Phrenic nerve injury after paediatric heart surgery: is aggressive plication of the diaphragm beneficial?

OBJECTIVES Phrenic nerve injury after paediatric heart surgery is associated with significant morbidity. Surgical plication of the diaphragm is believed to be beneficial to the patient, with difficult weaning from ventilation; however, the optimal timing remains unclear. We aimed to compare the outc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery 2013-11, Vol.44 (5), p.808-812
Hauptverfasser: Georgiev, Stanimir, Konstantinov, Georgi, Latcheva, Alexandra, Mitev, Plamen, Mitev, Ivajlo, Lazarov, Stojan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 812
container_issue 5
container_start_page 808
container_title European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery
container_volume 44
creator Georgiev, Stanimir
Konstantinov, Georgi
Latcheva, Alexandra
Mitev, Plamen
Mitev, Ivajlo
Lazarov, Stojan
description OBJECTIVES Phrenic nerve injury after paediatric heart surgery is associated with significant morbidity. Surgical plication of the diaphragm is believed to be beneficial to the patient, with difficult weaning from ventilation; however, the optimal timing remains unclear. We aimed to compare the outcome after two different strategies for treating hemidiaphragmatic paresis. METHODS A retrospective analysis of all patients with paresis of the diaphragm between 2000 and 2010 was performed, with special attention to the rate of reintubations, ventilation and intensive care unit (ICU) stay and the rate of plication. In 2005, the strategy for treating diaphragmatic paresis in our institution changed from conservative treatment with plication after multiple extubation efforts towards an aggressive one with plication after a single unsuccessful extubation. We compared the outcome of all patients and that of the newborns separately from the two periods. RESULTS During the study period, 148 patients with diaphragmatic paresis were diagnosed and included. Median age at the cardiac operation was 7 months (1 day-18 years), ventilation time ranged from 4 h to 41 days (median 7 days), 42 (28.4%) of the patients required at least one reintubation and ICU stay ranged from 2 to 63 days (median 11 days). A total of 63 plications were performed-5 (9%) before 2004 and 58 (62%) after 2005, P < 0.001. There were no significant differences in the ventilation time-6 (1-40) vs 8 (0-41) days, P = 0.36, reintubation rate-28 vs 29%, P = 0.85 and ICU stay-10 (3-63) vs 12 (2-55) days, P = 0.41 between both groups. The newborn patients, treated with the different strategies, also did not differ significantly in their outcome: ventilation time-12 (2-40) vs 11.5 (3-34) days, P = 0.38; reintubation rate-43 vs 41%, P = 0.62; ICU stay-16 (6-63) vs 15 (7-55) days, P = 0.55. CONCLUSIONS Changing the strategy for phrenic nerve injury after paediatric heart surgery towards a more aggressive one with early plication of the diaphragm was not associated with the better outcome. Prospective randomized studies are needed to determine the optimal management of this complication.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ejcts/ezt110
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1443393611</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ejcts/ezt110</oup_id><sourcerecordid>1443393611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-bfd981ccacd8ae89a6f4d55cde44f3d2b968e6a0824137753a63169a8232583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtLxDAQh4Mo7vq4eZbc9GDdpElfXkQWX7CgoAdvZZpO2yx9maTC-tdb7erR0wzM9_sNfISccHbJWSIWuFbOLvDTcc52yJzHkfAiId92x51x5kWJZDNyYO2aMRYKP9onM1_IIGRczol-rgy2WtEWzQdS3a4Hs6FQODS0B8w1ODNeKwTjqB1MiWZzRbWlUJYGrdVjqK-1Aqe7lnYFdRXSMdVXBsqGZthioZWG-vqI7BVQWzzezkPycnf7unzwVk_3j8ubladEyJ2XFXkSc6VA5TFgnEBYyDwIVI5SFiL3sySMMQQW-5KLKAoEhIKHCcS-8INYHJLzqbU33fuA1qWNtgrrGlrsBptyKYVIxk98RC8mVJnOWoNF2hvdgNmknKXfatMftemkdsRPt81D1mD-B_-6HIGzCeiG_v-qL73vhXY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1443393611</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phrenic nerve injury after paediatric heart surgery: is aggressive plication of the diaphragm beneficial?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Georgiev, Stanimir ; Konstantinov, Georgi ; Latcheva, Alexandra ; Mitev, Plamen ; Mitev, Ivajlo ; Lazarov, Stojan</creator><creatorcontrib>Georgiev, Stanimir ; Konstantinov, Georgi ; Latcheva, Alexandra ; Mitev, Plamen ; Mitev, Ivajlo ; Lazarov, Stojan</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVES Phrenic nerve injury after paediatric heart surgery is associated with significant morbidity. Surgical plication of the diaphragm is believed to be beneficial to the patient, with difficult weaning from ventilation; however, the optimal timing remains unclear. We aimed to compare the outcome after two different strategies for treating hemidiaphragmatic paresis. METHODS A retrospective analysis of all patients with paresis of the diaphragm between 2000 and 2010 was performed, with special attention to the rate of reintubations, ventilation and intensive care unit (ICU) stay and the rate of plication. In 2005, the strategy for treating diaphragmatic paresis in our institution changed from conservative treatment with plication after multiple extubation efforts towards an aggressive one with plication after a single unsuccessful extubation. We compared the outcome of all patients and that of the newborns separately from the two periods. RESULTS During the study period, 148 patients with diaphragmatic paresis were diagnosed and included. Median age at the cardiac operation was 7 months (1 day-18 years), ventilation time ranged from 4 h to 41 days (median 7 days), 42 (28.4%) of the patients