Locking plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures with impaction of the fracture site to restore medial column support: a biomechanical study

Background Despite the advent of locking plate techniques, proximal humeral fracture fixation can fail due to varus collapse, especially in osteoporotic bone with medial cortex comminution. This study investigated the effect of restoring the integrity of the medial column by fracture impaction and s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2013-11, Vol.22 (11), p.1552-1557
Hauptverfasser: Weeks, Colleen A., MD, Begum, Farhana, MSc, Beaupre, Lauren A., PhD, Carey, Jason P., PhD, Adeeb, Samer, PhD, Bouliane, Martin J., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1557
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1552
container_title Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
container_volume 22
creator Weeks, Colleen A., MD
Begum, Farhana, MSc
Beaupre, Lauren A., PhD
Carey, Jason P., PhD
Adeeb, Samer, PhD
Bouliane, Martin J., MD
description Background Despite the advent of locking plate techniques, proximal humeral fracture fixation can fail due to varus collapse, especially in osteoporotic bone with medial cortex comminution. This study investigated the effect of restoring the integrity of the medial column by fracture impaction and shaft medialization with locking plate fixation. This construct was compared with a traditional locking plate construct under conditions of varus cyclical loading. Materials and methods Proximal humeral fractures with medial comminution were simulated by performing wedge-shaped osteotomies at the surgical neck in cadaveric specimens and removing 1 cm of medial cortex. For each cadaver (n = 6), 1 humeral fracture was fixed with a traditional locking plate construct. The other was fixed with the locking plate construct plus fracture impaction and shaft medialization, resulting in medial column restoration. The humeral head was immobilized, and a repetitive, varus force was applied to the humeral shaft until construct collapse or until 25,000 cycles were completed. Results None of the constructs with fracture impaction collapsed, whereas 5 of 6 of the nonaugmented constructs collapsed before reaching 25,000 cycles ( P = .008). Collapse of the 5 nonimpacted constructs that failed occurred after an average of 11,470 ± 3589 cycles. Conclusion Fracture impaction increased the ability of the locking plate to withstand repetitive varus loading. This technique provides a construct biomechanically superior to locking plate fixation alone.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jse.2013.02.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1443999684</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1058274613001274</els_id><sourcerecordid>1443999684</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-62c8be836a4557a60ce5347bdc0176cd01c693fd780882be44cfc58bbb90de563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UsuO1DAQjBCIfcAHcEE-cklox4njgISEVrAgjcQBOFuO02E8m8TBdmDnM_gDvoUvo4cZ9sCBU7ftqpK7qrPsCYeCA5fPd8UuYlECFwWUBYC4l53zWpS5rAHuUw-1ysumkmfZRYw7AGgrKB9mZ6WQolVCnGc_Nt7euPkLW0aTkA3u1iTnZ-YHtgR_6yYzsu06YaA6BGPTGjCy7y5tf_1000IXJ3Ta4h2ARUdayTPCJk_nCXtHAtaP6zSzuC6LD-kFM6xzfkK7NbOz9B7T2u8fZQ8GM0Z8fKqX2ee3bz5dvcs3H67fX73e5FYIlXJZWtWhEtJUdd0YCRZrUTVdb4E30vbArWzF0DcKlCo7rCo72Fp1XddCj7UUl9mzoy7N-XWlj-rJRYvjaGb0a9S8qkTbtlJVBOVHqA0-xoCDXgI5E_aagz4koXeaktCHJDSUmpIgztOT_NrR-HeMv9YT4OURgDTkN4dBR-twtmRVQJt0791_5V_9w7aj--PiDe4x7vwaZnJPcx2JoD8eVuGwCVwAcGrEb3O7skE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1443999684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Locking plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures with impaction of the fracture site to restore medial column support: a biomechanical study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Weeks, Colleen A., MD ; Begum, Farhana, MSc ; Beaupre, Lauren A., PhD ; Carey, Jason P., PhD ; Adeeb, Samer, PhD ; Bouliane, Martin J., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Weeks, Colleen A., MD ; Begum, Farhana, MSc ; Beaupre, Lauren A., PhD ; Carey, Jason P., PhD ; Adeeb, Samer, PhD ; Bouliane, Martin J., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Despite the advent of locking plate techniques, proximal humeral fracture fixation can fail due to varus collapse, especially in osteoporotic bone with medial cortex comminution. This study investigated the effect of restoring the integrity of the medial column by fracture impaction and shaft medialization with locking plate fixation. This construct was compared with a traditional locking plate construct under conditions of varus cyclical loading. Materials and methods Proximal humeral fractures with medial comminution were simulated by performing wedge-shaped osteotomies at the surgical neck in cadaveric specimens and removing 1 cm of medial cortex. For each cadaver (n = 6), 1 humeral fracture was fixed with a traditional locking plate construct. The other was fixed with the locking plate construct plus fracture impaction and shaft medialization, resulting in medial column restoration. The humeral head was immobilized, and a repetitive, varus force was applied to the humeral shaft until construct collapse or until 25,000 cycles were completed. Results None of the constructs with fracture impaction collapsed, whereas 5 of 6 of the nonaugmented constructs collapsed before reaching 25,000 cycles ( P = .008). Collapse of the 5 nonimpacted constructs that failed occurred after an average of 11,470 ± 3589 cycles. Conclusion Fracture impaction increased the ability of the locking plate to withstand repetitive varus loading. This technique provides a construct biomechanically superior to locking plate fixation alone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-2746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.02.