Waveform Analysis–Guided Treatment Versus a Standard Shock-First Protocol for the Treatment of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Presenting in Ventricular Fibrillation: Results of an International Randomized, Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND—Ventricular fibrillation (VF) waveform properties have been shown to predict defibrillation success and outcomes among patients treated with immediate defibrillation. We postulated that a waveform analysis algorithm could be used to identify VF unlikely to respond to immediate defibrillat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2013-08, Vol.128 (9), p.995-1002
Hauptverfasser: Freese, John P., Jorgenson, Dawn B., Liu, Ping-Yu, Innes, Jennifer, Matallana, Luis, Nammi, Krishnakant, Donohoe, Rachael T., Whitbread, Mark, Silverman, Robert A., Prezant, David J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1002
container_issue 9
container_start_page 995
container_title Circulation (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 128
creator Freese, John P.
Jorgenson, Dawn B.
Liu, Ping-Yu
Innes, Jennifer
Matallana, Luis
Nammi, Krishnakant
Donohoe, Rachael T.
Whitbread, Mark
Silverman, Robert A.
Prezant, David J.
description BACKGROUND—Ventricular fibrillation (VF) waveform properties have been shown to predict defibrillation success and outcomes among patients treated with immediate defibrillation. We postulated that a waveform analysis algorithm could be used to identify VF unlikely to respond to immediate defibrillation, allowing selective initial treatment with cardiopulmonary resuscitation in an effort to improve overall survival. METHODS AND RESULTS—In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in 2 urban emergency medical services systems were treated with automated external defibrillators using either a VF waveform analysis algorithm or the standard shock-first protocol. The VF waveform analysis used a predefined threshold value below which return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was unlikely with immediate defibrillation, allowing selective treatment with a 2-minute interval of cardiopulmonary resuscitation before initial defibrillation. The primary end point was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary end points included ROSC, sustained ROSC, and survival to hospital admission. Of 6738 patients enrolled, 987 patients with VF of primary cardiac origin were included in the primary analysis. No immediate or long-term survival benefit was noted for either treatment algorithm (ROSC, 42.5% versus 41.2%, P=0.70; sustained ROSC, 32.4% versus 33.4%, P=0.79; survival to admission, 34.1% versus 36.4%, P=0.46; survival to hospital discharge, 15.6% versus 17.2%, P=0.55, respectively). CONCLUSIONS—Use of a waveform analysis algorithm to guide the initial treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients presenting in VF did not improve overall survival compared with a standard shock-first protocol. Further study is recommended to examine the role of waveform analysis for the guided management of VF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—URLhttp://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifierNCT00535106.
doi_str_mv 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003273
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1443394810</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1443394810</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3369-69e9d9fdf5374d1f66e673856b57da610310e165b6c415dce004b7b37e73d8133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc2O0zAUhSMEYobCKyCzQGJBBjtO7IZdFNFppYqiTgeWkRPfUDOOXWyH0bDiHXhBxJPg_vC3snz9nXNucpLkGcEXhDDyql6s6-tltVms3lbzKs7oBcY04_Reck6KLE_zgpb3k3OMcZlymmVnySPvP8Uro7x4mJxltOQly_h58uOD-AK9dQOqjNB3Xvmf375fjkqCRBsHIgxgAnoPzo8eCXQVhJHCSXS1td1NOlPOB_TO2WA7q1H0QWEL_whtj1ZjSG2fzq3fqSA0qqNciQ5VzsFBDD6SynxEysQgE5zqRi0cmqnWKa1FUNa8Rmvwow5-7ygMWpgAzhyeouU6LmUH9RXkS1Tb6GC1PuyvhH6cPOiF9vDkdE6S69mbTT1Pl6vLRV0t045SVqashFKWvewLynNJesaAcTotWFtwKRjBlGAgrGhZl5NCdoBx3vKWcuBUTgmlk-TF0Xfn7OcxflkzKN9B3N-AHX1D8pzSMp9Gp0lSHtHOWe8d9M3OqUG4u4bgZl9w83_BcUabY8FR-_QUM7YDyD_K341G4PkJEL4TunfCdMr_5TjjuMhI5PIjd2t1_Jf-Ro-34JotCB22MS3mYcLTDBOKpxnH6X5U0l_bfsVC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1443394810</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Waveform Analysis–Guided Treatment Versus a Standard Shock-First Protocol for the Treatment of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Presenting in Ventricular Fibrillation: Results of an International Randomized, Controlled Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Freese, John P. ; Jorgenson, Dawn B. ; Liu, Ping-Yu ; Innes, Jennifer ; Matallana, Luis ; Nammi, Krishnakant ; Donohoe, Rachael T. ; Whitbread, Mark ; Silverman, Robert A. ; Prezant, David J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Freese, John P. ; Jorgenson, Dawn B. ; Liu, Ping-Yu ; Innes, Jennifer ; Matallana, Luis ; Nammi, Krishnakant ; Donohoe, Rachael T. ; Whitbread, Mark ; Silverman, Robert A. ; Prezant, David J.