Is the use of the cervical vertebrae maturation method justified to determine skeletal age? A comparison of radiation dose of two strategies for skeletal age estimation
The aim of this study was to assess effective doses of a lateral cephalogram radiograph with and without thyroid shield and compare the differences with the radiation dose of a hand-wrist radiograph. Thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed at 19 different sites in the head and neck of a tissue-equi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of orthodontics 2013-10, Vol.35 (5), p.604-609 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 609 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 604 |
container_title | European journal of orthodontics |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Patcas, Raphael Signorelli, Luca Peltomäki, Timo Schätzle, Marc |
description | The aim of this study was to assess effective doses of a lateral cephalogram radiograph with and without thyroid shield and compare the differences with the radiation dose of a hand-wrist radiograph. Thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed at 19 different sites in the head and neck of a tissue-equivalent human skull (RANDO phantom). Analogue lateral cephalograms with and without thyroid shield (67 kV, 250 mA, 10 mAs) and hand-wrist radiographs (40 kV, 250 mA, 10 mAs) were obtained. The effective doses were calculated using the 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations. The effective dose for conventional lateral cephalogram without a thyroid shield was 5.03 microsieverts (µSv). By applying a thyroid shield to the RANDO phantom, a remarkable dose reduction of 1.73 µSv could be achieved. The effective dose of a conventional hand-wrist radiograph was calculated to be 0.16 µSv. Adding the effective dose of the hand-wrist radiograph to the effective dose of the lateral cephalogram with thyroid shield resulted in a cumulative effective dose of 3.46 µSv. Without thyroid shield, the effective dose of a lateral cephalogram was approximately 1.5-fold increased than the cumulative effective dose of a hand-wrist radiograph and a lateral cephalogram with thyroid shield. Thyroid is an organ that is very sensitive to radiation exposure. Its shielding will significantly reduce the effective dose. An additional hand-wrist radiograph, involving no vulnerable tissues, however, causes very little radiation risk. In accordance with the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle, if an evaluation of skeletal age is indicated, an additional hand-wrist radiograph seems much more justifiable than removing the thyroid shield. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ejo/cjs043 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1437582181</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1437582181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-24fbb924b725321650a1bc24a63a53cbe02adfd7b5831438a8983711c6c5b8803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkctKAzEYhYMotlY3PoBkKcLYXGY66UpK8VIouNH1kGT-aTPONDXJVHwjH9PYqYKr_IvzfSdwELqk5JaSKR9Dbce69iTlR2hI0wlJGKPkGA0JTWmScZEP0Jn3NSGEizQ_RQPGBBMkF0P0tfA4rAF3HrCt9qcGtzNaNngHLoByEnArQ-dkMHaDWwhrW-K688FUBkocLC4hgGvNBrB_gwZCZOUK7vAMa9tupTM-gtHuZGl6S2kPfR8W-xDVsDLgcWXdPwWG2NLukXN0UsnGw8XhHaHXh_uX-VOyfH5czGfLRHPGQ8LSSqkpS1XOMs7oJCOSKs1SOeEy41oBYbKsylxlgtOUCymmgueU6onOlBCEj9B17906-97F_qI1XkPTyA3YzhcRyjPBqKAxetNHtbPeO6iKrYu_dZ8FJcXPMkVcpuiXieGrg7dTLZR_0d8p-Df7XY1o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1437582181</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is the use of the cervical vertebrae maturation method justified to determine skeletal age? A comparison of radiation dose of two strategies for skeletal age estimation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Patcas, Raphael ; Signorelli, Luca ; Peltomäki, Timo ; Schätzle, Marc</creator><creatorcontrib>Patcas, Raphael ; Signorelli, Luca ; Peltomäki, Timo ; Schätzle, Marc</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to assess effective doses of a lateral cephalogram radiograph with and without thyroid shield and compare the differences with the radiation dose of a hand-wrist radiograph. Thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed at 19 different sites in the head and neck of a tissue-equivalent human skull (RANDO phantom). Analogue lateral cephalograms with and without thyroid shield (67 kV, 250 mA, 10 mAs) and hand-wrist radiographs (40 kV, 250 mA, 10 mAs) were obtained. The effective doses were calculated using the 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations. The effective dose for conventional lateral cephalogram without a thyroid shield was 5.03 microsieverts (µSv). By applying a thyroid shield to the RANDO phantom, a remarkable dose reduction of 1.73 µSv could be achieved. The effective dose of a conventional hand-wrist radiograph was calculated to be 0.16 µSv. Adding the effective dose of the hand-wrist radiograph to the effective dose of the lateral cephalogram with thyroid shield resulted in a cumulative effective dose of 3.46 µSv. Without thyroid shield, the effective dose of a lateral cephalogram was approximately 1.5-fold increased than the cumulative effective dose of a hand-wrist radiograph and a lateral cephalogram with thyroid shield. Thyroid is an organ that is very sensitive to radiation exposure. Its shielding will significantly reduce the effective dose. An additional hand-wrist radiograph, involving no vulnerable tissues, however, causes very little radiation risk. In accordance with the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle, if an evaluation of skeletal age is indicated, an additional hand-wrist radiograph seems much more justifiable than removing the thyroid shield.