Review of Whole-Organism Bioassays: Soil, Freshwater Sediment, and Freshwater Assessment in Canada

Whole organism bioassays for the assessment of soil, freshwater sediment, and freshwater quality were evaluated for their application in the assessment and remediation of contaminated sites in Canada under the National Contaminated Sites Remediation Program. Using 3 essential and 12 desirable method...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecotoxicology and environmental safety 1995-04, Vol.30 (3), p.221-251
Hauptverfasser: Keddy, C.J., Greene, J.C., Bonnell, M.A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 251
container_issue 3
container_start_page 221
container_title Ecotoxicology and environmental safety
container_volume 30
creator Keddy, C.J.
Greene, J.C.
Bonnell, M.A.
description Whole organism bioassays for the assessment of soil, freshwater sediment, and freshwater quality were evaluated for their application in the assessment and remediation of contaminated sites in Canada under the National Contaminated Sites Remediation Program. Using 3 essential and 12 desirable methodological criteria, bioassays were categorized as currently usable, prototype, or under development. Based on further considerations related to bioassay application, a battery of usable screening and definitive tests was recommended (with suggestions for augmentation) for each medium. Of the 18 bioassays reviewed for soil quality assessment, 6 were usable, 5 were prototypes, and 7 were under development. Battery screening and definitive tests included 14-day Eisenia andrei survival, 120-hr lettuce and radish seedling emergence, and 72-hr Selenastrum capricornutum growth inhibition. Augmentation with the following bioassays was recommended: soil/freshwater bacterial growth, arthropod reproduction, earthworm reproduction, and reproduction of other soil-dependent organisms. Of the 9 bioassays reviewed for freshwater sediment quality assessment, 1 was usable, 2 were prototypes, and 6 were under development. Three bioassays in the latter two groups were considered usable with the imminent completion of research underway. Screening tests selected included 10-day Chironomus tentans survival, 10-day Hyalella Aztec survival, 10-day Hexagenia spp. survival, and 72-hr S. capricornutum growth inhibition. Definitive tests included screening tests, substituting 28-day H. azteca sexual maturation for 10-day survival. Augmentation with the following bioassays was recommended: sediment/freshwater bacterial test, 28-day Tubifex tubifex reproduction, and rooted aquatic plant growth. Of the 25 bioassays considered for freshwater quality assessment, 8 were usable, 7 were prototypes, and 10 were under development. Screening tests selected included 72-hr S. capricornutum growth inhibition; 48-hr Daphnia sp. survival, and 5- and 15-min Photobacterium phosphoreum bioluminescence. Definitive tests included first screening test, 7-day Ceriodaphnia dubia, 7-day fathead minnow larval survival, or 96-hr rainbow trout survival. Augmentation with the following bioassays was recommended: Brachionus calyciflorus 24-hr survival, 48-hr reproduction; freshwater bacterial growth; and aquatic vascular plant growth.
