Survey Research and the Production of Evidence for Social Policy
Large representative surveys have become a valuable resource to inform public policy in an increasingly complex modern world. They provide authority to policy since they are considered objective, neutral and scientific. In contrast, this article conceives the production of knowledge as an interactiv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social policy and society : a journal of the Social Policy Association 2013-04, Vol.12 (2), p.309-318 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 318 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 309 |
container_title | Social policy and society : a journal of the Social Policy Association |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Boehm, Marine Bowman, Dina Zinn, Jens O. |
description | Large representative surveys have become a valuable resource to inform public policy in an increasingly complex modern world. They provide authority to policy since they are considered objective, neutral and scientific. In contrast, this article conceives the production of knowledge as an interactive process. We argue that the conduct of large social surveys tends to reinforce existing world views, power relations and a narrow construction of social issues. To illustrate this, we draw on a small exploratory study which examined the experience of responding to selected survey questions of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia study (HILDA). We suggest that while more open approaches are required to capture the complexities of everyday life, these are unlikely to be implemented given the dominance of particular forms of knowledge. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1474746412000668 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1435357886</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1474746412000668</cupid><sourcerecordid>1435357886</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-be6844f4cd7d93f0d471c57eccf65b95798f1dea3238def0e0eb7e05f3e7928d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFvAi5fVZJPdJDel-AUFi9Xzkk0mdst2U5Nuof_e1PYgiiAzMMPM874wg9A5JVeUUHE9pVykKDnNCSFlKQ_QII2KjBHBDr96nm33x-gkxjkhOS9YMUA30z6sYYNfIIIOZoZ1Z_FqBngSvO3NqvEd9g7frRsLnQHsfMBTbxrd4olvG7M5RUdOtxHO9nWI3u7vXkeP2fj54Wl0O84Mk2yV1VBKzh03VljFHLFcUFMIMMaVRa0KoaSjFjTLmbTgCBCoBZDCMRAql5YN0eXOdxn8Rw9xVS2aaKBtdQe-jxXlLB0kpCz_geaqTKloQi9-oHPfhy4dUtFcUakYoyJRdEeZ4GMM4KplaBY6bCpKqu37q1_vTxq21-hFHRr7Dt-s_1R9ApwnhTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1291893317</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survey Research and the Production of Evidence for Social Policy</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Boehm, Marine ; Bowman, Dina ; Zinn, Jens O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Boehm, Marine ; Bowman, Dina ; Zinn, Jens O.</creatorcontrib><description>Large representative surveys have become a valuable resource to inform public policy in an increasingly complex modern world. They provide authority to policy since they are considered objective, neutral and scientific. In contrast, this article conceives the production of knowledge as an interactive process. We argue that the conduct of large social surveys tends to reinforce existing world views, power relations and a narrow construction of social issues. To illustrate this, we draw on a small exploratory study which examined the experience of responding to selected survey questions of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia study (HILDA). We suggest that while more open approaches are required to capture the complexities of everyday life, these are unlikely to be implemented given the dominance of particular forms of knowledge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1474-7464</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-3073</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1474746412000668</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Australia ; Everyday Life ; Evidence ; Income ; Knowledge ; Polls & surveys ; Power ; Power relations ; Social interaction ; Social Policy ; Surveys ; Themed Section on Risk, Social Inclusion and the Life Course ; World view</subject><ispartof>Social policy and society : a journal of the Social Policy Association, 2013-04, Vol.12 (2), p.309-318</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-be6844f4cd7d93f0d471c57eccf65b95798f1dea3238def0e0eb7e05f3e7928d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-be6844f4cd7d93f0d471c57eccf65b95798f1dea3238def0e0eb7e05f3e7928d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1474746412000668/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,12846,27344,27924,27925,30999,33774,33775,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boehm, Marine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowman, Dina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zinn, Jens O.