Periosteal Adventitia is a Valuable Bone Graft Alternative
Background Periosteal adventitia is believed to consist of fibrous tissue without any regenerative potential. This theory results in the assumption that surgically stripped periosteum which is also adventitial has no bone regeneration potential. We decided to test whether the periosteal adventitia i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of artificial organs 2013-05, Vol.36 (5), p.341-349 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 349 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 341 |
container_title | International journal of artificial organs |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Gemalmaz, Halil Can Bolukbasi, Selcuk Esen, Erdinc Erdogan, Deniz Giray, Seren Gulsen Bardakci, Yesim |
description | Background
Periosteal adventitia is believed to consist of fibrous tissue without any regenerative potential. This theory results in the assumption that surgically stripped periosteum which is also adventitial has no bone regeneration potential. We decided to test whether the periosteal adventitia is osteoinductive and whether it is suitable for a commonly faced clinical situation in an animal model.
Methods
This study used 24 femurs from 12 rabbits, which were separated into 3 groups. Lateral femoral condylar cavitary defects were created with a 5 mm drill bit. In group I, the defects were left empty as the control. In group II, the defects were only filled with ceramic graft particles. In group III, the defects were filled with a mixture of ceramic graft particles and autogenous, adventitial, periosteal particles. All animals were sacrificed at the end of the 6th week and were evaluated histologically.
Results
The microscopy of 3 different histologists suggested that group III had far superior healing when compared to the control group and group II. The statistical evaluation of the histomorphometrically gathered quantitative results revealed a meaningful increase in woven bone and a decrease in fibrous tissue in group III, confirming the histological analysis.
Conclusions
In this study we observed that the composite graft obtained by mixing ceramics and free adventitial periosteal grafts offers healing potential surpassing both the ceramic-only group as well as the control group. We conclude that adventitial periosteal graft greatly facilitates new bone formation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5301/ijao.5000228 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1443375177</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.5301_ijao.5000228</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1443375177</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-e397183b7f7f4072649f7a27167981549763b0b1e105a8e875482dc59107e7683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1LwzAYh4Mobk5vnqVHBTuT5tvbHDqFgR7Ua0i7t5KRtTNJB_73dmx6Ejy9l-d94PcgdE7wmFNMbtzStmOOMS4KdYCGRBYsF5jhQzTEVJOcaqUG6CTGJcZEMMaP0aCgQgsq-RDdvkBwbUxgfTZZbKBJLjmbuZjZ7N36zpYesru2gWwWbJ2yiU8QGpvcBk7RUW19hLP9HaG3h_vX6WM-f549TSfzvKJcpRyolkTRUtayZlgWgula2kISIbUinGkpaIlLAgRzq0BJzlSxqLgmWIIUio7Q5c67Du1nBzGZlYsVeG8baLtoCGO030Kk_B-lnElNaP8wQtc7tAptjAFqsw5uZcOXIdhsw5ptWLMP2-MXe3NXrmDxC_-U7IGrHRDtB5hl2_WVfPxb9g3dyH19</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1354791343</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Periosteal Adventitia is a Valuable Bone Graft Alternative</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Gemalmaz, Halil Can ; Bolukbasi, Selcuk ; Esen, Erdinc ; Erdogan, Deniz ; Giray, Seren Gulsen ; Bardakci, Yesim</creator><creatorcontrib>Gemalmaz, Halil Can ; Bolukbasi, Selcuk ; Esen, Erdinc ; Erdogan, Deniz ; Giray, Seren Gulsen ; Bardakci, Yesim</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Periosteal adventitia is believed to consist of fibrous tissue without any regenerative potential. This theory results in the assumption that surgically stripped periosteum which is also adventitial has no bone regeneration potential. We decided to test whether the periosteal adventitia is osteoinductive and whether it is suitable for a commonly faced clinical situation in an animal model.
Methods
This study used 24 femurs from 12 rabbits, which were separated into 3 groups. Lateral femoral condylar cavitary defects were created with a 5 mm drill bit. In group I, the defects were left empty as the control. In group II, the defects were only filled with ceramic graft particles. In group III, the defects were filled with a mixture of ceramic graft particles and autogenous, adventitial, periosteal particles. All animals were sacrificed at the end of the 6th week and were evaluated histologically.