doi_str_mv 10.1006/eesa.1995.1027
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14371474</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0147651385710275</els_id><sourcerecordid>14371474</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-1005ddf40db12d629a9d7ff81eaeaf99203d3823041288d98a7b40c5112ad263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ElLBDEQBeAgio7L1ZuQk6fpMVtv3nRwA0FQwWOo6VRrpBdN9Sj-e9PMIF7EUwjv5UE-xg6lmEkhshNEgpksyzReVb7BJlKUIlFGmk02EdLkSZZKvcN2iV6FEFqk6TbbzlMjtc4nbHGPHx4_eV_zp5e-weQuPEPnqeXnvgci-KJT_tD7ZsovA9LLJwwY-AM632I3TDl07ndwRoREY8R9x-fQgYN9tlVDQ3iwPvfY4-XF4_w6ub27upmf3SaVltmQxN-kztVGuIVULlMllC6v60IiINRlqYR2ulBaGKmKwpUF5AsjqlRKBU5leo8dr2bfQv--RBps66nCpoEO-yVZaXQeOcz_RZ1FHVHE4mxVrEJPFLC2b8G3EL6sFHbEtyO-HfHtiB8fHK2Xl4sW3U99rR3zYpVjZIjswVLlsauiZsBqsK73f01_A2NukpE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>13654108</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Review of Whole-Organism Bioassays: Soil, Freshwater Sediment, and Freshwater Assessment in Canada</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Keddy, C.J. ; Greene, J.C. ; Bonnell, M.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Keddy, C.J. ; Greene, J.C. ; Bonnell, M.A.</creatorcontrib><description>Whole organism bioassays for the assessment of soil, freshwater sediment, and freshwater quality were evaluated for their application in the assessment and remediation of contaminated sites in Canada under the National Contaminated Sites Remediation Program. Using 3 essential and 12 desirable methodological criteria, bioassays were categorized as currently usable, prototype, or under development. Based on further considerations related to bioassay application, a battery of usable screening and definitive tests was recommended (with suggestions for augmentation) for each medium. Of the 18 bioassays reviewed for soil quality assessment, 6 were usable, 5 were prototypes, and 7 were under development. Battery screening and definitive tests included 14-day Eisenia andrei survival, 120-hr lettuce and radish seedling emergence, and 72-hr Selenastrum capricornutum growth inhibition. Augmentation with the following bioassays was recommended: soil/freshwater bacterial growth, arthropod reproduction, earthworm reproduction, and reproduction of other soil-dependent organisms. Of the 9 bioassays reviewed for freshwater sediment quality assessment, 1 was usable, 2 were prototypes, and 6 were under development. Three bioassays in the latter two groups were considered usable with the imminent completion of research underway. Screening tests selected included 10-day Chironomus tentans survival, 10-day Hyalella Aztec survival, 10-day Hexagenia spp. survival, and 72-hr S. capricornutum growth inhibition. Definitive tests included screening tests, substituting 28-day H. azteca sexual maturation for 10-day survival. Augmentation with the following bioassays was recommended: sediment/freshwater bacterial test, 28-day Tubifex tubifex reproduction, and rooted aquatic plant growth. Of the 25 bioassays considered for freshwater quality assessment, 8 were usable, 7 were prototypes, and 10 were under development. Screening tests selected included 72-hr S. capricornutum growth inhibition; 48-hr Daphnia sp. survival, and 5- and 15-min Photobacterium phosphoreum bioluminescence. Definitive tests included first screening test, 7-day Ceriodaphnia dubia, 7-day fathead minnow larval survival, or 96-hr rainbow trout survival. Augmentation with the following bioassays was recommended: Brachionus calyciflorus 24-hr survival, 48-hr reproduction; freshwater bacterial growth; and aquatic vascular plant growth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-6513</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2414</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/eesa.1995.1027</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7541337</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Arthropods - growth &amp; development ; Bacteria - growth &amp; development ; Biological Assay - methods ; Canada ; Eukaryota - growth &amp; development ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Fishes - growth &amp; development ; Helminths - growth &amp; development ; Plant Development ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Soil Microbiology ; Soil Pollutants - analysis ; Toxicity Tests ; Water Microbiology ; Water Pollution, Chemical - analysis</subject><ispartof>Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 1995-04, Vol.30 (3), p.221-251</ispartof><rights>1995 Academic Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-1005ddf40db12d629a9d7ff81eaeaf99203d3823041288d98a7b40c5112ad263</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147651385710275$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7541337$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keddy, C.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnell, M.