A comparative study on invasion, survival, modulation of oxidative burst, and nitric oxide responses of macrophages (HD11), and systemic infection in chickens by prevalent poultry Salmonella serovars

Poultry is a major reservoir for foodborne Salmonella serovars. Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Enteritidis, Salmonella Heidelberg, Salmonella Kentucky, and Salmonella Senftenberg are the most prevalent serovars in U.S. poultry. Information concerning the interactions between different Salmonella...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Foodborne pathogens and disease 2012-12, Vol.9 (12), p.1104-1110
Hauptverfasser: He, Haiqi, Genovese, Kenneth J, Swaggerty, Christina L, Nisbet, David J, Kogut, Michael H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1110
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1104
container_title Foodborne pathogens and disease
container_volume 9
creator He, Haiqi
Genovese, Kenneth J
Swaggerty, Christina L
Nisbet, David J
Kogut, Michael H
description Poultry is a major reservoir for foodborne Salmonella serovars. Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Enteritidis, Salmonella Heidelberg, Salmonella Kentucky, and Salmonella Senftenberg are the most prevalent serovars in U.S. poultry. Information concerning the interactions between different Salmonella species and host cells in poultry is lacking. In the present study, the above mentioned Salmonella serovars were examined for invasion, intracellular survival, and their ability to modulate oxidative burst and nitric oxide (NO) responses in chicken macrophage HD11 cells. All Salmonella serovars demonstrated similar capacity to invade HD11 cells. At 24 h post-infection, a 36-43% reduction of intracellular bacteria, in log(10)(CFU), was observed for Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Heidelberg, Salmonella Kentucky, and Salmonella Senftenberg, whereas a significantly lower reduction (16%) was observed for Salmonella Enteritidis, indicating its higher resistance to the killing by HD11 cells. Production of NO was completely diminished in HD11 cells infected with Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Enteritidis, but remained intact when infected with Salmonella Heidelberg, Salmonella Kentucky, and Salmonella Senftenberg. Phorbol myristate acetate-stimulated oxidative burst in HD11 cells was greatly impaired after infection by each of the five serovars. When newly hatched chickens were challenged orally, a high rate (86-98%) of systemic infection (Salmonella positive in liver/spleen) was observed in birds challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Enteritidis, Salmonella Heidelberg, and Salmonella Kentucky, while only 14% of the birds were Salmonella Senftenberg positive. However, there was no direct correlation between systemic infection and in vitro differential intracellular survival and modulation of NO response among the tested serovars.
doi_str_mv 10.1089/fpd.2012.1233
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1446268903</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1239061048</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-4e293e7417d9a9d7936972cab6d14920a06ca378e86361e739b1930c4875b3ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1TAQhSMEoqWwZIu8LNLNxY_EiZdVeRSpEgtgHTn2hBoSO3iciPxC_hZOb2HLajya75yx5hTFS0aPjLbqzTDbI6eMHxkX4lFxzupalg3j9eP9LepSsIqdFc8Qv1PKFa-bp8UZF1Q2Qsnz4vcVMWGaddTJrUAwLXYjwRPnV40u-APBJa5u1eOBTMEuY-byOAwk_HL2JOqXiOlAtLfEuxSduZ8BiYBz8Ai445M2Mcx3-ltuL2_eMvb6pMANE0xZ4_wA5t7ceWLunPkBHkm_kTlCXg8-kTksY4ob-azHKXgYR00QYlh1xOfFk0GPCC8e6kXx9f27L9c35e2nDx-vr25LIxRPZQVcCWgq1lillW2UkKrhRvfSskpxqqk0WjQttFJIBvlGPVOCmqpt6l5oIy6Ky5PvHMPPBTB1k0Ozf8VDWLBjVSW5bBUV_0e5UFQyWrUZLU9ovhFihKGbo5t03DpGuz3mLsfc7THvqt361YP10k9g_9F_cxV_AKJupnM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1239061048</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative study on invasion, survival, modulation of oxidative burst, and nitric oxide responses of macrophages (HD11), and systemic infection in chickens by prevalent poultry Salmonella serovars</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>He, Haiqi ; Genovese, Kenneth J ; Swaggerty, Christina L ; Nisbet, David J ; Kogut, Michael H</creator><creatorcontrib>He, Haiqi ; Genovese, Kenneth J ; Swaggerty, Christina L ; Nisbet, David J ; Kogut, Michael H</creatorcontrib><description>Poultry is a major reservoir for foodborne Salmonella serovars. Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Enteritidis, Salmonella Heidelberg, Salmonella Kentucky, and Salmonella Senftenberg are the most prevalent serovars in U.S. poultry. Information concerning the interactions between different Salmonella species and host cells in poultry is lacking. In the present study, the above mentioned Salmonella serovars were examined for invasion, intracellular survival, and their ability to modulate oxidative burst and nitric oxide (NO) responses in chicken macrophage HD11 cells. All Salmonella serovars demonstrated similar capacity to invade HD11 cells. At 24 h post-infection, a 36-43% reduction of intracellular bacteria, in log(10)(CFU), was observed for Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Heidelberg, Salmonella Kentucky, and Salmonella Senftenberg, whereas a significantly lower reduction (16%) was observed for Salmonella Enteritidis, indicating its higher resistance to the killing by HD11 cells. Production of NO was completely diminished in HD11 cells infected with Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Enteritidis, but remained intact when infected with Salmonella Heidelberg, Salmonella Kentucky, and Salmonella Senftenberg. Phorbol myristate acetate-stimulated oxidative burst in HD11 cells was greatly impaired after infection by each of the five serovars. When newly hatched chickens were challenged orally, a high rate (86-98%) of systemic infection (Salmonella positive in liver/spleen) was observed in birds challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Enteritidis, Salmonella Heidelberg, and Salmonella Kentucky, while only 14% of the birds were Salmonella Senftenberg positive. However, there was no direct correlation between systemic infection and in vitro differential intracellular survival and modulation of NO response among the tested serovars.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1535-3141</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1556-7125</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-7125</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2012.1233</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23067396</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cell Line ; Cell Survival ; Chickens ; Colony Count, Microbial ; defense mechanisms ; Down-Regulation ; drug effects ; growth &amp; development ; immunology ; Intracellular Space ; Intracellular Space - microbiology ; macrophages ; Macrophages - drug effects ; Macrophages - immunology ; Macrophages - metabolism ; Macrophages - microbiology ; metabolism ; microbiology ; nitric oxide ; Nitric Oxide - metabolism ; pathogen survival ; pathogenicity ; pharmacology ; Poultry Diseases ; Poultry Diseases - immunology ; Poultry Diseases - microbiology ; reactive oxygen species ; Respiratory Burst ; Respiratory Burst - drug effects ; Salmonella ; Salmonella - growth &amp; development ; Salmonella - immunology ; Salmonella - pathogenicity ; Salmonella Enteritidis ; Salmonella Heidelberg ; Salmonella Infections, Animal ; Salmonella Infections, Animal - immunology ; Salmonella Infections, Animal - microbiology ; Salmonella Kentucky ; Salmonella Senftenberg ; Salmonella Typhimurium ; serotypes ; Tetradecanoylphorbol Acetate ; Tetradecanoylphorbol Acetate - pharmacology ; United States</subject><ispartof>Foodborne pathogens and disease, 2012-12, Vol.9 (12), p.1104-1110</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-4e293e7417d9a9d7936972cab6d14920a06ca378e86361e739b1930c4875b3ac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-4e293e7417d9a9d7936972cab6d14920a06ca378e86361e739b1930c4875b3ac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23067396$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>He, Haiqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genovese, Kenneth J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swaggerty, Christina L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nisbet, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kogut, Michael H</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative study on invasion, survival, modulation of oxidative burst, and nitric oxide responses of macrophages (HD11), and systemic infection in chickens by prevalent poultry Salmonella serovars</title><title>Foodborne pathogens and disease</title><addtitle>Foodborne Pathog Dis</addtitle><description>Poultry is a major reservoir for foodborne Salmonella serovars. Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Enteritidis, Salmonella Heidelberg, Salmonella Kentucky, and Salmonella Senftenberg are the most prevalent serovars in U.S. poultry. Information concerning the interactions between different Salmonella species and host cells in poultry is lacking. In the present study, the above mentioned Salmonella serovars were examined for invasion, intracellular survival, and their ability to modulate oxidative burst and nitric oxide (NO) responses in chicken macrophage HD11 cells. All Salmonella serovars demonstrated similar capacity to invade HD11 cells. At 24 h post-infection, a 36-43% reduction of intracellular bacteria, in log(10)(CFU), was observed for Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Heidelberg, Salmonella Kentucky, and Salmonella Senftenberg, whereas a significantly lower reduction (16%) was observed for Salmonella Enteritidis, indicating its higher resistance to the killing by HD11 cells. Production of NO was completely diminished in HD11 cells infected with Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Enteritidis, but remained intact when infected with Salmonella Heidelberg, Salmonella Kentucky, and Salmonella Senftenberg. Phorbol myristate acetate-stimulated oxidative burst in HD11 cells was greatly impaired after infection by each of the five serovars. When newly hatched chickens were challenged orally, a high rate (86-98%) of systemic infection (Salmonella positive in liver/spleen) was observed in birds challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Enteritidis, Salmonella Heidelberg, and Salmonella Kentucky, while only 14% of the birds were Salmonella Senftenberg positive. However, there was no direct correlation between systemic infection and in vitro differential intracellular survival and modulation of NO response among the tested serovars.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cell Line</subject><subject>Cell Survival</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>defense mechanisms</subject><subject>Down-Regulation</subject><subject>drug effects</subject><subject>growth &amp; development</subject><subject>immunology</subject><subject>Intracellular Space</subject><subject>Intracellular Space - microbiology</subject><subject>macrophages</subject><subject>Macrophages - drug effects</subject><subject>Macrophages - immunology</subject><subject>Macrophages - metabolism</subject><subject>Macrophages - microbiology</subject><subject>metabolism</subject><subject>microbiology</subject><subject>nitric oxide</subject><subject>Nitric Oxide - metabolism</subject><subject>pathogen survival</subject><subject>pathogenicity</subject><subject>pharmacology</subject><subject>Poultry Diseases</subject><subject>Poultry Diseases - immunology</subject><subject>Poultry Diseases - microbiology</subject><subject>reactive oxygen species</subject><subject>Respiratory Burst</subject><subject>Respiratory Burst - drug effects</subject><subject>Salmonella</subject><subject>Salmonella - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Salmonella - immunology</subject><subject>Salmonella - pathogenicity</subject><subject>Salmonella Enteritidis</subject><subject>Salmonella Heidelberg</subject><subject>Salmonella Infections, Animal</subject><subject>Salmonella Infections, Animal - immunology</subject><subject>Salmonella Infections, Animal - microbiology</subject><subject>Salmonella Kentucky</subject><subject>Salmonella Senftenberg</subject><subject>Salmonella Typhimurium</subject><subject>serotypes</subject><subject>Tetradecanoylphorbol Acetate</subject><subject>Tetradecanoylphorbol Acetate - pharmacology</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1535-3141</issn><issn>1556-7125</issn><issn>1556-7125</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1TAQhSMEoqWwZIu8LNLNxY_EiZdVeRSpEgtgHTn2hBoSO3iciPxC_hZOb2HLajya75yx5hTFS0aPjLbqzTDbI6eMHxkX4lFxzupalg3j9eP9LepSsIqdFc8Qv1PKFa-bp8UZF1Q2Qsnz4vcVMWGaddTJrUAwLXYjwRPnV40u-APBJa5u1eOBTMEuY-byOAwk_HL2JOqXiOlAtLfEuxSduZ8BiYBz8Ai445M2Mcx3-ltuL2_eMvb6pMANE0xZ4_wA5t7ceWLunPkBHkm_kTlCXg8-kTksY4ob-azHKXgYR00QYlh1xOfFk0GPCC8e6kXx9f27L9c35e2nDx-vr25LIxRPZQVcCWgq1lillW2UkKrhRvfSskpxqqk0WjQttFJIBvlGPVOCmqpt6l5oIy6Ky5PvHMPPBTB1k0Ozf8VDWLBjVSW5bBUV_0e5UFQyWrUZLU9ovhFihKGbo5t03DpGuz3mLsfc7THvqt361YP10k9g_9F_cxV_AKJupnM</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>He, Haiqi</creator><creator>Genovese, Kenneth J</creator><creator>Swaggerty, Christina L</creator><creator>Nisbet, David J</creator><creator>Kogut, Michael H</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>A comparative study on invasion, survival, modulation of oxidative burst, and nitric oxide responses of macrophages (HD11), and systemic infection in chickens by prevalent poultry Salmonella serovars</title><author>He, Haiqi ; Genovese, Kenneth J ; Swaggerty, Christina L ; Nisbet, David J ; Kogut, Michael H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-4e293e7417d9a9d7936972cab6d14920a06ca378e86361e739b1930c4875b3ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cell Line</topic><topic>Cell Survival</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>defense mechanisms</topic><topic>Down-Regulation</topic><topic>drug effects</topic><topic>growth &amp; development</topic><topic>immunology</topic><topic>Intracellular Space</topic><topic>Intracellular Space - microbiology</topic><topic>macrophages</topic><topic>Macrophages - drug effects</topic><topic>Macrophages - immunology</topic><topic>Macrophages - metabolism</topic><topic>Macrophages - microbiology</topic><topic>metabolism</topic><topic>microbiology</topic><topic>nitric oxide</topic><topic>Nitric Oxide - metabolism</topic><topic>pathogen survival</topic><topic>pathogenicity</topic><topic>pharmacology</topic><topic>Poultry Diseases</topic><topic>Poultry Diseases - immunology</topic><topic>Poultry Diseases - microbiology</topic><topic>reactive oxygen species</topic><topic>Respiratory Burst</topic><topic>Respiratory Burst - drug effects</topic><topic>Salmonella</topic><topic>Salmonella - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Salmonella - immunology</topic><topic>Salmonella - pathogenicity</topic><topic>Salmonella Enteritidis</topic><topic>Salmonella Heidelberg</topic><topic>Salmonella Infections, Animal</topic><topic>Salmonella Infections, Animal - immunology</topic><topic>Salmonella Infections, Animal - microbiology</topic><topic>Salmonella Kentucky</topic><topic>Salmonella Senftenberg</topic><topic>Salmonella Typhimurium</topic><topic>serotypes</topic><topic>Tetradecanoylphorbol Acetate</topic><topic>Tetradecanoylphorbol Acetate - pharmacology</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>He, Haiqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genovese, Kenneth J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swaggerty, Christina L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nisbet, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kogut, Michael H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Foodborne pathogens and disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>He, Haiqi</au><au>Genovese, Kenneth J</au><au>Swaggerty, Christina L</au><au>Nisbet, David J</au><au>Kogut, Michael H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative study on invasion, survival, modulation of oxidative burst, and nitric oxide responses of macrophages (HD11), and systemic infection in chickens by prevalent poultry Salmonella serovars</atitle><jtitle>Foodborne pathogens and disease</jtitle><addtitle>Foodborne Pathog Dis</addtitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1104</spage><epage>1110</epage><pages>1104-1110</pages><issn>1535-3141</issn><issn>1556-7125</issn><eissn>1556-7125</eissn><abstract>Poultry is a major reservoir for foodborne Salmonella serovars. Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Enteritidis, Salmonella Heidelberg, Salmonella Kentucky, and Salmonella Senftenberg are the most prevalent serovars in U.S. poultry. Information concerning the interactions between different Salmonella species and host cells in poultry is lacking. In the present study, the above mentioned Salmonella serovars were examined for invasion, intracellular survival, and their ability to modulate oxidative burst and nitric oxide (NO) responses in chicken macrophage HD11 cells. All Salmonella serovars demonstrated similar capacity to invade HD11 cells. At 24 h post-infection, a 36-43% reduction of intracellular bacteria, in log(10)(CFU), was observed for Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Heidelberg, Salmonella Kentucky, and Salmonella Senftenberg, whereas a significantly lower reduction (16%) was observed for Salmonella Enteritidis, indicating its higher resistance to the killing by HD11 cells. Production of NO was completely diminished in HD11 cells infected with Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Enteritidis, but remained intact when infected with Salmonella Heidelberg, Salmonella Kentucky, and Salmonella Senftenberg. Phorbol myristate acetate-stimulated oxidative burst in HD11 cells was greatly impaired after infection by each of the five serovars. When newly hatched chickens were challenged orally, a high rate (86-98%) of systemic infection (Salmonella positive in liver/spleen) was observed in birds challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Enteritidis, Salmonella Heidelberg, and Salmonella Kentucky, while only 14% of the birds were Salmonella Senftenberg positive. However, there was no direct correlation between systemic infection and in vitro differential intracellular survival and modulation of NO response among the tested serovars.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>23067396</pmid><doi>10.1089/fpd.2012.1233</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1535-3141
ispartof Foodborne pathogens and disease, 2012-12, Vol.9 (12), p.1104-1110
issn 1535-3141
1556-7125
1556-7125
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1446268903
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animals
Cell Line
Cell Survival
Chickens
Colony Count, Microbial
defense mechanisms
Down-Regulation
drug effects
growth & development
immunology
Intracellular Space
Intracellular Space - microbiology
macrophages
Macrophages - drug effects
Macrophages - immunology
Macrophages - metabolism
Macrophages - microbiology
metabolism
microbiology
nitric oxide
Nitric Oxide - metabolism
pathogen survival
pathogenicity
pharmacology
Poultry Diseases
Poultry Diseases - immunology
Poultry Diseases - microbiology
reactive oxygen species
Respiratory Burst
Respiratory Burst - drug effects
Salmonella
Salmonella - growth & development
Salmonella - immunology
Salmonella - pathogenicity
Salmonella Enteritidis
Salmonella Heidelberg
Salmonella Infections, Animal
Salmonella Infections, Animal - immunology
Salmonella Infections, Animal - microbiology
Salmonella Kentucky
Salmonella Senftenberg
Salmonella Typhimurium
serotypes
Tetradecanoylphorbol Acetate
Tetradecanoylphorbol Acetate - pharmacology
United States
title A comparative study on invasion, survival, modulation of oxidative burst, and nitric oxide responses of macrophages (HD11), and systemic infection in chickens by prevalent poultry Salmonella serovars
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T19%3A45%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20study%20on%20invasion,%20survival,%20modulation%20of%20oxidative%20burst,%20and%20nitric%20oxide%20responses%20of%20macrophages%20(HD11),%20and%20systemic%20infection%20in%20chickens%20by%20prevalent%20poultry%20Salmonella%20serovars&rft.jtitle=Foodborne%20pathogens%20and%20disease&rft.au=He,%20Haiqi&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1104&rft.epage=1110&rft.pages=1104-1110&rft.issn=1535-3141&rft.eissn=1556-7125&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/fpd.2012.1233&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1239061048%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1239061048&rft_id=info:pmid/23067396&rfr_iscdi=true