Limited hybridization across an edaphic disjunction between the gabbro-endemic shrub Ceanothus roderickii (Rhamnaceae) and the soil-generalist Ceanothus cuneatus
• Premise of the study: Hybridization is thought to have played an important role in diversification of the speciose shrub genus Ceanothus; putative hybrid species have been described, and data suggest that intrinsic barriers may not exist among closely related species. However, the extent to which...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of botany 2013-09, Vol.100 (9), p.1883-1895 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1895 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1883 |
container_title | American journal of botany |
container_volume | 100 |
creator | Burge, Dylan O Hopkins, Robin Tsai, Yi-Hsin Erica Manos, Paul S |
description | • Premise of the study: Hybridization is thought to have played an important role in diversification of the speciose shrub genus Ceanothus; putative hybrid species have been described, and data suggest that intrinsic barriers may not exist among closely related species. However, the extent to which hybridization occurs in the wild is not known, and little is understood about how extrinsic factors such as soil chemistry may influence the process. The present research focuses on the gabbro-endemic C. roderickii and the closely related soil-generalist C. cuneatus. Though the species occur peripatrically, they remain distinct across an edaphic disjunction.• Methods: AFLP was used to quantify hybridization and introgression. Biological data and experiments were used to test for prezygotic isolation. Growth trials were used to test for local adaptation and selection against hybrids.• Key results: Ceanothus cuneatus and C. roderickii were strongly differentiated morphologically and genetically, despite a lack of evidence for prezygotic barriers. Hybrids and back-crosses were present but infrequent. Finally, there was selection against hybrids in nonnative soil.• Conclusions: There is little genetic exchange between the focal species across an edaphic disjunction, despite the absence of prezygotic barriers. This result implies that soil conditions, as well as other extrinsic factors, should be considered as forces that may restrict hybridization and gene flow in Ceanothus, influencing local adaptation and speciation. Findings presented here are significant because they imply that exchange of genetic material between plants may be limited directly by the abiotic environment, rather than by the biology of the plants. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3732/ajb.1200604 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1433273740</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23596218</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23596218</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4713-1e4d20783fb7c81710be444770f94d8c2629ae17ff267140abe5bf300ea3cd853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kktv1DAUhSMEotPCijVgiU0RSvErcbIsI54aCQnoOvLjZuKQ2FM7UTX9N_xT3MnwEAtWV9b5ztHVPc6yJwRfMMHoa9mrC0IxLjG_l61IwUROSS3uZyuMMc1rQulJdhpjn541r-nD7IRyTKqqKFfZj40d7QQGdXsVrLG3crLeIamDjxFJh8DIXWc1Mjb2s9MHVcF0A-DQ1AHaSqWCz8EZGBMWuzArtAbp_NTNEQVvIFj93Vp0_qWTo5MaJLxMyeZgj94O-RYcBDnYOP3l1LMDOc3xUfaglUOEx8d5ll29e_tt_SHffH7_cX25yTUXhOUEuKFYVKxVQldEEKyAcy4EbmtuKk1LWksgom1pKQjHUkGhWoYxSKZNVbCz7HzJ3QV_PUOcmtFGDcMgHfg5NoQzRgUTHCf0xT9o7-fg0nZ3FOesIgVP1KuFOtwyQNvsgh1l2DcEN3fNNam55thcop8dM2c1gvnN_qoqAWQBbuwA-_9lNZef3tBkYsnzdPH0cfLhTyYr6jIRSX--6K30jdwGG5urrxSTIn0Vks5UsJ_B_Ler</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1434438154</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Limited hybridization across an edaphic disjunction between the gabbro-endemic shrub Ceanothus roderickii (Rhamnaceae) and the soil-generalist Ceanothus cuneatus</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Burge, Dylan O ; Hopkins, Robin ; Tsai, Yi-Hsin Erica ; Manos, Paul S</creator><creatorcontrib>Burge, Dylan O ; Hopkins, Robin ; Tsai, Yi-Hsin Erica ; Manos, Paul S</creatorcontrib><description>• Premise of the study: Hybridization is thought to have played an important role in diversification of the speciose shrub genus Ceanothus; putative hybrid species have been described, and data suggest that intrinsic barriers may not exist among closely related species. However, the extent to which hybridization occurs in the wild is not known, and little is understood about how extrinsic factors such as soil chemistry may influence the process. The present research focuses on the gabbro-endemic C. roderickii and the closely related soil-generalist C. cuneatus. Though the species occur peripatrically, they remain distinct across an edaphic disjunction.