required at least one reintubation and ICU stay ranged from 2 to 63 days (median 11 days). A total of 63 plications were performed-5 (9%) before 2004 and 58 (62%) after 2005, P &lt; 0.001. There were no significant differences in the ventilation time-6 (1-40) vs 8 (0-41) days, P = 0.36, reintubation rate-28 vs 29%, P = 0.85 and ICU stay-10 (3-63) vs 12 (2-55) days, P = 0.41 between both groups. The newborn patients, treated with the different strategies, also did not differ significantly in their outcome: ventilation time-12 (2-40) vs 11.5 (3-34) days, P = 0.38; reintubation rate-43 vs 41%, P = 0.62; ICU stay-16 (6-63) vs 15 (7-55) days, P = 0.55. CONCLUSIONS Changing the strategy for phrenic nerve injury after paediatric heart surgery towards a more aggressive one with early plication of the diaphragm was not associated with the better outcome. Prospective randomized studies are needed to determine the optimal management of this complication.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-7940</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-734X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt110</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23456014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - methods ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Diaphragm - innervation ; Diaphragm - physiopathology ; Diaphragm - surgery ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Paresis - etiology ; Phrenic Nerve - injuries ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 2013-11, Vol.44 (5), p.808-812</ispartof><rights>The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved. 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-bfd981ccacd8ae89a6f4d55cde44f3d2b968e6a0824137753a63169a8232583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-bfd981ccacd8ae89a6f4d55cde44f3d2b968e6a0824137753a63169a8232583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23456014$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Georgiev, Stanimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konstantinov, Georgi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latcheva, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitev, Plamen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitev, Ivajlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lazarov, Stojan</creatorcontrib><title>Phrenic nerve injury after paediatric heart surgery: is aggressive plication of the diaphragm beneficial?</title><title>European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery</title><addtitle>Eur J Cardiothorac Surg</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVES Phrenic nerve injury after paediatric heart surgery is associated with significant morbidity. Surgical plication of the diaphragm is believed to be beneficial to the patient, with difficult weaning from ventilation; however, the optimal timing remains unclear. We aimed to compare the outcome after two different strategies for treating hemidiaphragmatic paresis. METHODS A retrospective analysis of all patients with paresis of the diaphragm between 2000 and 2010 was performed, with special attention to the rate of reintubations, ventilation and intensive care unit (ICU) stay and the rate of plication. In 2005, the strategy for treating diaphragmatic paresis in our institution changed from conservative treatment with plication after multiple extubation efforts towards an aggressive one with plication after a single unsuccessful extubation. We compared the outcome of all patients and that of the newborns separately from the two periods. RESULTS During the study period, 148 patients with diaphragmatic paresis were diagnosed and included. Median age at the cardiac operation was 7 months (1 day-18 years), ventilation time ranged from 4 h to 41 days (median 7 days), 42 (28.4%) of the patients required at least one reintubation and ICU stay ranged from 2 to 63 days (median 11 days). A total of 63 plications were performed-5 (9%) before 2004 and 58 (62%) after 2005, P &lt; 0.001. There were no significant differences in the ventilation time-6 (1-40) vs 8 (0-41) days, P = 0.36, reintubation rate-28 vs 29%, P = 0.85 and ICU stay-10 (3-63) vs 12 (2-55) days, P = 0.41 between both groups. The newborn patients, treated with the different strategies, also did not differ significantly in their outcome: ventilation time-12 (2-40) vs 11.5 (3-34) days, P = 0.38; reintubation rate-43 vs 41%, P = 0.62; ICU stay-16 (6-63) vs 15 (7-55) days, P = 0.55. CONCLUSIONS Changing the strategy for phrenic nerve injury after paediatric heart surgery towards a more aggressive one with early plication of the diaphragm was not associated with the better outcome. Prospective randomized studies are needed to determine the optimal management of this complication.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Diaphragm - innervation</subject><subject>Diaphragm - physiopathology</subject><subject>Diaphragm - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Paresis - etiology</subject><subject>Phrenic Nerve - injuries</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>1010-7940</issn><issn>1873-734X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtLxDAQh4Mo7vq4eZbc9GDdpElfXkQWX7CgoAdvZZpO2yx9maTC-tdb7erR0wzM9_sNfISccHbJWSIWuFbOLvDTcc52yJzHkfAiId92x51x5kWJZDNyYO2aMRYKP9onM1_IIGRczol-rgy2WtEWzQdS3a4Hs6FQODS0B8w1ODNeKwTjqB1MiWZzRbWlUJYGrdVjqK-1Aqe7lnYFdRXSMdVXBsqGZthioZWG-vqI7BVQWzzezkPycnf7unzwVk_3j8ubladEyJ2XFXkSc6VA5TFgnEBYyDwIVI5SFiL3sySMMQQW-5KLKAoEhIKHCcS-8INYHJLzqbU33fuA1qWNtgrrGlrsBptyKYVIxk98RC8mVJnOWoNF2hvdgNmknKXfatMftemkdsRPt81D1mD-B_-6HIGzCeiG_v-qL73vhXY</recordid><startdate>201311</startdate><enddate>201311</enddate><creator>Georgiev, Stanimir</creator><creator>Konstantinov, Georgi</creator><creator>Latcheva, Alexandra</creator><creator>Mitev, Plamen</creator><creator>Mitev, Ivajlo</creator><creator>Lazarov, Stojan</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201311</creationdate><title>Phrenic nerve injury after paediatric heart surgery: is aggressive plication of the diaphragm beneficial?