Analysis of cesarean delivery at Assiut University Hospital using the Ten Group Classification System

Abstract Objective To evaluate the feasibility of using the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) for cesarean delivery (CD) indications at institutional level. Methods Prospective clinical audits of women delivering by CD at Women’s Health Hospital, Assiut, Egypt, were conducted in 2008 and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 2013-11, Vol.123 (2), p.119-123
Hauptverfasser: Abdel-Aleem, Hany, Shaaban, Omar M, Hassanin, Ahmed I, Ibraheem, Alaa A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 123
container_issue 2
container_start_page 119
container_title International journal of gynecology and obstetrics
container_volume 123
creator Abdel-Aleem, Hany
Shaaban, Omar M
Hassanin, Ahmed I
Ibraheem, Alaa A
description Abstract Objective To evaluate the feasibility of using the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) for cesarean delivery (CD) indications at institutional level. Methods Prospective clinical audits of women delivering by CD at Women’s Health Hospital, Assiut, Egypt, were conducted in 2008 and 2011. The CD rates overall and in each Robson group were calculated, as was the contribution of each group to the overall CD rate. In addition, the CD indications in each group were analyzed. Results The CD rate was 32% (443/1357) in 2008 and 38% (626/1628) in 2011. The most common CD indication at both time intervals was a previous CD. Multiparas without uterine scar, a single cephalic term pregnancy, and spontaneous labor (Robson Group 3) comprised the largest group of women undergoing CD, followed by nulliparas with a single cephalic term pregnancy and spontaneous labor (Group 1), and multiparas with a scarred uterus and a single cephalic term pregnancy (Group 5). Group 5 was the largest contributor (30%) to the overall CD rate, followed by Groups 1 and 4 (10% each). Conclusion The TGCS can be applied at institutional level. It helps in planning strategies for specific subgroups of women to reduce CD rates and improve outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1443401699</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0020729213003627</els_id><sourcerecordid>1443401699</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4599-eee8a9bc9933edc7fecc52e2c20f2f5e5f5a997749fa0a4804b44e6fd35985613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk9v1DAQxS0EosvCF-CAfOSS4L9JLCGk1Qq2RZV6aHu2vM64ePHGi50U5dvjaAsHDojTSKP33ox-Mwi9paSmhDYfDrU_PMSaEcprImtC6TO0ol2rKi5a9RytCGGkapliF-hVzgdCCG0pfYkuGFeyk12zQrAZTJizzzg6bCGbBGbAPQT_CGnGZsSbnP004vth6WQ_zvgy5pMfTcBT9sMDHr8BvoMB71KcTngbTDE4b83o44Bv5zzC8TV64UzI8OaprtH9l89328vq-mZ3td1cV1ZIpSoA6IzaW6U4h962DqyVDJhlxDEnQTpplGpboZwhRnRE7IWAxvVcqk42lK_R-3PuKcUfE-RRH322EIIZIE5ZUyG4KOjKgDViZ6lNMecETp-SP5o0a0r0glcf9IJXL3g1kbrgLaZ3T_nT_gj9H8tvnkXQngU_fYD5PyL11dfdDaXLPh_PTih8Hj0kna2HwULvE9hR99H_e7NPf9lt8EO5QvgOM-RDnFI5dCGgM9NE3y6vsXwG5YTwhrX8F09gszE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1443401699</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of cesarean delivery at Assiut University Hospital using the Ten Group Classification System</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Abdel-Aleem, Hany ; Shaaban, Omar M ; Hassanin, Ahmed I ; Ibraheem, Alaa A</creator><creatorcontrib>Abdel-Aleem, Hany ; Shaaban, Omar M ; Hassanin, Ahmed I ; Ibraheem, Alaa A</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective To evaluate the feasibility of using the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) for cesarean delivery (CD) indications at institutional level. Methods Prospective clinical audits of women delivering by CD at Women’s Health Hospital, Assiut, Egypt, were conducted in 2008 and 2011. The CD rates overall and in each Robson group were calculated, as was the contribution of each group to the overall CD rate. In addition, the CD indications in each group were analyzed. Results The CD rate was 32% (443/1357) in 2008 and 38% (626/1628) in 2011. The most common CD indication at both time intervals was a previous CD. Multiparas without uterine scar, a single cephalic term pregnancy, and spontaneous labor (Robson Group 3) comprised the largest group of women undergoing CD, followed by nulliparas with a single cephalic term pregnancy and spontaneous labor (Group 1), and multiparas with a scarred uterus and a single cephalic term pregnancy (Group 5). Group 5 was the largest contributor (30%) to the overall CD rate, followed by Groups 1 and 4 (10% each). Conclusion The TGCS can be applied at institutional level. It helps in planning strategies for specific subgroups