• Methods: AFLP was used to quantify hybridization and introgression. Biological data and experiments were used to test for prezygotic isolation. Growth trials were used to test for local adaptation and selection against hybrids.• Key results: Ceanothus cuneatus and C. roderickii were strongly differentiated morphologically and genetically, despite a lack of evidence for prezygotic barriers. Hybrids and back-crosses were present but infrequent. Finally, there was selection against hybrids in nonnative soil.• Conclusions: There is little genetic exchange between the focal species across an edaphic disjunction, despite the absence of prezygotic barriers. This result implies that soil conditions, as well as other extrinsic factors, should be considered as forces that may restrict hybridization and gene flow in Ceanothus, influencing local adaptation and speciation. Findings presented here are significant because they imply that exchange of genetic material between plants may be limited directly by the abiotic environment, rather than by the biology of the plants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9122</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1200604</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24018856</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJBOAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Botanical Society of America</publisher><subject>adaptation ; Adaptation, Biological ; AFLP ; amplified fragment length polymorphism ; Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis ; backcrossing ; Botany ; Ceanothus ; Ceanothus - genetics ; Ceanothus cuneatus ; Cross pollination ; Ecological genetics ; Ecology ; Environment ; Evolution ; Gabbro ; gene flow ; genetic ; Genetic hybridization ; Genetics ; Hybridity ; Hybridization ; Hybridization, Genetic ; hybrids ; introgression ; Plant reproduction ; Plants ; Population Biology ; Reproductive Isolation ; Rhamnaceae ; Seeds ; shrubs ; Soil ; soil chemistry ; Soils ; Species</subject><ispartof>American journal of botany, 2013-09, Vol.100 (9), p.1883-1895</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2013 Botanical Society of America, Inc.</rights><rights>2013 Botanical Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright Botanical Society of America, Inc. Sep 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4713-1e4d20783fb7c81710be444770f94d8c2629ae17ff267140abe5bf300ea3cd853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4713-1e4d20783fb7c81710be444770f94d8c2629ae17ff267140abe5bf300ea3cd853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23596218$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23596218$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24018856$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burge, Dylan O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkins, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Yi-Hsin Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manos, Paul S</creatorcontrib><title>Limited hybridization across an edaphic disjunction between the gabbro-endemic shrub Ceanothus roderickii (Rhamnaceae) and the soil-generalist Ceanothus cuneatus</title><title>American journal of botany</title><addtitle>Am J Bot</addtitle><description>• Premise of the study: Hybridization is thought to have played an important role in diversification of the speciose shrub genus Ceanothus; putative hybrid species have been described, and data suggest that intrinsic barriers may not exist among closely related species. However, the extent to which hybridization occurs in the wild is not known, and little is understood about how extrinsic factors such as soil chemistry may influence the process. The present research focuses on the gabbro-endemic C. roderickii and the closely related soil-generalist C. cuneatus. Though the species occur peripatrically, they remain distinct across an edaphic disjunction.• Methods: AFLP was used to quantify hybridization and introgression. Biological data and experiments were used to test for prezygotic isolation. Growth trials were used to test for local adaptation and selection against hybrids.