Waveform Analysis–Guided Treatment Versus a Standard Shock-First Protocol for the Treatment of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Presenting in Ventricular Fibrillation: Results of an International Randomized, Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND—Ventricular fibrillation (VF) waveform properties have been shown to predict defibrillation success and outcomes among patients treated with immediate defibrillation. We postulated that a waveform analysis algorithm could be used to identify VF unlikely to respond to immediate defibrillat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2013-08, Vol.128 (9), p.995-1002 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1002 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 995 |
container_title | Circulation (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 128 |
creator | Freese, John P. Jorgenson, Dawn B. Liu, Ping-Yu Innes, Jennifer Matallana, Luis Nammi, Krishnakant Donohoe, Rachael T. Whitbread, Mark Silverman, Robert A. Prezant, David J. |
description | BACKGROUND—Ventricular fibrillation (VF) waveform properties have been shown to predict defibrillation success and outcomes among patients treated with immediate defibrillation. We postulated that a waveform analysis algorithm could be used to identify VF unlikely to respond to immediate defibrillation, allowing selective initial treatment with cardiopulmonary resuscitation in an effort to improve overall survival.
METHODS AND RESULTS—In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in 2 urban emergency medical services systems were treated with automated external defibrillators using either a VF waveform analysis algorithm or the standard shock-first protocol. The VF waveform analysis used a predefined threshold value below which return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was unlikely with immediate defibrillation, allowing selective treatment with a 2-minute interval of cardiopulmonary resuscitation before initial defibrillation. The primary end point was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary end points included ROSC, sustained ROSC, and survival to hospital admission. Of 6738 patients enrolled, 987 patients with VF of primary cardiac origin were included in the primary analysis. No immediate or long-term survival benefit was noted for either treatment algorithm (ROSC, 42.5% versus 41.2%, P=0.70; sustained ROSC, 32.4% versus 33.4%, P=0.79; survival to admission, 34.1% versus 36.4%, P=0.46; survival to hospital discharge, 15.6% versus 17.2%, P=0.55, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS—Use of a waveform analysis algorithm to guide the initial treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients presenting in VF did not improve overall survival compared with a standard shock-first protocol. Further study is recommended to examine the role of waveform analysis for the guided management of VF.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—URLhttp://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifierNCT00535106. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003273 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1443394810</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1443394810</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3369-69e9d9fdf5374d1f66e673856b57da610310e165b6c415dce004b7b37e73d8133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc2O0zAUhSMEYobCKyCzQGJBBjtO7IZdFNFppYqiTgeWkRPfUDOOXWyH0bDiHXhBxJPg_vC3snz9nXNucpLkGcEXhDDyql6s6-tltVms3lbzKs7oBcY04_Reck6KLE_zgpb3k3OMcZlymmVnySPvP8Uro7x4mJxltOQly_h58uOD-AK9dQOqjNB3Xvmf375fjkqCRBsHIgxgAnoPzo8eCXQVhJHCSXS1td1NOlPOB_TO2WA7q1H0QWEL_whtj1ZjSG2fzq3fqSA0qqNciQ5VzsFBDD6SynxEysQgE5zqRi0cmqnWKa1FUNa8Rmvwow5-7ygMWpgAzhyeouU6LmUH9RXkS1Tb6GC1PuyvhH6cPOiF9vDkdE6S69mbTT1Pl6vLRV0t045SVqashFKWvewLynNJesaAcTotWFtwKRjBlGAgrGhZl5NCdoBx3vKWcuBUTgmlk-TF0Xfn7OcxflkzKN9B3N-AHX1D8pzSMp9Gp0lSHtHOWe8d9M3OqUG4u4bgZl9w83_BcUabY8FR-_QUM7YDyD_K341G4PkJEL4TunfCdMr_5TjjuMhI5PIjd2t1_Jf-Ro-34JotCB22MS3mYcLTDBOKpxnH6X5U0l_bfsVC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1443394810</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Waveform Analysis–Guided Treatment Versus a Standard Shock-First Protocol for the Treatment of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Presenting in Ventricular Fibrillation: Results of an International Randomized, Controlled Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Freese, John P. ; Jorgenson, Dawn B. ; Liu, Ping-Yu ; Innes, Jennifer ; Matallana, Luis ; Nammi, Krishnakant ; Donohoe, Rachael T. ; Whitbread, Mark ; Silverman, Robert A. ; Prezant, David J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Freese, John P. ; Jorgenson, Dawn B. ; Liu, Ping-Yu ; Innes, Jennifer ; Matallana, Luis ; Nammi, Krishnakant ; Donohoe, Rachael T. ; Whitbread, Mark ; Silverman, Robert A. ; Prezant, David J.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND—Ventricular fibrillation (VF) waveform properties have been shown to predict defibrillation success and outcomes among patients treated with immediate defibrillation. We postulated that a waveform analysis algorithm could be used to identify VF unlikely to respond to immediate defibrillation, allowing selective initial treatment with cardiopulmonary resuscitation in an effort to improve overall survival.