Results
The microscopy of 3 different histologists suggested that group III had far superior healing when compared to the control group and group II. The statistical evaluation of the histomorphometrically gathered quantitative results revealed a meaningful increase in woven bone and a decrease in fibrous tissue in group III, confirming the histological analysis.
Conclusions
In this study we observed that the composite graft obtained by mixing ceramics and free adventitial periosteal grafts offers healing potential surpassing both the ceramic-only group as well as the control group. We conclude that adventitial periosteal graft greatly facilitates new bone formation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0391-3988</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1724-6040</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5301/ijao.5000228</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23696375</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adventitia - transplantation ; Animal models ; Animals ; Bone Regeneration ; Bone Substitutes - pharmacology ; Bone Transplantation - methods ; Female ; Femur - pathology ; Femur - physiopathology ; Femur - surgery ; Male ; Models, Animal ; Osteotomy ; Periosteum - transplantation ; Rabbits ; Time Factors ; Transplantation, Autologous ; Wound Healing</subject><ispartof>International journal of artificial organs, 2013-05, Vol.36 (5), p.341-349</ispartof><rights>2013 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-e397183b7f7f4072649f7a27167981549763b0b1e105a8e875482dc59107e7683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-e397183b7f7f4072649f7a27167981549763b0b1e105a8e875482dc59107e7683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.5301/ijao.5000228$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5301/ijao.5000228$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23696375$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gemalmaz, Halil Can</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolukbasi, Selcuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esen, Erdinc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdogan, Deniz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giray, Seren Gulsen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bardakci, Yesim</creatorcontrib><title>Periosteal Adventitia is a Valuable Bone Graft Alternative</title><title>International journal of artificial organs</title><addtitle>Int J Artif Organs</addtitle><description>Background
Periosteal adventitia is believed to consist of fibrous tissue without any regenerative potential. This theory results in the assumption that surgically stripped periosteum which is also adventitial has no bone regeneration potential. We decided to test whether the periosteal adventitia is osteoinductive and whether it is suitable for a commonly faced clinical situation in an animal model.
Methods
This study used 24 femurs from 12 rabbits, which were separated into 3 groups. Lateral femoral condylar cavitary defects were created with a 5 mm drill bit. In group I, the defects were left empty as the control. In group II, the defects were only filled with ceramic graft particles. In group III, the defects were filled with a mixture of ceramic graft particles and autogenous, adventitial, periosteal particles. All animals were sacrificed at the end of the 6th week and were evaluated histologically.
Results
The microscopy of 3 different histologists suggested that group III had far superior healing when compared to the control group and group II. The statistical evaluation of the histomorphometrically gathered quantitative results revealed a meaningful increase in woven bone and a decrease in fibrous tissue in group III, confirming the histological analysis.
Conclusions
In this study we observed that the composite graft obtained by mixing ceramics and free adventitial periosteal grafts offers healing potential surpassing both the ceramic-only group as well as the control group. We conclude that adventitial periosteal graft greatly facilitates new bone formation.</description><subject>Adventitia - transplantation</subject><subject>Animal models</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bone Regeneration</subject><subject>Bone Substitutes - pharmacology</subject><subject>Bone Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur - pathology</subject><subject>Femur - physiopathology</subject><subject>Femur - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Animal</subject><subject>Osteotomy</subject><subject>Periosteum - transplantation</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Transplantation, Autologous</subject><subject>Wound Healing</subject><issn>0391-3988</issn><issn>1724-6040</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1LwzAYh4Mobk5vnqVHBTuT5tvbHDqFgR7Ua0i7t5KRtTNJB_73dmx6Ejy9l-d94PcgdE7wmFNMbtzStmOOMS4KdYCGRBYsF5jhQzTEVJOcaqUG6CTGJcZEMMaP0aCgQgsq-RDdvkBwbUxgfTZZbKBJLjmbuZjZ7N36zpYesru2gWwWbJ2yiU8QGpvcBk7RUW19hLP9HaG3h_vX6WM-f549TSfzvKJcpRyolkTRUtayZlgWgula2kISIbUinGkpaIlLAgRzq0BJzlSxqLgmWIIUio7Q5c67Du1nBzGZlYsVeG8baLtoCGO030Kk_B-lnElNaP8wQtc7tAptjAFqsw5uZcOXIdhsw5ptWLMP2-MXe3NXrmDxC_-U7IGrHRDtB5hl2_WVfPxb9g3dyH19</recordid><startdate>20130501</startdate><enddate>20130501</enddate><creator>Gemalmaz, Halil