• Key results: Ceanothus cuneatus and C. roderickii were strongly differentiated morphologically and genetically, despite a lack of evidence for prezygotic barriers. Hybrids and back-crosses were present but infrequent. Finally, there was selection against hybrids in nonnative soil.• Conclusions: There is little genetic exchange between the focal species across an edaphic disjunction, despite the absence of prezygotic barriers. This result implies that soil conditions, as well as other extrinsic factors, should be considered as forces that may restrict hybridization and gene flow in Ceanothus, influencing local adaptation and speciation. Findings presented here are significant because they imply that exchange of genetic material between plants may be limited directly by the abiotic environment, rather than by the biology of the plants.</description><subject>adaptation</subject><subject>Adaptation, Biological</subject><subject>AFLP</subject><subject>amplified fragment length polymorphism</subject><subject>Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis</subject><subject>backcrossing</subject><subject>Botany</subject><subject>Ceanothus</subject><subject>Ceanothus - genetics</subject><subject>Ceanothus cuneatus</subject><subject>Cross pollination</subject><subject>Ecological genetics</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Gabbro</subject><subject>gene flow</subject><subject>genetic</subject><subject>Genetic hybridization</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Hybridity</subject><subject>Hybridization</subject><subject>Hybridization, Genetic</subject><subject>hybrids</subject><subject>introgression</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Population Biology</subject><subject>Reproductive Isolation</subject><subject>Rhamnaceae</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>shrubs</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>soil chemistry</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Species</subject><issn>0002-9122</issn><issn>1537-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kktv1DAUhSMEotPCijVgiU0RSvErcbIsI54aCQnoOvLjZuKQ2FM7UTX9N_xT3MnwEAtWV9b5ztHVPc6yJwRfMMHoa9mrC0IxLjG_l61IwUROSS3uZyuMMc1rQulJdhpjn541r-nD7IRyTKqqKFfZj40d7QQGdXsVrLG3crLeIamDjxFJh8DIXWc1Mjb2s9MHVcF0A-DQ1AHaSqWCz8EZGBMWuzArtAbp_NTNEQVvIFj93Vp0_qWTo5MaJLxMyeZgj94O-RYcBDnYOP3l1LMDOc3xUfaglUOEx8d5ll29e_tt_SHffH7_cX25yTUXhOUEuKFYVKxVQldEEKyAcy4EbmtuKk1LWksgom1pKQjHUkGhWoYxSKZNVbCz7HzJ3QV_PUOcmtFGDcMgHfg5NoQzRgUTHCf0xT9o7-fg0nZ3FOesIgVP1KuFOtwyQNvsgh1l2DcEN3fNNam55thcop8dM2c1gvnN_qoqAWQBbuwA-_9lNZef3tBkYsnzdPH0cfLhTyYr6jIRSX--6K30jdwGG5urrxSTIn0Vks5UsJ_B_Ler</recordid><startdate>201309</startdate><enddate>201309</enddate><creator>Burge, Dylan O</creator><creator>Hopkins, Robin</creator><creator>Tsai, Yi-Hsin Erica</creator><creator>Manos, Paul S</creator><general>Botanical Society of America</general><general>Botanical Society of America, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201309</creationdate><title>Limited hybridization across an edaphic disjunction between the gabbro-endemic shrub Ceanothus roderickii (Rhamnaceae) and the soil-generalist Ceanothus cuneatus</title><author>Burge, Dylan O ; Hopkins, Robin ; Tsai, Yi-Hsin Erica ; Manos, Paul S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4713-1e4d20783fb7c81710be444770f94d8c2629ae17ff267140abe5bf300ea3cd853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>adaptation</topic><topic>Adaptation, Biological</topic><topic>AFLP</topic><topic>amplified fragment length polymorphism</topic><topic>Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis</topic><topic>backcrossing</topic><topic>Botany</topic><topic>Ceanothus</topic><topic>Ceanothus - genetics</topic><topic>Ceanothus cuneatus</topic><topic>Cross pollination</topic><topic>Ecological genetics</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Gabbro</topic><topic>gene flow</topic><topic>genetic</topic><topic>Genetic hybridization</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Hybridity</topic><topic>Hybridization</topic><topic>Hybridization, Genetic</topic><topic>hybrids</topic><topic>introgression</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Population Biology</topic><topic>Reproductive Isolation</topic><topic>Rhamnaceae</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>shrubs</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>soil chemistry</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Species</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burge, Dylan