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-5387</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjs043</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22828078</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Age Determination by Skeleton - methods ; Age Factors ; Cephalometry - methods ; Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging ; Dentistry ; Head - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Male ; Neck - diagnostic imaging ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation Protection - instrumentation ; Thyroid Gland - radiation effects</subject><ispartof>European journal of orthodontics, 2013-10, Vol.35 (5), p.604-609</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-24fbb924b725321650a1bc24a63a53cbe02adfd7b5831438a8983711c6c5b8803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-24fbb924b725321650a1bc24a63a53cbe02adfd7b5831438a8983711c6c5b8803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22828078$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Patcas, Raphael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Signorelli, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peltomäki, Timo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schätzle, Marc</creatorcontrib><title>Is the use of the cervical vertebrae maturation method justified to determine skeletal age? A comparison of radiation dose of two strategies for skeletal age estimation</title><title>European journal of orthodontics</title><addtitle>Eur J Orthod</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to assess effective doses of a lateral cephalogram radiograph with and without thyroid shield and compare the differences with the radiation dose of a hand-wrist radiograph. Thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed at 19 different sites in the head and neck of a tissue-equivalent human skull (RANDO phantom). Analogue lateral cephalograms with and without thyroid shield (67 kV, 250 mA, 10 mAs) and hand-wrist radiographs (40 kV, 250 mA, 10 mAs) were obtained. The effective doses were calculated using the 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations. The effective dose for conventional lateral cephalogram without a thyroid shield was 5.03 microsieverts (µSv). By applying a thyroid shield to the RANDO phantom, a remarkable dose reduction of 1.73 µSv could be achieved. The effective dose of a conventional hand-wrist radiograph was calculated to be 0.16 µSv. Adding the effective dose of the hand-wrist radiograph to the effective dose of the lateral cephalogram with thyroid shield resulted in a cumulative effective dose of 3.46 µSv. Without thyroid shield, the effective dose of a lateral cephalogram was approximately 1.5-fold increased than the cumulative effective dose of a hand-wrist radiograph and a lateral cephalogram with thyroid shield. Thyroid is an organ that is very sensitive to radiation exposure. Its shielding will significantly reduce the effective dose. An additional hand-wrist radiograph, involving no vulnerable tissues, however, causes very little radiation risk. In accordance with the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle, if an evaluation of skeletal age is indicated, an additional hand-wrist radiograph seems much more justifiable than removing the thyroid shield.</description><subject>Age Determination by Skeleton - methods</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Cephalometry - methods</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Head - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neck - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation Protection - instrumentation</subject><subject>Thyroid Gland - radiation effects</subject><issn>0141-5387</issn><issn>1460-2210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkctKAzEYhYMotlY3PoBkKcLYXGY66UpK8VIouNH1kGT-aTPONDXJVHwjH9PYqYKr_IvzfSdwELqk5JaSKR9Dbce69iTlR2hI0wlJGKPkGA0JTWmScZEP0Jn3NSGEizQ_RQPGBBMkF0P0tfA4rAF3HrCt9qcGtzNaNngHLoByEnArQ-dkMHaDWwhrW-K688FUBkocLC4hgGvNBrB_gwZCZOUK7vAMa9tupTM-gtHuZGl6S2kPfR8W-xDVsDLgcWXdPwWG2NLukXN0UsnGw8XhHaHXh_uX-VOyfH5czGfLRHPGQ8LSSqkpS1XOMs7oJCOSKs1SOeEy41oBYbKsylxlgtOUCymmgueU6onOlBCEj9B17906-97F_qI1XkPTyA3YzhcRyjPBqKAxetNHtbPeO6iKrYu_dZ8FJcXPMkVcpuiXieGrg7dTLZR_0d8p-Df7XY1o</recordid><startdate>201310</startdate><enddate>201310</enddate><creator>Patcas, Raphael</creator><creator>Signorelli, Luca</creator><creator>Peltomäki, Timo</creator><creator>Schätzle, Marc</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201310</creationdate><title>Is the use of the cervical vertebrae maturation