Review of Whole-Organism Bioassays: Soil, Freshwater Sediment, and Freshwater Assessment in Canada
Whole organism bioassays for the assessment of soil, freshwater sediment, and freshwater quality were evaluated for their application in the assessment and remediation of contaminated sites in Canada under the National Contaminated Sites Remediation Program. Using 3 essential and 12 desirable method...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecotoxicology and environmental safety 1995-04, Vol.30 (3), p.221-251 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 251 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 221 |
container_title | Ecotoxicology and environmental safety |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Keddy, C.J. Greene, J.C. Bonnell, M.A. |
description | Whole organism bioassays for the assessment of soil, freshwater sediment, and freshwater quality were evaluated for their application in the assessment and remediation of contaminated sites in Canada under the National Contaminated Sites Remediation Program. Using 3 essential and 12 desirable methodological criteria, bioassays were categorized as currently usable, prototype, or under development. Based on further considerations related to bioassay application, a battery of usable screening and definitive tests was recommended (with suggestions for augmentation) for each medium. Of the 18 bioassays reviewed for soil quality assessment, 6 were usable, 5 were prototypes, and 7 were under development. Battery screening and definitive tests included 14-day Eisenia andrei survival, 120-hr lettuce and radish seedling emergence, and 72-hr Selenastrum capricornutum growth inhibition. Augmentation with the following bioassays was recommended: soil/freshwater bacterial growth, arthropod reproduction, earthworm reproduction, and reproduction of other soil-dependent organisms. Of the 9 bioassays reviewed for freshwater sediment quality assessment, 1 was usable, 2 were prototypes, and 6 were under development. Three bioassays in the latter two groups were considered usable with the imminent completion of research underway. Screening tests selected included 10-day Chironomus tentans survival, 10-day Hyalella Aztec survival, 10-day Hexagenia spp. survival, and 72-hr S. capricornutum growth inhibition. Definitive tests included screening tests, substituting 28-day H. azteca sexual maturation for 10-day survival. Augmentation with the following bioassays was recommended: sediment/freshwater bacterial test, 28-day Tubifex tubifex reproduction, and rooted aquatic plant growth. Of the 25 bioassays considered for freshwater quality assessment, 8 were usable, 7 were prototypes, and 10 were under development. Screening tests selected included 72-hr S. capricornutum growth inhibition; 48-hr Daphnia sp. survival, and 5- and 15-min Photobacterium phosphoreum bioluminescence. Definitive tests included first screening test, 7-day Ceriodaphnia dubia, 7-day fathead minnow larval survival, or 96-hr rainbow trout survival. Augmentation with the following bioassays was recommended: Brachionus calyciflorus 24-hr survival, 48-hr reproduction; freshwater bacterial growth; and aquatic vascular plant growth. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1006/eesa.1995.1027 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14371474</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0147651385710275</els_id><sourcerecordid>14371474</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-1005ddf40db12d629a9d7ff81eaeaf99203d3823041288d98a7b40c5112ad263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ElLBDEQBeAgio7L1ZuQk6fpMVtv3nRwA0FQwWOo6VRrpBdN9Sj-e9PMIF7EUwjv5UE-xg6lmEkhshNEgpksyzReVb7BJlKUIlFGmk02EdLkSZZKvcN2iV6FEFqk6TbbzlMjtc4nbHGPHx4_eV_zp5e-weQuPEPnqeXnvgci-KJT_tD7ZsovA9LLJwwY-AM632I3TDl07ndwRoREY8R9x-fQgYN9tlVDQ3iwPvfY4-XF4_w6ub27upmf3SaVltmQxN-kztVGuIVULlMllC6v60IiINRlqYR2ulBaGKmKwpUF5AsjqlRKBU5leo8dr2bfQv--RBps66nCpoEO-yVZaXQeOcz_RZ1FHVHE4mxVrEJPFLC2b8G3EL6sFHbEtyO-HfHtiB8fHK2Xl4sW3U99rR3zYpVjZIjswVLlsauiZsBqsK73f01_A2NukpE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>13654108</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Review of Whole-Organism Bioassays: Soil, Freshwater Sediment, and Freshwater Assessment in Canada</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Keddy, C.J. ; Greene, J.C. ; Bonnell, M.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Keddy, C.J. ; Greene, J.C. ; Bonnell, M.A.