The effect of property taxes on vacation home growth rates: Evidence from Michigan
The Tiebout model assumes that individuals sort to the jurisdiction which best matches their fiscal preferences. However, there is a paucity of reliable estimates for the impact of tax changes on household mobility. We utilize a state mandated school finance reform and temporal differences in vacati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Regional science and urban economics 2013-09, Vol.43 (5), p.740-750 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 750 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 740 |
container_title | Regional science and urban economics |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Johnson, Erik Walsh, Randall |
description | The Tiebout model assumes that individuals sort to the jurisdiction which best matches their fiscal preferences. However, there is a paucity of reliable estimates for the impact of tax changes on household mobility. We utilize a state mandated school finance reform and temporal differences in vacation home densities to provide a unique test of this fundamental Tiebout assumption. The results show that changes in property taxes explain a significant amount of the variation in vacation home growth; a 3–4mil decrease in property tax rates is associated with an increase of approximately one vacation home per square kilometer.
•Estimate how changes in property taxes affect vacation home market growth•Overcome many of the traditional confounding factors by using Proposal A•Vacation home growth sensitive to within county differences in property tax changes•Magnitude of the effect economically significant in places with elastic land supply |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.06.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1446267805</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0166046213000550</els_id><sourcerecordid>1446267805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-898b0f12e7f4c743aa7639153820adef8476bf32dfe541b4ddd62513db32243d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkLtOAzEQRS0EEuHxDxY0NLv4Fa-XDvGWQEgIastrjxNHyTrYmwB_j6NQICqqmeLM6N6D0AklNSVUns_qBJNswyp1YGPNCOU1kTUhdAeNqGrainGidtGowLIiQrJ9dJDzjBRCMj5CL69TwOA92AFHj5cpLiENX3gwn5Bx7PHaWDOEskzjAvAkxY9hipMZIF_gm3Vw0FvAPsUFfgp2GiamP0J73swzHP_MQ_R2e_N6dV89Pt89XF0-VlaIdqhUqzriKYPGC9sIbkwjeUvHXDFiHHglGtl5zpyHsaCdcM5JNqbcdZwxwR0_RGfbvyX0-wryoBchW5jPTQ9xlTUVpa5sFBkX9PQPOour1Jd0heJCtUwRXqiLLWVTzDmB18sUFiZ9aUr0Rree6d-69Ua3JlIXmeX4ensMpfI6QNKF28hxIRW52sXwnzffiaOO_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1434892803</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of property taxes on vacation home growth rates: Evidence from Michigan</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Johnson, Erik ; Walsh, Randall</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Erik ; Walsh, Randall</creatorcontrib><description>The Tiebout model assumes that individuals sort to the jurisdiction which best matches their fiscal preferences. However, there is a paucity of reliable estimates for the impact of tax changes on household mobility. We utilize a state mandated school finance reform and temporal differences in vacation home densities to provide a unique test of this fundamental Tiebout assumption. The results show that changes in property taxes explain a significant amount of the variation in vacation home growth; a 3–4mil decrease in property tax rates is associated with an increase of approximately one vacation home per square kilometer.
•Estimate how changes in property taxes affect vacation home market growth•Overcome many of the traditional confounding factors by using Proposal A•Vacation home growth sensitive to within county differences in property tax changes•Magnitude of the effect economically significant in places with elastic land supply</description><identifier>ISSN: 0166-0462</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2308</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.06.001</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RGUEA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Economic models ; Economic theory ; Growth models ; Growth rate ; Growth rates ; Michigan ; Property taxation ; Property taxes ; Real estate ; School finance ; Studies ; Tax rates ; Taxation ; Tiebout sorting ; U.S.A ; Vacation homes</subject><ispartof>Regional science and urban economics, 2013-09, Vol.43 (5), p.740-750</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Sep 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-898b0f12e7f4c743aa7639153820adef8476bf32dfe541b4ddd62513db32243d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-898b0f12e7f4c743aa7639153820adef8476bf32dfe541b4ddd62513db32243d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166046213000550$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Randall</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of property taxes on vacation home growth rates: Evidence from Michigan</title><title>Regional science and urban economics</title><description>The Tiebout model assumes that individuals sort to the jurisdiction which best matches their fiscal preferences. However, there is a paucity of reliable estimates for the impact of tax changes on household mobility. We utilize a state mandated school finance reform and temporal differences in vacation home densities to provide a unique test of this fundamental Tiebout assumption. The results show that changes in property taxes explain a significant amount of the variation in vacation home growth; a 3–4mil decrease in property tax rates is associated with an increase of approximately one vacation home per square kilometer.
