Limited hybridization across an edaphic disjunction between the gabbro-endemic shrub Ceanothus roderickii (Rhamnaceae) and the soil-generalist Ceanothus cuneatus

• Premise of the study: Hybridization is thought to have played an important role in diversification of the speciose shrub genus Ceanothus; putative hybrid species have been described, and data suggest that intrinsic barriers may not exist among closely related species. However, the extent to which...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of botany 2013-09, Vol.100 (9), p.1883-1895
Hauptverfasser: Burge, Dylan O, Hopkins, Robin, Tsai, Yi-Hsin Erica, Manos, Paul S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1895
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1883
container_title American journal of botany
container_volume 100
creator Burge, Dylan O
Hopkins, Robin
Tsai, Yi-Hsin Erica
Manos, Paul S
description • Premise of the study: Hybridization is thought to have played an important role in diversification of the speciose shrub genus Ceanothus; putative hybrid species have been described, and data suggest that intrinsic barriers may not exist among closely related species. However, the extent to which hybridization occurs in the wild is not known, and little is understood about how extrinsic factors such as soil chemistry may influence the process. The present research focuses on the gabbro-endemic C. roderickii and the closely related soil-generalist C. cuneatus. Though the species occur peripatrically, they remain distinct across an edaphic disjunction.• Methods: AFLP was used to quantify hybridization and introgression. Biological data and experiments were used to test for prezygotic isolation. Growth trials were used to test for local adaptation and selection against hybrids.• Key results: Ceanothus cuneatus and C. roderickii were strongly differentiated morphologically and genetically, despite a lack of evidence for prezygotic barriers. Hybrids and back-crosses were present but infrequent. Finally, there was selection against hybrids in nonnative soil.• Conclusions: There is little genetic exchange between the focal species across an edaphic disjunction, despite the absence of prezygotic barriers. This result implies that soil conditions, as well as other extrinsic factors, should be considered as forces that may restrict hybridization and gene flow in Ceanothus, influencing local adaptation and speciation. Findings presented here are significant because they imply that exchange of genetic material between plants may be limited directly by the abiotic environment, rather than by the biology of the plants.
doi_str_mv 10.3732/ajb.1200604
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1433273740</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23596218</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23596218</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4713-1e4d20783fb7c81710be444770f94d8c2629ae17ff267140abe5bf300ea3cd853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kktv1DAUhSMEotPCijVgiU0RSvErcbIsI54aCQnoOvLjZuKQ2FM7UTX9N_xT3MnwEAtWV9b5ztHVPc6yJwRfMMHoa9mrC0IxLjG_l61IwUROSS3uZyuMMc1rQulJdhpjn541r-nD7IRyTKqqKFfZj40d7QQGdXsVrLG3crLeIamDjxFJh8DIXWc1Mjb2s9MHVcF0A-DQ1AHaSqWCz8EZGBMWuzArtAbp_NTNEQVvIFj93Vp0_qWTo5MaJLxMyeZgj94O-RYcBDnYOP3l1LMDOc3xUfaglUOEx8d5ll29e_tt_SHffH7_cX25yTUXhOUEuKFYVKxVQldEEKyAcy4EbmtuKk1LWksgom1pKQjHUkGhWoYxSKZNVbCz7HzJ3QV_PUOcmtFGDcMgHfg5NoQzRgUTHCf0xT9o7-fg0nZ3FOesIgVP1KuFOtwyQNvsgh1l2DcEN3fNNam55thcop8dM2c1gvnN_qoqAWQBbuwA-_9lNZef3tBkYsnzdPH0cfLhTyYr6jIRSX--6K30jdwGG5urrxSTIn0Vks5UsJ_B_Ler</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1434438154</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Limited hybridization across an edaphic disjunction between the gabbro-endemic shrub Ceanothus roderickii (Rhamnaceae) and the soil-generalist Ceanothus cuneatus</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Burge, Dylan O ; Hopkins, Robin ; Tsai, Yi-Hsin Erica ; Manos, Paul S</creator><creatorcontrib>Burge, Dylan O ; Hopkins, Robin ; Tsai, Yi-Hsin Erica ; Manos, Paul S</creatorcontrib><description>• Premise of the study: Hybridization is thought to have played an important role in diversification of the speciose shrub genus Ceanothus; putative hybrid species have been described, and data suggest that intrinsic barriers may not exist among closely related species. However, the extent to which hybridization occurs in the wild is not known, and little is understood about how extrinsic factors such as soil chemistry may influence the process. The present research focuses on the gabbro-endemic C. roderickii and the closely related soil-generalist C. cuneatus. Though the species occur peripatrically, they remain distinct across an edaphic disjunction.