Rainfall partitioning into throughfall and stemflow and associated nutrient fluxes: land use impacts in a lower montane tropical region of Panama
Land-use change alters catchment hydrology by influencing the quality and quantity of partitioned rainfall. We compared rainfall partitioning (throughfall, stemflow and interception) and nutrient concentrations in rainfall, throughfall and stemflow in three land-use types [primary forest (PF), secon...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biogeochemistry 2012-11, Vol.111 (1/3), p.661-676 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 676 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1/3 |
container_start_page | 661 |
container_title | Biogeochemistry |
container_volume | 111 |
creator | Macinnis-Ng, Catriona M. O. Flores, Eric E. Müller, Henry Schwendenmann, Luitgard |
description | Land-use change alters catchment hydrology by influencing the quality and quantity of partitioned rainfall. We compared rainfall partitioning (throughfall, stemflow and interception) and nutrient concentrations in rainfall, throughfall and stemflow in three land-use types [primary forest (PF), secondary forest (SF) and agriculture (A)] in Panama. Measurements of throughfall were highly variable which may have masked seasonal and land use differences but it was clear that throughfall at agricultural sites made up a larger proportion of gross precipitation than at forest sites. Of incident precipitation, 94% became throughfall in agriculture sites while 83 and 81% of gross precipitation became throughfall in PF and SF, respectively. The size of the precipitation event was the main driver of variation in throughfall and stemflow. Consistent patterns in nutrient cycling were also difficult to identify. Vegetation has a vital role in delivering nutrients as throughfall deposition of K was often larger than precipitation deposition. A canopy budget model indicated that canopy exchange was often more dominant than dry deposition. Throughfall was generally enriched with nutrients, especially K and Mg, with enrichment factors of up to 17 and 5 for K and Mg, respectively, in PF. In contrast, Ca was sometimes taken up by the canopy. Values of nutrient deposition were high (with up to 15, 3, 30 and 15 kg ha -1 month -1 in stand deposition of Ca, Mg, K and Na, respectively in PF), possibly due to the slash- and-burn agricultural practices in the area or marine inputs. Throughfall and stemflow are vital sources of nutrients in these ecosystems. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10533-012-9709-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1434013247</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23359766</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23359766</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-350c1d8bae9a2752aa1c556d373391b4419980fb2f3d9e748ec3f9bc578f76453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2KFDEUhYMo2I4-gAshIIKb0vxUkoo7GXRGGFBEwV24nUp60lQlZZJCfQzf2PTUoOLCVQj3O-ce7kHoMSUvKCHqZaFEcN4RyjqtiO7IHbSjQvFOUPHlLtoRKoeOCcnvowelHAkhDeM79PMjhOhhmvACuYYaUgzxgEOsCdfrnNbD9c0U4ohLdbOf0rebD5SSbIDqRhzXmoOLFftp_e7KKzydgLU4HOYFbC3NDgNuSpfxnGKF6HDNaQkWJpzdoS3FyeMPEGGGh-he21jco9v3DH1---bT-WV39f7i3fnrq872hNaOC2LpOOzBaWBKMABqhZAjV5xruu97qvVA_J55Pmqn-sFZ7vXeCjV4JXvBz9DzzXfJ6evqSjVzKNZNLbxLazG0520RZ71q6NN_0GNac2zpDGVqELKXlDWKbpTNqZTsvFlymCH_MJSYU0lmK8m0ksypJEOa5tmtM5R2DJ8h2lB-C5mUctD8FJZtXGmjeHD5rwT_MX-yiY6lpvzHlHOhlZT8F4EzrPA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1278564612</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rainfall partitioning into throughfall and stemflow and associated nutrient fluxes: land use impacts in a lower montane tropical region of Panama</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Macinnis-Ng, Catriona M. O. ; Flores, Eric E. ; Müller, Henry ; Schwendenmann, Luitgard</creator><creatorcontrib>Macinnis-Ng, Catriona M. O. ; Flores, Eric E. ; Müller, Henry ; Schwendenmann, Luitgard</creatorcontrib><description>Land-use change alters catchment hydrology by influencing the quality and quantity of partitioned rainfall. We compared rainfall partitioning (throughfall, stemflow and interception) and nutrient concentrations in rainfall, throughfall and stemflow in three land-use types [primary forest (PF), secondary forest (SF) and agriculture (A)] in Panama. Measurements of throughfall were highly variable which may have masked seasonal and land use differences but it was clear that throughfall at agricultural sites made up a larger proportion of gross precipitation than at forest sites. Of incident precipitation, 94% became throughfall in agriculture sites while 83 and 81% of gross precipitation became throughfall in PF and SF, respectively. The size of the precipitation event was the main driver of variation in throughfall and stemflow. Consistent patterns in nutrient cycling were also difficult to identify. Vegetation has a vital role in delivering nutrients as throughfall deposition of K was often larger than precipitation deposition. A canopy budget model indicated that canopy exchange was often more dominant than dry deposition. Throughfall was generally enriched with nutrients, especially K and Mg, with enrichment factors of up to 17 and 5 for K and Mg, respectively, in PF. In contrast, Ca was sometimes taken up by the canopy. Values of nutrient deposition were high (with up to 15, 3, 30 and 15 kg ha -1 month -1 in stand deposition of Ca, Mg, K and Na, respectively in PF), possibly due to the slash- and-burn agricultural practices in the area or marine inputs. Throughfall and stemflow are vital sources of nutrients in these