Crop residue effects on soil quality following 10-years of no-till corn
Numerous biological, chemical, and physical indicators of soil quality have been suggested, but few have been evaluated using data from long-term field studies. Our objective was to evaluate several proposed soil quality indicators to determine effects of removing, doubling, or maintaining crop resi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Soil & tillage research 1994-08, Vol.31 (2), p.149-167 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 167 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 149 |
container_title | Soil & tillage research |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Karlen, D.L. Wollenhaupt, N.C. Erbach, D.C. Berry, E.C. Swan, J.B. Eash, N.S. Jordahl, J.L. |
description | Numerous biological, chemical, and physical indicators of soil quality have been suggested, but few have been evaluated using data from long-term field studies. Our objective was to evaluate several proposed soil quality indicators to determine effects of removing, doubling, or maintaining crop residues for 10 years in a no-till, continuous corn (
Zea mays L.) production study. Soil aggregate characteristics, penetration resistance, bulk density, volumetric water content, earthworm populations, respiration, microbial biomass, ergosterol concentrations, and several soil-test parameters (pH, P, K, Ca, Mg, Total-N, Total-C, NH
4-N, and NO
3-N) were measured on samples collected from Rozetta and Palsgrove silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, mesic Typic Hapludalfs) soils. Soil aggregates from double residue treatments were more stable in water than those from normal and removal treatments. The double and normal residue treatments had higher total carbon concentrations and higher levels of microbial activity as measured by CO
2 evolution. Ergosterol concentrations where crop residues were removed were 8 to 10 times lower suggesting this biochemical measurement of fungal biomass may be a sensitive soil quality indicator. Earthworm populations where crop residues had been removed for 10 years were significantly lower than in either normal or double residue treatments. Measures of force and energy required to crush soil aggregates were extremely variable and showed significant differences only for aggregate size. Several parameters were used to develop a soil quality index that gave ratings of 0.45, 0.68, or 0.86 for removal, normal, or double residue treatments, respectively. This study demonstrates a framework for soil quality evaluation and shows how crop residue management can affect this rating. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0167-1987(94)90077-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14342467</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0167198794900779</els_id><sourcerecordid>14342467</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-14e8bfec63b6fb4066594f14ae8970a9ede8232a627e27493c74f6d3904960a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1LBDEQhoMoeH78AbFIIaLFarKZSzaNIIdfcGijdchlJxKJmzPZU-7fu-uJpcUwxTzzzvAQcszZBWdcXg6lKq4bdabhXDOmVKW3yIQ3SlcCALbJ5A_ZJXulvDHGQNTNhNzNclrSjCW0K6ToPbq-0NTRkkKkHysbQ7-mPsWYvkL3Sjmr1mjzgHjapaoPMVKXcndAdryNBQ9_-z55ub15nt1X86e7h9n1vHKiEX3FAZvFcEOKhfQLYFJONXgOFhutmNXYYlOL2spaYa1AC6fAy1ZoBloyC2KfnG5ylzl9rLD05j0UhzHaDtOqGA4CapBqAGEDupxKyejNMod3m9eGMzNaM6MSMyoxGsyPNaOHtZPffFucjT7bzoXytyuZmtZ8TD_aYN4mY1_zgDzO9ZSxph6HV5shDiI-A2ZTXMDOYRvyoNe0Kfz_xDeayYdN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14342467</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Crop residue effects on soil quality following 10-years of no-till corn</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Karlen, D.L. ; Wollenhaupt, N.C. ; Erbach, D.C. ; Berry, E.C. ; Swan, J.B. ; Eash, N.S. ; Jordahl, J.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Karlen, D.L. ; Wollenhaupt, N.C. ; Erbach, D.C. ; Berry, E.C. ; Swan, J.B. ; Eash, N.S. ; Jordahl, J.L.</creatorcontrib><description>Numerous biological, chemical, and physical indicators of soil quality have been suggested, but few have been evaluated using data from long-term field studies. Our objective was to evaluate several proposed soil quality indicators to determine effects of removing, doubling, or maintaining crop residues for 10 years in a no-till, continuous corn (