• Methods: AFLP was used to quantify hybridization and introgression. Biological data and experiments were used to test for prezygotic isolation. Growth trials were used to test for local adaptation and selection against hybrids.• Key results: Ceanothus cuneatus and C. roderickii were strongly differentiated morphologically and genetically, despite a lack of evidence for prezygotic barriers. Hybrids and back-crosses were present but infrequent. Finally, there was selection against hybrids in nonnative soil.• Conclusions: There is little genetic exchange between the focal species across an edaphic disjunction, despite the absence of prezygotic barriers. This result implies that soil conditions, as well as other extrinsic factors, should be considered as forces that may restrict hybridization and gene flow in Ceanothus, influencing local adaptation and speciation. Findings presented here are significant because they imply that exchange of genetic material between plants may be limited directly by the abiotic environment, rather than by the biology of the plants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9122</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1200604</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24018856</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJBOAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Botanical Society of America</publisher><subject>adaptation ; Adaptation, Biological ; AFLP ; amplified fragment length polymorphism ; Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis ; backcrossing ; Botany ; Ceanothus ; Ceanothus - genetics ; Ceanothus cuneatus ; Cross pollination ; Ecological genetics ; Ecology ; Environment ; Evolution ; Gabbro ; gene flow ; genetic ; Genetic hybridization ; Genetics ; Hybridity ; Hybridization ; Hybridization, Genetic ; hybrids ; introgression ; Plant reproduction ; Plants ; Population Biology ; Reproductive Isolation ; Rhamnaceae ; Seeds ; shrubs ; Soil ; soil chemistry ; Soils ; Species</subject><ispartof>American journal of botany, 2013-09, Vol.100 (9), p.1883-1895</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2013 Botanical Society of America, Inc.</rights><rights>2013 Botanical Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright Botanical Society of America, Inc. Sep 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4713-1e4d20783fb7c81710be444770f94d8c2629ae17ff267140abe5bf300ea3cd853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4713-1e4d20783fb7c81710be444770f94d8c2629ae17ff267140abe5bf300ea3cd853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23596218$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23596218$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24018856$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burge, Dylan O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkins, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Yi-Hsin Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manos, Paul S</creatorcontrib><title>Limited hybridization across an edaphic disjunction between the gabbro-endemic shrub Ceanothus roderickii (Rhamnaceae) and the soil-generalist Ceanothus cuneatus</title><title>American journal of botany</title><addtitle>Am J Bot</addtitle><description>• Premise of the study: Hybridization is thought to have played an important role in diversification of the speciose shrub genus Ceanothus; putative hybrid species have been described, and data suggest that intrinsic barriers may not exist among closely related species. However, the extent to which hybridization occurs in the wild is not known, and little is understood about how extrinsic factors such as soil chemistry may influence the process. The present research focuses on the gabbro-endemic C. roderickii and the closely related soil-generalist C. cuneatus. Though the species occur peripatrically, they remain distinct across an edaphic disjunction.• Methods: AFLP was used to quantify hybridization and introgression. Biological data and experiments were used to test for prezygotic isolation. Growth trials were used to test for local adaptation and selection against hybrids.