of women to reduce CD rates and improve outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3479</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23958586</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cesarean delivery ; Cesarean Section - classification ; Cesarean Section - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Cicatrix - pathology ; Classification of cesarean delivery ; Clinical audit ; Egypt ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Hospitals, University ; Humans ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Prospective Studies ; Ten Group Classification System ; Time Factors ; Uterus - pathology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics, 2013-11, Vol.123 (2), p.119-123</ispartof><rights>International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics</rights><rights>2013 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics</rights><rights>2013.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4599-eee8a9bc9933edc7fecc52e2c20f2f5e5f5a997749fa0a4804b44e6fd35985613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4599-eee8a9bc9933edc7fecc52e2c20f2f5e5f5a997749fa0a4804b44e6fd35985613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1016%2Fj.ijgo.2013.05.011$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,3552,27931,27932,45581,45582,46002</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23958586$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abdel-Aleem, Hany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaaban, Omar M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassanin, Ahmed I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibraheem, Alaa A</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of cesarean delivery at Assiut University Hospital using the Ten Group Classification System</title><title>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</title><addtitle>Int J Gynaecol Obstet</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective To evaluate the feasibility of using the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) for cesarean delivery (CD) indications at institutional level. Methods Prospective clinical audits of women delivering by CD at Women’s Health Hospital, Assiut, Egypt, were conducted in 2008 and 2011. The CD rates overall and in each Robson group were calculated, as was the contribution of each group to the overall CD rate. In addition, the CD indications in each group were analyzed. Results The CD rate was 32% (443/1357) in 2008 and 38% (626/1628) in 2011. The most common CD indication at both time intervals was a previous CD. Multiparas without uterine scar, a single cephalic term pregnancy, and spontaneous labor (Robson Group 3) comprised the largest group of women undergoing CD, followed by nulliparas with a single cephalic term pregnancy and spontaneous labor (Group 1), and multiparas with a scarred uterus and a single cephalic term pregnancy (Group 5). Group 5 was the largest contributor (30%) to the overall CD rate, followed by Groups 1 and 4 (10% each). Conclusion The TGCS can be applied at institutional level. It helps in planning strategies for specific subgroups of women to reduce CD rates and improve outcomes.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cesarean delivery</subject><subject>Cesarean Section - classification</subject><subject>Cesarean Section - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Cicatrix - pathology</subject><subject>Classification of cesarean delivery</subject><subject>Clinical audit</subject><subject>Egypt</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitals, University</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Ten Group Classification System</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Uterus - pathology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0020-7292</issn><issn>1879-3479</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk9v1DAQxS0EosvCF-CAfOSS4L9JLCGk1Qq2RZV6aHu2vM64ePHGi50U5dvjaAsHDojTSKP33ox-Mwi9paSmhDYfDrU_PMSaEcprImtC6TO0ol2rKi5a9RytCGGkapliF-hVzgdCCG0pfYkuGFeyk12zQrAZTJizzzg6bCGbBGbAPQT_CGnGZsSbnP004vth6WQ_zvgy5pMfTcBT9sMDHr8BvoMB71KcTngbTDE4b83o44Bv5zzC8TV64UzI8OaprtH9l89328vq-mZ3td1cV1ZIpSoA6IzaW6U4h962DqyVDJhlxDEnQTpplGpboZwhRnRE7IWAxvVcqk42lK_R-3PuKcUfE-RRH322EIIZIE5ZUyG4KOjKgDViZ6lNMecETp-SP5o0a0r0glcf9IJXL3g1kbrgLaZ3T_nT_gj9H8tvnkXQngU_fYD5PyL11dfdDaXLPh_PTih8Hj0kna2HwULvE9hR99H_e7NPf9lt8EO5QvgOM-RDnFI5dCGgM9NE3y6vsXwG5YTwhrX8F09gszE</recordid><startdate>201311</startdate><enddate>201311</enddate><creator>Abdel-Aleem, Hany</creator><creator>Shaaban, Omar M</creator><creator>Hassanin, Ahmed I</creator><creator>Ibraheem, Alaa