Periosteal Adventitia is a Valuable Bone Graft Alternative

Background Periosteal adventitia is believed to consist of fibrous tissue without any regenerative potential. This theory results in the assumption that surgically stripped periosteum which is also adventitial has no bone regeneration potential. We decided to test whether the periosteal adventitia i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of artificial organs 2013-05, Vol.36 (5), p.341-349
Hauptverfasser: Gemalmaz, Halil Can, Bolukbasi, Selcuk, Esen, Erdinc, Erdogan, Deniz, Giray, Seren Gulsen, Bardakci, Yesim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 349
container_issue 5
container_start_page 341
container_title International journal of artificial organs
container_volume 36
creator Gemalmaz, Halil Can
Bolukbasi, Selcuk
Esen, Erdinc
Erdogan, Deniz
Giray, Seren Gulsen
Bardakci, Yesim
description Background Periosteal adventitia is believed to consist of fibrous tissue without any regenerative potential. This theory results in the assumption that surgically stripped periosteum which is also adventitial has no bone regeneration potential. We decided to test whether the periosteal adventitia is osteoinductive and whether it is suitable for a commonly faced clinical situation in an animal model. Methods This study used 24 femurs from 12 rabbits, which were separated into 3 groups. Lateral femoral condylar cavitary defects were created with a 5 mm drill bit. In group I, the defects were left empty as the control. In group II, the defects were only filled with ceramic graft particles. In group III, the defects were filled with a mixture of ceramic graft particles and autogenous, adventitial, periosteal particles. All animals were sacrificed at the end of the 6th week and were evaluated histologically. Results The microscopy of 3 different histologists suggested that group III had far superior healing when compared to the control group and group II. The statistical evaluation of the histomorphometrically gathered quantitative results revealed a meaningful increase in woven bone and a decrease in fibrous tissue in group III, confirming the histological analysis. Conclusions In this study we observed that the composite graft obtained by mixing ceramics and free adventitial periosteal grafts offers healing potential surpassing both the ceramic-only group as well as the control group. We conclude that adventitial periosteal graft greatly facilitates new bone formation.
doi_str_mv 10.5301/ijao.5000228
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1443375177</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.5301_ijao.5000228</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1443375177</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-e397183b7f7f4072649f7a27167981549763b0b1e105a8e875482dc59107e7683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1LwzAYh4Mobk5vnqVHBTuT5tvbHDqFgR7Ua0i7t5KRtTNJB_73dmx6Ejy9l-d94PcgdE7wmFNMbtzStmOOMS4KdYCGRBYsF5jhQzTEVJOcaqUG6CTGJcZEMMaP0aCgQgsq-RDdvkBwbUxgfTZZbKBJLjmbuZjZ7N36zpYesru2gWwWbJ2yiU8QGpvcBk7RUW19hLP9HaG3h_vX6WM-f549TSfzvKJcpRyolkTRUtayZlgWgula2kISIbUinGkpaIlLAgRzq0BJzlSxqLgmWIIUio7Q5c67Du1nBzGZlYsVeG8baLtoCGO030Kk_B-lnElNaP8wQtc7tAptjAFqsw5uZcOXIdhsw5ptWLMP2-MXe3NXrmDxC_-U7IGrHRDtB5hl2_WVfPxb9g3dyH19</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1354791343</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Periosteal Adventitia is a Valuable Bone Graft Alternative</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Gemalmaz, Halil Can ; Bolukbasi, Selcuk ; Esen, Erdinc ; Erdogan, Deniz ; Giray, Seren Gulsen ; Bardakci, Yesim</creator><creatorcontrib>Gemalmaz, Halil Can ; Bolukbasi, Selcuk ; Esen, Erdinc ; Erdogan, Deniz ; Giray, Seren Gulsen ; Bardakci, Yesim</creatorcontrib><description>Background Periosteal adventitia is believed to consist of fibrous tissue without any regenerative potential. This theory results in the assumption that surgically stripped periosteum which is also adventitial has no bone regeneration potential. We decided to test whether the periosteal adventitia is osteoinductive and whether it is suitable for a commonly faced clinical situation in an animal model. Methods This study used 24 femurs from 12 rabbits, which were separated into 3 groups. Lateral femoral condylar cavitary defects were created with a 5 mm drill bit. In group I, the defects were left empty as the control. In group II, the defects were only filled with ceramic graft particles. In group III, the defects were filled with a mixture of ceramic graft particles and autogenous, adventitial, periosteal particles. All animals were sacrificed at the end of the 6th week and were evaluated histologically. Results The microscopy of 3 different histologists suggested that group III had far superior healing when compared to the control group and group II. The statistical evaluation of the histomorphometrically gathered quantitative results revealed a meaningful increase in woven bone and a decrease in fibrous tissue in group III, confirming the histological analysis. Conclusions In this study we