Cereal planting dates as a tool in the management of Galeopsis tetrahit and associated weed species in spring barley and oat

The effects of delayed planting and herbicide treatments on populations of Galeopsis tetrahit and associated weed species, and on mid-season above-ground dry weight and grain yield of spring barley and oat were measured in field experiments conducted from 1989 to 1991, in La Pocatière, Québec, Canad...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Crop protection 1997-03, Vol.16 (2), p.117-125
1. Verfasser: Legere, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 125
container_issue 2
container_start_page 117
container_title Crop protection
container_volume 16
creator Legere, A
description The effects of delayed planting and herbicide treatments on populations of Galeopsis tetrahit and associated weed species, and on mid-season above-ground dry weight and grain yield of spring barley and oat were measured in field experiments conducted from 1989 to 1991, in La Pocatière, Québec, Canada. Two crop planting dates were compared in 1989 and three dates in 1990–1991. The weed control factor included two post-emergence herbicide treatments (cyanazine/MCPA, thifensulfuron-methyl) and a weedy control treatment. By mid-season, post-planting cohorts of G. tetrahit generally had comparable densities and above-ground dry weight, regardless of crop planting date. Delayed planting reduced density but had no effect on dry weight of associated weeds. Both herbicide treatments effectively suppressed G. tetrahit and associated weeds. However, effects of weed control treatments were generally the same, regardless of planting date. Delayed planting most often did not compensate for the benefits from chemical weed control and affected both crops at mid-season by reducing crop height and dry weight. This effect carried over to oat but not to barley grain yields. Herbicide applications were beneficial to barley grain yields in two out of three years but not to oat yields. Overall, delayed planting was generally not favourable to early barley and oat growth and oat yields, and did not provide the expected suppression of G. tetrahit and associated weeds which could have alleviated the need for chemical weed control.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0261-2194(96)00084-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14448152</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0261219496000841</els_id><sourcerecordid>14448152</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-8de328c132248dcc55837e86b9b6293d43f282cf2e3795729c04e67ff5f9fbc93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEYRYMoWB8_QchKdDGa18wkK5GiVRBcqOuQZr60kelkTKIi-ONNW3ErhGRz7iH3InRCyQUltLl8IqyhFaNKnKnmnBAiRUV30ITKlleNImIXTf6QfXSQ0muBGOdsgr6nEMH0eOzNkP2wwJ3JkLApB-cQeuwHnJeAV2YwC1jBkHFweGZ6CGPyCWfI0Sx9xmboSioF64ugw59QrjSC9cVWHGmMa_vcxB6-NnAw-QjtOdMnOP59D9HL7c3z9K56eJzdT68fKsu5zJXsgDNpKWdMyM7aupa8BdnM1bxhineCOyaZdQx4q-qWKUsENK1ztVNubhU_RKdb7xjD2zukrFc-WehLZwjvSVMhhKQ1K2C9BW0MKUVwunx7ZeKXpkSvt9abrfV6SK0avdla05K72uagtPjwEHUqxQcLnY9gs-6C_8fwAx_vh0c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14448152</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cereal planting dates as a tool in the management of Galeopsis tetrahit and associated weed species in spring barley and oat</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Legere, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Legere, A</creatorcontrib><description>The effects of delayed planting and herbicide treatments on populations of Galeopsis tetrahit and associated weed species, and on mid-season above-ground dry weight and grain yield of spring barley and oat were measured in field experiments conducted from 1989 to 1991, in La Pocatière, Québec, Canada. Two crop planting dates were compared in 1989 and three dates in 1990–1991. The weed control factor included two post-emergence herbicide treatments (cyanazine/MCPA, thifensulfuron-methyl) and a weedy control treatment. By mid-season, post-planting cohorts of G. tetrahit generally had comparable densities and above-ground dry weight, regardless of crop planting date. Delayed planting reduced density but had no effect on dry weight of associated weeds. Both herbicide treatments effectively suppressed G. tetrahit and associated weeds. However, effects of weed control treatments were generally the same, regardless of planting date. Delayed planting most often did not compensate for the benefits from chemical weed control and affected both crops at mid-season by reducing crop height and dry weight. This effect carried over to oat but not to barley grain yields. Herbicide applications were beneficial to barley grain yields in two out of three years but not to oat yields. Overall, delayed planting was generally not favourable to early barley and oat growth and oat yields, and did not provide the expected suppression of G. tetrahit and associated weeds which could have alleviated the need for chemical weed control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-2194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6904</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0261-2194(96)00084-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>crop planting dates ; delayed planting ; Galeopsis tetrahit ; hemp-nettle ; oat ; spring barley</subject><ispartof>Crop protection, 1997-03, Vol.16 (2), p.117-125</ispartof><rights>1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-8de328c132248dcc55837e86b9b6293d43f282cf2e3795729c04e67ff5f9fbc93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-8de328c132248dcc55837e86b9b6293d43f282cf2e3795729c04e67ff5f9fbc93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(96)00084-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Legere, A</creatorcontrib><title>Cereal planting dates as a tool in the management of Galeopsis tetrahit and associated weed species in spring barley and oat</title><title>Crop protection</title><description>The effects of delayed planting and herbicide treatments on populations of Galeopsis tetrahit and associated weed species, and on mid-season above-ground