Reproduction in a population of wild pigs (Sus scrofa) subjected to lethal control

The continued range expansion of wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in North America is an increasing cause for concern because of the numerous negative impacts that wild pigs have on ecosystem structure and function. Once populations are established, wild pigs have proven to be extremely difficult to control,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of wildlife management 2012-08, Vol.76 (6), p.1235-1240
Hauptverfasser: Ditchkoff, Stephen S., Jolley, D. Buck, Sparklin, Bill D., Hanson, Laura B., Mitchell, Michael S., Grand, James B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1240
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1235
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 76
creator Ditchkoff, Stephen S.
Jolley, D. Buck
Sparklin, Bill D.
Hanson, Laura B.
Mitchell, Michael S.
Grand, James B.
description The continued range expansion of wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in North America is an increasing cause for concern because of the numerous negative impacts that wild pigs have on ecosystem structure and function. Once populations are established, wild pigs have proven to be extremely difficult to control, and close to impossible to eradicate. If effective control and removal techniques are to be developed, we must determine if wild pig populations respond to reductions in density by increasing reproductive output. This study was designed to examine if reproductive parameters of female wild pigs display a density-dependent response following a concentrated removal effort. We compared reproductive parameters and condition of adult sows that were collected between a control area and a treatment area where lethal removal occurred. From August 2004 to May 2006, we focused a concentrated removal effort within the treatment area. Although the population density was more than 65% greater in the control area than the treatment area during the study, we did not detect differences between areas for condition, litter size, ovarian mass, corpus luteum mass, or corpora lutea number. Several years of heavy mast production during the study may have negated any effect on condition and subsequent reproduction between the 2 study areas. These data suggest that reproductive parameters of wild pigs do not exhibit density-dependence during periods when pig populations are in good condition.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jwmg.356
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1434025760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23251654</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23251654</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3866-86db72d59fd20cb5484855d8f2834869c2fc6d64fb82aa34fc6e8375e090689f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1r2zAYhUXpoGk26B8YCHaTXbjTt-XLErqsH_sgydrSG6HIUmrPsTzJps2_n9qMFAa7ejmch8N7DgAnGJ1ihMin-nGzPqVcHIARLmieEYnzQzBKFsk4w3dH4DjGGiGKsRQjMJ_bLvhyMH3lW1i1UMPOd0OjX7R38LFqSthV6wgniyHCaIJ3-iOMw6q2prcl7D1sbP-gG2h82wffvAVvnG6ifff3jsHPz-fL6Zfs-vvsYnp2nRkqhcikKFc5KXnhSoLMijPJJOeldERSJkVhiDOiFMytJNGasqSspDm3qEBCFo6OwWSXmwr8Hmzs1aaKxjaNbq0fosKMMkR4LlBCP_yD1n4IbfouUQSRPOeieA1MHWMM1qkuVBsdtgoj9Tyueh5XpXETmu3QNI_d_pdTl7dfZzv-_Y6vY-_DnieUcCw4e82rYm-f9r4Ov5TIU2l1-22m7n_wuyu-uFFL-geRGpNM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1420277569</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reproduction in a population of wild pigs (Sus scrofa) subjected to lethal control</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ditchkoff, Stephen S. ; Jolley, D. Buck ; Sparklin, Bill D. ; Hanson, Laura B. ; Mitchell, Michael S. ; Grand, James B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ditchkoff, Stephen S. ; Jolley, D. Buck ; Sparklin, Bill D. ; Hanson, Laura B. ; Mitchell, Michael S. ; Grand, James B.</creatorcontrib><description>The continued range expansion of wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in North America is an increasing cause for concern because of the numerous negative impacts that wild pigs have on ecosystem structure and function. Once populations are established, wild pigs have proven to be extremely difficult to control, and close to impossible to eradicate. If effective control and removal techniques are to be developed, we must determine if wild pig populations respond to reductions in density by increasing reproductive output. This study was designed to examine if reproductive parameters of female wild pigs display a density-dependent response following a concentrated removal effort. We compared reproductive parameters and condition of adult sows that were collected between a control area and a treatment area where lethal removal occurred. From August 2004 to May 2006, we focused a concentrated removal effort within the treatment area. Although the population density was more than 65% greater