Is the use of the cervical vertebrae maturation method justified to determine skeletal age? A comparison of radiation dose of two strategies for skeletal age estimation

The aim of this study was to assess effective doses of a lateral cephalogram radiograph with and without thyroid shield and compare the differences with the radiation dose of a hand-wrist radiograph. Thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed at 19 different sites in the head and neck of a tissue-equi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of orthodontics 2013-10, Vol.35 (5), p.604-609
Hauptverfasser: Patcas, Raphael, Signorelli, Luca, Peltomäki, Timo, Schätzle, Marc
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 609
container_issue 5
container_start_page 604
container_title European journal of orthodontics
container_volume 35
creator Patcas, Raphael
Signorelli, Luca
Peltomäki, Timo
Schätzle, Marc
description The aim of this study was to assess effective doses of a lateral cephalogram radiograph with and without thyroid shield and compare the differences with the radiation dose of a hand-wrist radiograph. Thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed at 19 different sites in the head and neck of a tissue-equivalent human skull (RANDO phantom). Analogue lateral cephalograms with and without thyroid shield (67 kV, 250 mA, 10 mAs) and hand-wrist radiographs (40 kV, 250 mA, 10 mAs) were obtained. The effective doses were calculated using the 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations. The effective dose for conventional lateral cephalogram without a thyroid shield was 5.03 microsieverts (µSv). By applying a thyroid shield to the RANDO phantom, a remarkable dose reduction of 1.73 µSv could be achieved. The effective dose of a conventional hand-wrist radiograph was calculated to be 0.16 µSv. Adding the effective dose of the hand-wrist radiograph to the effective dose of the lateral cephalogram with thyroid shield resulted in a cumulative effective dose of 3.46 µSv. Without thyroid shield, the effective dose of a lateral cephalogram was approximately 1.5-fold increased than the cumulative effective dose of a hand-wrist radiograph and a lateral cephalogram with thyroid shield. Thyroid is an organ that is very sensitive to radiation exposure. Its shielding will significantly reduce the effective dose. An additional hand-wrist radiograph, involving no vulnerable tissues, however, causes very little radiation risk. In accordance with the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle, if an evaluation of skeletal age is indicated, an additional hand-wrist radiograph seems much more justifiable than removing the thyroid shield.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ejo/cjs043
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1437582181</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1437582181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-24fbb924b725321650a1bc24a63a53cbe02adfd7b5831438a8983711c6c5b8803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkctKAzEYhYMotlY3PoBkKcLYXGY66UpK8VIouNH1kGT-aTPONDXJVHwjH9PYqYKr_IvzfSdwELqk5JaSKR9Dbce69iTlR2hI0wlJGKPkGA0JTWmScZEP0Jn3NSGEizQ_RQPGBBMkF0P0tfA4rAF3HrCt9qcGtzNaNngHLoByEnArQ-dkMHaDWwhrW-K688FUBkocLC4hgGvNBrB_gwZCZOUK7vAMa9tupTM-gtHuZGl6S2kPfR8W-xDVsDLgcWXdPwWG2NLukXN0UsnGw8XhHaHXh_uX-VOyfH5czGfLRHPGQ8LSSqkpS1XOMs7oJCOSKs1SOeEy41oBYbKsylxlgtOUCymmgueU6onOlBCEj9B17906-97F_qI1XkPTyA3YzhcRyjPBqKAxetNHtbPeO6iKrYu_dZ8FJcXPMkVcpuiXieGrg7dTLZR_0d8p-Df7XY1o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1437582181</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is the use of the cervical vertebrae maturation method justified to determine skeletal age? A comparison of radiation dose of two strategies for skeletal age estimation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Patcas, Raphael ; Signorelli, Luca ; Peltomäki, Timo ; Schätzle, Marc</creator><creatorcontrib>Patcas, Raphael ; Signorelli, Luca ; Peltomäki, Timo ; Schätzle, Marc</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to assess effective doses of a lateral cephalogram radiograph with and without thyroid shield and compare the differences with the radiation dose of a hand-wrist radiograph. Thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed at 19 different sites in the head and neck of a tissue-equivalent human skull (RANDO phantom). Analogue lateral cephalograms with and without thyroid shield (67 kV, 250 mA, 10 mAs) and hand-wrist radiographs (40 kV, 250 mA, 10 mAs) were obtained. The effective doses were calculated using the 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations. The effective dose for conventional lateral cephalogram without a thyroid shield was 5.03 microsieverts (µSv). By applying a thyroid shield to the RANDO phantom, a remarkable dose reduction of 1.73 µSv could be achieved. The effective dose of a conventional hand-wrist radiograph was calculated to be 0.16 µSv. Adding the effective dose of the hand-wrist radiograph to the effective dose of the lateral cephalogram with thyroid shield resulted in a cumulative effective dose of 3.46 µSv. Without thyroid shield, the effective dose of a lateral cephalogram was approximately 1.5-fold increased than the cumulative effective dose of a hand-wrist radiograph and a lateral cephalogram with thyroid shield. Thyroid is an organ that is very sensitive to radiation exposure. Its shielding will significantly reduce the effective dose. An additional hand-wrist radiograph, involving no vulnerable tissues, however, causes very little radiation risk. In accordance with the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle, if an evaluation of skeletal age is indicated, an additional hand-wrist radiograph seems much more justifiable than removing the thyroid shield.