Can</creator><creator>Bolukbasi, Selcuk</creator><creator>Esen, Erdinc</creator><creator>Erdogan, Deniz</creator><creator>Giray, Seren Gulsen</creator><creator>Bardakci, Yesim</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130501</creationdate><title>Periosteal Adventitia is a Valuable Bone Graft Alternative</title><author>Gemalmaz, Halil Can ; Bolukbasi, Selcuk ; Esen, Erdinc ; Erdogan, Deniz ; Giray, Seren Gulsen ; Bardakci, Yesim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-e397183b7f7f4072649f7a27167981549763b0b1e105a8e875482dc59107e7683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adventitia - transplantation</topic><topic>Animal models</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bone Regeneration</topic><topic>Bone Substitutes - pharmacology</topic><topic>Bone Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur - pathology</topic><topic>Femur - physiopathology</topic><topic>Femur - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Animal</topic><topic>Osteotomy</topic><topic>Periosteum - transplantation</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Transplantation, Autologous</topic><topic>Wound Healing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gemalmaz, Halil Can</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolukbasi, Selcuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esen, Erdinc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdogan, Deniz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giray, Seren Gulsen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bardakci, Yesim</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of artificial organs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gemalmaz, Halil Can</au><au>Bolukbasi, Selcuk</au><au>Esen, Erdinc</au><au>Erdogan, Deniz</au><au>Giray, Seren Gulsen</au><au>Bardakci, Yesim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Periosteal Adventitia is a Valuable Bone Graft Alternative</atitle><jtitle>International journal of artificial organs</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Artif Organs</addtitle><date>2013-05-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>341</spage><epage>349</epage><pages>341-349</pages><issn>0391-3988</issn><eissn>1724-6040</eissn><abstract>Background
Periosteal adventitia is believed to consist of fibrous tissue without any regenerative potential. This theory results in the assumption that surgically stripped periosteum which is also adventitial has no bone regeneration potential. We decided to test whether the periosteal adventitia is osteoinductive and whether it is suitable for a commonly faced clinical situation in an animal model.
Methods
This study used 24 femurs from 12 rabbits, which were separated into 3 groups. Lateral femoral condylar cavitary defects were created with a 5 mm drill bit. In group I, the defects were left empty as the control. In group II, the defects were only filled with ceramic graft particles. In group III, the defects were filled with a mixture of ceramic graft particles and autogenous, adventitial, periosteal particles. All animals were sacrificed at the end of the 6th week and were evaluated histologically.
Results
The microscopy of 3 different histologists suggested that group III had far superior healing when compared to the control group and group II. The statistical evaluation of the histomorphometrically gathered quantitative results revealed a meaningful increase in woven bone and a decrease in fibrous tissue in group III, confirming the histological analysis.
Conclusions
In this study we observed that the composite graft obtained by mixing ceramics and free adventitial periosteal grafts offers healing potential surpassing both the ceramic-only group as well as the control group. We conclude that adventitial periosteal graft greatly facilitates new bone formation.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>23696375</pmid><doi>10.5301/ijao.5000228</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0391-3988 |
ispartof | International journal of artificial organs, 2013-05, Vol.36 (5), p.341-349 |
issn | 0391-3988 1724-6040 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1443375177 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete |
subjects | Adventitia - transplantation Animal models Animals Bone Regeneration Bone Substitutes - pharmacology Bone Transplantation - methods Female Femur - pathology Femur - physiopathology Femur - surgery Male Models, Animal Osteotomy Periosteum - transplantation Rabbits Time Factors Transplantation, Autologous Wound Healing |
title | Periosteal Adventitia is a Valuable Bone Graft Alternative |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T23%3A41%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Periosteal%20Adventitia%20is%20a%20Valuable%20Bone%20Graft%20Alternative&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20artificial%20organs&rft.au=Gemalmaz,%20Halil%20Can&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=341&rft.epage=349&rft.pages=341-349&rft.issn=0391-3988&rft.eissn=1724-6040&rft_id=info:doi/10.5301/ijao.5000228&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1443375177%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1354791343&rft_id=info:pmid/23696375&rft_sage_id=10.5301_ijao.5000228&rfr_iscdi=true |