Chronic Pain and Health Services Utilization: Is There Overuse of Diagnostic Tests and Inequalities in Nonpharmacologic Treatment Methods Utilization?

Background: Few studies have described patterns and determinants of health services utilization (HSU) in chronic pain (CP) subjects. We aimed to describe these, in particular, regarding medical consultations (MCs), diagnostic tests (DTs), pain medicines (PMs) and nonpharmacologic treatment methods (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical care 2013-10, Vol.51 (10), p.859-869
Hauptverfasser: Azevedo, Luís Filipe, Costa-Pereira, Altamiro, Mendonça, Liliane, Dias, Cláudia Camila, Castro-Lopes, José M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 869
container_issue 10
container_start_page 859
container_title Medical care
container_volume 51
creator Azevedo, Luís Filipe
Costa-Pereira, Altamiro
Mendonça, Liliane
Dias, Cláudia Camila
Castro-Lopes, José M.
description Background: Few studies have described patterns and determinants of health services utilization (HSU) in chronic pain (CP) subjects. We aimed to describe these, in particular, regarding medical consultations (MCs), diagnostic tests (DTs), pain medicines (PMs) and nonpharmacologic treatment methods (NTM) utilization. Methods: A cross-sectional nationwide study was conducted in a representative sample of the Portuguese population. The 5094 participants were selected using random digit dialling and were contacted by computer-assisted telephone interviews. Questionnaires included the brief pain inventory and pain disability index. Estimates were adequately weighted for the population. Results: Prevalence of CP and CP with moderate to severe disability was 36.7% and 10.8%, respectively. Most CP subjects were being managed/treated by health professionals (81%) and had high levels of HSU. More than half of them had used imaging DT in the previous 6 months. Main factors associated with HSU were as follows: pain-related disability, intensity, duration, and depressive symptoms for MC utilization; sex, pain-related disability, and duration for PM utilization; and education level and depression diagnosis for NTM utilization. Conclusions: The main drivers behind HSU are pain severity, psychological distress, and socio-economic determinants. An important set of benchmarks are presented regarding HSU in CP subjects, comprising useful tools for public health policy and decision-making. Results presented may suggest possible inequalities in the access to NTM, and interventions to improve access are encouraged. Moreover, possible indirect evidence of imaging DT overuse is presented, and it is recommended that their use in CP subjects should more closely follow existing guidelines.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182a53e4e
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1432619108</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42568827</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>42568827</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355e-20a88b9fe5cb261f169008f3c45e931a6aaac23ae1827b0ab363c119d2645f383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAURi0EokPhDQBZYsMmxT9xYrNBaCh0pClFMF1Hjuem8ZDYU9tpVR6E58XTKZXohtXdnO_cq_sh9JKSI0pU_e50-f2ItIRy4FQyLTiU8AjNqOB1QVUpH6MZIUwUNanVAXoW44YQWnPBnqIDxlWlhJQz9HveB--swd-0dVi7NT4BPaQe_4BwZQ1EfJ7sYH_pZL17jxcRr3oIgM-uIEwRsO_wJ6svnI8pS1YQU7y1LBxcTnqwyWZFNn_1btvrMGrjB3-xQwPoNIJL-BRS79f_LPrwHD3p9BDhxd08ROefj1fzk2J59mUx_7gsDBcCCka0lK3qQJiWVbSjlSJEdtyUAhSnutJaG8Y15A_VLdEtr7ihVK1ZVYqOS36I3u692-Avp3x9M9poYBi0Az_FhpY8exUlO_TNA3Tjp-DydTtKVEzVUmWq3FMm-BgDdM022FGHm4aSZtdbk3trHvaWY6_v5FM7wvo-9LeoDMg9cO2HBCH-HKZrCE1_W9b_3K_20U1MPtyrSyYqmd_C_wDUNLJs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1435629789</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chronic Pain and Health Services Utilization: Is There Overuse of Diagnostic Tests and Inequalities in Nonpharmacologic Treatment Methods Utilization?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Azevedo, Luís Filipe ; Costa-Pereira, Altamiro ; Mendonça, Liliane ; Dias, Cláudia Camila ; Castro-Lopes, José M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Azevedo, Luís Filipe ; Costa-Pereira, Altamiro ; Mendonça, Liliane ; Dias, Cláudia Camila ; Castro-Lopes, José M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Few studies have described patterns and determinants of health services utilization (HSU) in chronic pain (CP) subjects. We aimed to describe these, in particular, regarding medical consultations (MCs), diagnostic tests (DTs), pain medicines (PMs) and nonpharmacologic treatment methods (NTM) utilization. Methods: A cross-sectional nationwide study was conducted in a representative sample of the Portuguese population. The 5094 participants were selected using random digit dialling and were contacted by computer-assisted telephone interviews. Questionnaires included the brief pain inventory and pain disability index. Estimates were adequately weighted for the population. Results: Prevalence of CP and CP with moderate to severe disability was 36.7% and 10.8%, respectively. Most CP subjects were being managed/treated by health professionals (81%) and had high levels of HSU. More than half of them had used imaging DT in the previous 6 months. Main factors associated with HSU were as follows: pain-related disability, intensity, duration, and depressive symptoms for MC utilization; sex, pain-related disability, and duration for PM utilization; and education level and depression diagnosis for NTM utilization. Conclusions: The main drivers behind HSU are pain severity, psychological distress, and socio-economic determinants. An important set of benchmarks are presented regarding HSU in CP subjects, comprising useful tools for public health policy and decision-making. Results