Diagnostic Criteria for Nonviable Pregnancy Early in the First Trimester
Determining the viability of a pregnancy is a major challenge, especially with a pregnancy of unknown location. This review provides specific guidance, including stringent criteria for nonviability, that can reduce the risk of inadvertent harm to a potentially normal pregnancy. Over the past two to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 2013-10, Vol.369 (15), p.1443-1451 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1451 |
---|---|
container_issue | 15 |
container_start_page | 1443 |
container_title | The New England journal of medicine |
container_volume | 369 |
creator | Doubilet, Peter M Benson, Carol B Bourne, Tom Blaivas, Michael |
description | Determining the viability of a pregnancy is a major challenge, especially with a pregnancy of unknown location. This review provides specific guidance, including stringent criteria for nonviability, that can reduce the risk of inadvertent harm to a potentially normal pregnancy.
Over the past two to three decades, pelvic ultrasonography and measurement of the serum concentration of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) (Table 1) have become mainstays in the diagnosis and management of early-pregnancy problems. These tests, which allow earlier detection of pregnancy and more accurate diagnosis of its complications than were previously possible, have revolutionized the management of intrauterine pregnancies and markedly reduced the morbidity and mortality associated with ectopic pregnancy.
1
,
2
Although these tests have indisputable benefits, their misuse and misinterpretation can lead to interventions that inadvertently damage pregnancies that might have had normal outcomes.
3
,
4
There are well-documented instances . . . |
doi_str_mv | 10.1056/NEJMra1302417 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1443426246</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3096164791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-eee8af2a92d9c17e009c65bf630dbf52625e822a1a213dd3805b17a1b85c791d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M1LwzAYBvAgipvTo1cJiOClms-mPcrcnDKnh3kuaZrOjDadSSvsvzdj06FgLrn88rxvHgDOMbrBiMe3s9HTs5OYIsKwOAB9zCmNGEPxIegjRJKIiZT2wIn3SxQOZukx6AWL4pSKPpjcG7mwjW-NgkNnWu2MhGXj4Kyxn0bmlYavTi-stGoNR9JVa2gsbN81HBvnWzh3ptY-PDsFR6WsvD7b3QPwNh7Nh5No-vLwOLybRoolcRtprRNZEpmSIlVYaIRSFfO8jCkq8pKTmHCdECKxJJgWBU0Qz7GQOE-4Eiku6ABcb3NXrvnowuisNl7pqpJWN53PMGOUhRgWB3r5hy6bztmw3UZhSkhCaVDRVinXeO90ma3Cn6RbZxhlm4qzXxUHf7FL7fJaFz_6u9MArnZAeiWr0oXujN87IbgIS-5dXfvM6mX9z8AvZ_uNXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1441322833</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic Criteria for Nonviable Pregnancy Early in the First Trimester</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>New England Journal of Medicine</source><creator>Doubilet, Peter M ; Benson, Carol B ; Bourne, Tom ; Blaivas, Michael</creator><contributor>Campion, Edward W</contributor><creatorcontrib>Doubilet, Peter M ; Benson, Carol B ; Bourne, Tom ; Blaivas, Michael ; Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Multispecialty Panel on Early First Trimester Diagnosis of Miscarriage and Exclusion of a Viable Intrauterine Pregnancy ; Campion, Edward W</creatorcontrib><description>Determining the viability of a pregnancy is a major challenge, especially with a pregnancy of unknown location. This review provides specific guidance, including stringent criteria for nonviability, that can reduce the risk of inadvertent harm to a potentially normal pregnancy.
Over the past two to three decades, pelvic ultrasonography and measurement of the serum concentration of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) (Table 1) have become mainstays in the diagnosis and management of early-pregnancy problems. These tests, which allow earlier detection of pregnancy and more accurate diagnosis of its complications than were previously possible, have revolutionized the management of intrauterine pregnancies and markedly reduced the morbidity and mortality associated with ectopic pregnancy.