METHODS AND RESULTS—In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in 2 urban emergency medical services systems were treated with automated external defibrillators using either a VF waveform analysis algorithm or the standard shock-first protocol. The VF waveform analysis used a predefined threshold value below which return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was unlikely with immediate defibrillation, allowing selective treatment with a 2-minute interval of cardiopulmonary resuscitation before initial defibrillation. The primary end point was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary end points included ROSC, sustained ROSC, and survival to hospital admission. Of 6738 patients enrolled, 987 patients with VF of primary cardiac origin were included in the primary analysis. No immediate or long-term survival benefit was noted for either treatment algorithm (ROSC, 42.5% versus 41.2%, P=0.70; sustained ROSC, 32.4% versus 33.4%, P=0.79; survival to admission, 34.1% versus 36.4%, P=0.46; survival to hospital discharge, 15.6% versus 17.2%, P=0.55, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS—Use of a waveform analysis algorithm to guide the initial treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients presenting in VF did not improve overall survival compared with a standard shock-first protocol. Further study is recommended to examine the role of waveform analysis for the guided management of VF.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—URLhttp://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifierNCT00535106.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-7322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003273</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23979627</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CIRCAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Algorithms ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood and lymphatic vessels ; Cardiac dysrhythmias ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ; Defibrillators ; Disease Management ; Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Heart ; Humans ; International Cooperation ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - etiology ; Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - therapy ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Prospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome ; Ventricular Fibrillation - complications ; Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 2013-08, Vol.128 (9), p.995-1002</ispartof><rights>2013 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc.</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3369-69e9d9fdf5374d1f66e673856b57da610310e165b6c415dce004b7b37e73d8133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3687,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27670521$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23979627$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Freese, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jorgenson, Dawn B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ping-Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Innes, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matallana, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nammi, Krishnakant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donohoe, Rachael T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitbread, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silverman, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prezant, David J.</creatorcontrib><title>Waveform Analysis–Guided Treatment Versus a Standard Shock-First Protocol for the Treatment of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Presenting in Ventricular Fibrillation: Results of an International Randomized, Controlled Trial</title><title>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND—Ventricular fibrillation (VF) waveform properties have been shown to predict defibrillation success and outcomes among patients treated with immediate defibrillation. We postulated that a waveform analysis algorithm could be used to identify VF unlikely to respond to immediate defibrillation, allowing selective initial treatment with cardiopulmonary resuscitation in an effort to improve overall survival.