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND—Ventricular fibrillation (VF) waveform properties have been shown to predict defibrillation success and outcomes among patients treated with immediate defibrillation. We postulated that a waveform analysis algorithm could be used to identify VF unlikely to respond to immediate defibrillation, allowing selective initial treatment with cardiopulmonary resuscitation in an effort to improve overall survival. METHODS AND RESULTS—In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in 2 urban emergency medical services systems were treated with automated external defibrillators using either a VF waveform analysis algorithm or the standard shock-first protocol. The VF waveform analysis used a predefined threshold value below which return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was unlikely with immediate defibrillation, allowing selective treatment with a 2-minute interval of cardiopulmonary resuscitation before initial defibrillation. The primary end point was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary end points included ROSC, sustained ROSC, and survival to hospital admission. Of 6738 patients enrolled, 987 patients with VF of primary cardiac origin were included in the primary analysis. No immediate or long-term survival benefit was noted for either treatment algorithm (ROSC, 42.5% versus 41.2%, P=0.70; sustained ROSC, 32.4% versus 33.4%, P=0.79; survival to admission, 34.1% versus 36.4%, P=0.46; survival to hospital discharge, 15.6% versus 17.2%, P=0.55, respectively). CONCLUSIONS—Use of a waveform analysis algorithm to guide the initial treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients presenting in VF did not improve overall survival compared with a standard shock-first protocol. Further study is recommended to examine the role of waveform analysis for the guided management of VF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—URLhttp://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifierNCT00535106.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-7322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003273</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23979627</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CIRCAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Algorithms ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood and lymphatic vessels ; Cardiac dysrhythmias ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ; Defibrillators ; Disease Management ; Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Heart ; Humans ; International Cooperation ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - etiology ; Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - therapy ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Prospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome ; Ventricular Fibrillation - complications ; Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 2013-08, Vol.128 (9), p.995-1002</ispartof><rights>2013 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc.</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3369-69e9d9fdf5374d1f66e673856b57da610310e165b6c415dce004b7b37e73d8133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3687,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27670521$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23979627$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Freese, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jorgenson, Dawn B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ping-Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Innes, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matallana, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nammi, Krishnakant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donohoe, Rachael T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitbread, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silverman, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prezant, David J.</creatorcontrib><title>Waveform Analysis–Guided Treatment Versus a Standard Shock-First Protocol for the Treatment of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Presenting in Ventricular Fibrillation: Results of an International Randomized, Controlled Trial</title><title>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND—Ventricular fibrillation (VF) waveform properties have been shown to predict defibrillation success and outcomes among patients treated with immediate defibrillation. We postulated that a waveform analysis algorithm could be used to identify VF unlikely to respond to immediate defibrillation, allowing selective initial treatment with cardiopulmonary resuscitation in an effort to improve overall survival. METHODS AND RESULTS—In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in 2 urban emergency medical services systems were treated with automated external defibrillators using either a VF waveform analysis algorithm or the standard shock-first protocol. The