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-5387</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjs043</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22828078</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Age Determination by Skeleton - methods ; Age Factors ; Cephalometry - methods ; Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging ; Dentistry ; Head - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Male ; Neck - diagnostic imaging ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation Protection - instrumentation ; Thyroid Gland - radiation effects</subject><ispartof>European journal of orthodontics, 2013-10, Vol.35 (5), p.604-609</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-24fbb924b725321650a1bc24a63a53cbe02adfd7b5831438a8983711c6c5b8803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-24fbb924b725321650a1bc24a63a53cbe02adfd7b5831438a8983711c6c5b8803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22828078$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Patcas, Raphael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Signorelli, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peltomäki, Timo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schätzle, Marc</creatorcontrib><title>Is the use of the cervical vertebrae maturation method justified to determine skeletal age? A comparison of radiation dose of two strategies for skeletal age estimation</title><title>European journal of orthodontics</title><addtitle>Eur J Orthod</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to assess effective doses of a lateral cephalogram radiograph with and without thyroid shield and compare the differences with the radiation dose of a hand-wrist radiograph. Thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed at 19 different sites in the head and neck of a tissue-equivalent human skull (RANDO phantom). Analogue lateral cephalograms with and without thyroid shield (67 kV, 250 mA, 10 mAs) and hand-wrist radiographs (40 kV, 250 mA, 10 mAs) were obtained. The effective doses were calculated using the 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations. The effective dose for conventional lateral cephalogram without a thyroid shield was 5.03 microsieverts (µSv). By applying a thyroid shield to the RANDO phantom, a remarkable dose reduction of 1.73 µSv could be achieved. The effective dose of a conventional hand-wrist radiograph was calculated to be 0.16 µSv. Adding the effective dose of the hand-wrist radiograph to the effective dose of the lateral cephalogram with thyroid shield resulted in a cumulative effective dose of 3.46 µSv. Without thyroid shield, the effective dose of a lateral cephalogram was approximately 1.5-fold increased than the cumulative effective dose of a hand-wrist radiograph and a lateral cephalogram with thyroid shield. Thyroid is an organ that is very sensitive to radiation exposure. Its shielding will significantly reduce the effective dose. An additional hand-wrist radiograph, involving no vulnerable tissues, however, causes very little radiation risk. In accordance with the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle, if an evaluation of skeletal age is indicated, an additional hand-wrist radiograph seems much more justifiable than removing the thyroid shield.</description><subject>Age Determination by Skeleton - methods</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Cephalometry - methods</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Head - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neck - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation Protection - instrumentation</subject><subject>Thyroid Gland - radiation effects</subject><issn>0141-5387</issn><issn>1460-2210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkctKAzEYhYMotlY3PoBkKcLYXGY66UpK8VIouNH1kGT-aTPONDXJVHwjH9PYqYKr_IvzfSdwELqk5JaSKR9Dbce69iTlR2hI0wlJGKPkGA0JTWmScZEP0Jn3NSGEizQ_RQPGBBMkF0P0tfA4rAF3HrCt9qcGtzNaNngHLoByEnArQ-dkMHaDWwhrW-K688FUBkocLC4hgGvNBrB_gwZCZOUK7vAMa9tupTM-gtHuZGl6S2kPfR8W-xDVsDLgcWXdPwWG2NLukXN0UsnGw8XhHaHXh_uX-VOyfH5czGfLRHPGQ8LSSqkpS1XOMs7oJCOSKs1SOeEy41oBYbKsylxlgtOUCymmgueU6onOlBCEj9B17906-97F_qI1XkPTyA3YzhcRyjPBqKAxetNHtbPeO6iKrYu_dZ8FJcXPMkVcpuiXieGrg7dTLZR_0d8p-Df7XY1o</recordid><startdate>201310</startdate><enddate>201310</enddate><creator>Patcas, Raphael</creator><creator>Signorelli, Luca</creator><creator>Peltomäki, Timo</creator><creator>Schätzle, Marc</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201310</creationdate><title>Is the use of the cervical vertebrae