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23639833</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; biomechanical ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Bone Plates ; Cadaver ; complications ; Female ; fracture ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods ; fracture impaction ; Fractures, Comminuted - surgery ; Humans ; locking plate ; Male ; medial support ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedics ; Proximal humerus ; Shoulder Fractures - surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2013-11, Vol.22 (11), p.1552-1557</ispartof><rights>Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>2013 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-62c8be836a4557a60ce5347bdc0176cd01c693fd780882be44cfc58bbb90de563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-62c8be836a4557a60ce5347bdc0176cd01c693fd780882be44cfc58bbb90de563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058274613001274$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23639833$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weeks, Colleen A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Begum, Farhana, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaupre, Lauren A., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carey, Jason P., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adeeb, Samer, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouliane, Martin J., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Locking plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures with impaction of the fracture site to restore medial column support: a biomechanical study</title><title>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</title><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><description>Background Despite the advent of locking plate techniques, proximal humeral fracture fixation can fail due to varus collapse, especially in osteoporotic bone with medial cortex comminution. This study investigated the effect of restoring the integrity of the medial column by fracture impaction and shaft medialization with locking plate fixation. This construct was compared with a traditional locking plate construct under conditions of varus cyclical loading. Materials and methods Proximal humeral fractures with medial comminution were simulated by performing wedge-shaped osteotomies at the surgical neck in cadaveric specimens and removing 1 cm of medial cortex. For each cadaver (n = 6), 1 humeral fracture was fixed with a traditional locking plate construct. The other was fixed with the locking plate construct plus fracture impaction and shaft medialization, resulting in medial column restoration. The humeral head was immobilized, and a repetitive, varus force was applied to the humeral shaft until construct collapse or until 25,000 cycles were completed. Results None of the constructs with fracture impaction collapsed, whereas 5 of 6 of the nonaugmented constructs collapsed before reaching 25,000 cycles ( P = .008). Collapse of the 5 nonimpacted constructs that failed occurred after an average of 11,470 ± 3589 cycles. Conclusion Fracture impaction increased the ability of the locking plate to withstand repetitive varus loading. This technique provides a construct biomechanically superior to locking plate fixation alone.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>biomechanical</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Bone Plates</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>complications</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fracture</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</subject><subject>fracture impaction</subject><subject>Fractures, Comminuted - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>locking plate</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>medial support</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Proximal humerus</subject><subject>Shoulder Fractures - surgery</subject><issn>1058-2746</issn><issn>1532-6500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UsuO1DAQjBCIfcAHcEE-cklox4njgISEVrAgjcQBOFuO02E8m8TBdmDnM_gDvoUvo4cZ9sCBU7ftqpK7qrPsCYeCA5fPd8UuYlECFwWUBYC4l53zWpS5rAHuUw-1ysumkmfZRYw7AGgrKB9mZ6WQolVCnGc_Nt7euPkLW0aTkA3u1iTnZ-YHtgR_6yYzsu06YaA6BGPTGjCy7y5tf_1000IXJ3Ta4h2ARUdayTPCJk_nCXtHAtaP6zSzuC6LD-kFM6xzfkK7NbOz9B7T2u8fZQ8GM0Z8fKqX2ee3bz5dvcs3H67fX73e5FYIlXJZWtWhEtJUdd0YCRZrUTVdb4E30vbArWzF0DcKlCo7rCo72Fp1XddCj7UUl9mzoy7N-XWlj-rJRYvjaGb0a9S8qkTbtlJVBOVHqA0-xoCDXgI5E_aagz4koXeaktCHJDSUmpIgztOT_NrR-HeMv9YT4OURgDTkN4dBR-twtmRVQJt0791_5V_9w7aj--PiDe4x7vwaZnJPcx2JoD8eVuGwCVwAcGrEb3O7skE</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Weeks, Colleen A., MD</creator><creator>Begum, Farhana, MSc</creator><creator>Beaupre, Lauren A., PhD</creator><creator>Carey, Jason P., PhD</creator><creator>Adeeb, Samer, PhD</creator><creator>Bouliane, Martin