ecosystems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-2563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-515X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10533-012-9709-0</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BIOGEP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Agricultural practices ; Agriculture ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biogeosciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Canopies ; Dry deposition ; Dry seasons ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Ecosystems ; Environmental Chemistry ; Exact sciences and technology ; Forest canopy ; Fresh water ecosystems ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Geochemistry ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Interception ; Land use ; Life Sciences ; Mineralogy ; Montane forests ; Nutrient concentrations ; Nutrient cycles ; Nutrients ; Old growth forests ; Precipitation ; Rain ; Rainfall ; Rainforests ; Silicates ; Slash and burn ; Stemflow ; Synecology ; Throughfall ; Tropical environments ; Tropical rain forests ; Water geochemistry ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Biogeochemistry, 2012-11, Vol.111 (1/3), p.661-676</ispartof><rights>2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-350c1d8bae9a2752aa1c556d373391b4419980fb2f3d9e748ec3f9bc578f76453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-350c1d8bae9a2752aa1c556d373391b4419980fb2f3d9e748ec3f9bc578f76453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23359766$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23359766$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26668935$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Macinnis-Ng, Catriona M. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flores, Eric E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwendenmann, Luitgard</creatorcontrib><title>Rainfall partitioning into throughfall and stemflow and associated nutrient fluxes: land use impacts in a lower montane tropical region of Panama</title><title>Biogeochemistry</title><addtitle>Biogeochemistry</addtitle><description>Land-use change alters catchment hydrology by influencing the quality and quantity of partitioned rainfall. We compared rainfall partitioning (throughfall, stemflow and interception) and nutrient concentrations in rainfall, throughfall and stemflow in three land-use types [primary forest (PF), secondary forest (SF) and agriculture (A)] in Panama. Measurements of throughfall were highly variable which may have masked seasonal and land use differences but it was clear that throughfall at agricultural sites made up a larger proportion of gross precipitation than at forest sites. Of incident precipitation, 94% became throughfall in agriculture sites while 83 and 81% of gross precipitation became throughfall in PF and SF, respectively. The size of the precipitation event was the main driver of variation in throughfall and stemflow. Consistent patterns in nutrient cycling were also difficult to identify. Vegetation has a vital role in delivering nutrients as throughfall deposition of K was often larger than precipitation deposition. A canopy budget model indicated that canopy exchange was often more dominant than dry deposition. Throughfall was generally enriched with nutrients, especially K and Mg, with enrichment factors of up to 17 and 5 for K and Mg, respectively, in PF. In contrast, Ca was sometimes taken up by the canopy. Values of nutrient deposition were high (with up to 15, 3, 30 and 15 kg ha -1 month -1 in stand deposition of Ca, Mg, K and Na, respectively in PF), possibly due to the slash- and-burn agricultural practices in the area or marine inputs. Throughfall and stemflow are vital sources of nutrients in these ecosystems.</description><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biogeosciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>Dry deposition</subject><subject>Dry seasons</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Forest canopy</subject><subject>Fresh water ecosystems</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Interception</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mineralogy</subject><subject>Montane forests</subject><subject>Nutrient concentrations</subject><subject>Nutrient cycles</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Old growth forests</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Rainforests</subject><subject>Silicates</subject><subject>Slash and burn</subject><subject>Stemflow</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Throughfall</subject><subject>Tropical environments</subject><subject>Tropical rain forests</subject><subject>Water geochemistry</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>0168-2563</issn><issn>1573-515X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2KFDEUhYMo2I4-gAshIIKb0vxUkoo7GXRGGFBEwV24nUp60lQlZZJCfQzf2PTUoOLCVQj3O-ce7kHoMSUvKCHqZaFEcN4RyjqtiO7IHbSjQvFOUPHlLtoRKoeOCcnvowelHAkhDeM79PMjhOhhmvACuYYaUgzxgEOsCdfrnNbD9c0U4ohLdbOf0rebD5SSbIDqRhzXmoOLFftp_e7KKzydgLU4HOYFbC3NDgNuSpfxnGKF6HDNaQkWJpzdoS3FyeMPEGGGh-he21jco9v3DH1---bT-WV39f7i3fnrq872hNaOC2LpOOzBaWBKMABqhZAjV5xruu97qvVA_J55Pmqn-sFZ7vXeCjV4JXvBz9DzzXfJ6evqSjVzKNZNLbxLazG0520RZ71q6NN_0GNac2zpDGVqELKXlDWKbpTNqZTsvFlymCH_MJSYU0lmK8m0ksypJEOa5tmtM5R2DJ8h2lB-C5mUctD8FJZtXGmjeHD5rwT_MX-yiY6lpvzHlHOhlZT8F4EzrPA</recordid><startdate>20121101</startdate><enddate>20121101</enddate><creator>Macinnis-Ng, Catriona M. O.</creator><creator>Flores, Eric E.