Crop residue effects on soil quality following 10-years of no-till corn

Numerous biological, chemical, and physical indicators of soil quality have been suggested, but few have been evaluated using data from long-term field studies. Our objective was to evaluate several proposed soil quality indicators to determine effects of removing, doubling, or maintaining crop resi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Soil & tillage research 1994-08, Vol.31 (2), p.149-167
Hauptverfasser: Karlen, D.L., Wollenhaupt, N.C., Erbach, D.C., Berry, E.C., Swan, J.B., Eash, N.S., Jordahl, J.L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 167
container_issue 2
container_start_page 149
container_title Soil & tillage research
container_volume 31
creator Karlen, D.L.
Wollenhaupt, N.C.
Erbach, D.C.
Berry, E.C.
Swan, J.B.
Eash, N.S.
Jordahl, J.L.
description Numerous biological, chemical, and physical indicators of soil quality have been suggested, but few have been evaluated using data from long-term field studies. Our objective was to evaluate several proposed soil quality indicators to determine effects of removing, doubling, or maintaining crop residues for 10 years in a no-till, continuous corn ( Zea mays L.) production study. Soil aggregate characteristics, penetration resistance, bulk density, volumetric water content, earthworm populations, respiration, microbial biomass, ergosterol concentrations, and several soil-test parameters (pH, P, K, Ca, Mg, Total-N, Total-C, NH 4-N, and NO 3-N) were measured on samples collected from Rozetta and Palsgrove silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, mesic Typic Hapludalfs) soils. Soil aggregates from double residue treatments were more stable in water than those from normal and removal treatments. The double and normal residue treatments had higher total carbon concentrations and higher levels of microbial activity as measured by CO 2 evolution. Ergosterol concentrations where crop residues were removed were 8 to 10 times lower suggesting this biochemical measurement of fungal biomass may be a sensitive soil quality indicator. Earthworm populations where crop residues had been removed for 10 years were significantly lower than in either normal or double residue treatments. Measures of force and energy required to crush soil aggregates were extremely variable and showed significant differences only for aggregate size. Several parameters were used to develop a soil quality index that gave ratings of 0.45, 0.68, or 0.86 for removal, normal, or double residue treatments, respectively. This study demonstrates a framework for soil quality evaluation and shows how crop residue management can affect this rating.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0167-1987(94)90077-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14342467</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0167198794900779</els_id><sourcerecordid>14342467</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-14e8bfec63b6fb4066594f14ae8970a9ede8232a627e27493c74f6d3904960a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1LBDEQhoMoeH78AbFIIaLFarKZSzaNIIdfcGijdchlJxKJmzPZU-7fu-uJpcUwxTzzzvAQcszZBWdcXg6lKq4bdabhXDOmVKW3yIQ3SlcCALbJ5A_ZJXulvDHGQNTNhNzNclrSjCW0K6ToPbq-0NTRkkKkHysbQ7-mPsWYvkL3Sjmr1mjzgHjapaoPMVKXcndAdryNBQ9_-z55ub15nt1X86e7h9n1vHKiEX3FAZvFcEOKhfQLYFJONXgOFhutmNXYYlOL2spaYa1AC6fAy1ZoBloyC2KfnG5ylzl9rLD05j0UhzHaDtOqGA4CapBqAGEDupxKyejNMod3m9eGMzNaM6MSMyoxGsyPNaOHtZPffFucjT7bzoXytyuZmtZ8TD_aYN4mY1_zgDzO9ZSxph6HV5shDiI-A2ZTXMDOYRvyoNe0Kfz_xDeayYdN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14342467</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Crop residue effects on soil quality following 10-years of no-till corn</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Karlen, D.L. ; Wollenhaupt, N.C. ; Erbach, D.C. ; Berry, E.C. ; Swan, J.B. ; Eash, N.S. ; Jordahl, J.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Karlen, D.L. ; Wollenhaupt, N.C. ; Erbach, D.C. ; Berry, E.C. ; Swan, J.B. ; Eash, N.S. ; Jordahl, J.L.