method justified to determine skeletal age? A comparison of radiation dose of two strategies for skeletal age estimation</title><author>Patcas, Raphael ; Signorelli, Luca ; Peltomäki, Timo ; Schätzle, Marc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-24fbb924b725321650a1bc24a63a53cbe02adfd7b5831438a8983711c6c5b8803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Age Determination by Skeleton - methods</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Cephalometry - methods</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Head - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neck - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation Protection - instrumentation</topic><topic>Thyroid Gland - radiation effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Patcas, Raphael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Signorelli, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peltomäki, Timo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schätzle, Marc</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of orthodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Patcas, Raphael</au><au>Signorelli, Luca</au><au>Peltomäki, Timo</au><au>Schätzle, Marc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is the use of the cervical vertebrae maturation method justified to determine skeletal age? A comparison of radiation dose of two strategies for skeletal age estimation</atitle><jtitle>European journal of orthodontics</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Orthod</addtitle><date>2013-10</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>604</spage><epage>609</epage><pages>604-609</pages><issn>0141-5387</issn><eissn>1460-2210</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to assess effective doses of a lateral cephalogram radiograph with and without thyroid shield and compare the differences with the radiation dose of a hand-wrist radiograph. Thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed at 19 different sites in the head and neck of a tissue-equivalent human skull (RANDO phantom). Analogue lateral cephalograms with and without thyroid shield (67 kV, 250 mA, 10 mAs) and hand-wrist radiographs (40 kV, 250 mA, 10 mAs) were obtained. The effective doses were calculated using the 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations. The effective dose for conventional lateral cephalogram without a thyroid shield was 5.03 microsieverts (µSv). By applying a thyroid shield to the RANDO phantom, a remarkable dose reduction of 1.73 µSv could be achieved. The effective dose of a conventional hand-wrist radiograph was calculated to be 0.16 µSv. Adding the effective dose of the hand-wrist radiograph to the effective dose of the lateral cephalogram with thyroid shield resulted in a cumulative effective dose of 3.46 µSv. Without thyroid shield, the effective dose of a lateral cephalogram was approximately 1.5-fold increased than the cumulative effective dose of a hand-wrist radiograph and a lateral cephalogram with thyroid shield. Thyroid is an organ that is very sensitive to radiation exposure. Its shielding will significantly reduce the effective dose. An additional hand-wrist radiograph, involving no vulnerable tissues, however, causes very little radiation risk. In accordance with the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle, if an evaluation of skeletal age is indicated, an additional hand-wrist radiograph seems much more justifiable than removing the thyroid shield.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>22828078</pmid><doi>10.1093/ejo/cjs043</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0141-5387 |
ispartof | European journal of orthodontics, 2013-10, Vol.35 (5), p.604-609 |
issn | 0141-5387 1460-2210 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1437582181 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Age Determination by Skeleton - methods Age Factors Cephalometry - methods Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging Dentistry Head - diagnostic imaging Humans Male Neck - diagnostic imaging Phantoms, Imaging Radiation Dosage Radiation Protection - instrumentation Thyroid Gland - radiation effects |
title | Is the use of the cervical vertebrae maturation method justified to determine skeletal age? A comparison of radiation dose of two strategies for skeletal age estimation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T04%3A04%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20the%20use%20of%20the%20cervical%20vertebrae%20maturation%20method%20justified%20to%20determine%20skeletal%20age?%20A%20comparison%20of%20radiation%20dose%20of%20two%20strategies%20for%20skeletal%20age%20estimation&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20orthodontics&rft.au=Patcas,%20Raphael&rft.date=2013-10&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=604&rft.epage=609&rft.pages=604-609&rft.issn=0141-5387&rft.eissn=1460-2210&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjs043&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1437582181%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1437582181&rft_id=info:pmid/22828078&rfr_iscdi=true |