in the control area than the treatment area during the study, we did not detect differences between areas for condition, litter size, ovarian mass, corpus luteum mass, or corpora lutea number. Several years of heavy mast production during the study may have negated any effect on condition and subsequent reproduction between the 2 study areas. These data suggest that reproductive parameters of wild pigs do not exhibit density-dependence during periods when pig populations are in good condition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.356</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Animal populations ; Animal reproduction ; Animal traps ; Average linear density ; Body condition ; condition ; corpora lutea ; Corpus luteum ; density dependence ; Ecosystem structure ; Hogs ; Kidneys ; lethal control ; Litter size ; Management and Conservation ; Population density ; reproduction ; Sus scrofa ; Swine ; wild pig ; Wildlife ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2012-08, Vol.76 (6), p.1235-1240</ispartof><rights>Copyright© 2012 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>Copyright © The Wildlife Society, 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3866-86db72d59fd20cb5484855d8f2834869c2fc6d64fb82aa34fc6e8375e090689f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3866-86db72d59fd20cb5484855d8f2834869c2fc6d64fb82aa34fc6e8375e090689f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23251654$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23251654$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ditchkoff, Stephen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jolley, D. Buck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sparklin, Bill D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanson, Laura B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grand, James B.</creatorcontrib><title>Reproduction in a population of wild pigs (Sus scrofa) subjected to lethal control</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><addtitle>The Journal of Wildlife Management</addtitle><description>The continued range expansion of wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in North America is an increasing cause for concern because of the numerous negative impacts that wild pigs have on ecosystem structure and function. Once populations are established, wild pigs have proven to be extremely difficult to control, and close to impossible to eradicate. If effective control and removal techniques are to be developed, we must determine if wild pig populations respond to reductions in density by increasing reproductive output. This study was designed to examine if reproductive parameters of female wild pigs display a density-dependent response following a concentrated removal effort. We compared reproductive parameters and condition of adult sows that were collected between a control area and a treatment area where lethal removal occurred. From August 2004 to May 2006, we focused a concentrated removal effort within the treatment area. Although the population density was more than 65% greater in the control area than the treatment area during the study, we did not detect differences between areas for condition, litter size, ovarian mass, corpus luteum mass, or corpora lutea number. Several years of heavy mast production during the study may have negated any effect on condition and subsequent reproduction between the 2 study areas. These data suggest that reproductive parameters of wild pigs do not exhibit density-dependence during periods when pig populations are in good condition.</description><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Animal traps</subject><subject>Average linear density</subject><subject>Body condition</subject><subject>condition</subject><subject>corpora lutea</subject><subject>Corpus luteum</subject><subject>density dependence</subject><subject>Ecosystem structure</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Kidneys</subject><subject>lethal control</subject><subject>Litter size</subject><subject>Management and Conservation</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>reproduction</subject><subject>Sus scrofa</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>wild pig</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1r2zAYhUXpoGk26B8YCHaTXbjTt-XLErqsH_sgydrSG6HIUmrPsTzJps2_n9qMFAa7ejmch8N7DgAnGJ1ihMin-nGzPqVcHIARLmieEYnzQzBKFsk4w3dH4DjGGiGKsRQjMJ_bLvhyMH3lW1i1UMPOd0OjX7R38LFqSthV6wgniyHCaIJ3-iOMw6q2prcl7D1sbP-gG2h82wffvAVvnG6ifff3jsHPz-fL6Zfs-vvsYnp2nRkqhcikKFc5KXnhSoLMijPJJOeldERSJkVhiDOiFMytJNGasqSspDm3qEBCFo6OwWSXmwr8Hmzs1aaKxjaNbq0fosKMMkR4LlBCP_yD1n4IbfouUQSRPOeieA1MHWMM1qkuVBsdtgoj9Tyueh5XpXETmu3QNI_d_pdTl7dfZzv-_Y6vY-_DnieUcCw4e82rYm-f9r4Ov5TIU2l1-22m7n_wuyu-uFFL-geRGpNM</recordid><startdate>201208</startdate><enddate>201208</enddate><creator>Ditchkoff, Stephen S.</creator><creator>Jolley, D. Buck</creator><creator>Sparklin, Bill D.