</creatorcontrib><description>Whole organism bioassays for the assessment of soil, freshwater sediment, and freshwater quality were evaluated for their application in the assessment and remediation of contaminated sites in Canada under the National Contaminated Sites Remediation Program. Using 3 essential and 12 desirable methodological criteria, bioassays were categorized as currently usable, prototype, or under development. Based on further considerations related to bioassay application, a battery of usable screening and definitive tests was recommended (with suggestions for augmentation) for each medium. Of the 18 bioassays reviewed for soil quality assessment, 6 were usable, 5 were prototypes, and 7 were under development. Battery screening and definitive tests included 14-day Eisenia andrei survival, 120-hr lettuce and radish seedling emergence, and 72-hr Selenastrum capricornutum growth inhibition. Augmentation with the following bioassays was recommended: soil/freshwater bacterial growth, arthropod reproduction, earthworm reproduction, and reproduction of other soil-dependent organisms. Of the 9 bioassays reviewed for freshwater sediment quality assessment, 1 was usable, 2 were prototypes, and 6 were under development. Three bioassays in the latter two groups were considered usable with the imminent completion of research underway. Screening tests selected included 10-day Chironomus tentans survival, 10-day Hyalella Aztec survival, 10-day Hexagenia spp. survival, and 72-hr S. capricornutum growth inhibition. Definitive tests included screening tests, substituting 28-day H. azteca sexual maturation for 10-day survival. Augmentation with the following bioassays was recommended: sediment/freshwater bacterial test, 28-day Tubifex tubifex reproduction, and rooted aquatic plant growth. Of the 25 bioassays considered for freshwater quality assessment, 8 were usable, 7 were prototypes, and 10 were under development. Screening tests selected included 72-hr S. capricornutum growth inhibition; 48-hr Daphnia sp. survival, and 5- and 15-min Photobacterium phosphoreum bioluminescence. Definitive tests included first screening test, 7-day Ceriodaphnia dubia, 7-day fathead minnow larval survival, or 96-hr rainbow trout survival. Augmentation with the following bioassays was recommended: Brachionus calyciflorus 24-hr survival, 48-hr reproduction; freshwater bacterial growth; and aquatic vascular plant growth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-6513</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2414</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/eesa.1995.1027</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7541337</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Arthropods - growth & development ; Bacteria - growth & development ; Biological Assay - methods ; Canada ; Eukaryota - growth & development ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Fishes - growth & development ; Helminths - growth & development ; Plant Development ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Soil Microbiology ; Soil Pollutants - analysis ; Toxicity Tests ; Water Microbiology ; Water Pollution, Chemical - analysis</subject><ispartof>Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 1995-04, Vol.30 (3), p.221-251</ispartof><rights>1995 Academic Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-1005ddf40db12d629a9d7ff81eaeaf99203d3823041288d98a7b40c5112ad263</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147651385710275$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7541337$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keddy, C.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnell, M.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Review of Whole-Organism Bioassays: Soil, Freshwater Sediment, and Freshwater Assessment in Canada</title><title>Ecotoxicology and environmental safety</title><addtitle>Ecotoxicol Environ Saf</addtitle><description>Whole organism bioassays for the assessment of soil, freshwater sediment, and freshwater quality were evaluated for their application in the assessment and remediation of contaminated sites in Canada under the National Contaminated Sites Remediation Program. Using 3 essential and 12 desirable methodological criteria, bioassays were categorized as currently usable, prototype, or under development. Based on further considerations related to bioassay application, a battery of usable screening and definitive tests was recommended (with suggestions for augmentation) for each