Zea mays L.) production study. Soil aggregate characteristics, penetration resistance, bulk density, volumetric water content, earthworm populations, respiration, microbial biomass, ergosterol concentrations, and several soil-test parameters (pH, P, K, Ca, Mg, Total-N, Total-C, NH
4-N, and NO
3-N) were measured on samples collected from Rozetta and Palsgrove silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, mesic Typic Hapludalfs) soils. Soil aggregates from double residue treatments were more stable in water than those from normal and removal treatments. The double and normal residue treatments had higher total carbon concentrations and higher levels of microbial activity as measured by CO
2 evolution. Ergosterol concentrations where crop residues were removed were 8 to 10 times lower suggesting this biochemical measurement of fungal biomass may be a sensitive soil quality indicator. Earthworm populations where crop residues had been removed for 10 years were significantly lower than in either normal or double residue treatments. Measures of force and energy required to crush soil aggregates were extremely variable and showed significant differences only for aggregate size. Several parameters were used to develop a soil quality index that gave ratings of 0.45, 0.68, or 0.86 for removal, normal, or double residue treatments, respectively. This study demonstrates a framework for soil quality evaluation and shows how crop residue management can affect this rating.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-1987</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3444</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0167-1987(94)90077-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; CERO-LABRANZA ; CONTINUOUS CROPPING ; Crop residue management ; CROP RESIDUES ; CULTIVO CONTINUO ; CULTURE CONTINUE ; ESTRUCTURA DEL SUELO ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; LUMBRICIDAE ; No-tillage ; NON TRAVAIL DU SOL ; ORGANISME DU SOL ; ORGANISMOS DEL SUELO ; Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries ; RESIDU DE RECOLTE ; RESIDUOS DE COSECHAS ; RESPIRACION DEL SUELO ; RESPIRATION DU SOL ; SOIL ORGANISMS ; Soil quality index ; SOIL RESPIRATION ; SOIL STRUCTURE ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments ; STRUCTURE DU SOL ; ZEA MAYS ; ZERO TILLAGE</subject><ispartof>Soil & tillage research, 1994-08, Vol.31 (2), p.149-167</ispartof><rights>1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-14e8bfec63b6fb4066594f14ae8970a9ede8232a627e27493c74f6d3904960a43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-14e8bfec63b6fb4066594f14ae8970a9ede8232a627e27493c74f6d3904960a43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167198794900779$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=6075217$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karlen, D.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wollenhaupt, N.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erbach, D.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, E.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swan, J.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eash, N.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordahl, J.L.</creatorcontrib><title>Crop residue effects on soil quality following 10-years of no-till corn</title><title>Soil & tillage research</title><description>Numerous biological, chemical, and physical indicators of soil quality have been suggested, but few have been evaluated using data from long-term field studies. Our objective was to evaluate several proposed soil quality indicators to determine effects of removing, doubling, or maintaining crop residues for 10 years in a no-till, continuous corn (
Zea mays L.) production study. Soil aggregate characteristics, penetration resistance, bulk density, volumetric water content, earthworm populations, respiration, microbial biomass, ergosterol concentrations, and several soil-test parameters (pH, P, K, Ca, Mg, Total-N, Total-C, NH
4-N, and NO
3-N) were measured on samples collected from Rozetta and Palsgrove silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, mesic Typic Hapludalfs) soils. Soil aggregates from double residue treatments were more stable in water than those from normal and removal treatments. The double and normal residue treatments had higher total carbon concentrations and higher levels of microbial activity as measured by CO