</creator><creator>Müller, Henry</creator><creator>Schwendenmann, Luitgard</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121101</creationdate><title>Rainfall partitioning into throughfall and stemflow and associated nutrient fluxes: land use impacts in a lower montane tropical region of Panama</title><author>Macinnis-Ng, Catriona M. O. ; Flores, Eric E. ; Müller, Henry ; Schwendenmann, Luitgard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-350c1d8bae9a2752aa1c556d373391b4419980fb2f3d9e748ec3f9bc578f76453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biogeosciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>Dry deposition</topic><topic>Dry seasons</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Forest canopy</topic><topic>Fresh water ecosystems</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Interception</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mineralogy</topic><topic>Montane forests</topic><topic>Nutrient concentrations</topic><topic>Nutrient cycles</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Old growth forests</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Rainforests</topic><topic>Silicates</topic><topic>Slash and burn</topic><topic>Stemflow</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Throughfall</topic><topic>Tropical environments</topic><topic>Tropical rain forests</topic><topic>Water geochemistry</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Macinnis-Ng, Catriona M. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flores, Eric E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwendenmann, Luitgard</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biogeochemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Macinnis-Ng, Catriona M. O.</au><au>Flores, Eric E.</au><au>Müller, Henry</au><au>Schwendenmann, Luitgard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rainfall partitioning into throughfall and stemflow and associated nutrient fluxes: land use impacts in a lower montane tropical region of Panama</atitle><jtitle>Biogeochemistry</jtitle><stitle>Biogeochemistry</stitle><date>2012-11-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>1/3</issue><spage>661</spage><epage>676</epage><pages>661-676</pages><issn>0168-2563</issn><eissn>1573-515X</eissn><coden>BIOGEP</coden><abstract>Land-use change alters catchment hydrology by influencing the quality and quantity of partitioned rainfall. We compared rainfall partitioning (throughfall, stemflow and interception) and nutrient concentrations in rainfall, throughfall and stemflow in three land-use types [primary forest (PF), secondary forest (SF) and agriculture (A)] in Panama. Measurements of throughfall were highly variable which may have masked seasonal and land use differences but it was clear that throughfall at agricultural sites made up a larger proportion of gross precipitation than at forest sites. Of incident precipitation, 94% became throughfall in agriculture sites while 83 and 81% of gross precipitation became throughfall in PF and SF, respectively. The size of the precipitation event was the main driver of variation in throughfall and stemflow. Consistent patterns in nutrient cycling were also difficult to identify. Vegetation has a vital role in delivering nutrients as throughfall deposition of K was often larger than precipitation deposition. A canopy budget model indicated that canopy exchange was often more dominant than dry deposition. Throughfall was generally enriched with nutrients, especially K and Mg, with enrichment factors of up to 17 and 5 for K and Mg, respectively, in PF. In contrast, Ca was sometimes taken up by the canopy. Values of nutrient deposition were high (with up to 15, 3, 30 and 15 kg ha -1 month -1 in stand deposition of Ca, Mg, K and Na, respectively in PF), possibly due to the slash- and-burn agricultural practices in the area or marine inputs. Throughfall and stemflow are vital sources of nutrients in these ecosystems.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10533-012-9709-0</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0168-2563 |
ispartof | Biogeochemistry, 2012-11, Vol.111 (1/3), p.661-676 |
issn | 0168-2563 1573-515X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1434013247 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Agricultural practices Agriculture Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Biogeosciences Biological and medical sciences Canopies Dry deposition Dry seasons Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Earth, ocean, space Ecosystems Environmental Chemistry Exact sciences and technology Forest canopy Fresh water ecosystems Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Geochemistry Hydrology Hydrology. Hydrogeology Interception Land use Life Sciences Mineralogy Montane forests Nutrient concentrations Nutrient cycles Nutrients Old growth forests Precipitation Rain Rainfall Rainforests Silicates Slash and burn Stemflow Synecology Throughfall Tropical environments Tropical rain forests Water geochemistry Watersheds |
title | Rainfall partitioning into throughfall and stemflow and associated nutrient fluxes: land use impacts in a lower montane tropical region of Panama |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A11%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rainfall%20partitioning%20into%20throughfall%20and%20stemflow%20and%20associated%20nutrient%20fluxes:%20land%20use%20impacts%20in%20a%20lower%20montane%20tropical%20region%20of%20Panama&rft.jtitle=Biogeochemistry&rft.au=Macinnis-Ng,%20Catriona%20M.%20O.&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=1/3&rft.spage=661&rft.epage=676&rft.pages=661-676&rft.issn=0168-2563&rft.eissn=1573-515X&rft.coden=BIOGEP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10533-012-9709-0&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23359766%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1278564612&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23359766&rfr_iscdi=true |