•Estimate how changes in property taxes affect vacation home market growth•Overcome many of the traditional confounding factors by using Proposal A•Vacation home growth sensitive to within county differences in property tax changes•Magnitude of the effect economically significant in places with elastic land supply</description><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Growth models</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Growth rates</subject><subject>Michigan</subject><subject>Property taxation</subject><subject>Property taxes</subject><subject>Real estate</subject><subject>School finance</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tax rates</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Tiebout sorting</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Vacation homes</subject><issn>0166-0462</issn><issn>1879-2308</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkLtOAzEQRS0EEuHxDxY0NLv4Fa-XDvGWQEgIastrjxNHyTrYmwB_j6NQICqqmeLM6N6D0AklNSVUns_qBJNswyp1YGPNCOU1kTUhdAeNqGrainGidtGowLIiQrJ9dJDzjBRCMj5CL69TwOA92AFHj5cpLiENX3gwn5Bx7PHaWDOEskzjAvAkxY9hipMZIF_gm3Vw0FvAPsUFfgp2GiamP0J73swzHP_MQ_R2e_N6dV89Pt89XF0-VlaIdqhUqzriKYPGC9sIbkwjeUvHXDFiHHglGtl5zpyHsaCdcM5JNqbcdZwxwR0_RGfbvyX0-wryoBchW5jPTQ9xlTUVpa5sFBkX9PQPOour1Jd0heJCtUwRXqiLLWVTzDmB18sUFiZ9aUr0Rree6d-69Ua3JlIXmeX4ensMpfI6QNKF28hxIRW52sXwnzffiaOO_w</recordid><startdate>20130901</startdate><enddate>20130901</enddate><creator>Johnson, Erik</creator><creator>Walsh, Randall</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130901</creationdate><title>The effect of property taxes on vacation home growth rates: Evidence from Michigan</title><author>Johnson, Erik ; Walsh, Randall</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-898b0f12e7f4c743aa7639153820adef8476bf32dfe541b4ddd62513db32243d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Growth models</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Growth rates</topic><topic>Michigan</topic><topic>Property taxation</topic><topic>Property taxes</topic><topic>Real estate</topic><topic>School finance</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tax rates</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Tiebout sorting</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Vacation homes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Randall</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Regional science and urban economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, Erik</au><au>Walsh, Randall</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of property taxes on vacation home growth rates: Evidence from Michigan</atitle><jtitle>Regional science and urban economics</jtitle><date>2013-09-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>740</spage><epage>750</epage><pages>740-750</pages><issn>0166-0462</issn><eissn>1879-2308</eissn><coden>RGUEA3</coden><abstract>The Tiebout model assumes that individuals sort to the jurisdiction which best matches their fiscal preferences. However, there is a paucity of reliable estimates for the impact of tax changes on household mobility. We utilize a state mandated school finance reform and temporal differences in vacation home densities to provide a unique test of this fundamental Tiebout assumption. The results show that changes in property taxes explain a significant amount of the variation in vacation home growth; a 3–4mil decrease in property tax rates is associated with an increase of approximately one vacation home per square kilometer.
•Estimate how changes in property taxes affect vacation home market growth•Overcome many of the traditional confounding factors by using Proposal A•Vacation home growth sensitive to within county differences in property tax changes•Magnitude of the effect economically significant in places with elastic land supply</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.06.001</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0166-0462 |
ispartof | Regional science and urban economics, 2013-09, Vol.43 (5), p.740-750 |
issn | 0166-0462 1879-2308 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1446267805 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Economic models Economic theory Growth models Growth rate Growth rates Michigan Property taxation Property taxes Real estate School finance Studies Tax rates Taxation Tiebout sorting U.S.A Vacation homes |
title | The effect of property taxes on vacation home growth rates: Evidence from Michigan |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T15%3A07%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20property%20taxes%20on%20vacation%20home%20growth%20rates:%20Evidence%20from%20Michigan&rft.jtitle=Regional%20science%20and%20urban%20economics&rft.au=Johnson,%20Erik&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=740&rft.epage=750&rft.pages=740-750&rft.issn=0166-0462&rft.eissn=1879-2308&rft.coden=RGUEA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.06.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1446267805%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1434892803&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0166046213000550&rfr_iscdi=true |