medium. Of the 18 bioassays reviewed for soil quality assessment, 6 were usable, 5 were prototypes, and 7 were under development. Battery screening and definitive tests included 14-day Eisenia andrei survival, 120-hr lettuce and radish seedling emergence, and 72-hr Selenastrum capricornutum growth inhibition. Augmentation with the following bioassays was recommended: soil/freshwater bacterial growth, arthropod reproduction, earthworm reproduction, and reproduction of other soil-dependent organisms. Of the 9 bioassays reviewed for freshwater sediment quality assessment, 1 was usable, 2 were prototypes, and 6 were under development. Three bioassays in the latter two groups were considered usable with the imminent completion of research underway. Screening tests selected included 10-day Chironomus tentans survival, 10-day Hyalella Aztec survival, 10-day Hexagenia spp. survival, and 72-hr S. capricornutum growth inhibition. Definitive tests included screening tests, substituting 28-day H. azteca sexual maturation for 10-day survival. Augmentation with the following bioassays was recommended: sediment/freshwater bacterial test, 28-day Tubifex tubifex reproduction, and rooted aquatic plant growth. Of the 25 bioassays considered for freshwater quality assessment, 8 were usable, 7 were prototypes, and 10 were under development. Screening tests selected included 72-hr S. capricornutum growth inhibition; 48-hr Daphnia sp. survival, and 5- and 15-min Photobacterium phosphoreum bioluminescence. Definitive tests included first screening test, 7-day Ceriodaphnia dubia, 7-day fathead minnow larval survival, or 96-hr rainbow trout survival. Augmentation with the following bioassays was recommended: Brachionus calyciflorus 24-hr survival, 48-hr reproduction; freshwater bacterial growth; and aquatic vascular plant growth.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Arthropods - growth & development</subject><subject>Bacteria - growth & development</subject><subject>Biological Assay - methods</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Eukaryota - growth & development</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Fishes - growth & development</subject><subject>Helminths - growth & development</subject><subject>Plant Development</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Soil Microbiology</subject><subject>Soil Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Toxicity Tests</subject><subject>Water Microbiology</subject><subject>Water Pollution, Chemical - analysis</subject><issn>0147-6513</issn><issn>1090-2414</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0ElLBDEQBeAgio7L1ZuQk6fpMVtv3nRwA0FQwWOo6VRrpBdN9Sj-e9PMIF7EUwjv5UE-xg6lmEkhshNEgpksyzReVb7BJlKUIlFGmk02EdLkSZZKvcN2iV6FEFqk6TbbzlMjtc4nbHGPHx4_eV_zp5e-weQuPEPnqeXnvgci-KJT_tD7ZsovA9LLJwwY-AM632I3TDl07ndwRoREY8R9x-fQgYN9tlVDQ3iwPvfY4-XF4_w6ub27upmf3SaVltmQxN-kztVGuIVULlMllC6v60IiINRlqYR2ulBaGKmKwpUF5AsjqlRKBU5leo8dr2bfQv--RBps66nCpoEO-yVZaXQeOcz_RZ1FHVHE4mxVrEJPFLC2b8G3EL6sFHbEtyO-HfHtiB8fHK2Xl4sW3U99rR3zYpVjZIjswVLlsauiZsBqsK73f01_A2NukpE</recordid><startdate>199504</startdate><enddate>199504</enddate><creator>Keddy, C.J.</creator><creator>Greene, J.C.</creator><creator>Bonnell, M.A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199504</creationdate><title>Review of Whole-Organism Bioassays: Soil, Freshwater Sediment, and Freshwater Assessment in Canada</title><author>Keddy, C.J. ; Greene, J.C. ; Bonnell, M.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-1005ddf40db12d629a9d7ff81eaeaf99203d3823041288d98a7b40c5112ad263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Arthropods - growth & development</topic><topic>Bacteria - growth & development</topic><topic>Biological Assay - methods</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Eukaryota - growth & development</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Fishes - growth & development</topic><topic>Helminths - growth & development</topic><topic>Plant Development</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Soil Microbiology</topic><topic>Soil Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Toxicity Tests</topic><topic>Water Microbiology</topic><topic>Water Pollution, Chemical - analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keddy, C.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnell, M.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecotoxicology and environmental safety</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keddy, C.J.</au><au>Greene, J.C.