A</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201311</creationdate><title>Analysis of cesarean delivery at Assiut University Hospital using the Ten Group Classification System</title><author>Abdel-Aleem, Hany ; Shaaban, Omar M ; Hassanin, Ahmed I ; Ibraheem, Alaa A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4599-eee8a9bc9933edc7fecc52e2c20f2f5e5f5a997749fa0a4804b44e6fd35985613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cesarean delivery</topic><topic>Cesarean Section - classification</topic><topic>Cesarean Section - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Cicatrix - pathology</topic><topic>Classification of cesarean delivery</topic><topic>Clinical audit</topic><topic>Egypt</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitals, University</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Ten Group Classification System</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Uterus - pathology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abdel-Aleem, Hany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaaban, Omar M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassanin, Ahmed I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibraheem, Alaa A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abdel-Aleem, Hany</au><au>Shaaban, Omar M</au><au>Hassanin, Ahmed I</au><au>Ibraheem, Alaa A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of cesarean delivery at Assiut University Hospital using the Ten Group Classification System</atitle><jtitle>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Gynaecol Obstet</addtitle><date>2013-11</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>123</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>119</spage><epage>123</epage><pages>119-123</pages><issn>0020-7292</issn><eissn>1879-3479</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective To evaluate the feasibility of using the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) for cesarean delivery (CD) indications at institutional level. Methods Prospective clinical audits of women delivering by CD at Women’s Health Hospital, Assiut, Egypt, were conducted in 2008 and 2011. The CD rates overall and in each Robson group were calculated, as was the contribution of each group to the overall CD rate. In addition, the CD indications in each group were analyzed. Results The CD rate was 32% (443/1357) in 2008 and 38% (626/1628) in 2011. The most common CD indication at both time intervals was a previous CD. Multiparas without uterine scar, a single cephalic term pregnancy, and spontaneous labor (Robson Group 3) comprised the largest group of women undergoing CD, followed by nulliparas with a single cephalic term pregnancy and spontaneous labor (Group 1), and multiparas with a scarred uterus and a single cephalic term pregnancy (Group 5). Group 5 was the largest contributor (30%) to the overall CD rate, followed by Groups 1 and 4 (10% each). Conclusion The TGCS can be applied at institutional level. It helps in planning strategies for specific subgroups of women to reduce CD rates and improve outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>23958586</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7292
ispartof International journal of gynecology and obstetrics, 2013-11, Vol.123 (2), p.119-123
issn 0020-7292
1879-3479
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1443401699
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Cesarean delivery
Cesarean Section - classification
Cesarean Section - statistics & numerical data
Cicatrix - pathology
Classification of cesarean delivery
Clinical audit
Egypt
Feasibility Studies
Female
Hospitals, University
Humans
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Prospective Studies
Ten Group Classification System
Time Factors
Uterus - pathology
Young Adult
title Analysis of cesarean delivery at Assiut University Hospital using the Ten Group Classification System
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T17%3A25%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20cesarean%20delivery%20at%20Assiut%20University%20Hospital%20using%20the%20Ten%20Group%20Classification%20System&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20gynecology%20and%20obstetrics&rft.au=Abdel-Aleem,%20Hany&rft.date=2013-11&rft.volume=123&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=119&rft.epage=123&rft.pages=119-123&rft.issn=0020-7292&rft.eissn=1879-3479&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1443401699%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1443401699&rft_id=info:pmid/23958586&rft_els_id=S0020729213003627&rfr_iscdi=true