Treatment decisions based on egg scouting for tomato fruitworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), reduce insecticide use in tomato

Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a tomato fruitworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), management program where insecticide application was made only when fruitworm eggs were detected on tomato foliage. Fruit damage and number of insecticide applications were compared betwee...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Crop protection 1995-12, Vol.14 (8), p.683-687
Hauptverfasser: Zehnder, G.W., Sikora, E.J., Goodman, W.R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 687
container_issue 8
container_start_page 683
container_title Crop protection
container_volume 14
creator Zehnder, G.W.
Sikora, E.J.
Goodman, W.R.
description Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a tomato fruitworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), management program where insecticide application was made only when fruitworm eggs were detected on tomato foliage. Fruit damage and number of insecticide applications were compared between the egg scouting program and a standard fruitworm management program where insecticides were applied on a weekly schedule. On average, 59 and 43% fewer insecticide applications (for esfenvalerate and Bacillus thuringiensis, respectively) were required in the egg scouting program, compared with the weekly spray program, without any reduction in marketable yield. The average seasonal insecticide cost savings associated with the use of the egg scouting program were $US109.33 and $US93.33 per ha for esfenvalerate and B. thuringiensis, respectively. When scouting was used, average net returns, considering machinery and labor costs, were $US146.45 and $US164.33 per ha higher for esfenvalerate and B. thuringiensis, respectively.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0261-2194(95)00032-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14411262</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0261219495000321</els_id><sourcerecordid>14411262</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-8aeef27da3d216361157b485bed61c8601bc24da56234081c19cd5312e163e3d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFFLwzAUhYMoOKf_wIc8yQar5iZt174IOtQJA1_mc8iS2xFZm5mkE_frbd3w0afLhe8cOB8h18BugUF-x3gOCYcyHZXZmDEmeAInZADFVCR5ydJTMvhDzslFCB8dxIXgA7JfelSxxiZSg9oG65pAVyqgoa6huF7ToF0bbbOmlfM0ulpFRyvf2vjlfD2hc9xY7Xbot4ruUdHRozPG4nhCPZpWI7VNQB2ttgZpG_r_2HJJziq1CXh1vEPy_vy0nM2TxdvL6-xhkWghspgUCrHiU6OE4ZCLHCCbrtIiW6HJQRc5g5XmqVFZzkXKCtBQapMJ4NjRKIwYkptD79a7zxZDlLUNGjcb1aBrg4Q0BeBdekjSA6i9C8FjJbfe1sp_S2CyFy17i7K3KMtM_oqW0MXuDzHsRuwsehm0xUajsb5bLo2z_xf8AId8hWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14411262</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treatment decisions based on egg scouting for tomato fruitworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), reduce insecticide use in tomato</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Zehnder, G.W. ; Sikora, E.J. ; Goodman, W.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zehnder, G.W. ; Sikora, E.J. ; Goodman, W.R.</creatorcontrib><description>Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a tomato fruitworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), management program where insecticide application was made only when fruitworm eggs were detected on tomato foliage. Fruit damage and number of insecticide applications were compared between the egg scouting program and a standard fruitworm management program where insecticides were applied on a weekly schedule. On average, 59 and 43% fewer insecticide applications (for esfenvalerate and Bacillus thuringiensis, respectively) were required in the egg scouting program, compared with the weekly spray program, without any reduction in marketable yield. The average seasonal insecticide cost savings associated with the use of the egg scouting program were $US109.33 and $US93.33 per ha for esfenvalerate and B. thuringiensis, respectively. When scouting was used, average net returns, considering machinery and labor costs, were $US146.45 and $US164.33 per ha higher for esfenvalerate and B. thuringiensis, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-2194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6904</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0261-2194(95)00032-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>cost ; Helicoverpa zea ; insecticide treatment ; scouting ; tomato ; tomato fruitworm</subject><ispartof>Crop protection, 1995-12, Vol.14 (8), p.683-687</ispartof><rights>1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-8aeef27da3d216361157b485bed61c8601bc24da56234081c19cd5312e163e3d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-8aeef27da3d216361157b485bed61c8601bc24da56234081c19cd5312e163e3d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0261-2194(95)00032-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zehnder, G.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sikora, E.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodman, W.R.