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Review of Whole-Organism Bioassays: Soil, Freshwater Sediment, and Freshwater Assessment in Canada</title><title>Ecotoxicology and environmental safety</title><addtitle>Ecotoxicol Environ Saf</addtitle><description>Whole organism bioassays for the assessment of soil, freshwater sediment, and freshwater quality were evaluated for their application in the assessment and remediation of contaminated sites in Canada under the National Contaminated Sites Remediation Program. Using 3 essential and 12 desirable methodological criteria, bioassays were categorized as currently usable, prototype, or under development. Based on further considerations related to bioassay application, a battery of usable screening and definitive tests was recommended (with suggestions for augmentation) for each medium. Of the 18 bioassays reviewed for soil quality assessment, 6 were usable, 5 were prototypes, and 7 were under development. Battery screening and definitive tests included 14-day Eisenia andrei survival, 120-hr lettuce and radish seedling emergence, and 72-hr Selenastrum capricornutum growth inhibition. Augmentation with the following bioassays was recommended: soil/freshwater bacterial growth, arthropod reproduction, earthworm reproduction, and reproduction of other soil-dependent organisms. Of the 9 bioassays reviewed for freshwater sediment quality assessment, 1 was usable, 2 were prototypes, and 6 were under development. Three bioassays in the latter two groups were considered usable with the imminent completion of research underway. Screening tests selected included 10-day Chironomus tentans survival, 10-day Hyalella Aztec survival, 10-day Hexagenia spp. survival, and 72-hr S. capricornutum growth inhibition. Definitive tests included screening tests, substituting 28-day H. azteca sexual maturation for 10-day survival. Augmentation with the following bioassays was recommended: sediment/freshwater bacterial test, 28-day Tubifex tubifex reproduction, and rooted aquatic plant growth. Of the 25 bioassays considered for freshwater quality assessment, 8 were usable, 7 were prototypes, and 10 were under development. Screening tests selected included 72-hr S. capricornutum growth inhibition; 48-hr Daphnia sp. survival, and 5- and 15-min Photobacterium phosphoreum bioluminescence. Definitive tests included first screening test, 7-day Ceriodaphnia dubia, 7-day fathead minnow larval survival, or 96-hr rainbow trout survival. Augmentation with the following bioassays was recommended: Brachionus calyciflorus 24-hr survival, 48-hr reproduction; freshwater bacterial growth; and aquatic vascular plant growth.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Arthropods - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Bacteria - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Biological Assay - methods</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Eukaryota - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Fishes - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Helminths - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Plant Development</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Soil Microbiology</subject><subject>Soil Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Toxicity Tests</subject><subject>Water Microbiology</subject><subject>Water Pollution, Chemical - analysis</subject><issn>0147-6513</issn><issn>1090-2414</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0ElLBDEQBeAgio7L1ZuQk6fpMVtv3nRwA0FQwWOo6VRrpBdN9Sj-e9PMIF7EUwjv5UE-xg6lmEkhshNEgpksyzReVb7BJlKUIlFGmk02EdLkSZZKvcN2iV6FEFqk6TbbzlMjtc4nbHGPHx4_eV_zp5e-weQuPEPnqeXnvgci-KJT_tD7ZsovA9LLJwwY-AM632I3TDl07ndwRoREY8R9x-fQgYN9tlVDQ3iwPvfY4-XF4_w6ub27upmf3SaVltmQxN-kztVGuIVULlMllC6v60IiINRlqYR2ulBaGKmKwpUF5AsjqlRKBU5leo8dr2bfQv--RBps66nCpoEO-yVZaXQeOcz_RZ1FHVHE4mxVrEJPFLC2b8G3EL6sFHbEtyO-HfHtiB8fHK2Xl4sW3U99rR3zYpVjZIjswVLlsauiZsBqsK73f01_A2NukpE</recordid><startdate>199504</startdate><enddate>199504</enddate><creator>Keddy, C.J.</creator><creator>Greene, J.C.</creator><creator>Bonnell, M.A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199504</creationdate><title>Review of Whole-Organism Bioassays: Soil, Freshwater Sediment, and Freshwater Assessment in Canada</title><author>Keddy, C.J. ; Greene, J.C. ; Bonnell, M.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-1005ddf40db12d629a9d7ff81eaeaf99203d3823041288d98a7b40c5112ad263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Arthropods - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Bacteria - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Biological Assay - methods</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Eukaryota - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Fishes - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Helminths - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Plant Development</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Soil Microbiology</topic><topic>Soil Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Toxicity Tests</topic><topic>Water Microbiology</topic><topic>Water Pollution, Chemical - analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keddy, C.