maturation method justified to determine skeletal age? A comparison of radiation dose of two strategies for skeletal age estimation</title><author>Patcas, Raphael ; Signorelli, Luca ; Peltomäki, Timo ; Schätzle, Marc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-24fbb924b725321650a1bc24a63a53cbe02adfd7b5831438a8983711c6c5b8803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Age Determination by Skeleton - methods</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Cephalometry - methods</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Head - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neck - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation Protection - instrumentation</topic><topic>Thyroid Gland - radiation effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Patcas, Raphael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Signorelli, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peltomäki, Timo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schätzle, Marc</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of orthodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Patcas, Raphael</au><au>Signorelli, Luca</au><au>Peltomäki, Timo</au><au>Schätzle, Marc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is the use of the cervical vertebrae maturation method justified to determine skeletal age? A comparison of radiation dose of two strategies for skeletal age estimation</atitle><jtitle>European journal of orthodontics</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Orthod</addtitle><date>2013-10</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>604</spage><epage>609</epage><pages>604-609</pages><issn>0141-5387</issn><eissn>1460-2210</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to assess effective doses of a lateral cephalogram radiograph with and without thyroid shield and compare the differences with the radiation dose of a hand-wrist radiograph. Thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed at 19 different sites in the head and neck of a tissue-equivalent human skull (RANDO phantom). Analogue lateral cephalograms with and without thyroid shield (67 kV, 250 mA, 10 mAs) and hand-wrist radiographs (40 kV, 250 mA, 10 mAs) were obtained. The effective doses were calculated using the 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations. The effective dose for conventional lateral cephalogram without a thyroid shield was 5.03 microsieverts (µSv). By applying a thyroid shield to the RANDO phantom, a remarkable dose reduction of 1.73 µSv could be achieved. The effective dose of a conventional hand-wrist radiograph was calculated to be 0.16 µSv. Adding the effective dose of the hand-wrist radiograph to the effective dose of the lateral cephalogram with thyroid shield resulted in a cumulative effective dose of 3.46 µSv. Without thyroid shield, the effective dose of a lateral cephalogram was approximately 1.5-fold increased than the cumulative effective dose of a hand-wrist radiograph and a lateral cephalogram with thyroid shield. Thyroid is an organ that is very sensitive to radiation exposure. Its shielding will significantly reduce the effective dose. An additional hand-wrist radiograph, involving no vulnerable tissues, however, causes very little radiation risk. In accordance with the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle, if an evaluation of skeletal age is indicated, an additional hand-wrist radiograph seems much more justifiable than removing the thyroid shield.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>22828078</pmid><doi>10.1093/ejo/cjs043</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0141-5387
ispartof European journal of orthodontics, 2013-10, Vol.35 (5), p.604-609
issn 0141-5387
1460-2210
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1437582181
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Age Determination by Skeleton - methods
Age Factors
Cephalometry - methods
Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging
Dentistry
Head - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Male
Neck - diagnostic imaging
Phantoms, Imaging
Radiation Dosage
Radiation Protection - instrumentation
Thyroid Gland - radiation effects
title Is the use of the cervical vertebrae maturation method justified to determine skeletal age? A comparison of radiation dose of two strategies for skeletal age estimation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T04%3A04%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20the%20use%20of%20the%20cervical%20vertebrae%20maturation%20method%20justified%20to%20determine%20skeletal%20age?%20A%20comparison%20of%20radiation%20dose%20of%20two%20strategies%20for%20skeletal%20age%20estimation&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20orthodontics&rft.au=Patcas,%20Raphael&rft.date=2013-10&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=604&rft.epage=609&rft.pages=604-609&rft.issn=0141-5387&rft.eissn=1460-2210&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjs043&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1437582181%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1437582181&rft_id=info:pmid/22828078&rfr_iscdi=true