1
,
2
Although these tests have indisputable benefits, their misuse and misinterpretation can lead to interventions that inadvertently damage pregnancies that might have had normal outcomes.
3
,
4
There are well-documented instances . . .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-4793</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1302417</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24106937</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NEJMAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Waltham, MA: Massachusetts Medical Society</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Crown-Rump Length ; False Positive Reactions ; Fees & charges ; Female ; Fetal Death - diagnosis ; Fetal Viability ; General aspects ; Gestational Sac - anatomy & histology ; Gestational Sac - diagnostic imaging ; Health education ; Humans ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical malpractice ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy complications ; Pregnancy Trimester, First ; Testimony ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>The New England journal of medicine, 2013-10, Vol.369 (15), p.1443-1451</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-eee8af2a92d9c17e009c65bf630dbf52625e822a1a213dd3805b17a1b85c791d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-eee8af2a92d9c17e009c65bf630dbf52625e822a1a213dd3805b17a1b85c791d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMra1302417$$EPDF$$P50$$Gmms$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra1302417$$EHTML$$P50$$Gmms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2746,2747,26080,27901,27902,52357,54039</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27757443$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24106937$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Campion, Edward W</contributor><creatorcontrib>Doubilet, Peter M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benson, Carol B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourne, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blaivas, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Multispecialty Panel on Early First Trimester Diagnosis of Miscarriage and Exclusion of a Viable Intrauterine Pregnancy</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic Criteria for Nonviable Pregnancy Early in the First Trimester</title><title>The New England journal of medicine</title><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><description>Determining the viability of a pregnancy is a major challenge, especially with a pregnancy of unknown location. This review provides specific guidance, including stringent criteria for nonviability, that can reduce the risk of inadvertent harm to a potentially normal pregnancy.
Over the past two to three decades, pelvic ultrasonography and measurement of the serum concentration of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) (Table 1) have become mainstays in the diagnosis and management of early-pregnancy problems. These tests, which allow earlier detection of pregnancy and more accurate diagnosis of its complications than were previously possible, have revolutionized the management of intrauterine pregnancies and markedly reduced the morbidity and mortality associated with ectopic pregnancy.
1
,
2
Although these tests have indisputable benefits, their misuse and misinterpretation can lead to interventions that inadvertently damage pregnancies that might have had normal outcomes.
3
,
4
There are well-documented instances . . .</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Crown-Rump Length</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Fees & charges</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Death - diagnosis</subject><subject>Fetal Viability</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Gestational Sac - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Gestational Sac - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical malpractice</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy complications</subject><subject>Pregnancy Trimester, First</subject><subject>Testimony</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0028-4793</issn><issn>1533-4406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp10M1LwzAYBvAgipvTo1cJiOClms-mPcrcnDKnh3kuaZrOjDadSSvsvzdj06FgLrn88rxvHgDOMbrBiMe3s9HTs5OYIsKwOAB9zCmNGEPxIegjRJKIiZT2wIn3SxQOZukx6AWL4pSKPpjcG7mwjW-NgkNnWu2MhGXj4Kyxn0bmlYavTi-stGoNR9JVa2gsbN81HBvnWzh3ptY-PDsFR6WsvD7b3QPwNh7Nh5No-vLwOLybRoolcRtprRNZEpmSIlVYaIRSFfO8jCkq8pKTmHCdECKxJJgWBU0Qz7GQOE-4Eiku6ABcb3NXrvnowuisNl7pqpJWN53PMGOUhRgWB3r5hy6bztmw3UZhSkhCaVDRVinXeO90ma3Cn6RbZxhlm4qzXxUHf7FL7fJaFz_6u9MArnZAeiWr0oXujN87IbgIS-5dXfvM6mX9z8AvZ_uNXA</recordid><startdate>20131010</startdate><enddate>20131010</enddate><creator>Doubilet, Peter M</creator><creator>Benson, Carol B</creator><creator>Bourne, Tom</creator><creator>Blaivas, Michael</creator><general>Massachusetts Medical Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K0Y</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131010</creationdate><title>Diagnostic Criteria for Nonviable