</creatorcontrib><description>Numerous biological, chemical, and physical indicators of soil quality have been suggested, but few have been evaluated using data from long-term field studies. Our objective was to evaluate several proposed soil quality indicators to determine effects of removing, doubling, or maintaining crop residues for 10 years in a no-till, continuous corn ( Zea mays L.) production study. Soil aggregate characteristics, penetration resistance, bulk density, volumetric water content, earthworm populations, respiration, microbial biomass, ergosterol concentrations, and several soil-test parameters (pH, P, K, Ca, Mg, Total-N, Total-C, NH 4-N, and NO 3-N) were measured on samples collected from Rozetta and Palsgrove silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, mesic Typic Hapludalfs) soils. Soil aggregates from double residue treatments were more stable in water than those from normal and removal treatments. The double and normal residue treatments had higher total carbon concentrations and higher levels of microbial activity as measured by CO 2 evolution. Ergosterol concentrations where crop residues were removed were 8 to 10 times lower suggesting this biochemical measurement of fungal biomass may be a sensitive soil quality indicator. Earthworm populations where crop residues had been removed for 10 years were significantly lower than in either normal or double residue treatments. Measures of force and energy required to crush soil aggregates were extremely variable and showed significant differences only for aggregate size. Several parameters were used to develop a soil quality index that gave ratings of 0.45, 0.68, or 0.86 for removal, normal, or double residue treatments, respectively. This study demonstrates a framework for soil quality evaluation and shows how crop residue management can affect this rating.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-1987</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3444</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0167-1987(94)90077-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; CERO-LABRANZA ; CONTINUOUS CROPPING ; Crop residue management ; CROP RESIDUES ; CULTIVO CONTINUO ; CULTURE CONTINUE ; ESTRUCTURA DEL SUELO ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; LUMBRICIDAE ; No-tillage ; NON TRAVAIL DU SOL ; ORGANISME DU SOL ; ORGANISMOS DEL SUELO ; Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries ; RESIDU DE RECOLTE ; RESIDUOS DE COSECHAS ; RESPIRACION DEL SUELO ; RESPIRATION DU SOL ; SOIL ORGANISMS ; Soil quality index ; SOIL RESPIRATION ; SOIL STRUCTURE ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments ; STRUCTURE DU SOL ; ZEA MAYS ; ZERO TILLAGE</subject><ispartof>Soil &amp; tillage research, 1994-08, Vol.31 (2), p.149-167</ispartof><rights>1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-14e8bfec63b6fb4066594f14ae8970a9ede8232a627e27493c74f6d3904960a43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-14e8bfec63b6fb4066594f14ae8970a9ede8232a627e27493c74f6d3904960a43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167198794900779$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=6075217$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karlen, D.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wollenhaupt, N.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erbach, D.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, E.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swan, J.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eash, N.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordahl, J.L.</creatorcontrib><title>Crop residue effects on soil quality following 10-years of no-till corn</title><title>Soil &amp; tillage research</title><description>Numerous biological, chemical, and physical indicators of soil quality have been suggested, but few have been evaluated using data from long-term field studies. Our objective was to evaluate several proposed soil quality indicators to determine effects of removing, doubling, or maintaining crop residues for 10 years in a no-till, continuous corn ( Zea mays L.) production study. Soil aggregate characteristics, penetration resistance, bulk density, volumetric water content, earthworm populations, respiration, microbial biomass, ergosterol concentrations, and several soil-test parameters (pH, P, K, Ca, Mg, Total-N, Total-C, NH 4-N, and NO 3-N) were measured on samples collected from Rozetta and Palsgrove silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, mesic Typic Hapludalfs) soils. Soil aggregates from double residue treatments were more stable