observed that the composite graft obtained by mixing ceramics and free adventitial periosteal grafts offers healing potential surpassing both the ceramic-only group as well as the control group. We conclude that adventitial periosteal graft greatly facilitates new bone formation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0391-3988</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1724-6040</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5301/ijao.5000228</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23696375</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adventitia - transplantation ; Animal models ; Animals ; Bone Regeneration ; Bone Substitutes - pharmacology ; Bone Transplantation - methods ; Female ; Femur - pathology ; Femur - physiopathology ; Femur - surgery ; Male ; Models, Animal ; Osteotomy ; Periosteum - transplantation ; Rabbits ; Time Factors ; Transplantation, Autologous ; Wound Healing</subject><ispartof>International journal of artificial organs, 2013-05, Vol.36 (5), p.341-349</ispartof><rights>2013 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-e397183b7f7f4072649f7a27167981549763b0b1e105a8e875482dc59107e7683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-e397183b7f7f4072649f7a27167981549763b0b1e105a8e875482dc59107e7683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.5301/ijao.5000228$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5301/ijao.5000228$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23696375$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gemalmaz, Halil Can</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolukbasi, Selcuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esen, Erdinc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdogan, Deniz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giray, Seren Gulsen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bardakci, Yesim</creatorcontrib><title>Periosteal Adventitia is a Valuable Bone Graft Alternative</title><title>International journal of artificial organs</title><addtitle>Int J Artif Organs</addtitle><description>Background Periosteal adventitia is believed to consist of fibrous tissue without any regenerative potential. This theory results in the assumption that surgically stripped periosteum which is also adventitial has no bone regeneration potential. We decided to test whether the periosteal adventitia is osteoinductive and whether it is suitable for a commonly faced clinical situation in an animal model. Methods This study used 24 femurs from 12 rabbits, which were separated into 3 groups. Lateral femoral condylar cavitary defects were created with a 5 mm drill bit. In group I, the defects were left empty as the control. In group II, the defects were only filled with ceramic graft particles. In group III, the defects were filled with a mixture of ceramic graft particles and autogenous, adventitial, periosteal particles. All animals were sacrificed at the end of the 6th week and were evaluated histologically. Results The microscopy of 3 different histologists suggested that group III had far superior healing when compared to the control group and group II. The statistical evaluation of the histomorphometrically gathered quantitative results revealed a meaningful increase in woven bone and a decrease in fibrous tissue in group III, confirming the histological analysis. Conclusions In this study we observed that the composite graft obtained by mixing ceramics and free adventitial periosteal grafts offers healing potential surpassing both the ceramic-only group as well as the control group. We conclude that adventitial periosteal graft greatly facilitates new bone formation.</description><subject>Adventitia - transplantation</subject><subject>Animal models</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bone Regeneration</subject><subject>Bone Substitutes - pharmacology</subject><subject>Bone Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur - pathology</subject><subject>Femur - physiopathology</subject><subject>Femur - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Animal</subject><subject>Osteotomy</subject><subject>Periosteum - transplantation</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Transplantation, Autologous</subject><subject>Wound Healing</subject><issn>0391-3988</issn><issn>1724-6040</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1LwzAYh4Mobk5vnqVHBTuT5tvbHDqFgR7Ua0i7t5KRtTNJB_73dmx6Ejy9l-d94PcgdE7wmFNMbtzStmOOMS4KdYCGRBYsF5jhQzTEVJOcaqUG6CTGJcZEMMaP0aCgQgsq-RDdvkBwbUxgfTZZbKBJLjmbuZjZ7N36zpYesru2gWwWbJ2yiU8QGpvcBk7RUW19hLP9HaG3h_vX6WM-f549TSfzvKJcpRyolkTRUtayZlgWgula2kISIbUinGkpaIlLAgRzq0BJzlSxqLgmWIIUio7Q5c67Du1nBzGZlYsVeG8baLtoCGO030Kk_B-lnElNaP8wQtc7tAptjAFqsw5uZcOXIdhsw5ptWLMP2-MXe3NXrmDxC_-U7IGrHRDtB5hl2_WVfPxb9g3dyH19</recordid><startdate>20130501</startdate><enddate>20130501</enddate><creator>Gemalmaz, Halil Can</creator><creator>Bolukbasi, Selcuk</creator><creator>Esen, Erdinc</creator><creator>Erdogan, Deniz</creator><creator>Giray, Seren