</title><author>Georgiev, Stanimir ; Konstantinov, Georgi ; Latcheva, Alexandra ; Mitev, Plamen ; Mitev, Ivajlo ; Lazarov, Stojan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-bfd981ccacd8ae89a6f4d55cde44f3d2b968e6a0824137753a63169a8232583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Diaphragm - innervation</topic><topic>Diaphragm - physiopathology</topic><topic>Diaphragm - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Paresis - etiology</topic><topic>Phrenic Nerve - injuries</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Georgiev, Stanimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konstantinov, Georgi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latcheva, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitev, Plamen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitev, Ivajlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lazarov, Stojan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Georgiev, Stanimir</au><au>Konstantinov, Georgi</au><au>Latcheva, Alexandra</au><au>Mitev, Plamen</au><au>Mitev, Ivajlo</au><au>Lazarov, Stojan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phrenic nerve injury after paediatric heart surgery: is aggressive plication of the diaphragm beneficial?</atitle><jtitle>European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Cardiothorac Surg</addtitle><date>2013-11</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>808</spage><epage>812</epage><pages>808-812</pages><issn>1010-7940</issn><eissn>1873-734X</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVES Phrenic nerve injury after paediatric heart surgery is associated with significant morbidity. Surgical plication of the diaphragm is believed to be beneficial to the patient, with difficult weaning from ventilation; however, the optimal timing remains unclear. We aimed to compare the outcome after two different strategies for treating hemidiaphragmatic paresis. METHODS A retrospective analysis of all patients with paresis of the diaphragm between 2000 and 2010 was performed, with special attention to the rate of reintubations, ventilation and intensive care unit (ICU) stay and the rate of plication. In 2005, the strategy for treating diaphragmatic paresis in our institution changed from conservative treatment with plication after multiple extubation efforts towards an aggressive one with plication after a single unsuccessful extubation. We compared the outcome of all patients and that of the newborns separately from the two periods. RESULTS During the study period, 148 patients with diaphragmatic paresis were diagnosed and included. Median age at the cardiac operation was 7 months (1 day-18 years), ventilation time ranged from 4 h to 41 days (median 7 days), 42 (28.4%) of the patients required at least one reintubation and ICU stay ranged from 2 to 63 days (median 11 days). A total of 63 plications were performed-5 (9%) before 2004 and 58 (62%) after 2005, P &lt; 0.001. There were no significant differences in the ventilation time-6 (1-40) vs 8 (0-41) days, P = 0.36, reintubation rate-28 vs 29%, P = 0.85 and ICU stay-10 (3-63) vs 12 (2-55) days, P = 0.41 between both groups. The newborn patients, treated with the different strategies, also did not differ significantly in their outcome: ventilation time-12 (2-40) vs 11.5 (3-34) days, P = 0.38; reintubation rate-43 vs 41%, P = 0.62; ICU stay-16 (6-63) vs 15 (7-55) days, P = 0.55. CONCLUSIONS Changing the strategy for phrenic nerve injury after paediatric heart surgery towards a more aggressive one with early plication of the diaphragm was not associated with the better outcome. Prospective randomized studies are needed to determine the optimal management of this complication.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>23456014</pmid><doi>10.1093/ejcts/ezt110</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1010-7940
ispartof European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 2013-11, Vol.44 (5), p.808-812
issn 1010-7940
1873-734X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1443393611
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Cardiac Surgical Procedures - methods
Child
Child, Preschool
Diaphragm - innervation
Diaphragm - physiopathology
Diaphragm - surgery
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Paresis - etiology
Phrenic Nerve - injuries
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Retrospective Studies
title Phrenic nerve injury after paediatric heart surgery: is aggressive plication of the diaphragm beneficial?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T19%3A12%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phrenic%20nerve%20injury%20after%20paediatric%20heart%20surgery:%20is%20aggressive%20plication%20of%20the%20diaphragm%20beneficial?&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20cardio-thoracic%20surgery&rft.au=Georgiev,%20Stanimir&rft.date=2013-11&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=808&rft.epage=812&rft.pages=808-812&rft.issn=1010-7940&rft.eissn=1873-734X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ejcts/ezt110&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1443393611%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1443393611&rft_id=info:pmid/23456014&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ejcts/ezt110&rfr_iscdi=true