Survey Research and the Production of Evidence for Social Policy

Large representative surveys have become a valuable resource to inform public policy in an increasingly complex modern world. They provide authority to policy since they are considered objective, neutral and scientific. In contrast, this article conceives the production of knowledge as an interactiv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social policy and society : a journal of the Social Policy Association 2013-04, Vol.12 (2), p.309-318
Hauptverfasser: Boehm, Marine, Bowman, Dina, Zinn, Jens O.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 318
container_issue 2
container_start_page 309
container_title Social policy and society : a journal of the Social Policy Association
container_volume 12
creator Boehm, Marine
Bowman, Dina
Zinn, Jens O.
description Large representative surveys have become a valuable resource to inform public policy in an increasingly complex modern world. They provide authority to policy since they are considered objective, neutral and scientific. In contrast, this article conceives the production of knowledge as an interactive process. We argue that the conduct of large social surveys tends to reinforce existing world views, power relations and a narrow construction of social issues. To illustrate this, we draw on a small exploratory study which examined the experience of responding to selected survey questions of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia study (HILDA). We suggest that while more open approaches are required to capture the complexities of everyday life, these are unlikely to be implemented given the dominance of particular forms of knowledge.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1474746412000668
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1435357886</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1474746412000668</cupid><sourcerecordid>1435357886</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-be6844f4cd7d93f0d471c57eccf65b95798f1dea3238def0e0eb7e05f3e7928d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFvAi5fVZJPdJDel-AUFi9Xzkk0mdst2U5Nuof_e1PYgiiAzMMPM874wg9A5JVeUUHE9pVykKDnNCSFlKQ_QII2KjBHBDr96nm33x-gkxjkhOS9YMUA30z6sYYNfIIIOZoZ1Z_FqBngSvO3NqvEd9g7frRsLnQHsfMBTbxrd4olvG7M5RUdOtxHO9nWI3u7vXkeP2fj54Wl0O84Mk2yV1VBKzh03VljFHLFcUFMIMMaVRa0KoaSjFjTLmbTgCBCoBZDCMRAql5YN0eXOdxn8Rw9xVS2aaKBtdQe-jxXlLB0kpCz_geaqTKloQi9-oHPfhy4dUtFcUakYoyJRdEeZ4GMM4KplaBY6bCpKqu37q1_vTxq21-hFHRr7Dt-s_1R9ApwnhTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1291893317</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survey Research and the Production of Evidence for Social Policy</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Boehm, Marine ; Bowman, Dina ; Zinn, Jens O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Boehm, Marine ; Bowman, Dina ; Zinn, Jens O.</creatorcontrib><description>Large representative surveys have become a valuable resource to inform public policy in an increasingly complex modern world. They provide authority to policy since they are considered objective, neutral and scientific. In contrast, this article conceives the production of knowledge as an interactive process. We argue that the conduct of large social surveys tends to reinforce existing world views, power relations and a narrow construction of social issues. To illustrate this, we draw on a small exploratory study which examined the experience of responding to selected survey questions of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia study (HILDA). We suggest that while more open approaches are required to capture the complexities of everyday life, these are unlikely to be implemented given the dominance of particular forms of knowledge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1474-7464</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-3073</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1474746412000668</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Australia ; Everyday Life ; Evidence ; Income ; Knowledge ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Power ; Power relations ; Social interaction ; Social Policy ; Surveys ; Themed Section on Risk, Social Inclusion and the Life Course ; World view</subject><ispartof>Social policy and society : a journal of the Social Policy Association, 2013-04, Vol.12 (2), p.309-318</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-be6844f4cd7d93f0d471c57eccf65b95798f1dea3238def0e0eb7e05f3e7928d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-be6844f4cd7d93f0d471c57eccf65b95798f1dea3238def0e0eb7e05f3e7928d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1474746412000668/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,12846,27344,27924,27925,30999,33774,33775,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boehm, Marine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowman, Dina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zinn, Jens O.