dry weight and grain yield of spring barley and oat were measured in field experiments conducted from 1989 to 1991, in La Pocatière, Québec, Canada. Two crop planting dates were compared in 1989 and three dates in 1990–1991. The weed control factor included two post-emergence herbicide treatments (cyanazine/MCPA, thifensulfuron-methyl) and a weedy control treatment. By mid-season, post-planting cohorts of G. tetrahit generally had comparable densities and above-ground dry weight, regardless of crop planting date. Delayed planting reduced density but had no effect on dry weight of associated weeds. Both herbicide treatments effectively suppressed G. tetrahit and associated weeds. However, effects of weed control treatments were generally the same, regardless of planting date. Delayed planting most often did not compensate for the benefits from chemical weed control and affected both crops at mid-season by reducing crop height and dry weight. This effect carried over to oat but not to barley grain yields. Herbicide applications were beneficial to barley grain yields in two out of three years but not to oat yields. Overall, delayed planting was generally not favourable to early barley and oat growth and oat yields, and did not provide the expected suppression of G. tetrahit and associated weeds which could have alleviated the need for chemical weed control.</description><subject>crop planting dates</subject><subject>delayed planting</subject><subject>Galeopsis tetrahit</subject><subject>hemp-nettle</subject><subject>oat</subject><subject>spring barley</subject><issn>0261-2194</issn><issn>1873-6904</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEYRYMoWB8_QchKdDGa18wkK5GiVRBcqOuQZr60kelkTKIi-ONNW3ErhGRz7iH3InRCyQUltLl8IqyhFaNKnKnmnBAiRUV30ITKlleNImIXTf6QfXSQ0muBGOdsgr6nEMH0eOzNkP2wwJ3JkLApB-cQeuwHnJeAV2YwC1jBkHFweGZ6CGPyCWfI0Sx9xmboSioF64ugw59QrjSC9cVWHGmMa_vcxB6-NnAw-QjtOdMnOP59D9HL7c3z9K56eJzdT68fKsu5zJXsgDNpKWdMyM7aupa8BdnM1bxhineCOyaZdQx4q-qWKUsENK1ztVNubhU_RKdb7xjD2zukrFc-WehLZwjvSVMhhKQ1K2C9BW0MKUVwunx7ZeKXpkSvt9abrfV6SK0avdla05K72uagtPjwEHUqxQcLnY9gs-6C_8fwAx_vh0c</recordid><startdate>19970301</startdate><enddate>19970301</enddate><creator>Legere, A</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970301</creationdate><title>Cereal planting dates as a tool in the management of Galeopsis tetrahit and associated weed species in spring barley and oat</title><author>Legere, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-8de328c132248dcc55837e86b9b6293d43f282cf2e3795729c04e67ff5f9fbc93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>crop planting dates</topic><topic>delayed planting</topic><topic>Galeopsis tetrahit</topic><topic>hemp-nettle</topic><topic>oat</topic><topic>spring barley</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Legere, A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Crop protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Legere, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cereal planting dates as a tool in the management of Galeopsis tetrahit and associated weed species in spring barley and oat</atitle><jtitle>Crop protection</jtitle><date>1997-03-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>117</spage><epage>125</epage><pages>117-125</pages><issn>0261-2194</issn><eissn>1873-6904</eissn><abstract>The effects of delayed planting and herbicide treatments on populations of Galeopsis tetrahit and associated weed species, and on mid-season above-ground dry weight and grain yield of spring barley and oat were measured in field experiments conducted from 1989 to 1991, in La Pocatière, Québec, Canada. Two crop planting dates were compared in 1989 and three dates in 1990–1991. The weed control factor included two post-emergence herbicide treatments (cyanazine/MCPA, thifensulfuron-methyl) and a weedy control treatment. By mid-season, post-planting cohorts of G. tetrahit generally had comparable densities and above-ground dry weight, regardless of crop planting date. Delayed planting reduced density but had no effect on dry weight of associated weeds. Both herbicide treatments effectively suppressed G. tetrahit and associated weeds. However, effects of weed control treatments were generally the same, regardless of planting date. Delayed planting most often did not compensate for the benefits from chemical weed control and affected both crops at mid-season by reducing crop height and dry weight. This effect carried over to oat but not to barley grain yields. Herbicide applications were beneficial to barley grain yields in two out of three years but not to oat yields. Overall, delayed planting was generally not favourable to early barley and oat growth and oat yields, and did not provide the expected suppression of G. tetrahit and associated weeds which could have alleviated the need for chemical weed control.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0261-2194(96)00084-1</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0261-2194
ispartof Crop protection, 1997-03, Vol.16 (2), p.117-125
issn 0261-2194
1873-6904
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14448152
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects crop planting dates
delayed planting
Galeopsis tetrahit
hemp-nettle
oat
spring barley
title Cereal planting dates as a tool in the management of Galeopsis tetrahit and associated weed species in spring barley and oat
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T09%3A20%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cereal%20planting%20dates%20as%20a%20tool%20in%20the%20management%20of%20Galeopsis%20tetrahit%20and%20associated%20weed%20species%20in%20spring%20barley%20and%20oat&rft.jtitle=Crop%20protection&rft.au=Legere,%20A&rft.date=1997-03-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=117&rft.epage=125&rft.pages=117-125&rft.issn=0261-2194&rft.eissn=1873-6904&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0261-2194(96)00084-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14448152%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14448152&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0261219496000841&rfr_iscdi=true