J., MD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>Locking plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures with impaction of the fracture site to restore medial column support: a biomechanical study</title><author>Weeks, Colleen A., MD ; Begum, Farhana, MSc ; Beaupre, Lauren A., PhD ; Carey, Jason P., PhD ; Adeeb, Samer, PhD ; Bouliane, Martin J., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-62c8be836a4557a60ce5347bdc0176cd01c693fd780882be44cfc58bbb90de563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>biomechanical</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Bone Plates</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>complications</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fracture</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</topic><topic>fracture impaction</topic><topic>Fractures, Comminuted - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>locking plate</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>medial support</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Proximal humerus</topic><topic>Shoulder Fractures - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weeks, Colleen A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Begum, Farhana, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaupre, Lauren A., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carey, Jason P., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adeeb, Samer, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouliane, Martin J., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weeks, Colleen A., MD</au><au>Begum, Farhana, MSc</au><au>Beaupre, Lauren A., PhD</au><au>Carey, Jason P., PhD</au><au>Adeeb, Samer, PhD</au><au>Bouliane, Martin J., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Locking plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures with impaction of the fracture site to restore medial column support: a biomechanical study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1552</spage><epage>1557</epage><pages>1552-1557</pages><issn>1058-2746</issn><eissn>1532-6500</eissn><abstract>Background Despite the advent of locking plate techniques, proximal humeral fracture fixation can fail due to varus collapse, especially in osteoporotic bone with medial cortex comminution. This study investigated the effect of restoring the integrity of the medial column by fracture impaction and shaft medialization with locking plate fixation. This construct was compared with a traditional locking plate construct under conditions of varus cyclical loading. Materials and methods Proximal humeral fractures with medial comminution were simulated by performing wedge-shaped osteotomies at the surgical neck in cadaveric specimens and removing 1 cm of medial cortex. For each cadaver (n = 6), 1 humeral fracture was fixed with a traditional locking plate construct. The other was fixed with the locking plate construct plus fracture impaction and shaft medialization, resulting in medial column restoration. The humeral head was immobilized, and a repetitive, varus force was applied to the humeral shaft until construct collapse or until 25,000 cycles were completed. Results None of the constructs with fracture impaction collapsed, whereas 5 of 6 of the nonaugmented constructs collapsed before reaching 25,000 cycles ( P = .008). Collapse of the 5 nonimpacted constructs that failed occurred after an average of 11,470 ± 3589 cycles. Conclusion Fracture impaction increased the ability of the locking plate to withstand repetitive varus loading. This technique provides a construct biomechanically superior to locking plate fixation alone.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>23639833</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jse.2013.02.003</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-2746
ispartof Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2013-11, Vol.22 (11), p.1552-1557
issn 1058-2746
1532-6500
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1443999684
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
biomechanical
Biomechanical Phenomena
Bone Plates
Cadaver
complications
Female
fracture
Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation
Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods
fracture impaction
Fractures, Comminuted - surgery
Humans
locking plate
Male
medial support
Middle Aged
Orthopedics
Proximal humerus
Shoulder Fractures - surgery
title Locking plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures with impaction of the fracture site to restore medial column support: a biomechanical study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T01%3A25%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Locking%20plate%20fixation%20of%20proximal%20humeral%20fractures%20with%C2%A0impaction%20of%20the%20fracture%20site%20to%20restore%20medial%20column%20support:%20a%20biomechanical%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20shoulder%20and%20elbow%20surgery&rft.au=Weeks,%20Colleen%20A.,%20MD&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1552&rft.epage=1557&rft.pages=1552-1557&rft.issn=1058-2746&rft.eissn=1532-6500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jse.2013.02.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1443999684%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1443999684&rft_id=info:pmid/23639833&rft_els_id=S1058274613001274&rfr_iscdi=true