</au><au>Bonnell, M.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Review of Whole-Organism Bioassays: Soil, Freshwater Sediment, and Freshwater Assessment in Canada</atitle><jtitle>Ecotoxicology and environmental safety</jtitle><addtitle>Ecotoxicol Environ Saf</addtitle><date>1995-04</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>221</spage><epage>251</epage><pages>221-251</pages><issn>0147-6513</issn><eissn>1090-2414</eissn><abstract>Whole organism bioassays for the assessment of soil, freshwater sediment, and freshwater quality were evaluated for their application in the assessment and remediation of contaminated sites in Canada under the National Contaminated Sites Remediation Program. Using 3 essential and 12 desirable methodological criteria, bioassays were categorized as currently usable, prototype, or under development. Based on further considerations related to bioassay application, a battery of usable screening and definitive tests was recommended (with suggestions for augmentation) for each medium. Of the 18 bioassays reviewed for soil quality assessment, 6 were usable, 5 were prototypes, and 7 were under development. Battery screening and definitive tests included 14-day Eisenia andrei survival, 120-hr lettuce and radish seedling emergence, and 72-hr Selenastrum capricornutum growth inhibition. Augmentation with the following bioassays was recommended: soil/freshwater bacterial growth, arthropod reproduction, earthworm reproduction, and reproduction of other soil-dependent organisms. Of the 9 bioassays reviewed for freshwater sediment quality assessment, 1 was usable, 2 were prototypes, and 6 were under development. Three bioassays in the latter two groups were considered usable with the imminent completion of research underway. Screening tests selected included 10-day Chironomus tentans survival, 10-day Hyalella Aztec survival, 10-day Hexagenia spp. survival, and 72-hr S. capricornutum growth inhibition. Definitive tests included screening tests, substituting 28-day H. azteca sexual maturation for 10-day survival. Augmentation with the following bioassays was recommended: sediment/freshwater bacterial test, 28-day Tubifex tubifex reproduction, and rooted aquatic plant growth. Of the 25 bioassays considered for freshwater quality assessment, 8 were usable, 7 were prototypes, and 10 were under development. Screening tests selected included 72-hr S. capricornutum growth inhibition; 48-hr Daphnia sp. survival, and 5- and 15-min Photobacterium phosphoreum bioluminescence. Definitive tests included first screening test, 7-day Ceriodaphnia dubia, 7-day fathead minnow larval survival, or 96-hr rainbow trout survival. Augmentation with the following bioassays was recommended: Brachionus calyciflorus 24-hr survival, 48-hr reproduction; freshwater bacterial growth; and aquatic vascular plant growth.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>7541337</pmid><doi>10.1006/eesa.1995.1027</doi><tpages>31</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0147-6513 |
ispartof | Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 1995-04, Vol.30 (3), p.221-251 |
issn | 0147-6513 1090-2414 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14371474 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Animals Arthropods - growth & development Bacteria - growth & development Biological Assay - methods Canada Eukaryota - growth & development Evaluation Studies as Topic Fishes - growth & development Helminths - growth & development Plant Development Sensitivity and Specificity Soil Microbiology Soil Pollutants - analysis Toxicity Tests Water Microbiology Water Pollution, Chemical - analysis |
title | Review of Whole-Organism Bioassays: Soil, Freshwater Sediment, and Freshwater Assessment in Canada |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T02%3A01%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review%20of%20Whole-Organism%20Bioassays:%20Soil,%20Freshwater%20Sediment,%20and%20Freshwater%20Assessment%20in%20Canada&rft.jtitle=Ecotoxicology%20and%20environmental%20safety&rft.au=Keddy,%20C.J.&rft.date=1995-04&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=221&rft.epage=251&rft.pages=221-251&rft.issn=0147-6513&rft.eissn=1090-2414&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/eesa.1995.1027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14371474%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=13654108&rft_id=info:pmid/7541337&rft_els_id=S0147651385710275&rfr_iscdi=true |