O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkins, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Yi-Hsin Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manos, Paul S</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burge, Dylan O</au><au>Hopkins, Robin</au><au>Tsai, Yi-Hsin Erica</au><au>Manos, Paul S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Limited hybridization across an edaphic disjunction between the gabbro-endemic shrub Ceanothus roderickii (Rhamnaceae) and the soil-generalist Ceanothus cuneatus</atitle><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Bot</addtitle><date>2013-09</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1883</spage><epage>1895</epage><pages>1883-1895</pages><issn>0002-9122</issn><eissn>1537-2197</eissn><coden>AJBOAA</coden><abstract>• Premise of the study: Hybridization is thought to have played an important role in diversification of the speciose shrub genus Ceanothus; putative hybrid species have been described, and data suggest that intrinsic barriers may not exist among closely related species. However, the extent to which hybridization occurs in the wild is not known, and little is understood about how extrinsic factors such as soil chemistry may influence the process. The present research focuses on the gabbro-endemic C. roderickii and the closely related soil-generalist C. cuneatus. Though the species occur peripatrically, they remain distinct across an edaphic disjunction.• Methods: AFLP was used to quantify hybridization and introgression. Biological data and experiments were used to test for prezygotic isolation. Growth trials were used to test for local adaptation and selection against hybrids.• Key results: Ceanothus cuneatus and C. roderickii were strongly differentiated morphologically and genetically, despite a lack of evidence for prezygotic barriers. Hybrids and back-crosses were present but infrequent. Finally, there was selection against hybrids in nonnative soil.• Conclusions: There is little genetic exchange between the focal species across an edaphic disjunction, despite the absence of prezygotic barriers. This result implies that soil conditions, as well as other extrinsic factors, should be considered as forces that may restrict hybridization and gene flow in Ceanothus, influencing local adaptation and speciation. Findings presented here are significant because they imply that exchange of genetic material between plants may be limited directly by the abiotic environment, rather than by the biology of the plants.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Botanical Society of America</pub><pmid>24018856</pmid><doi>10.3732/ajb.1200604</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9122 |
ispartof | American journal of botany, 2013-09, Vol.100 (9), p.1883-1895 |
issn | 0002-9122 1537-2197 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1433273740 |
source | MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | adaptation Adaptation, Biological AFLP amplified fragment length polymorphism Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis backcrossing Botany Ceanothus Ceanothus - genetics Ceanothus cuneatus Cross pollination Ecological genetics Ecology Environment Evolution Gabbro gene flow genetic Genetic hybridization Genetics Hybridity Hybridization Hybridization, Genetic hybrids introgression Plant reproduction Plants Population Biology Reproductive Isolation Rhamnaceae Seeds shrubs Soil soil chemistry Soils Species |
title | Limited hybridization across an edaphic disjunction between the gabbro-endemic shrub Ceanothus roderickii (Rhamnaceae) and the soil-generalist Ceanothus cuneatus |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T20%3A53%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Limited%20hybridization%20across%20an%20edaphic%20disjunction%20between%20the%20gabbro-endemic%20shrub%20Ceanothus%20roderickii%20(Rhamnaceae)%20and%20the%20soil-generalist%20Ceanothus%20cuneatus&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20botany&rft.au=Burge,%20Dylan%20O&rft.date=2013-09&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1883&rft.epage=1895&rft.pages=1883-1895&rft.issn=0002-9122&rft.eissn=1537-2197&rft.coden=AJBOAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.3732/ajb.1200604&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23596218%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1434438154&rft_id=info:pmid/24018856&rft_jstor_id=23596218&rfr_iscdi=true |