VF waveform analysis used a predefined threshold value below which return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was unlikely with immediate defibrillation, allowing selective treatment with a 2-minute interval of cardiopulmonary resuscitation before initial defibrillation. The primary end point was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary end points included ROSC, sustained ROSC, and survival to hospital admission. Of 6738 patients enrolled, 987 patients with VF of primary cardiac origin were included in the primary analysis. No immediate or long-term survival benefit was noted for either treatment algorithm (ROSC, 42.5% versus 41.2%, P=0.70; sustained ROSC, 32.4% versus 33.4%, P=0.79; survival to admission, 34.1% versus 36.4%, P=0.46; survival to hospital discharge, 15.6% versus 17.2%, P=0.55, respectively). CONCLUSIONS—Use of a waveform analysis algorithm to guide the initial treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients presenting in VF did not improve overall survival compared with a standard shock-first protocol. Further study is recommended to examine the role of waveform analysis for the guided management of VF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—URLhttp://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifierNCT00535106.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood and lymphatic vessels</subject><subject>Cardiac dysrhythmias</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</subject><subject>Defibrillators</subject><subject>Disease Management</subject><subject>Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>International Cooperation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - etiology</subject><subject>Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - therapy</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - complications</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0009-7322</issn><issn>1524-4539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc2O0zAUhSMEYobCKyCzQGJBBjtO7IZdFNFppYqiTgeWkRPfUDOOXWyH0bDiHXhBxJPg_vC3snz9nXNucpLkGcEXhDDyql6s6-tltVms3lbzKs7oBcY04_Reck6KLE_zgpb3k3OMcZlymmVnySPvP8Uro7x4mJxltOQly_h58uOD-AK9dQOqjNB3Xvmf375fjkqCRBsHIgxgAnoPzo8eCXQVhJHCSXS1td1NOlPOB_TO2WA7q1H0QWEL_whtj1ZjSG2fzq3fqSA0qqNciQ5VzsFBDD6SynxEysQgE5zqRi0cmqnWKa1FUNa8Rmvwow5-7ygMWpgAzhyeouU6LmUH9RXkS1Tb6GC1PuyvhH6cPOiF9vDkdE6S69mbTT1Pl6vLRV0t045SVqashFKWvewLynNJesaAcTotWFtwKRjBlGAgrGhZl5NCdoBx3vKWcuBUTgmlk-TF0Xfn7OcxflkzKN9B3N-AHX1D8pzSMp9Gp0lSHtHOWe8d9M3OqUG4u4bgZl9w83_BcUabY8FR-_QUM7YDyD_K341G4PkJEL4TunfCdMr_5TjjuMhI5PIjd2t1_Jf-Ro-34JotCB22MS3mYcLTDBOKpxnH6X5U0l_bfsVC</recordid><startdate>20130827</startdate><enddate>20130827</enddate><creator>Freese, John P.</creator><creator>Jorgenson, Dawn B.</creator><creator>Liu, Ping-Yu</creator><creator>Innes, Jennifer</creator><creator>Matallana, Luis</creator><creator>Nammi, Krishnakant</creator><creator>Donohoe, Rachael T.</creator><creator>Whitbread, Mark</creator><creator>Silverman, Robert A.</creator><creator>Prezant, David J.</creator><general>by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130827</creationdate><title>Waveform Analysis–Guided Treatment Versus a Standard Shock-First Protocol for the Treatment of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Presenting in Ventricular Fibrillation: Results of an International Randomized, Controlled Trial</title><author>Freese, John P. ; Jorgenson, Dawn B. ; Liu, Ping-Yu ; Innes, Jennifer ; Matallana, Luis ; Nammi, Krishnakant ; Donohoe, Rachael T. ; Whitbread, Mark ; Silverman, Robert A. ; Prezant, David J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3369-69e9d9fdf5374d1f66e673856b57da610310e165b6c415dce004b7b37e73d8133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood and lymphatic vessels</topic><topic>Cardiac dysrhythmias</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</topic><topic>Defibrillators</topic><topic>Disease Management</topic><topic>Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>International Cooperation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - etiology</topic><topic>Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - therapy</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - complications</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Freese, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jorgenson, Dawn B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ping-Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Innes, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matallana, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nammi, Krishnakant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donohoe, Rachael T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitbread, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silverman, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prezant, David J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Freese, John P.</au><au>Jorgenson, Dawn B.