Interobserver reproducibility of a grading system for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma
To evaluate interobserver reproducibility of a grading system proposed by Paner et al. for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. After selecting 23 cases of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma from the Xeral-Cíes Hospital, Meixoeiro Hospital and POVISA Hospital from the last 15 years, an informative meetin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Actas urologicas españolas 2013-06, Vol.37 (6), p.338-341 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng ; spa |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 341 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 338 |
container_title | Actas urologicas españolas |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Pérez-Pedrosa, A Ortiz-Rey, J A Lorenzo-Mahía, Y Iglesias-Rodríguez, B Peteiro-Cancelo, A González-Carreró, J |
description | To evaluate interobserver reproducibility of a grading system proposed by Paner et al. for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
After selecting 23 cases of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma from the Xeral-Cíes Hospital, Meixoeiro Hospital and POVISA Hospital from the last 15 years, an informative meeting on the Paner et al. grading system criteria was held. After, the participating pathologists applied the system to each case, evaluating one slide selected. Kappa index for interobserver reproducibility was calculated, and it was classified according to the Landis and Koch scale.
The grading distribution was similar for most of the 6 participating observers, with grade 1 predominance. The remaining 2 observers considered a relatively higher proportion of grade 2. Kappa index values ranged from 0.136 to 0.674, with a discrete-moderate reproducibility index predominance (0.21-0.60). Highest Kappa value (0.674) was obtained between the most novel and the most expert interobservers. The lowest Kappa value was obtained among the most veteran pathologists (0.136).
Interobserver reproducibility for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma is discrete-moderate in our institutions when the novel grade proposed by Paner et al. is used. Labeling of grades 1 and 2 is not homogeneous among 6 participating observers. While awaiting a grading consensus on a new classification by the scientific societies, we consider that the routine use of a grading system for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma should not be used. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.acuro.2012.04.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1445914765</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1445914765</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-9085cf467edf68ba04f74da15e1aafbf17d46fdc4c97788f32eac2b9cae9f6d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kMFLwzAYxYMgbk7_AkFy9NKatEnTHGXoHAy8qNfyNfmydbRNTVph_70V5-W9y3uPH4-QO85SznjxeEzBTMGnGeNZykTKmLwgS15onShdsgW5jvHIWCbyUl2RRZYzWWotl-Rz248YfB0xfGOgAYfg7WSaummb8US9o0D3AWzT72k8xRE76nyg5hB854eDr3Hu9NBSg-0sEEzT-w5uyKWDNuLt2Vfk4-X5ff2a7N422_XTLhm44GOiWSmNE4VC64qyBiacEha4RA7gaseVFYWzRhitVFm6PEMwWa0NoHaFzfIVefjbnbG_Joxj1TXxFwV69FOsuBBSc6EKOUfvz9Gp7tBWQ2g6CKfq_4v8B6dDYxY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1445914765</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interobserver reproducibility of a grading system for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Pérez-Pedrosa, A ; Ortiz-Rey, J A ; Lorenzo-Mahía, Y ; Iglesias-Rodríguez, B ; Peteiro-Cancelo, A ; González-Carreró, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Pedrosa, A ; Ortiz-Rey, J A ; Lorenzo-Mahía, Y ; Iglesias-Rodríguez, B ; Peteiro-Cancelo, A ; González-Carreró, J</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate interobserver reproducibility of a grading system proposed by Paner et al. for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
After selecting 23 cases of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma from the Xeral-Cíes Hospital, Meixoeiro Hospital and POVISA Hospital from the last 15 years, an informative meeting on the Paner et al. grading system criteria was held. After, the participating pathologists applied the system to each case, evaluating one slide selected. Kappa index for interobserver reproducibility was calculated, and it was classified according to the Landis and Koch scale.
The grading distribution was similar for most of the 6 participating observers, with grade 1 predominance. The remaining 2 observers considered a relatively higher proportion of grade 2. Kappa index values ranged from 0.136 to 0.674, with a discrete-moderate reproducibility index predominance (0.21-0.60). Highest Kappa value (0.674) was obtained between the most novel and the most expert interobservers. The lowest Kappa value was obtained among the most veteran pathologists (0.136).
Interobserver reproducibility for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma is discrete-moderate in our institutions when the novel grade proposed by Paner et al. is used. Labeling of grades 1 and 2 is not homogeneous among 6 participating observers. While awaiting a grading consensus on a new classification by the scientific societies, we consider that the routine use of a grading system for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma should not be used.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1699-7980</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2012.04.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23058995</identifier><language>eng ; spa</language><publisher>Spain</publisher><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - classification ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - pathology ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - ultrastructure ; Cell Nucleolus - ultrastructure ; Cell Nucleus - ultrastructure ; Chromatin - ultrastructure ; Humans ; Kidney Neoplasms - classification ; Kidney Neoplasms - pathology ; Kidney Neoplasms - ultrastructure ; Neoplasm Grading - methods ; Observer Variation ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Staining and Labeling</subject><ispartof>Actas urologicas españolas, 2013-06, Vol.37 (6), p.338-341</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 AEU. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23058995$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Pedrosa, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortiz-Rey, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorenzo-Mahía, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iglesias-Rodríguez, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peteiro-Cancelo, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Carreró, J</creatorcontrib><title>Interobserver reproducibility of a grading system for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma</title><title>Actas urologicas españolas</title><addtitle>Actas Urol Esp</addtitle><description>To evaluate interobserver reproducibility of a grading system proposed by Paner et al. for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
After selecting 23 cases of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma from the Xeral-Cíes Hospital, Meixoeiro Hospital and POVISA Hospital from the last 15 years, an informative meeting on the Paner et al. grading system criteria was held. After, the participating pathologists applied the system to each case, evaluating one slide selected. Kappa index for interobserver reproducibility was calculated, and it was classified according to the Landis and Koch scale.