METHODS AND RESULTS—In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in 2 urban emergency medical services systems were treated with automated external defibrillators using either a VF waveform analysis algorithm or the standard shock-first protocol. The VF waveform analysis used a predefined threshold value below which return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was unlikely with immediate defibrillation, allowing selective treatment with a 2-minute interval of cardiopulmonary resuscitation before initial defibrillation. The primary end point was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary end points included ROSC, sustained ROSC, and survival to hospital admission. Of 6738 patients enrolled, 987 patients with VF of primary cardiac origin were included in the primary analysis. No immediate or long-term survival benefit was noted for either treatment algorithm (ROSC, 42.5% versus 41.2%, P=0.70; sustained ROSC, 32.4% versus 33.4%, P=0.79; survival to admission, 34.1% versus 36.4%, P=0.46; survival to hospital discharge, 15.6% versus 17.2%, P=0.55, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS—Use of a waveform analysis algorithm to guide the initial treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients presenting in VF did not improve overall survival compared with a standard shock-first protocol. Further study is recommended to examine the role of waveform analysis for the guided management of VF.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—URLhttp://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifierNCT00535106.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood and lymphatic vessels</subject><subject>Cardiac dysrhythmias</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</subject><subject>Defibrillators</subject><subject>Disease Management</subject><subject>Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>International Cooperation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - etiology</subject><subject>Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - therapy</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - complications</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0009-7322</issn><issn>1524-4539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc2O0zAUhSMEYobCKyCzQGJBBjtO7IZdFNFppYqiTgeWkRPfUDOOXWyH0bDiHXhBxJPg_vC3snz9nXNucpLkGcEXhDDyql6s6-tltVms3lbzKs7oBcY04_Reck6KLE_zgpb3k3OMcZlymmVnySPvP8Uro7x4mJxltOQly_h58uOD-AK9dQOqjNB3Xvmf375fjkqCRBsHIgxgAnoPzo8eCXQVhJHCSXS1td1NOlPOB_TO2WA7q1H0QWEL_whtj1ZjSG2fzq3fqSA0qqNciQ5VzsFBDD6SynxEysQgE5zqRi0cmqnWKa1FUNa8Rmvwow5-7ygMWpgAzhyeouU6LmUH9RXkS1Tb6GC1PuyvhH6cPOiF9vDkdE6S69mbTT1Pl6vLRV0t045SVqashFKWvewLynNJesaAcTotWFtwKRjBlGAgrGhZl5NCdoBx3vKWcuBUTgmlk-TF0Xfn7OcxflkzKN9B3N-AHX1D8pzSMp9Gp0lSHtHOWe8d9M3OqUG4u4bgZl9w83_BcUabY8FR-_QUM7YDyD_K341G4PkJEL4TunfCdMr_5TjjuMhI5PIjd2t1_Jf-Ro-34JotCB22MS3mYcLTDBOKpxnH6X5U0l_bfsVC</recordid><startdate>20130827</startdate><enddate>20130827</enddate><creator>Freese, John P.</creator><creator>Jorgenson, Dawn B.</creator><creator>Liu, Ping-Yu</creator><creator>Innes, Jennifer</creator><creator>Matallana, Luis</creator><creator>Nammi, Krishnakant</creator><creator>Donohoe, Rachael T.</creator><creator>Whitbread, Mark</creator><creator>Silverman, Robert A.</creator><creator>Prezant, David J.</creator><general>by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130827</creationdate><title>Waveform Analysis–Guided Treatment Versus a Standard Shock-First Protocol for the Treatment of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Presenting in Ventricular Fibrillation: Results of an International Randomized, Controlled Trial</title><author>Freese, John P. ; Jorgenson, Dawn B. ; Liu, Ping-Yu ; Innes, Jennifer ; Matallana, Luis ; Nammi, Krishnakant ; Donohoe, Rachael T. ; Whitbread, Mark ; Silverman, Robert A. ; Prezant, David J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3369-69e9d9fdf5374d1f66e673856b57da610310e165b6c415dce004b7b37e73d8133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood and lymphatic vessels</topic><topic>Cardiac dysrhythmias</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</topic><topic>Defibrillators</topic><topic>Disease Management</topic><topic>Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>International Cooperation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - etiology</topic><topic>Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - therapy</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - complications</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Freese, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jorgenson, Dawn B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ping-Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Innes, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matallana, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nammi, Krishnakant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donohoe, Rachael T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitbread, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silverman, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prezant, David J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Freese, John P.