in water than those from normal and removal treatments. The double and normal residue treatments had higher total carbon concentrations and higher levels of microbial activity as measured by CO 2 evolution. Ergosterol concentrations where crop residues were removed were 8 to 10 times lower suggesting this biochemical measurement of fungal biomass may be a sensitive soil quality indicator. Earthworm populations where crop residues had been removed for 10 years were significantly lower than in either normal or double residue treatments. Measures of force and energy required to crush soil aggregates were extremely variable and showed significant differences only for aggregate size. Several parameters were used to develop a soil quality index that gave ratings of 0.45, 0.68, or 0.86 for removal, normal, or double residue treatments, respectively. This study demonstrates a framework for soil quality evaluation and shows how crop residue management can affect this rating.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>CERO-LABRANZA</subject><subject>CONTINUOUS CROPPING</subject><subject>Crop residue management</subject><subject>CROP RESIDUES</subject><subject>CULTIVO CONTINUO</subject><subject>CULTURE CONTINUE</subject><subject>ESTRUCTURA DEL SUELO</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>LUMBRICIDAE</subject><subject>No-tillage</subject><subject>NON TRAVAIL DU SOL</subject><subject>ORGANISME DU SOL</subject><subject>ORGANISMOS DEL SUELO</subject><subject>Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries</subject><subject>RESIDU DE RECOLTE</subject><subject>RESIDUOS DE COSECHAS</subject><subject>RESPIRACION DEL SUELO</subject><subject>RESPIRATION DU SOL</subject><subject>SOIL ORGANISMS</subject><subject>Soil quality index</subject><subject>SOIL RESPIRATION</subject><subject>SOIL STRUCTURE</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</subject><subject>STRUCTURE DU SOL</subject><subject>ZEA MAYS</subject><subject>ZERO TILLAGE</subject><issn>0167-1987</issn><issn>1879-3444</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1LBDEQhoMoeH78AbFIIaLFarKZSzaNIIdfcGijdchlJxKJmzPZU-7fu-uJpcUwxTzzzvAQcszZBWdcXg6lKq4bdabhXDOmVKW3yIQ3SlcCALbJ5A_ZJXulvDHGQNTNhNzNclrSjCW0K6ToPbq-0NTRkkKkHysbQ7-mPsWYvkL3Sjmr1mjzgHjapaoPMVKXcndAdryNBQ9_-z55ub15nt1X86e7h9n1vHKiEX3FAZvFcEOKhfQLYFJONXgOFhutmNXYYlOL2spaYa1AC6fAy1ZoBloyC2KfnG5ylzl9rLD05j0UhzHaDtOqGA4CapBqAGEDupxKyejNMod3m9eGMzNaM6MSMyoxGsyPNaOHtZPffFucjT7bzoXytyuZmtZ8TD_aYN4mY1_zgDzO9ZSxph6HV5shDiI-A2ZTXMDOYRvyoNe0Kfz_xDeayYdN</recordid><startdate>19940801</startdate><enddate>19940801</enddate><creator>Karlen, D.L.</creator><creator>Wollenhaupt, N.C.</creator><creator>Erbach, D.C.</creator><creator>Berry, E.C.</creator><creator>Swan, J.B.</creator><creator>Eash, N.S.</creator><creator>Jordahl, J.L.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940801</creationdate><title>Crop residue effects on soil quality following 10-years of no-till corn</title><author>Karlen, D.L. ; Wollenhaupt, N.C. ; Erbach, D.C. ; Berry, E.C. ; Swan, J.B. ; Eash, N.S. ; Jordahl, J.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-14e8bfec63b6fb4066594f14ae8970a9ede8232a627e27493c74f6d3904960a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>CERO-LABRANZA</topic><topic>CONTINUOUS CROPPING</topic><topic>Crop residue management</topic><topic>CROP RESIDUES</topic><topic>CULTIVO CONTINUO</topic><topic>CULTURE CONTINUE</topic><topic>ESTRUCTURA DEL SUELO</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>LUMBRICIDAE</topic><topic>No-tillage</topic><topic>NON TRAVAIL DU SOL</topic><topic>ORGANISME DU SOL</topic><topic>ORGANISMOS DEL SUELO</topic><topic>Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries</topic><topic>RESIDU DE RECOLTE</topic><topic>RESIDUOS DE COSECHAS</topic><topic>RESPIRACION DEL SUELO</topic><topic>RESPIRATION DU SOL</topic><topic>SOIL ORGANISMS</topic><topic>Soil quality index</topic><topic>SOIL RESPIRATION</topic><topic>SOIL STRUCTURE</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</topic><topic>STRUCTURE DU SOL</topic><topic>ZEA MAYS</topic><topic>ZERO TILLAGE</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karlen, D.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wollenhaupt, N.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erbach, D.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, E.