Gulsen</creator><creator>Bardakci, Yesim</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130501</creationdate><title>Periosteal Adventitia is a Valuable Bone Graft Alternative</title><author>Gemalmaz, Halil Can ; Bolukbasi, Selcuk ; Esen, Erdinc ; Erdogan, Deniz ; Giray, Seren Gulsen ; Bardakci, Yesim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-e397183b7f7f4072649f7a27167981549763b0b1e105a8e875482dc59107e7683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adventitia - transplantation</topic><topic>Animal models</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bone Regeneration</topic><topic>Bone Substitutes - pharmacology</topic><topic>Bone Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur - pathology</topic><topic>Femur - physiopathology</topic><topic>Femur - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Animal</topic><topic>Osteotomy</topic><topic>Periosteum - transplantation</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Transplantation, Autologous</topic><topic>Wound Healing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gemalmaz, Halil Can</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolukbasi, Selcuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esen, Erdinc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdogan, Deniz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giray, Seren Gulsen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bardakci, Yesim</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of artificial organs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gemalmaz, Halil Can</au><au>Bolukbasi, Selcuk</au><au>Esen, Erdinc</au><au>Erdogan, Deniz</au><au>Giray, Seren Gulsen</au><au>Bardakci, Yesim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Periosteal Adventitia is a Valuable Bone Graft Alternative</atitle><jtitle>International journal of artificial organs</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Artif Organs</addtitle><date>2013-05-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>341</spage><epage>349</epage><pages>341-349</pages><issn>0391-3988</issn><eissn>1724-6040</eissn><abstract>Background Periosteal adventitia is believed to consist of fibrous tissue without any regenerative potential. This theory results in the assumption that surgically stripped periosteum which is also adventitial has no bone regeneration potential. We decided to test whether the periosteal adventitia is osteoinductive and whether it is suitable for a commonly faced clinical situation in an animal model. Methods This study used 24 femurs from 12 rabbits, which were separated into 3 groups. Lateral femoral condylar cavitary defects were created with a 5 mm drill bit. In group I, the defects were left empty as the control. In group II, the defects were only filled with ceramic graft particles. In group III, the defects were filled with a mixture of ceramic graft particles and autogenous, adventitial, periosteal particles. All animals were sacrificed at the end of the 6th week and were evaluated histologically. Results The microscopy of 3 different histologists suggested that group III had far superior healing when compared to the control group and group II. The statistical evaluation of the histomorphometrically gathered quantitative results revealed a meaningful increase in woven bone and a decrease in fibrous tissue in group III, confirming the histological analysis. Conclusions In this study we observed that the composite graft obtained by mixing ceramics and free adventitial periosteal grafts offers healing potential surpassing both the ceramic-only group as well as the control group. We conclude that adventitial periosteal graft greatly facilitates new bone formation.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>23696375</pmid><doi>10.5301/ijao.5000228</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0391-3988
ispartof International journal of artificial organs, 2013-05, Vol.36 (5), p.341-349
issn 0391-3988
1724-6040
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1443375177
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete
subjects Adventitia - transplantation
Animal models
Animals
Bone Regeneration
Bone Substitutes - pharmacology
Bone Transplantation - methods
Female
Femur - pathology
Femur - physiopathology
Femur - surgery
Male
Models, Animal
Osteotomy
Periosteum - transplantation
Rabbits
Time Factors
Transplantation, Autologous
Wound Healing
title Periosteal Adventitia is a Valuable Bone Graft Alternative
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T23%3A41%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Periosteal%20Adventitia%20is%20a%20Valuable%20Bone%20Graft%20Alternative&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20artificial%20organs&rft.au=Gemalmaz,%20Halil%20Can&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=341&rft.epage=349&rft.pages=341-349&rft.issn=0391-3988&rft.eissn=1724-6040&rft_id=info:doi/10.5301/ijao.5000228&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1443375177%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1354791343&rft_id=info:pmid/23696375&rft_sage_id=10.5301_ijao.5000228&rfr_iscdi=true