Effects of supplemental nitrate and thermal regime on the nitrogen nutrition of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): I. Growth and development
Nodulated chickpea plants were grown in pots in a glasshouse programmed to simulate either hot (32.5°C day/18°C night) or warm (25°/18°C) thermal regimes characteristic of those experienced by crops grown in different seasons or locations in the semi-arid tropics. The plants were irrigated with nutr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plant and soil 1985-06, Vol.83 (2), p.265-277 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 277 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 265 |
container_title | Plant and soil |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | RAWSTHORNE, S. HADLEY, P. ROBERTS, E. H. SUMMERFIELD, R. J. |
description | Nodulated chickpea plants were grown in pots in a glasshouse programmed to simulate either hot (32.5°C day/18°C night) or warm (25°/18°C) thermal regimes characteristic of those experienced by crops grown in different seasons or locations in the semi-arid tropics. The plants were irrigated with nutrient solution either devoid of inorganic nitrogen or containing 0.71, 1.43 or 2.86 mM nitrate. Increasing concentrations of supplemental nitrate stimulated the rate of dry matter production by vegetative plants in both thermal regimes. Differences between vegetative dry weight of plants given nitrate and those relying exclusively on symbiotic dinitrogen fixation were greatest in the hot regime where the durations of vegetative growth were shorter. However, symbiotically-dependent plants and those given 0.71 mM nitrate continued to produce branches throughout the reproductive period, particularly in the warm regime. As they matured, these plants became more comparable in vegetative stature to those which had received greater concentrations of nitrate and had established final branch numbers earlier (i.e. prior to main pod-fill). Potential seed yields were determined primarily by the number of potential reproductive sites (nodes) available (i.e. by the extent of branching) which largely determined the number of seeds harvested. Since final branch numbers in all nitrate treatments were greatest in the warm regime, yields were also larger than those at 32.5°C. The implications of these data for the nitrogen economy of chickpea crops is discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF02184298 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14328950</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42934745</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>42934745</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c185t-c92564ab3fce1fa5b1b22213d8c8c83b4caaca3a0c53a7640862d322748b7aab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEtrGzEURkVpIK7TTfYFLUJoC-PqMc_sWuOkBkM2CWQ33JHv2HJmpImkack_yM-u_CBFC6FP554LHyGXnM04Y8WPX7dM8DIVVfmBTHhWyCRjMv9IJoxJkbCiejonn7zfsf2b5xPytmhbVMFT21I_DkOHPZoAHTU6OAhIwaxp2KLrY-Zwo3uk1uyTA2E3aKgZg9NBxzhK1Far5wGBfp1rhY6C0xi0GXu6mn27ocsZvXP2b9gexGv8g50d9isvyFkLncfPp3tKHm8XD_Pfyer-bjn_uUoUL7OQqEpkeQqNbBXyFrKGN0IILtelikc2qQJQIIGpTEKRp6zMxVoKUaRlU0Ccm5Lro3dw9mVEH-pee4VdBwbt6GueSlFWsbUp-X4ElbPeO2zrweke3GvNWb0vu_5fdoSvTlbwCrrWgVHav09UTMqyyCP25YjtfLDu_TsqZFqkmfwHOs-JNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14328950</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of supplemental nitrate and thermal regime on the nitrogen nutrition of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): I. Growth and development</title><source>Springer Online Journals Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>RAWSTHORNE, S. ; HADLEY, P. ; ROBERTS, E. H. ; SUMMERFIELD, R. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>RAWSTHORNE, S. ; HADLEY, P. ; ROBERTS, E. H. ; SUMMERFIELD, R. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Nodulated chickpea plants were grown in pots in a glasshouse programmed to simulate either hot (32.5°C day/18°C night) or warm (25°/18°C) thermal regimes characteristic of those experienced by crops grown in different seasons or locations in the semi-arid tropics. The plants were irrigated with nutrient solution either devoid of inorganic nitrogen or containing 0.71, 1.43 or 2.86 mM nitrate. Increasing concentrations of supplemental nitrate stimulated the rate of dry matter production by vegetative plants in both thermal regimes. Differences between vegetative dry weight of plants given nitrate and those relying exclusively on symbiotic dinitrogen fixation were greatest in the hot regime where the durations of vegetative growth were shorter. However, symbiotically-dependent plants and those given 0.71 mM nitrate continued to produce branches throughout the reproductive period, particularly in the warm regime. As they matured, these plants became more comparable in vegetative stature to those which had received greater concentrations of nitrate and had established final branch numbers earlier (i.e. prior to main pod-fill). Potential seed yields were determined primarily by the number of potential reproductive sites (nodes) available (i.e. by the extent of branching) which largely determined the number of seeds harvested. Since final branch numbers in all nitrate treatments were greatest in the warm regime, yields were also larger than those at 32.5°C. The implications of these data for the nitrogen economy of chickpea crops is discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-079X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02184298</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PLSOA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W.Junk Publishers</publisher><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage ; Agricultural and forest meteorology ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chickpeas ; Cicer arietinum ; Crop climate. Energy and radiation balances ; Crop harvesting ; Economic plant physiology ; Fruits ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Mineral nutrition ; nitrate ; Nitrates ; Nitrogen ; Nitrogen fertilization ; Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations ; Nodulation ; Nutrition ; Nutrition. Photosynthesis. Respiration. Metabolism ; Plants ; Rhizobium ; Seed productivity ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments ; Sowing ; temperature</subject><ispartof>Plant and soil, 1985-06, Vol.83 (2), p.265-277</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1985 Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers</rights><rights>1985 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c185t-c92564ab3fce1fa5b1b22213d8c8c83b4caaca3a0c53a7640862d322748b7aab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/42934745$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/42934745$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=9033876$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>RAWSTHORNE, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HADLEY, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROBERTS, E. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SUMMERFIELD, R. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of supplemental nitrate and thermal regime on the nitrogen nutrition of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): I. Growth and development</title><title>Plant and soil</title><description>Nodulated chickpea plants were grown in pots in a glasshouse programmed to simulate either hot (32.5°C day/18°C night) or warm (25°/18°C) thermal regimes characteristic of those experienced by crops grown in different seasons or locations in the semi-arid tropics. The plants were irrigated with nutrient solution either devoid of inorganic nitrogen or containing 0.71, 1.43 or 2.86 mM nitrate. Increasing concentrations of supplemental nitrate stimulated the rate of dry matter production by vegetative plants in both thermal regimes. Differences between vegetative dry weight of plants given nitrate and those relying exclusively on symbiotic dinitrogen fixation were greatest in the hot regime where the durations of vegetative growth were shorter. However, symbiotically-dependent plants and those given 0.71 mM nitrate continued to produce branches throughout the reproductive period, particularly in the warm regime. As they matured, these plants became more comparable in vegetative stature to those which had received greater concentrations of nitrate and had established final branch numbers earlier (i.e. prior to main pod-fill). Potential seed yields were determined primarily by the number of potential reproductive sites (nodes) available (i.e. by the extent of branching) which largely determined the number of seeds harvested. Since final branch numbers in all nitrate treatments were greatest in the warm regime, yields were also larger than those at 32.5°C. The implications of these data for the nitrogen economy of chickpea crops is discussed.</description><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</subject><subject>Agricultural and forest meteorology</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chickpeas</subject><subject>Cicer arietinum</subject><subject>Crop climate. Energy and radiation balances</subject><subject>Crop harvesting</subject><subject>Economic plant physiology</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Mineral nutrition</subject><subject>nitrate</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen fertilization</subject><subject>Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations</subject><subject>Nodulation</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutrition. Photosynthesis. Respiration. Metabolism</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Rhizobium</subject><subject>Seed productivity</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</subject><subject>Sowing</subject><subject>temperature</subject><issn>0032-079X</issn><issn>1573-5036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkEtrGzEURkVpIK7TTfYFLUJoC-PqMc_sWuOkBkM2CWQ33JHv2HJmpImkack_yM-u_CBFC6FP554LHyGXnM04Y8WPX7dM8DIVVfmBTHhWyCRjMv9IJoxJkbCiejonn7zfsf2b5xPytmhbVMFT21I_DkOHPZoAHTU6OAhIwaxp2KLrY-Zwo3uk1uyTA2E3aKgZg9NBxzhK1Far5wGBfp1rhY6C0xi0GXu6mn27ocsZvXP2b9gexGv8g50d9isvyFkLncfPp3tKHm8XD_Pfyer-bjn_uUoUL7OQqEpkeQqNbBXyFrKGN0IILtelikc2qQJQIIGpTEKRp6zMxVoKUaRlU0Ccm5Lro3dw9mVEH-pee4VdBwbt6GueSlFWsbUp-X4ElbPeO2zrweke3GvNWb0vu_5fdoSvTlbwCrrWgVHav09UTMqyyCP25YjtfLDu_TsqZFqkmfwHOs-JNA</recordid><startdate>198506</startdate><enddate>198506</enddate><creator>RAWSTHORNE, S.</creator><creator>HADLEY, P.</creator><creator>ROBERTS, E. H.</creator><creator>SUMMERFIELD, R. J.</creator><general>Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W.Junk Publishers</general><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198506</creationdate><title>Effects of supplemental nitrate and thermal regime on the nitrogen nutrition of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): I. Growth and development</title><author>RAWSTHORNE, S. ; HADLEY, P. ; ROBERTS, E. H. ; SUMMERFIELD, R. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c185t-c92564ab3fce1fa5b1b22213d8c8c83b4caaca3a0c53a7640862d322748b7aab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</topic><topic>Agricultural and forest meteorology</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chickpeas</topic><topic>Cicer arietinum</topic><topic>Crop climate. Energy and radiation balances</topic><topic>Crop harvesting</topic><topic>Economic plant physiology</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Mineral nutrition</topic><topic>nitrate</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen fertilization</topic><topic>Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations</topic><topic>Nodulation</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutrition. Photosynthesis. Respiration. Metabolism</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Rhizobium</topic><topic>Seed productivity</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</topic><topic>Sowing</topic><topic>temperature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>RAWSTHORNE, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HADLEY, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROBERTS, E. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SUMMERFIELD, R. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>RAWSTHORNE, S.</au><au>HADLEY, P.</au><au>ROBERTS, E. H.</au><au>SUMMERFIELD, R. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of supplemental nitrate and thermal regime on the nitrogen nutrition of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): I. Growth and development</atitle><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle><date>1985-06</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>265</spage><epage>277</epage><pages>265-277</pages><issn>0032-079X</issn><eissn>1573-5036</eissn><coden>PLSOA2</coden><abstract>Nodulated chickpea plants were grown in pots in a glasshouse programmed to simulate either hot (32.5°C day/18°C night) or warm (25°/18°C) thermal regimes characteristic of those experienced by crops grown in different seasons or locations in the semi-arid tropics. The plants were irrigated with nutrient solution either devoid of inorganic nitrogen or containing 0.71, 1.43 or 2.86 mM nitrate. Increasing concentrations of supplemental nitrate stimulated the rate of dry matter production by vegetative plants in both thermal regimes. Differences between vegetative dry weight of plants given nitrate and those relying exclusively on symbiotic dinitrogen fixation were greatest in the hot regime where the durations of vegetative growth were shorter. However, symbiotically-dependent plants and those given 0.71 mM nitrate continued to produce branches throughout the reproductive period, particularly in the warm regime. As they matured, these plants became more comparable in vegetative stature to those which had received greater concentrations of nitrate and had established final branch numbers earlier (i.e. prior to main pod-fill). Potential seed yields were determined primarily by the number of potential reproductive sites (nodes) available (i.e. by the extent of branching) which largely determined the number of seeds harvested. Since final branch numbers in all nitrate treatments were greatest in the warm regime, yields were also larger than those at 32.5°C. The implications of these data for the nitrogen economy of chickpea crops is discussed.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W.Junk Publishers</pub><doi>10.1007/BF02184298</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-079X |
ispartof | Plant and soil, 1985-06, Vol.83 (2), p.265-277 |
issn | 0032-079X 1573-5036 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14328950 |
source | Springer Online Journals Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage Agricultural and forest meteorology Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biological and medical sciences Chickpeas Cicer arietinum Crop climate. Energy and radiation balances Crop harvesting Economic plant physiology Fruits Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agronomy. Plant production Mineral nutrition nitrate Nitrates Nitrogen Nitrogen fertilization Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations Nodulation Nutrition Nutrition. Photosynthesis. Respiration. Metabolism Plants Rhizobium Seed productivity Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments Sowing temperature |
title | Effects of supplemental nitrate and thermal regime on the nitrogen nutrition of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): I. Growth and development |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T02%3A12%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20supplemental%20nitrate%20and%20thermal%20regime%20on%20the%20nitrogen%20nutrition%20of%20chickpea%20(Cicer%20arietinum%20L.):%20I.%20Growth%20and%20development&rft.jtitle=Plant%20and%20soil&rft.au=RAWSTHORNE,%20S.&rft.date=1985-06&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=265&rft.epage=277&rft.pages=265-277&rft.issn=0032-079X&rft.eissn=1573-5036&rft.coden=PLSOA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02184298&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E42934745%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14328950&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=42934745&rfr_iscdi=true |