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swan, J.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eash, N.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordahl, J.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Soil &amp; tillage research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karlen, D.L.</au><au>Wollenhaupt, N.C.</au><au>Erbach, D.C.</au><au>Berry, E.C.</au><au>Swan, J.B.</au><au>Eash, N.S.</au><au>Jordahl, J.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Crop residue effects on soil quality following 10-years of no-till corn</atitle><jtitle>Soil &amp; tillage research</jtitle><date>1994-08-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>149</spage><epage>167</epage><pages>149-167</pages><issn>0167-1987</issn><eissn>1879-3444</eissn><abstract>Numerous biological, chemical, and physical indicators of soil quality have been suggested, but few have been evaluated using data from long-term field studies. Our objective was to evaluate several proposed soil quality indicators to determine effects of removing, doubling, or maintaining crop residues for 10 years in a no-till, continuous corn ( Zea mays L.) production study. Soil aggregate characteristics, penetration resistance, bulk density, volumetric water content, earthworm populations, respiration, microbial biomass, ergosterol concentrations, and several soil-test parameters (pH, P, K, Ca, Mg, Total-N, Total-C, NH 4-N, and NO 3-N) were measured on samples collected from Rozetta and Palsgrove silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, mesic Typic Hapludalfs) soils. Soil aggregates from double residue treatments were more stable in water than those from normal and removal treatments. The double and normal residue treatments had higher total carbon concentrations and higher levels of microbial activity as measured by CO 2 evolution. Ergosterol concentrations where crop residues were removed were 8 to 10 times lower suggesting this biochemical measurement of fungal biomass may be a sensitive soil quality indicator. Earthworm populations where crop residues had been removed for 10 years were significantly lower than in either normal or double residue treatments. Measures of force and energy required to crush soil aggregates were extremely variable and showed significant differences only for aggregate size. Several parameters were used to develop a soil quality index that gave ratings of 0.45, 0.68, or 0.86 for removal, normal, or double residue treatments, respectively. This study demonstrates a framework for soil quality evaluation and shows how crop residue management can affect this rating.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/0167-1987(94)90077-9</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-1987
ispartof Soil & tillage research, 1994-08, Vol.31 (2), p.149-167
issn 0167-1987
1879-3444
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14342467
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
CERO-LABRANZA
CONTINUOUS CROPPING
Crop residue management
CROP RESIDUES
CULTIVO CONTINUO
CULTURE CONTINUE
ESTRUCTURA DEL SUELO
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agronomy. Plant production
LUMBRICIDAE
No-tillage
NON TRAVAIL DU SOL
ORGANISME DU SOL
ORGANISMOS DEL SUELO
Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries
RESIDU DE RECOLTE
RESIDUOS DE COSECHAS
RESPIRACION DEL SUELO
RESPIRATION DU SOL
SOIL ORGANISMS
Soil quality index
SOIL RESPIRATION
SOIL STRUCTURE
Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments
STRUCTURE DU SOL
ZEA MAYS
ZERO TILLAGE
title Crop residue effects on soil quality following 10-years of no-till corn
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T07%3A57%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Crop%20residue%20effects%20on%20soil%20quality%20following%2010-years%20of%20no-till%20corn&rft.jtitle=Soil%20&%20tillage%20research&rft.au=Karlen,%20D.L.&rft.date=1994-08-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=167&rft.pages=149-167&rft.issn=0167-1987&rft.eissn=1879-3444&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0167-1987(94)90077-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14342467%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14342467&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0167198794900779&rfr_iscdi=true