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnell, M.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecotoxicology and environmental safety</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keddy, C.J.</au><au>Greene, J.C.</au><au>Bonnell, M.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Review of Whole-Organism Bioassays: Soil, Freshwater Sediment, and Freshwater Assessment in Canada</atitle><jtitle>Ecotoxicology and environmental safety</jtitle><addtitle>Ecotoxicol Environ Saf</addtitle><date>1995-04</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>221</spage><epage>251</epage><pages>221-251</pages><issn>0147-6513</issn><eissn>1090-2414</eissn><abstract>Whole organism bioassays for the assessment of soil, freshwater sediment, and freshwater quality were evaluated for their application in the assessment and remediation of contaminated sites in Canada under the National Contaminated Sites Remediation Program. Using 3 essential and 12 desirable methodological criteria, bioassays were categorized as currently usable, prototype, or under development. Based on further considerations related to bioassay application, a battery of usable screening and definitive tests was recommended (with suggestions for augmentation) for each medium. Of the 18 bioassays reviewed for soil quality assessment, 6 were usable, 5 were prototypes, and 7 were under development. Battery screening and definitive tests included 14-day Eisenia andrei survival, 120-hr lettuce and radish seedling emergence, and 72-hr Selenastrum capricornutum growth inhibition. Augmentation with the following bioassays was recommended: soil/freshwater bacterial growth, arthropod reproduction, earthworm reproduction, and reproduction of other soil-dependent organisms. Of the 9 bioassays reviewed for freshwater sediment quality assessment, 1 was usable, 2 were prototypes, and 6 were under development. Three bioassays in the latter two groups were considered usable with the imminent completion of research underway. Screening tests selected included 10-day Chironomus tentans survival, 10-day Hyalella Aztec survival, 10-day Hexagenia spp. survival, and 72-hr S. capricornutum growth inhibition. Definitive tests included screening tests, substituting 28-day H. azteca sexual maturation for 10-day survival. Augmentation with the following bioassays was recommended: sediment/freshwater bacterial test, 28-day Tubifex tubifex reproduction, and rooted aquatic plant growth. Of the 25 bioassays considered for freshwater quality assessment, 8 were usable, 7 were prototypes, and 10 were under development. Screening tests selected included 72-hr S. capricornutum growth inhibition; 48-hr Daphnia sp. survival, and 5- and 15-min Photobacterium phosphoreum bioluminescence. Definitive tests included first screening test, 7-day Ceriodaphnia dubia, 7-day fathead minnow larval survival, or 96-hr rainbow trout survival. Augmentation with the following bioassays was recommended: Brachionus calyciflorus 24-hr survival, 48-hr reproduction; freshwater bacterial growth; and aquatic vascular plant growth.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>7541337</pmid><doi>10.1006/eesa.1995.1027</doi><tpages>31</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0147-6513
ispartof Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 1995-04, Vol.30 (3), p.221-251
issn 0147-6513
1090-2414
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14371474
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animals
Arthropods - growth & development
Bacteria - growth & development
Biological Assay - methods
Canada
Eukaryota - growth & development
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Fishes - growth & development
Helminths - growth & development
Plant Development
Sensitivity and Specificity
Soil Microbiology
Soil Pollutants - analysis
Toxicity Tests
Water Microbiology
Water Pollution, Chemical - analysis
title Review of Whole-Organism Bioassays: Soil, Freshwater Sediment, and Freshwater Assessment in Canada
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T02%3A01%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review%20of%20Whole-Organism%20Bioassays:%20Soil,%20Freshwater%20Sediment,%20and%20Freshwater%20Assessment%20in%20Canada&rft.jtitle=Ecotoxicology%20and%20environmental%20safety&rft.au=Keddy,%20C.J.&rft.date=1995-04&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=221&rft.epage=251&rft.pages=221-251&rft.issn=0147-6513&rft.eissn=1090-2414&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/eesa.1995.1027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14371474%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=13654108&rft_id=info:pmid/7541337&rft_els_id=S0147651385710275&rfr_iscdi=true