• Key results: Ceanothus cuneatus and C. roderickii were strongly differentiated morphologically and genetically, despite a lack of evidence for prezygotic barriers. Hybrids and back-crosses were present but infrequent. Finally, there was selection against hybrids in nonnative soil.• Conclusions: There is little genetic exchange between the focal species across an edaphic disjunction, despite the absence of prezygotic barriers. This result implies that soil conditions, as well as other extrinsic factors, should be considered as forces that may restrict hybridization and gene flow in Ceanothus, influencing local adaptation and speciation. Findings presented here are significant because they imply that exchange of genetic material between plants may be limited directly by the abiotic environment, rather than by the biology of the plants.</description><subject>adaptation</subject><subject>Adaptation, Biological</subject><subject>AFLP</subject><subject>amplified fragment length polymorphism</subject><subject>Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis</subject><subject>backcrossing</subject><subject>Botany</subject><subject>Ceanothus</subject><subject>Ceanothus - genetics</subject><subject>Ceanothus cuneatus</subject><subject>Cross pollination</subject><subject>Ecological genetics</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Gabbro</subject><subject>gene flow</subject><subject>genetic</subject><subject>Genetic hybridization</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Hybridity</subject><subject>Hybridization</subject><subject>Hybridization, Genetic</subject><subject>hybrids</subject><subject>introgression</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Population Biology</subject><subject>Reproductive Isolation</subject><subject>Rhamnaceae</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>shrubs</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>soil chemistry</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Species</subject><issn>0002-9122</issn><issn>1537-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kktv1DAUhSMEotPCijVgiU0RSvErcbIsI54aCQnoOvLjZuKQ2FM7UTX9N_xT3MnwEAtWV9b5ztHVPc6yJwRfMMHoa9mrC0IxLjG_l61IwUROSS3uZyuMMc1rQulJdhpjn541r-nD7IRyTKqqKFfZj40d7QQGdXsVrLG3crLeIamDjxFJh8DIXWc1Mjb2s9MHVcF0A-DQ1AHaSqWCz8EZGBMWuzArtAbp_NTNEQVvIFj93Vp0_qWTo5MaJLxMyeZgj94O-RYcBDnYOP3l1LMDOc3xUfaglUOEx8d5ll29e_tt_SHffH7_cX25yTUXhOUEuKFYVKxVQldEEKyAcy4EbmtuKk1LWksgom1pKQjHUkGhWoYxSKZNVbCz7HzJ3QV_PUOcmtFGDcMgHfg5NoQzRgUTHCf0xT9o7-fg0nZ3FOesIgVP1KuFOtwyQNvsgh1l2DcEN3fNNam55thcop8dM2c1gvnN_qoqAWQBbuwA-_9lNZef3tBkYsnzdPH0cfLhTyYr6jIRSX--6K30jdwGG5urrxSTIn0Vks5UsJ_B_Ler</recordid><startdate>201309</startdate><enddate>201309</enddate><creator>Burge, Dylan O</creator><creator>Hopkins, Robin</creator><creator>Tsai, Yi-Hsin Erica</creator><creator>Manos, Paul S</creator><general>Botanical Society of America</general><general>Botanical Society of America, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201309</creationdate><title>Limited hybridization across an edaphic disjunction between the gabbro-endemic shrub Ceanothus roderickii (Rhamnaceae) and the soil-generalist Ceanothus cuneatus</title><author>Burge, Dylan O ; Hopkins, Robin ; Tsai, Yi-Hsin Erica ; Manos, Paul S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4713-1e4d20783fb7c81710be444770f94d8c2629ae17ff267140abe5bf300ea3cd853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>adaptation</topic><topic>Adaptation, Biological</topic><topic>AFLP</topic><topic>amplified fragment length polymorphism</topic><topic>Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis</topic><topic>backcrossing</topic><topic>Botany</topic><topic>Ceanothus</topic><topic>Ceanothus - genetics</topic><topic>Ceanothus cuneatus</topic><topic>Cross pollination</topic><topic>Ecological genetics</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Gabbro</topic><topic>gene flow</topic><topic>genetic</topic><topic>Genetic hybridization</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Hybridity</topic><topic>Hybridization</topic><topic>Hybridization, Genetic</topic><topic>hybrids</topic><topic>introgression</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Population Biology</topic><topic>Reproductive Isolation</topic><topic>Rhamnaceae</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>shrubs</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>soil chemistry</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Species</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burge, Dylan