</creator><creator>Hanson, Laura B.</creator><creator>Mitchell, Michael S.</creator><creator>Grand, James B.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201208</creationdate><title>Reproduction in a population of wild pigs (Sus scrofa) subjected to lethal control</title><author>Ditchkoff, Stephen S. ; Jolley, D. Buck ; Sparklin, Bill D. ; Hanson, Laura B. ; Mitchell, Michael S. ; Grand, James B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3866-86db72d59fd20cb5484855d8f2834869c2fc6d64fb82aa34fc6e8375e090689f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Animal traps</topic><topic>Average linear density</topic><topic>Body condition</topic><topic>condition</topic><topic>corpora lutea</topic><topic>Corpus luteum</topic><topic>density dependence</topic><topic>Ecosystem structure</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Kidneys</topic><topic>lethal control</topic><topic>Litter size</topic><topic>Management and Conservation</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>reproduction</topic><topic>Sus scrofa</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>wild pig</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ditchkoff, Stephen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jolley, D. Buck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sparklin, Bill D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanson, Laura B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grand, James B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ditchkoff, Stephen S.</au><au>Jolley, D. Buck</au><au>Sparklin, Bill D.</au><au>Hanson, Laura B.</au><au>Mitchell, Michael S.</au><au>Grand, James B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reproduction in a population of wild pigs (Sus scrofa) subjected to lethal control</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><addtitle>The Journal of Wildlife Management</addtitle><date>2012-08</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1235</spage><epage>1240</epage><pages>1235-1240</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>The continued range expansion of wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in North America is an increasing cause for concern because of the numerous negative impacts that wild pigs have on ecosystem structure and function. Once populations are established, wild pigs have proven to be extremely difficult to control, and close to impossible to eradicate. If effective control and removal techniques are to be developed, we must determine if wild pig populations respond to reductions in density by increasing reproductive output. This study was designed to examine if reproductive parameters of female wild pigs display a density-dependent response following a concentrated removal effort. We compared reproductive parameters and condition of adult sows that were collected between a control area and a treatment area where lethal removal occurred. From August 2004 to May 2006, we focused a concentrated removal effort within the treatment area. Although the population density was more than 65% greater in the control area than the treatment area during the study, we did not detect differences between areas for condition, litter size, ovarian mass, corpus luteum mass, or corpora lutea number. Several years of heavy mast production during the study may have negated any effect on condition and subsequent reproduction between the 2 study areas. These data suggest that reproductive parameters of wild pigs do not exhibit density-dependence during periods when pig populations are in good condition.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/jwmg.356</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 2012-08, Vol.76 (6), p.1235-1240
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1434025760
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animal populations
Animal reproduction
Animal traps
Average linear density
Body condition
condition
corpora lutea
Corpus luteum
density dependence
Ecosystem structure
Hogs
Kidneys
lethal control
Litter size
Management and Conservation
Population density
reproduction
Sus scrofa
Swine
wild pig
Wildlife
Wildlife management
title Reproduction in a population of wild pigs (Sus scrofa) subjected to lethal control
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T08%3A03%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reproduction%20in%20a%20population%20of%20wild%20pigs%20(Sus%20scrofa)%20subjected%20to%20lethal%20control&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=Ditchkoff,%20Stephen%20S.&rft.date=2012-08&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1235&rft.epage=1240&rft.pages=1235-1240&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jwmg.356&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23251654%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1420277569&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23251654&rfr_iscdi=true