</au><au>Liu, Ping-Yu</au><au>Innes, Jennifer</au><au>Matallana, Luis</au><au>Nammi, Krishnakant</au><au>Donohoe, Rachael T.</au><au>Whitbread, Mark</au><au>Silverman, Robert A.</au><au>Prezant, David J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Waveform Analysis–Guided Treatment Versus a Standard Shock-First Protocol for the Treatment of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Presenting in Ventricular Fibrillation: Results of an International Randomized, Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><date>2013-08-27</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>995</spage><epage>1002</epage><pages>995-1002</pages><issn>0009-7322</issn><eissn>1524-4539</eissn><coden>CIRCAZ</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND—Ventricular fibrillation (VF) waveform properties have been shown to predict defibrillation success and outcomes among patients treated with immediate defibrillation. We postulated that a waveform analysis algorithm could be used to identify VF unlikely to respond to immediate defibrillation, allowing selective initial treatment with cardiopulmonary resuscitation in an effort to improve overall survival. METHODS AND RESULTS—In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in 2 urban emergency medical services systems were treated with automated external defibrillators using either a VF waveform analysis algorithm or the standard shock-first protocol. The VF waveform analysis used a predefined threshold value below which return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was unlikely with immediate defibrillation, allowing selective treatment with a 2-minute interval of cardiopulmonary resuscitation before initial defibrillation. The primary end point was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary end points included ROSC, sustained ROSC, and survival to hospital admission. Of 6738 patients enrolled, 987 patients with VF of primary cardiac origin were included in the primary analysis. No immediate or long-term survival benefit was noted for either treatment algorithm (ROSC, 42.5% versus 41.2%, P=0.70; sustained ROSC, 32.4% versus 33.4%, P=0.79; survival to admission, 34.1% versus 36.4%, P=0.46; survival to hospital discharge, 15.6% versus 17.2%, P=0.55, respectively). CONCLUSIONS—Use of a waveform analysis algorithm to guide the initial treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients presenting in VF did not improve overall survival compared with a standard shock-first protocol. Further study is recommended to examine the role of waveform analysis for the guided management of VF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—URLhttp://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifierNCT00535106.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc</pub><pmid>23979627</pmid><doi>10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003273</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-7322
ispartof Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 2013-08, Vol.128 (9), p.995-1002
issn 0009-7322
1524-4539
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1443394810
source MEDLINE; American Heart Association Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Algorithms
Biological and medical sciences
Blood and lymphatic vessels
Cardiac dysrhythmias
Cardiology. Vascular system
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Defibrillators
Disease Management
Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous
Double-Blind Method
Female
Heart
Humans
International Cooperation
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - etiology
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - therapy
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Prospective Studies
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
Ventricular Fibrillation - complications
Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy
Young Adult
title Waveform Analysis–Guided Treatment Versus a Standard Shock-First Protocol for the Treatment of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Presenting in Ventricular Fibrillation: Results of an International Randomized, Controlled Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A24%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Waveform%20Analysis%E2%80%93Guided%20Treatment%20Versus%20a%20Standard%20Shock-First%20Protocol%20for%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Out-of-Hospital%20Cardiac%20Arrest%20Presenting%20in%20Ventricular%20Fibrillation:%20Results%20of%20an%20International%20Randomized,%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Circulation%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Freese,%20John%20P.&rft.date=2013-08-27&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=995&rft.epage=1002&rft.pages=995-1002&rft.issn=0009-7322&rft.eissn=1524-4539&rft.coden=CIRCAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003273&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1443394810%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1443394810&rft_id=info:pmid/23979627&rfr_iscdi=true