</creatorcontrib><title>Survey Research and the Production of Evidence for Social Policy</title><title>Social policy and society : a journal of the Social Policy Association</title><addtitle>Social Policy & Society</addtitle><description>Large representative surveys have become a valuable resource to inform public policy in an increasingly complex modern world. They provide authority to policy since they are considered objective, neutral and scientific. In contrast, this article conceives the production of knowledge as an interactive process. We argue that the conduct of large social surveys tends to reinforce existing world views, power relations and a narrow construction of social issues. To illustrate this, we draw on a small exploratory study which examined the experience of responding to selected survey questions of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia study (HILDA). We suggest that while more open approaches are required to capture the complexities of everyday life, these are unlikely to be implemented given the dominance of particular forms of knowledge.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Everyday Life</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Power relations</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social Policy</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Themed Section on Risk, Social Inclusion and the Life Course</subject><subject>World view</subject><issn>1474-7464</issn><issn>1475-3073</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFvAi5fVZJPdJDel-AUFi9Xzkk0mdst2U5Nuof_e1PYgiiAzMMPM874wg9A5JVeUUHE9pVykKDnNCSFlKQ_QII2KjBHBDr96nm33x-gkxjkhOS9YMUA30z6sYYNfIIIOZoZ1Z_FqBngSvO3NqvEd9g7frRsLnQHsfMBTbxrd4olvG7M5RUdOtxHO9nWI3u7vXkeP2fj54Wl0O84Mk2yV1VBKzh03VljFHLFcUFMIMMaVRa0KoaSjFjTLmbTgCBCoBZDCMRAql5YN0eXOdxn8Rw9xVS2aaKBtdQe-jxXlLB0kpCz_geaqTKloQi9-oHPfhy4dUtFcUakYoyJRdEeZ4GMM4KplaBY6bCpKqu37q1_vTxq21-hFHRr7Dt-s_1R9ApwnhTA</recordid><startdate>201304</startdate><enddate>201304</enddate><creator>Boehm, Marine</creator><creator>Bowman, Dina</creator><creator>Zinn, Jens O.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201304</creationdate><title>Survey Research and the Production of Evidence for Social Policy</title><author>Boehm, Marine ; Bowman, Dina ; Zinn, Jens O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-be6844f4cd7d93f0d471c57eccf65b95798f1dea3238def0e0eb7e05f3e7928d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Everyday Life</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Power relations</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social Policy</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Themed Section on Risk, Social Inclusion and the Life Course</topic><topic>World view</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boehm, Marine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowman, Dina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zinn, Jens O.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social policy and society : a journal of the Social Policy Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boehm, Marine</au><au>Bowman, Dina</au><au>Zinn, Jens O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survey Research and the Production of Evidence for Social Policy</atitle><jtitle>Social policy and society : a journal of the Social Policy Association</jtitle><addtitle>Social Policy & Society</addtitle><date>2013-04</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>309</spage><epage>318</epage><pages>309-318</pages><issn>1474-7464</issn><eissn>1475-3073</eissn><abstract>Large representative surveys have become a valuable resource to inform public policy in an increasingly complex modern world. They provide authority to policy since they are considered objective, neutral and scientific. In contrast, this article conceives the production of knowledge as an interactive process. We argue that the conduct of large social surveys tends to reinforce existing world views, power relations and a narrow construction of social issues. To illustrate this, we draw on a small exploratory study which examined the experience of responding to selected survey questions of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia study (HILDA). We suggest that while more open approaches are required to capture the complexities of everyday life, these are unlikely to be implemented given the dominance of particular forms of knowledge.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1474746412000668</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1474-7464 |
ispartof | Social policy and society : a journal of the Social Policy Association, 2013-04, Vol.12 (2), p.309-318 |
issn | 1474-7464 1475-3073 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1435357886 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Australia Everyday Life Evidence Income Knowledge Polls & surveys Power Power relations Social interaction Social Policy Surveys Themed Section on Risk, Social Inclusion and the Life Course World view |
title | Survey Research and the Production of Evidence for Social Policy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T07%3A33%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survey%20Research%20and%20the%20Production%20of%20Evidence%20for%20Social%20Policy&rft.jtitle=Social%20policy%20and%20society%20:%20a%20journal%20of%20the%20Social%20Policy%20Association&rft.au=Boehm,%20Marine&rft.date=2013-04&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=309&rft.epage=318&rft.pages=309-318&rft.issn=1474-7464&rft.eissn=1475-3073&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1474746412000668&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1435357886%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1291893317&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1474746412000668&rfr_iscdi=true |