Pregnancy Early in the First Trimester</title><author>Doubilet, Peter M ; Benson, Carol B ; Bourne, Tom ; Blaivas, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-eee8af2a92d9c17e009c65bf630dbf52625e822a1a213dd3805b17a1b85c791d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Crown-Rump Length</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Fees & charges</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Death - diagnosis</topic><topic>Fetal Viability</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Gestational Sac - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Gestational Sac - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical malpractice</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy complications</topic><topic>Pregnancy Trimester, First</topic><topic>Testimony</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Doubilet, Peter M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benson, Carol B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourne, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blaivas, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Multispecialty Panel on Early First Trimester Diagnosis of Miscarriage and Exclusion of a Viable Intrauterine Pregnancy</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>New England Journal of Medicine</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Doubilet, Peter M</au><au>Benson, Carol B</au><au>Bourne, Tom</au><au>Blaivas, Michael</au><au>Campion, Edward W</au><aucorp>Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Multispecialty Panel on Early First Trimester Diagnosis of Miscarriage and Exclusion of a Viable Intrauterine Pregnancy</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic Criteria for Nonviable Pregnancy Early in the First Trimester</atitle><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><date>2013-10-10</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>369</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>1443</spage><epage>1451</epage><pages>1443-1451</pages><issn>0028-4793</issn><eissn>1533-4406</eissn><coden>NEJMAG</coden><abstract>Determining the viability of a pregnancy is a major challenge, especially with a pregnancy of unknown location. This review provides specific guidance, including stringent criteria for nonviability, that can reduce the risk of inadvertent harm to a potentially normal pregnancy.
Over the past two to three decades, pelvic ultrasonography and measurement of the serum concentration of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) (Table 1) have become mainstays in the diagnosis and management of early-pregnancy problems. These tests, which allow earlier detection of pregnancy and more accurate diagnosis of its complications than were previously possible, have revolutionized the management of intrauterine pregnancies and markedly reduced the morbidity and mortality associated with ectopic pregnancy.
1
,
2
Although these tests have indisputable benefits, their misuse and misinterpretation can lead to interventions that inadvertently damage pregnancies that might have had normal outcomes.
3
,
4
There are well-documented instances . . .</abstract><cop>Waltham, MA</cop><pub>Massachusetts Medical Society</pub><pmid>24106937</pmid><doi>10.1056/NEJMra1302417</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-4793 |
ispartof | The New England journal of medicine, 2013-10, Vol.369 (15), p.1443-1451 |
issn | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1443426246 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; New England Journal of Medicine |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Crown-Rump Length False Positive Reactions Fees & charges Female Fetal Death - diagnosis Fetal Viability General aspects Gestational Sac - anatomy & histology Gestational Sac - diagnostic imaging Health education Humans Medical diagnosis Medical malpractice Medical sciences Medicine Pregnancy Pregnancy complications Pregnancy Trimester, First Testimony Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasonography, Prenatal Womens health |
title | Diagnostic Criteria for Nonviable Pregnancy Early in the First Trimester |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T23%3A42%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20Criteria%20for%20Nonviable%20Pregnancy%20Early%20in%20the%20First%20Trimester&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20England%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.au=Doubilet,%20Peter%20M&rft.aucorp=Society%20of%20Radiologists%20in%20Ultrasound%20Multispecialty%20Panel%20on%20Early%20First%20Trimester%20Diagnosis%20of%20Miscarriage%20and%20Exclusion%20of%20a%20Viable%20Intrauterine%20Pregnancy&rft.date=2013-10-10&rft.volume=369&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=1443&rft.epage=1451&rft.pages=1443-1451&rft.issn=0028-4793&rft.eissn=1533-4406&rft.coden=NEJMAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1056/NEJMra1302417&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3096164791%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1441322833&rft_id=info:pmid/24106937&rfr_iscdi=true |