</creatorcontrib><title>Treatment decisions based on egg scouting for tomato fruitworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), reduce insecticide use in tomato</title><title>Crop protection</title><description>Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a tomato fruitworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), management program where insecticide application was made only when fruitworm eggs were detected on tomato foliage. Fruit damage and number of insecticide applications were compared between the egg scouting program and a standard fruitworm management program where insecticides were applied on a weekly schedule. On average, 59 and 43% fewer insecticide applications (for esfenvalerate and Bacillus thuringiensis, respectively) were required in the egg scouting program, compared with the weekly spray program, without any reduction in marketable yield. The average seasonal insecticide cost savings associated with the use of the egg scouting program were $US109.33 and $US93.33 per ha for esfenvalerate and B. thuringiensis, respectively. When scouting was used, average net returns, considering machinery and labor costs, were $US146.45 and $US164.33 per ha higher for esfenvalerate and B. thuringiensis, respectively.</description><subject>cost</subject><subject>Helicoverpa zea</subject><subject>insecticide treatment</subject><subject>scouting</subject><subject>tomato</subject><subject>tomato fruitworm</subject><issn>0261-2194</issn><issn>1873-6904</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kFFLwzAUhYMoOKf_wIc8yQar5iZt174IOtQJA1_mc8iS2xFZm5mkE_frbd3w0afLhe8cOB8h18BugUF-x3gOCYcyHZXZmDEmeAInZADFVCR5ydJTMvhDzslFCB8dxIXgA7JfelSxxiZSg9oG65pAVyqgoa6huF7ToF0bbbOmlfM0ulpFRyvf2vjlfD2hc9xY7Xbot4ruUdHRozPG4nhCPZpWI7VNQB2ttgZpG_r_2HJJziq1CXh1vEPy_vy0nM2TxdvL6-xhkWghspgUCrHiU6OE4ZCLHCCbrtIiW6HJQRc5g5XmqVFZzkXKCtBQapMJ4NjRKIwYkptD79a7zxZDlLUNGjcb1aBrg4Q0BeBdekjSA6i9C8FjJbfe1sp_S2CyFy17i7K3KMtM_oqW0MXuDzHsRuwsehm0xUajsb5bLo2z_xf8AId8hWg</recordid><startdate>19951201</startdate><enddate>19951201</enddate><creator>Zehnder, G.W.</creator><creator>Sikora, E.J.</creator><creator>Goodman, W.R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19951201</creationdate><title>Treatment decisions based on egg scouting for tomato fruitworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), reduce insecticide use in tomato</title><author>Zehnder, G.W. ; Sikora, E.J. ; Goodman, W.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-8aeef27da3d216361157b485bed61c8601bc24da56234081c19cd5312e163e3d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>cost</topic><topic>Helicoverpa zea</topic><topic>insecticide treatment</topic><topic>scouting</topic><topic>tomato</topic><topic>tomato fruitworm</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zehnder, G.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sikora, E.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodman, W.R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Crop protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zehnder, G.W.</au><au>Sikora, E.J.</au><au>Goodman, W.R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treatment decisions based on egg scouting for tomato fruitworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), reduce insecticide use in tomato</atitle><jtitle>Crop protection</jtitle><date>1995-12-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>683</spage><epage>687</epage><pages>683-687</pages><issn>0261-2194</issn><eissn>1873-6904</eissn><abstract>Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a tomato fruitworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), management program where insecticide application was made only when fruitworm eggs were detected on tomato foliage. Fruit damage and number of insecticide applications were compared between the egg scouting program and a standard fruitworm management program where insecticides were applied on a weekly schedule. On average, 59 and 43% fewer insecticide applications (for esfenvalerate and Bacillus thuringiensis, respectively) were required in the egg scouting program, compared with the weekly spray program, without any reduction in marketable yield. The average seasonal insecticide cost savings associated with the use of the egg scouting program were $US109.33 and $US93.33 per ha for esfenvalerate and B. thuringiensis, respectively. When scouting was used, average net returns, considering machinery and labor costs, were $US146.45 and $US164.33 per ha higher for esfenvalerate and B. thuringiensis, respectively.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0261-2194(95)00032-1</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0261-2194
ispartof Crop protection, 1995-12, Vol.14 (8), p.683-687
issn 0261-2194
1873-6904
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14411262
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects cost
Helicoverpa zea
insecticide treatment
scouting
tomato
tomato fruitworm
title Treatment decisions based on egg scouting for tomato fruitworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), reduce insecticide use in tomato
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T18%3A42%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment%20decisions%20based%20on%20egg%20scouting%20for%20tomato%20fruitworm,%20Helicoverpa%20zea%20(Boddie),%20reduce%20insecticide%20use%20in%20tomato&rft.jtitle=Crop%20protection&rft.au=Zehnder,%20G.W.&rft.date=1995-12-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=683&rft.epage=687&rft.pages=683-687&rft.issn=0261-2194&rft.eissn=1873-6904&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0261-2194(95)00032-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14411262%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14411262&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0261219495000321&rfr_iscdi=true