2 evolution. Ergosterol concentrations where crop residues were removed were 8 to 10 times lower suggesting this biochemical measurement of fungal biomass may be a sensitive soil quality indicator. Earthworm populations where crop residues had been removed for 10 years were significantly lower than in either normal or double residue treatments. Measures of force and energy required to crush soil aggregates were extremely variable and showed significant differences only for aggregate size. Several parameters were used to develop a soil quality index that gave ratings of 0.45, 0.68, or 0.86 for removal, normal, or double residue treatments, respectively. This study demonstrates a framework for soil quality evaluation and shows how crop residue management can affect this rating.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>CERO-LABRANZA</subject><subject>CONTINUOUS CROPPING</subject><subject>Crop residue management</subject><subject>CROP RESIDUES</subject><subject>CULTIVO CONTINUO</subject><subject>CULTURE CONTINUE</subject><subject>ESTRUCTURA DEL SUELO</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>LUMBRICIDAE</subject><subject>No-tillage</subject><subject>NON TRAVAIL DU SOL</subject><subject>ORGANISME DU SOL</subject><subject>ORGANISMOS DEL SUELO</subject><subject>Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries</subject><subject>RESIDU DE RECOLTE</subject><subject>RESIDUOS DE COSECHAS</subject><subject>RESPIRACION DEL SUELO</subject><subject>RESPIRATION DU SOL</subject><subject>SOIL ORGANISMS</subject><subject>Soil quality index</subject><subject>SOIL RESPIRATION</subject><subject>SOIL STRUCTURE</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</subject><subject>STRUCTURE DU SOL</subject><subject>ZEA MAYS</subject><subject>ZERO TILLAGE</subject><issn>0167-1987</issn><issn>1879-3444</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1LBDEQhoMoeH78AbFIIaLFarKZSzaNIIdfcGijdchlJxKJmzPZU-7fu-uJpcUwxTzzzvAQcszZBWdcXg6lKq4bdabhXDOmVKW3yIQ3SlcCALbJ5A_ZJXulvDHGQNTNhNzNclrSjCW0K6ToPbq-0NTRkkKkHysbQ7-mPsWYvkL3Sjmr1mjzgHjapaoPMVKXcndAdryNBQ9_-z55ub15nt1X86e7h9n1vHKiEX3FAZvFcEOKhfQLYFJONXgOFhutmNXYYlOL2spaYa1AC6fAy1ZoBloyC2KfnG5ylzl9rLD05j0UhzHaDtOqGA4CapBqAGEDupxKyejNMod3m9eGMzNaM6MSMyoxGsyPNaOHtZPffFucjT7bzoXytyuZmtZ8TD_aYN4mY1_zgDzO9ZSxph6HV5shDiI-A2ZTXMDOYRvyoNe0Kfz_xDeayYdN</recordid><startdate>19940801</startdate><enddate>19940801</enddate><creator>Karlen, D.L.</creator><creator>Wollenhaupt, N.C.</creator><creator>Erbach, D.C.</creator><creator>Berry, E.C.</creator><creator>Swan, J.B.</creator><creator>Eash, N.S.</creator><creator>Jordahl, J.L.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940801</creationdate><title>Crop residue effects on soil quality following 10-years of no-till corn</title><author>Karlen, D.L. ; Wollenhaupt, N.C. ; Erbach, D.C. ; Berry, E.C. ; Swan, J.B. ; Eash, N.S. ; Jordahl, J.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-14e8bfec63b6fb4066594f14ae8970a9ede8232a627e27493c74f6d3904960a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>CERO-LABRANZA</topic><topic>CONTINUOUS CROPPING</topic><topic>Crop residue management</topic><topic>CROP RESIDUES</topic><topic>CULTIVO CONTINUO</topic><topic>CULTURE CONTINUE</topic><topic>ESTRUCTURA DEL SUELO</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>LUMBRICIDAE</topic><topic>No-tillage</topic><topic>NON TRAVAIL DU SOL</topic><topic>ORGANISME DU SOL</topic><topic>ORGANISMOS DEL SUELO</topic><topic>Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries</topic><topic>RESIDU DE RECOLTE</topic><topic>RESIDUOS DE COSECHAS</topic><topic>RESPIRACION DEL SUELO</topic><topic>RESPIRATION DU SOL</topic><topic>SOIL ORGANISMS</topic><topic>Soil quality index</topic><topic>SOIL RESPIRATION</topic><topic>SOIL STRUCTURE</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</topic><topic>STRUCTURE DU SOL</topic><topic>ZEA MAYS</topic><topic>ZERO TILLAGE</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karlen, D.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wollenhaupt, N.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erbach, D.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, E.