzupalg3j9eP9LepSsIqdFc8Qv1PKFa-bp8UZF1Q2Qsnz4vcVMWGaddTJrUAwLXYjwRPnV40u-APBJa5u1eOBTMEuY-byOAwk_HL2JOqXiOlAtLfEuxSduZ8BiYBz8Ai445M2Mcx3-ltuL2_eMvb6pMANE0xZ4_wA5t7ceWLunPkBHkm_kTlCXg8-kTksY4ob-azHKXgYR00QYlh1xOfFk0GPCC8e6kXx9f27L9c35e2nDx-vr25LIxRPZQVcCWgq1lillW2UkKrhRvfSskpxqqk0WjQttFJIBvlGPVOCmqpt6l5oIy6Ky5PvHMPPBTB1k0Ozf8VDWLBjVSW5bBUV_0e5UFQyWrUZLU9ovhFihKGbo5t03DpGuz3mLsfc7THvqt361YP10k9g_9F_cxV_AKJupnM</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>He, Haiqi</creator><creator>Genovese, Kenneth J</creator><creator>Swaggerty, Christina L</creator><creator>Nisbet, David J</creator><creator>Kogut, Michael H</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>A comparative study on invasion, survival, modulation of oxidative burst, and nitric oxide responses of macrophages (HD11), and systemic infection in chickens by prevalent poultry Salmonella serovars</title><author>He, Haiqi ; Genovese, Kenneth J ; Swaggerty, Christina L ; Nisbet, David J ; Kogut, Michael H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-4e293e7417d9a9d7936972cab6d14920a06ca378e86361e739b1930c4875b3ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cell Line</topic><topic>Cell Survival</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>defense mechanisms</topic><topic>Down-Regulation</topic><topic>drug effects</topic><topic>growth & development</topic><topic>immunology</topic><topic>Intracellular Space</topic><topic>Intracellular Space - microbiology</topic><topic>macrophages</topic><topic>Macrophages - drug effects</topic><topic>Macrophages - immunology</topic><topic>Macrophages - metabolism</topic><topic>Macrophages - microbiology</topic><topic>metabolism</topic><topic>microbiology</topic><topic>nitric oxide</topic><topic>Nitric Oxide - metabolism</topic><topic>pathogen survival</topic><topic>pathogenicity</topic><topic>pharmacology</topic><topic>Poultry Diseases</topic><topic>Poultry Diseases - immunology</topic><topic>Poultry Diseases - microbiology</topic><topic>reactive oxygen species</topic><topic>Respiratory Burst</topic><topic>Respiratory Burst - drug effects</topic><topic>Salmonella</topic><topic>Salmonella - growth & development</topic><topic>Salmonella - immunology</topic><topic>Salmonella - pathogenicity</topic><topic>Salmonella Enteritidis</topic><topic>Salmonella Heidelberg</topic><topic>Salmonella Infections, Animal</topic><topic>Salmonella Infections, Animal - immunology</topic><topic>Salmonella Infections, Animal - microbiology</topic><topic>Salmonella Kentucky</topic><topic>Salmonella Senftenberg</topic><topic>Salmonella Typhimurium</topic><topic>serotypes</topic><topic>Tetradecanoylphorbol Acetate</topic><topic>Tetradecanoylphorbol Acetate - pharmacology</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>He, Haiqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genovese, Kenneth J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swaggerty, Christina L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nisbet, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kogut, Michael H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Foodborne pathogens and disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>He, Haiqi</au><au>Genovese, Kenneth J</au><au>Swaggerty, Christina L</au><au>Nisbet, David J</au><au>Kogut, Michael H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative study on invasion, survival, modulation of oxidative burst, and nitric oxide responses of macrophages (HD11), and systemic infection in chickens by prevalent poultry Salmonella serovars</atitle><jtitle>Foodborne pathogens and disease</jtitle><addtitle>Foodborne Pathog Dis</addtitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1104</spage><epage>1110</epage><pages>1104-1110</pages><issn>1535-3141</issn><issn>1556-7125</issn><eissn>1556-7125</eissn><abstract>Poultry is a major reservoir for foodborne Salmonella serovars. Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Enteritidis, Salmonella Heidelberg, Salmonella Kentucky, and Salmonella Senftenberg are the most prevalent serovars in U.S. poultry. Information concerning the interactions between different Salmonella species and host cells in poultry is lacking. In the present study, the above mentioned Salmonella serovars were examined for invasion, intracellular survival, and their ability to modulate oxidative burst and nitric oxide (NO) responses in chicken macrophage HD11 cells. All Salmonella serovars demonstrated similar capacity to invade HD11 cells. At 24 h post-infection, a 36-43% reduction of intracellular bacteria, in log(10)(CFU), was observed for Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Heidelberg, Salmonella Kentucky, and Salmonella Senftenberg, whereas a significantly lower reduction (16%) was observed for Salmonella Enteritidis, indicating its higher resistance to the killing by HD11 cells. Production of NO was completely diminished in HD11 cells infected with Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Enteritidis, but remained intact when infected with Salmonella Heidelberg, Salmonella Kentucky, and Salmonella Senftenberg. Phorbol myristate acetate-stimulated oxidative burst in HD11 cells was greatly impaired after infection by each of the five serovars. When newly hatched chickens were challenged orally, a high rate (86-98%) of systemic infection (Salmonella positive in liver/spleen) was observed in birds challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Enteritidis, Salmonella Heidelberg, and Salmonella Kentucky, while only 14% of the birds were Salmonella Senftenberg positive. However, there was no direct correlation between systemic infection and in vitro differential intracellular survival and modulation of NO response among the tested serovars.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>23067396</pmid><doi>10.1089/fpd.2012.1233</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1535-3141 |
ispartof | Foodborne pathogens and disease, 2012-12, Vol.9 (12), p.1104-1110 |
issn | 1535-3141 1556-7125 1556-7125 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1446268903 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Animals Cell Line Cell Survival Chickens Colony Count, Microbial defense mechanisms Down-Regulation drug effects growth & development immunology Intracellular Space Intracellular Space - microbiology macrophages Macrophages - drug effects Macrophages - immunology Macrophages - metabolism Macrophages - microbiology metabolism microbiology nitric oxide Nitric Oxide - metabolism pathogen survival pathogenicity pharmacology Poultry Diseases Poultry Diseases - immunology Poultry Diseases - microbiology reactive oxygen species Respiratory Burst Respiratory Burst - drug effects Salmonella Salmonella - growth & development Salmonella - immunology Salmonella - pathogenicity Salmonella Enteritidis Salmonella Heidelberg Salmonella Infections, Animal Salmonella Infections, Animal - immunology Salmonella Infections, Animal - microbiology Salmonella Kentucky Salmonella Senftenberg Salmonella Typhimurium serotypes Tetradecanoylphorbol Acetate Tetradecanoylphorbol Acetate - pharmacology United States |
title | A comparative study on invasion, survival, modulation of oxidative burst, and nitric oxide responses of macrophages (HD11), and systemic infection in chickens by prevalent poultry Salmonella serovars |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T19%3A45%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20study%20on%20invasion,%20survival,%20modulation%20of%20oxidative%20burst,%20and%20nitric%20oxide%20responses%20of%20macrophages%20(HD11),%20and%20systemic%20infection%20in%20chickens%20by%20prevalent%20poultry%20Salmonella%20serovars&rft.jtitle=Foodborne%20pathogens%20and%20disease&rft.au=He,%20Haiqi&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1104&rft.epage=1110&rft.pages=1104-1110&rft.issn=1535-3141&rft.eissn=1556-7125&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/fpd.2012.1233&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1239061048%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1239061048&rft_id=info:pmid/23067396&rfr_iscdi=true |