</au><au>Jorgenson, Dawn B.</au><au>Liu, Ping-Yu</au><au>Innes, Jennifer</au><au>Matallana, Luis</au><au>Nammi, Krishnakant</au><au>Donohoe, Rachael T.</au><au>Whitbread, Mark</au><au>Silverman, Robert A.</au><au>Prezant, David J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Waveform Analysis–Guided Treatment Versus a Standard Shock-First Protocol for the Treatment of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Presenting in Ventricular Fibrillation: Results of an International Randomized, Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><date>2013-08-27</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>995</spage><epage>1002</epage><pages>995-1002</pages><issn>0009-7322</issn><eissn>1524-4539</eissn><coden>CIRCAZ</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND—Ventricular fibrillation (VF) waveform properties have been shown to predict defibrillation success and outcomes among patients treated with immediate defibrillation. We postulated that a waveform analysis algorithm could be used to identify VF unlikely to respond to immediate defibrillation, allowing selective initial treatment with cardiopulmonary resuscitation in an effort to improve overall survival.
METHODS AND RESULTS—In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in 2 urban emergency medical services systems were treated with automated external defibrillators using either a VF waveform analysis algorithm or the standard shock-first protocol. The VF waveform analysis used a predefined threshold value below which return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was unlikely with immediate defibrillation, allowing selective treatment with a 2-minute interval of cardiopulmonary resuscitation before initial defibrillation. The primary end point was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary end points included ROSC, sustained ROSC, and survival to hospital admission. Of 6738 patients enrolled, 987 patients with VF of primary cardiac origin were included in the primary analysis. No immediate or long-term survival benefit was noted for either treatment algorithm (ROSC, 42.5% versus 41.2%, P=0.70; sustained ROSC, 32.4% versus 33.4%, P=0.79; survival to admission, 34.1% versus 36.4%, P=0.46; survival to hospital discharge, 15.6% versus 17.2%, P=0.55, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS—Use of a waveform analysis algorithm to guide the initial treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients presenting in VF did not improve overall survival compared with a standard shock-first protocol. Further study is recommended to examine the role of waveform analysis for the guided management of VF.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—URLhttp://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifierNCT00535106.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc</pub><pmid>23979627</pmid><doi>10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003273</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0009-7322 |
ispartof | Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 2013-08, Vol.128 (9), p.995-1002 |
issn | 0009-7322 1524-4539 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1443394810 |
source | MEDLINE; American Heart Association Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Algorithms Biological and medical sciences Blood and lymphatic vessels Cardiac dysrhythmias Cardiology. Vascular system Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Defibrillators Disease Management Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous Double-Blind Method Female Heart Humans International Cooperation Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - etiology Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - therapy Outcome Assessment (Health Care) Prospective Studies Survival Rate Treatment Outcome Ventricular Fibrillation - complications Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy Young Adult |
title | Waveform Analysis–Guided Treatment Versus a Standard Shock-First Protocol for the Treatment of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Presenting in Ventricular Fibrillation: Results of an International Randomized, Controlled Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A24%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Waveform%20Analysis%E2%80%93Guided%20Treatment%20Versus%20a%20Standard%20Shock-First%20Protocol%20for%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Out-of-Hospital%20Cardiac%20Arrest%20Presenting%20in%20Ventricular%20Fibrillation:%20Results%20of%20an%20International%20Randomized,%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Circulation%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Freese,%20John%20P.&rft.date=2013-08-27&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=995&rft.epage=1002&rft.pages=995-1002&rft.issn=0009-7322&rft.eissn=1524-4539&rft.coden=CIRCAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003273&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1443394810%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1443394810&rft_id=info:pmid/23979627&rfr_iscdi=true |