O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkins, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Yi-Hsin Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manos, Paul S</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burge, Dylan O</au><au>Hopkins, Robin</au><au>Tsai, Yi-Hsin Erica</au><au>Manos, Paul S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Limited hybridization across an edaphic disjunction between the gabbro-endemic shrub Ceanothus roderickii (Rhamnaceae) and the soil-generalist Ceanothus cuneatus</atitle><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Bot</addtitle><date>2013-09</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1883</spage><epage>1895</epage><pages>1883-1895</pages><issn>0002-9122</issn><eissn>1537-2197</eissn><coden>AJBOAA</coden><abstract>• Premise of the study: Hybridization is thought to have played an important role in diversification of the speciose shrub genus Ceanothus; putative hybrid species have been described, and data suggest that intrinsic barriers may not exist among closely related species. However, the extent to which hybridization occurs in the wild is not known, and little is understood about how extrinsic factors such as soil chemistry may influence the process. The present research focuses on the gabbro-endemic C. roderickii and the closely related soil-generalist C. cuneatus. Though the species occur peripatrically, they remain distinct across an edaphic disjunction.• Methods: AFLP was used to quantify hybridization and introgression. Biological data and experiments were used to test for prezygotic isolation. Growth trials were used to test for local adaptation and selection against hybrids.• Key results: Ceanothus cuneatus and C. roderickii were strongly differentiated morphologically and genetically, despite a lack of evidence for prezygotic barriers. Hybrids and back-crosses were present but infrequent. Finally, there was selection against hybrids in nonnative soil.• Conclusions: There is little genetic exchange between the focal species across an edaphic disjunction, despite the absence of prezygotic barriers. This result implies that soil conditions, as well as other extrinsic factors, should be considered as forces that may restrict hybridization and gene flow in Ceanothus, influencing local adaptation and speciation. Findings presented here are significant because they imply that exchange of genetic material between plants may be limited directly by the abiotic environment, rather than by the biology of the plants.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Botanical Society of America</pub><pmid>24018856</pmid><doi>10.3732/ajb.1200604</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9122
ispartof American journal of botany, 2013-09, Vol.100 (9), p.1883-1895
issn 0002-9122
1537-2197
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1433273740
source MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects adaptation
Adaptation, Biological
AFLP
amplified fragment length polymorphism
Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis
backcrossing
Botany
Ceanothus
Ceanothus - genetics
Ceanothus cuneatus
Cross pollination
Ecological genetics
Ecology
Environment
Evolution
Gabbro
gene flow
genetic
Genetic hybridization
Genetics
Hybridity
Hybridization
Hybridization, Genetic
hybrids
introgression
Plant reproduction
Plants
Population Biology
Reproductive Isolation
Rhamnaceae
Seeds
shrubs
Soil
soil chemistry
Soils
Species
title Limited hybridization across an edaphic disjunction between the gabbro-endemic shrub Ceanothus roderickii (Rhamnaceae) and the soil-generalist Ceanothus cuneatus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T20%3A53%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Limited%20hybridization%20across%20an%20edaphic%20disjunction%20between%20the%20gabbro-endemic%20shrub%20Ceanothus%20roderickii%20(Rhamnaceae)%20and%20the%20soil-generalist%20Ceanothus%20cuneatus&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20botany&rft.au=Burge,%20Dylan%20O&rft.date=2013-09&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1883&rft.epage=1895&rft.pages=1883-1895&rft.issn=0002-9122&rft.eissn=1537-2197&rft.coden=AJBOAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.3732/ajb.1200604&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23596218%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1434438154&rft_id=info:pmid/24018856&rft_jstor_id=23596218&rfr_iscdi=true