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swan, J.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eash, N.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordahl, J.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Soil & tillage research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karlen, D.L.</au><au>Wollenhaupt, N.C.</au><au>Erbach, D.C.</au><au>Berry, E.C.</au><au>Swan, J.B.</au><au>Eash, N.S.</au><au>Jordahl, J.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Crop residue effects on soil quality following 10-years of no-till corn</atitle><jtitle>Soil & tillage research</jtitle><date>1994-08-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>149</spage><epage>167</epage><pages>149-167</pages><issn>0167-1987</issn><eissn>1879-3444</eissn><abstract>Numerous biological, chemical, and physical indicators of soil quality have been suggested, but few have been evaluated using data from long-term field studies. Our objective was to evaluate several proposed soil quality indicators to determine effects of removing, doubling, or maintaining crop residues for 10 years in a no-till, continuous corn (
Zea mays L.) production study. Soil aggregate characteristics, penetration resistance, bulk density, volumetric water content, earthworm populations, respiration, microbial biomass, ergosterol concentrations, and several soil-test parameters (pH, P, K, Ca, Mg, Total-N, Total-C, NH
4-N, and NO
3-N) were measured on samples collected from Rozetta and Palsgrove silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, mesic Typic Hapludalfs) soils. Soil aggregates from double residue treatments were more stable in water than those from normal and removal treatments. The double and normal residue treatments had higher total carbon concentrations and higher levels of microbial activity as measured by CO
2 evolution. Ergosterol concentrations where crop residues were removed were 8 to 10 times lower suggesting this biochemical measurement of fungal biomass may be a sensitive soil quality indicator. Earthworm populations where crop residues had been removed for 10 years were significantly lower than in either normal or double residue treatments. Measures of force and energy required to crush soil aggregates were extremely variable and showed significant differences only for aggregate size. Several parameters were used to develop a soil quality index that gave ratings of 0.45, 0.68, or 0.86 for removal, normal, or double residue treatments, respectively. This study demonstrates a framework for soil quality evaluation and shows how crop residue management can affect this rating.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/0167-1987(94)90077-9</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-1987 |
ispartof | Soil & tillage research, 1994-08, Vol.31 (2), p.149-167 |
issn | 0167-1987 1879-3444 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14342467 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biological and medical sciences CERO-LABRANZA CONTINUOUS CROPPING Crop residue management CROP RESIDUES CULTIVO CONTINUO CULTURE CONTINUE ESTRUCTURA DEL SUELO Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agronomy. Plant production LUMBRICIDAE No-tillage NON TRAVAIL DU SOL ORGANISME DU SOL ORGANISMOS DEL SUELO Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries RESIDU DE RECOLTE RESIDUOS DE COSECHAS RESPIRACION DEL SUELO RESPIRATION DU SOL SOIL ORGANISMS Soil quality index SOIL RESPIRATION SOIL STRUCTURE Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments STRUCTURE DU SOL ZEA MAYS ZERO TILLAGE |
title | Crop residue effects on soil quality following 10-years of no-till corn |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T07%3A57%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Crop%20residue%20effects%20on%20soil%20quality%20following%2010-years%20of%20no-till%20corn&rft.jtitle=Soil%20&%20tillage%20research&rft.au=Karlen,%20D.L.&rft.date=1994-08-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=167&rft.pages=149-167&rft.issn=0167-1987&rft.eissn=1879-3444&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0167-1987(94)90077-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14342467%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14342467&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0167198794900779&rfr_iscdi=true |