</creatorcontrib><title>Survey Research and the Production of Evidence for Social Policy</title><title>Social policy and society : a journal of the Social Policy Association</title><addtitle>Social Policy &amp; Society</addtitle><description>Large representative surveys have become a valuable resource to inform public policy in an increasingly complex modern world. They provide authority to policy since they are considered objective, neutral and scientific. In contrast, this article conceives the production of knowledge as an interactive process. We argue that the conduct of large social surveys tends to reinforce existing world views, power relations and a narrow construction of social issues. To illustrate this, we draw on a small exploratory study which examined the experience of responding to selected survey questions of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia study (HILDA). We suggest that while more open approaches are required to capture the complexities of everyday life, these are unlikely to be implemented given the dominance of particular forms of knowledge.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Everyday Life</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Power relations</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social Policy</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Themed Section on Risk, Social Inclusion and the Life Course</subject><subject>World view</subject><issn>1474-7464</issn><issn>1475-3073</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFvAi5fVZJPdJDel-AUFi9Xzkk0mdst2U5Nuof_e1PYgiiAzMMPM874wg9A5JVeUUHE9pVykKDnNCSFlKQ_QII2KjBHBDr96nm33x-gkxjkhOS9YMUA30z6sYYNfIIIOZoZ1Z_FqBngSvO3NqvEd9g7frRsLnQHsfMBTbxrd4olvG7M5RUdOtxHO9nWI3u7vXkeP2fj54Wl0O84Mk2yV1VBKzh03VljFHLFcUFMIMMaVRa0KoaSjFjTLmbTgCBCoBZDCMRAql5YN0eXOdxn8Rw9xVS2aaKBtdQe-jxXlLB0kpCz_geaqTKloQi9-oHPfhy4dUtFcUakYoyJRdEeZ4GMM4KplaBY6bCpKqu37q1_vTxq21-hFHRr7Dt-s_1R9ApwnhTA</recordid><startdate>201304</startdate><enddate>201304</enddate><creator>Boehm, Marine</creator><creator>Bowman, Dina</creator><creator>Zinn, Jens O.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201304</creationdate><title>Survey Research and the Production of Evidence for Social Policy</title><author>Boehm, Marine ; Bowman, Dina ; Zinn, Jens O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-be6844f4cd7d93f0d471c57eccf65b95798f1dea3238def0e0eb7e05f3e7928d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Everyday Life</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Power relations</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social Policy</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Themed Section on Risk, Social Inclusion and the Life Course</topic><topic>World view</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boehm, Marine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowman, Dina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zinn, Jens O.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social policy and society : a journal of the Social Policy Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boehm, Marine</au><au>Bowman, Dina</au><au>Zinn, Jens O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survey Research and the Production of Evidence for Social Policy</atitle><jtitle>Social policy and society : a journal of the Social Policy Association</jtitle><addtitle>Social Policy &amp; Society</addtitle><date>2013-04</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>309</spage><epage>318</epage><pages>309-318</pages><issn>1474-7464</issn><eissn>1475-3073</eissn><abstract>Large representative surveys have become a valuable resource to inform public policy in an increasingly complex modern world. They provide authority to policy since they are considered objective, neutral and scientific. In contrast, this article conceives the production of knowledge as an interactive process. We argue that the conduct of large social surveys tends to reinforce existing world views, power relations and a narrow construction of social issues. To illustrate this, we draw on a small exploratory study which examined the experience of responding to selected survey questions of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia study (HILDA). We suggest that while more open approaches are required to capture the complexities of everyday life, these are unlikely to be implemented given the dominance of particular forms of knowledge.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1474746412000668</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1474-7464
ispartof Social policy and society : a journal of the Social Policy Association, 2013-04, Vol.12 (2), p.309-318
issn 1474-7464
1475-3073
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1435357886
source Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Australia
Everyday Life
Evidence
Income
Knowledge
Polls & surveys
Power
Power relations
Social interaction
Social Policy
Surveys
Themed Section on Risk, Social Inclusion and the Life Course
World view
title Survey Research and the Production of Evidence for Social Policy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T07%3A33%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survey%20Research%20and%20the%20Production%20of%20Evidence%20for%20Social%20Policy&rft.jtitle=Social%20policy%20and%20society%20:%20a%20journal%20of%20the%20Social%20Policy%20Association&rft.au=Boehm,%20Marine&rft.date=2013-04&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=309&rft.epage=318&rft.pages=309-318&rft.issn=1474-7464&rft.eissn=1475-3073&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1474746412000668&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1435357886%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1291893317&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1474746412000668&rfr_iscdi=true