Invited commentary: Paths and pathologies of social epidemiology
The article by professors Galea and Link in this issue of the Journal (Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(6):843-849) is an important contribution to the field of social epidemiology. Their 6 paths provide ample fodder for reflection, debate, and advancement. Although I agree with the thrust and spirit of the...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of epidemiology 2013-09, Vol.178 (6), p.850-851 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 851 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 850 |
| container_title | American journal of epidemiology |
| container_volume | 178 |
| creator | Oakes, J Michael |
| description | The article by professors Galea and Link in this issue of the Journal (Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(6):843-849) is an important contribution to the field of social epidemiology. Their 6 paths provide ample fodder for reflection, debate, and advancement. Although I agree with the thrust and spirit of their recommendations, I argue that if social epidemiology is to advance and become not just more popular but also more useful, we social epidemiologists need to first address our disciplinary pathologies. Among other things, we must embrace macro-to-micro transitions, understand and act on the principles of effect identification, conduct many more experiments, and train students to be not researchers but scientists. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/aje/kwt144 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1434010897</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1434010897</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-32be8904e245ec2e1236eae7bbffc89a9ca9834edda7420dc0cdcf1d64562ab93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK1e_AES8CJC7OxHNllPSvGjUNCDnsNmd6KpSbZmE6X_3i2tHjzNwDy8zPsQckrhioLiU73E6cd3T4XYI2MqUhlLlsh9MgYAFism2Ygceb8EoFQlcEhGTABkitIxuZm3X1WPNjKuabDtdbe-jp51_-4j3dpoFTZXu7cKfeTKyDtT6TrCVWWxqTaH9TE5KHXt8WQ3J-T1_u5l9hgvnh7ms9tFbHhC-5izAjMFAplI0DCkjEvUmBZFWZpMaWW0yrhAa3UqGFgDxpqSWikSyXSh-IRcbHNXnfsc0Pd5U3mDda1bdIPPqeACaGiVBvT8H7p0Q9eG7wIlKEiV0CxQl1vKdM77Dst81VVN6J9TyDde8-A133oN8NkucigatH_or0j-A0JndCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1441069518</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Invited commentary: Paths and pathologies of social epidemiology</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Oakes, J Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Oakes, J Michael</creatorcontrib><description>The article by professors Galea and Link in this issue of the Journal (Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(6):843-849) is an important contribution to the field of social epidemiology. Their 6 paths provide ample fodder for reflection, debate, and advancement. Although I agree with the thrust and spirit of their recommendations, I argue that if social epidemiology is to advance and become not just more popular but also more useful, we social epidemiologists need to first address our disciplinary pathologies. Among other things, we must embrace macro-to-micro transitions, understand and act on the principles of effect identification, conduct many more experiments, and train students to be not researchers but scientists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-6256</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwt144</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24008911</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</publisher><subject>Causality ; Epidemiology ; Epidemiology - standards ; Health Status Disparities ; Humans ; Pathology ; Principles ; Social Environment ; Sociology, Medical - standards</subject><ispartof>American journal of epidemiology, 2013-09, Vol.178 (6), p.850-851</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Sep 15, 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-32be8904e245ec2e1236eae7bbffc89a9ca9834edda7420dc0cdcf1d64562ab93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-32be8904e245ec2e1236eae7bbffc89a9ca9834edda7420dc0cdcf1d64562ab93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24008911$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oakes, J Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Invited commentary: Paths and pathologies of social epidemiology</title><title>American journal of epidemiology</title><addtitle>Am J Epidemiol</addtitle><description>The article by professors Galea and Link in this issue of the Journal (Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(6):843-849) is an important contribution to the field of social epidemiology. Their 6 paths provide ample fodder for reflection, debate, and advancement. Although I agree with the thrust and spirit of their recommendations, I argue that if social epidemiology is to advance and become not just more popular but also more useful, we social epidemiologists need to first address our disciplinary pathologies. Among other things, we must embrace macro-to-micro transitions, understand and act on the principles of effect identification, conduct many more experiments, and train students to be not researchers but scientists.</description><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Epidemiology - standards</subject><subject>Health Status Disparities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Principles</subject><subject>Social Environment</subject><subject>Sociology, Medical - standards</subject><issn>0002-9262</issn><issn>1476-6256</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK1e_AES8CJC7OxHNllPSvGjUNCDnsNmd6KpSbZmE6X_3i2tHjzNwDy8zPsQckrhioLiU73E6cd3T4XYI2MqUhlLlsh9MgYAFism2Ygceb8EoFQlcEhGTABkitIxuZm3X1WPNjKuabDtdbe-jp51_-4j3dpoFTZXu7cKfeTKyDtT6TrCVWWxqTaH9TE5KHXt8WQ3J-T1_u5l9hgvnh7ms9tFbHhC-5izAjMFAplI0DCkjEvUmBZFWZpMaWW0yrhAa3UqGFgDxpqSWikSyXSh-IRcbHNXnfsc0Pd5U3mDda1bdIPPqeACaGiVBvT8H7p0Q9eG7wIlKEiV0CxQl1vKdM77Dst81VVN6J9TyDde8-A133oN8NkucigatH_or0j-A0JndCw</recordid><startdate>20130915</startdate><enddate>20130915</enddate><creator>Oakes, J Michael</creator><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130915</creationdate><title>Invited commentary: Paths and pathologies of social epidemiology</title><author>Oakes, J Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-32be8904e245ec2e1236eae7bbffc89a9ca9834edda7420dc0cdcf1d64562ab93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Epidemiology - standards</topic><topic>Health Status Disparities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Principles</topic><topic>Social Environment</topic><topic>Sociology, Medical - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oakes, J Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oakes, J Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Invited commentary: Paths and pathologies of social epidemiology</atitle><jtitle>American journal of epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2013-09-15</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>178</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>850</spage><epage>851</epage><pages>850-851</pages><issn>0002-9262</issn><eissn>1476-6256</eissn><abstract>The article by professors Galea and Link in this issue of the Journal (Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(6):843-849) is an important contribution to the field of social epidemiology. Their 6 paths provide ample fodder for reflection, debate, and advancement. Although I agree with the thrust and spirit of their recommendations, I argue that if social epidemiology is to advance and become not just more popular but also more useful, we social epidemiologists need to first address our disciplinary pathologies. Among other things, we must embrace macro-to-micro transitions, understand and act on the principles of effect identification, conduct many more experiments, and train students to be not researchers but scientists.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</pub><pmid>24008911</pmid><doi>10.1093/aje/kwt144</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-9262 |
| ispartof | American journal of epidemiology, 2013-09, Vol.178 (6), p.850-851 |
| issn | 0002-9262 1476-6256 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1434010897 |
| source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
| subjects | Causality Epidemiology Epidemiology - standards Health Status Disparities Humans Pathology Principles Social Environment Sociology, Medical - standards |
| title | Invited commentary: Paths and pathologies of social epidemiology |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T14%3A49%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Invited%20commentary:%20Paths%20and%20pathologies%20of%20social%20epidemiology&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20epidemiology&rft.au=Oakes,%20J%20Michael&rft.date=2013-09-15&rft.volume=178&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=850&rft.epage=851&rft.pages=850-851&rft.issn=0002-9262&rft.eissn=1476-6256&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/aje/kwt144&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1434010897%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1441069518&rft_id=info:pmid/24008911&rfr_iscdi=true |