The grading distribution was similar for most of the 6 participating observers, with grade 1 predominance. The remaining 2 observers considered a relatively higher proportion of grade 2. Kappa index values ranged from 0.136 to 0.674, with a discrete-moderate reproducibility index predominance (0.21-0.60). Highest Kappa value (0.674) was obtained between the most novel and the most expert interobservers. The lowest Kappa value was obtained among the most veteran pathologists (0.136).
Interobserver reproducibility for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma is discrete-moderate in our institutions when the novel grade proposed by Paner et al. is used. Labeling of grades 1 and 2 is not homogeneous among 6 participating observers. While awaiting a grading consensus on a new classification by the scientific societies, we consider that the routine use of a grading system for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma should not be used.</description><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - classification</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Cell Nucleolus - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Cell Nucleus - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Chromatin - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - classification</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading - methods</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Staining and Labeling</subject><issn>1699-7980</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kMFLwzAYxYMgbk7_AkFy9NKatEnTHGXoHAy8qNfyNfmydbRNTVph_70V5-W9y3uPH4-QO85SznjxeEzBTMGnGeNZykTKmLwgS15onShdsgW5jvHIWCbyUl2RRZYzWWotl-Rz248YfB0xfGOgAYfg7WSaummb8US9o0D3AWzT72k8xRE76nyg5hB854eDr3Hu9NBSg-0sEEzT-w5uyKWDNuLt2Vfk4-X5ff2a7N422_XTLhm44GOiWSmNE4VC64qyBiacEha4RA7gaseVFYWzRhitVFm6PEMwWa0NoHaFzfIVefjbnbG_Joxj1TXxFwV69FOsuBBSc6EKOUfvz9Gp7tBWQ2g6CKfq_4v8B6dDYxY</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Pérez-Pedrosa, A</creator><creator>Ortiz-Rey, J A</creator><creator>Lorenzo-Mahía, Y</creator><creator>Iglesias-Rodríguez, B</creator><creator>Peteiro-Cancelo, A</creator><creator>González-Carreró, J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>Interobserver reproducibility of a grading system for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma</title><author>Pérez-Pedrosa, A ; Ortiz-Rey, J A ; Lorenzo-Mahía, Y ; Iglesias-Rodríguez, B ; Peteiro-Cancelo, A ; González-Carreró, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-9085cf467edf68ba04f74da15e1aafbf17d46fdc4c97788f32eac2b9cae9f6d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; spa</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - classification</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Cell Nucleolus - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Cell Nucleus - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Chromatin - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - classification</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading - methods</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Staining and Labeling</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Pedrosa, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortiz-Rey, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorenzo-Mahía, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iglesias-Rodríguez, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peteiro-Cancelo, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Carreró, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Actas urologicas españolas</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pérez-Pedrosa, A</au><au>Ortiz-Rey, J A</au><au>Lorenzo-Mahía, Y</au><au>Iglesias-Rodríguez, B</au><au>Peteiro-Cancelo, A</au><au>González-Carreró, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interobserver reproducibility of a grading system for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma</atitle><jtitle>Actas urologicas españolas</jtitle><addtitle>Actas Urol Esp</addtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>338</spage><epage>341</epage><pages>338-341</pages><eissn>1699-7980</eissn><abstract>To evaluate interobserver reproducibility of a grading system proposed by Paner et al. for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
After selecting 23 cases of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma from the Xeral-Cíes Hospital, Meixoeiro Hospital and POVISA Hospital from the last 15 years, an informative meeting on the Paner et al. grading system criteria was held. After, the participating pathologists applied the system to each case, evaluating one slide selected. Kappa index for interobserver reproducibility was calculated, and it was classified according to the Landis and Koch scale.
The grading distribution was similar for most of the 6 participating observers, with grade 1 predominance. The remaining 2 observers considered a relatively higher proportion of grade 2. Kappa index values ranged from 0.136 to 0.674, with a discrete-moderate reproducibility index predominance (0.21-0.60). Highest Kappa value (0.674) was obtained between the most novel and the most expert interobservers. The lowest Kappa value was obtained among the most veteran pathologists (0.136).
Interobserver reproducibility for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma is discrete-moderate in our institutions when the novel grade proposed by Paner et al. is used. Labeling of grades 1 and 2 is not homogeneous among 6 participating observers. While awaiting a grading consensus on a new classification by the scientific societies, we consider that the routine use of a grading system for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma should not be used.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pmid>23058995</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.acuro.2012.04.005</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1699-7980 |
ispartof | Actas urologicas españolas, 2013-06, Vol.37 (6), p.338-341 |
issn | 1699-7980 |
language | eng ; spa |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1445914765 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Carcinoma, Renal Cell - classification Carcinoma, Renal Cell - pathology Carcinoma, Renal Cell - ultrastructure Cell Nucleolus - ultrastructure Cell Nucleus - ultrastructure Chromatin - ultrastructure Humans Kidney Neoplasms - classification Kidney Neoplasms - pathology Kidney Neoplasms - ultrastructure Neoplasm Grading - methods Observer Variation Reproducibility of Results Retrospective Studies Staining and Labeling |
title | Interobserver reproducibility of a grading system for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T19%3A06%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interobserver%20reproducibility%20of%20a%20grading%20system%20for%20chromophobe%20renal%20cell%20carcinoma&rft.jtitle=Actas%20urologicas%20espa%C3%B1olas&rft.au=P%C3%A9rez-Pedrosa,%20A&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=338&rft.epage=341&rft.pages=338-341&rft.eissn=1699-7980&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.acuro.2012.04.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1445914765%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1445914765&rft_id=info:pmid/23058995&rfr_iscdi=true |