Treatment decisions based on egg scouting for tomato fruitworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), reduce insecticide use in tomato
Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a tomato fruitworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), management program where insecticide application was made only when fruitworm eggs were detected on tomato foliage. Fruit damage and number of insecticide applications were compared betwee...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Crop protection 1995-12, Vol.14 (8), p.683-687 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 687 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 683 |
container_title | Crop protection |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Zehnder, G.W. Sikora, E.J. Goodman, W.R. |
description | Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a tomato fruitworm,
Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), management program where insecticide application was made only when fruitworm eggs were detected on tomato foliage. Fruit damage and number of insecticide applications were compared between the egg scouting program and a standard fruitworm management program where insecticides were applied on a weekly schedule. On average, 59 and 43% fewer insecticide applications (for esfenvalerate and
Bacillus thuringiensis, respectively) were required in the egg scouting program, compared with the weekly spray program, without any reduction in marketable yield. The average seasonal insecticide cost savings associated with the use of the egg scouting program were $US109.33 and $US93.33 per ha for esfenvalerate and
B. thuringiensis, respectively. When scouting was used, average net returns, considering machinery and labor costs, were $US146.45 and $US164.33 per ha higher for esfenvalerate and
B. thuringiensis, respectively. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0261-2194(95)00032-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14411262</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0261219495000321</els_id><sourcerecordid>14411262</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-8aeef27da3d216361157b485bed61c8601bc24da56234081c19cd5312e163e3d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFFLwzAUhYMoOKf_wIc8yQar5iZt174IOtQJA1_mc8iS2xFZm5mkE_frbd3w0afLhe8cOB8h18BugUF-x3gOCYcyHZXZmDEmeAInZADFVCR5ydJTMvhDzslFCB8dxIXgA7JfelSxxiZSg9oG65pAVyqgoa6huF7ToF0bbbOmlfM0ulpFRyvf2vjlfD2hc9xY7Xbot4ruUdHRozPG4nhCPZpWI7VNQB2ttgZpG_r_2HJJziq1CXh1vEPy_vy0nM2TxdvL6-xhkWghspgUCrHiU6OE4ZCLHCCbrtIiW6HJQRc5g5XmqVFZzkXKCtBQapMJ4NjRKIwYkptD79a7zxZDlLUNGjcb1aBrg4Q0BeBdekjSA6i9C8FjJbfe1sp_S2CyFy17i7K3KMtM_oqW0MXuDzHsRuwsehm0xUajsb5bLo2z_xf8AId8hWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14411262</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treatment decisions based on egg scouting for tomato fruitworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), reduce insecticide use in tomato</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Zehnder, G.W. ; Sikora, E.J. ; Goodman, W.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zehnder, G.W. ; Sikora, E.J. ; Goodman, W.R.</creatorcontrib><description>Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a tomato fruitworm,
Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), management program where insecticide application was made only when fruitworm eggs were detected on tomato foliage. Fruit damage and number of insecticide applications were compared between the egg scouting program and a standard fruitworm management program where insecticides were applied on a weekly schedule. On average, 59 and 43% fewer insecticide applications (for esfenvalerate and
Bacillus thuringiensis, respectively) were required in the egg scouting program, compared with the weekly spray program, without any reduction in marketable yield. The average seasonal insecticide cost savings associated with the use of the egg scouting program were $US109.33 and $US93.33 per ha for esfenvalerate and
B. thuringiensis, respectively. When scouting was used, average net returns, considering machinery and labor costs, were $US146.45 and $US164.33 per ha higher for esfenvalerate and
B. thuringiensis, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-2194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6904</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0261-2194(95)00032-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>cost ; Helicoverpa zea ; insecticide treatment ; scouting ; tomato ; tomato fruitworm</subject><ispartof>Crop protection, 1995-12, Vol.14 (8), p.683-687</ispartof><rights>1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-8aeef27da3d216361157b485bed61c8601bc24da56234081c19cd5312e163e3d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-8aeef27da3d216361157b485bed61c8601bc24da56234081c19cd5312e163e3d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0261-2194(95)00032-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zehnder, G.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sikora, E.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodman, W.R.</creatorcontrib><title>Treatment decisions based on egg scouting for tomato fruitworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), reduce insecticide use in tomato</title><title>Crop protection</title><description>Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a tomato fruitworm,
Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), management program where insecticide application was made only when fruitworm eggs were detected on tomato foliage. Fruit damage and number of insecticide applications were compared between the egg scouting program and a standard fruitworm management program where insecticides were applied on a weekly schedule. On average, 59 and 43% fewer insecticide applications (for esfenvalerate and
Bacillus thuringiensis, respectively) were required in the egg scouting program, compared with the weekly spray program, without any reduction in marketable yield. The average seasonal insecticide cost savings associated with the use of the egg scouting program were $US109.33 and $US93.33 per ha for esfenvalerate and
B. thuringiensis, respectively. When scouting was used, average net returns, considering machinery and labor costs, were $US146.45 and $US164.33 per ha higher for esfenvalerate and
B. thuringiensis, respectively.</description><subject>cost</subject><subject>Helicoverpa zea</subject><subject>insecticide treatment</subject><subject>scouting</subject><subject>tomato</subject><subject>tomato fruitworm</subject><issn>0261-2194</issn><issn>1873-6904</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kFFLwzAUhYMoOKf_wIc8yQar5iZt174IOtQJA1_mc8iS2xFZm5mkE_frbd3w0afLhe8cOB8h18BugUF-x3gOCYcyHZXZmDEmeAInZADFVCR5ydJTMvhDzslFCB8dxIXgA7JfelSxxiZSg9oG65pAVyqgoa6huF7ToF0bbbOmlfM0ulpFRyvf2vjlfD2hc9xY7Xbot4ruUdHRozPG4nhCPZpWI7VNQB2ttgZpG_r_2HJJziq1CXh1vEPy_vy0nM2TxdvL6-xhkWghspgUCrHiU6OE4ZCLHCCbrtIiW6HJQRc5g5XmqVFZzkXKCtBQapMJ4NjRKIwYkptD79a7zxZDlLUNGjcb1aBrg4Q0BeBdekjSA6i9C8FjJbfe1sp_S2CyFy17i7K3KMtM_oqW0MXuDzHsRuwsehm0xUajsb5bLo2z_xf8AId8hWg</recordid><startdate>19951201</startdate><enddate>19951201</enddate><creator>Zehnder, G.W.</creator><creator>Sikora, E.J.</creator><creator>Goodman, W.R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19951201</creationdate><title>Treatment decisions based on egg scouting for tomato fruitworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), reduce insecticide use in tomato</title><author>Zehnder, G.W. ; Sikora, E.J. ; Goodman, W.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-8aeef27da3d216361157b485bed61c8601bc24da56234081c19cd5312e163e3d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>cost</topic><topic>Helicoverpa zea</topic><topic>insecticide treatment</topic><topic>scouting</topic><topic>tomato</topic><topic>tomato fruitworm</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zehnder, G.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sikora, E.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodman, W.R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Crop protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zehnder, G.W.</au><au>Sikora, E.J.</au><au>Goodman, W.R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treatment decisions based on egg scouting for tomato fruitworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), reduce insecticide use in tomato</atitle><jtitle>Crop protection</jtitle><date>1995-12-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>683</spage><epage>687</epage><pages>683-687</pages><issn>0261-2194</issn><eissn>1873-6904</eissn><abstract>Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a tomato fruitworm,
Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), management program where insecticide application was made only when fruitworm eggs were detected on tomato foliage. Fruit damage and number of insecticide applications were compared between the egg scouting program and a standard fruitworm management program where insecticides were applied on a weekly schedule. On average, 59 and 43% fewer insecticide applications (for esfenvalerate and
Bacillus thuringiensis, respectively) were required in the egg scouting program, compared with the weekly spray program, without any reduction in marketable yield. The average seasonal insecticide cost savings associated with the use of the egg scouting program were $US109.33 and $US93.33 per ha for esfenvalerate and
B. thuringiensis, respectively. When scouting was used, average net returns, considering machinery and labor costs, were $US146.45 and $US164.33 per ha higher for esfenvalerate and
B. thuringiensis, respectively.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0261-2194(95)00032-1</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0261-2194 |
ispartof | Crop protection, 1995-12, Vol.14 (8), p.683-687 |
issn | 0261-2194 1873-6904 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14411262 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | cost Helicoverpa zea insecticide treatment scouting tomato tomato fruitworm |
title | Treatment decisions based on egg scouting for tomato fruitworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), reduce insecticide use in tomato |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T18%3A42%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment%20decisions%20based%20on%20egg%20scouting%20for%20tomato%20fruitworm,%20Helicoverpa%20zea%20(Boddie),%20reduce%20insecticide%20use%20in%20tomato&rft.jtitle=Crop%20protection&rft.au=Zehnder,%20G.W.&rft.date=1995-12-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=683&rft.epage=687&rft.pages=683-687&rft.issn=0261-2194&rft.eissn=1873-6904&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0261-2194(95)00032-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14411262%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14411262&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0261219495000321&rfr_iscdi=true |