presented may suggest possible inequalities in the access to NTM, and interventions to improve access are encouraged. Moreover, possible indirect evidence of imaging DT overuse is presented, and it is recommended that their use in CP subjects should more closely follow existing guidelines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7079</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-1948</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182a53e4e</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23969588</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MELAAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Chronic illnesses ; Chronic pain ; Chronic Pain - diagnosis ; Chronic Pain - epidemiology ; Chronic Pain - psychology ; Chronic Pain - therapy ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Depressive disorders ; Diagnostic tests ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine - utilization ; Disabilities ; Drug Utilization - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Health care industry ; Health care services ; Health care utilization ; Health Services - utilization ; Health Services Misuse ; Humans ; Male ; Managed care ; Medical personnel ; Medical treatment ; Middle Aged ; Pain ; Pain management ; Pain Measurement ; Portugal - epidemiology ; Prevalence ; Referral and Consultation - utilization ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Medical care, 2013-10, Vol.51 (10), p.859-869</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>2013 by Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins.</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Oct 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355e-20a88b9fe5cb261f169008f3c45e931a6aaac23ae1827b0ab363c119d2645f383</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/42568827$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/42568827$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23969588$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Azevedo, Luís Filipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa-Pereira, Altamiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendonça, Liliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias, Cláudia Camila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro-Lopes, José M.</creatorcontrib><title>Chronic Pain and Health Services Utilization: Is There Overuse of Diagnostic Tests and Inequalities in Nonpharmacologic Treatment Methods Utilization?</title><title>Medical care</title><addtitle>Med Care</addtitle><description>Background: Few studies have described patterns and determinants of health services utilization (HSU) in chronic pain (CP) subjects. We aimed to describe these, in particular, regarding medical consultations (MCs), diagnostic tests (DTs), pain medicines (PMs) and nonpharmacologic treatment methods (NTM) utilization. Methods: A cross-sectional nationwide study was conducted in a representative sample of the Portuguese population. The 5094 participants were selected using random digit dialling and were contacted by computer-assisted telephone interviews. Questionnaires included the brief pain inventory and pain disability index. Estimates were adequately weighted for the population. Results: Prevalence of CP and CP with moderate to severe disability was 36.7% and 10.8%, respectively. Most CP subjects were being managed/treated by health professionals (81%) and had high levels of HSU. More than half of them had used imaging DT in the previous 6 months. Main factors associated with HSU were as follows: pain-related disability, intensity, duration, and depressive symptoms for MC utilization; sex, pain-related disability, and duration for PM utilization; and education level and depression diagnosis for NTM utilization. Conclusions: The main drivers behind HSU are pain severity, psychological distress, and socio-economic determinants. An important set of benchmarks are presented regarding HSU in CP subjects, comprising useful tools for public health policy and decision-making. Results presented may suggest possible inequalities in the access to NTM, and interventions to improve access are encouraged. Moreover, possible indirect evidence of imaging DT overuse is presented, and it is recommended that their use in CP subjects should more closely follow existing guidelines.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Chronic pain</subject><subject>Chronic Pain - diagnosis</subject><subject>Chronic Pain - epidemiology</subject><subject>Chronic Pain - psychology</subject><subject>Chronic Pain - therapy</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Depressive disorders</subject><subject>Diagnostic tests</subject><subject>Diagnostic Tests, Routine - utilization</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Drug Utilization - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Health care services</subject><subject>Health care utilization</subject><subject>Health Services - utilization</subject><subject>Health Services Misuse</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Managed care</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain management</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Portugal - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation - utilization</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0025-7079</issn><issn>1537-1948</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAURi0EokPhDQBZYsMmxT9xYrNBaCh0pClFMF1Hjuem8ZDYU9tpVR6E58XTKZXohtXdnO_cq_sh9JKSI0pU_e50-f2ItIRy4FQyLTiU8AjNqOB1QVUpH6MZIUwUNanVAXoW44YQWnPBnqIDxlWlhJQz9HveB--swd-0dVi7NT4BPaQe_4BwZQ1EfJ7sYH_pZL17jxcRr3oIgM-uIEwRsO_wJ6svnI8pS1YQU7y1LBxcTnqwyWZFNn_1btvrMGrjB3-xQwPoNIJL-BRS79f_LPrwHD3p9BDhxd08ROefj1fzk2J59mUx_7gsDBcCCka0lK3qQJiWVbSjlSJEdtyUAhSnutJaG8Y15A_VLdEtr7ihVK1ZVYqOS36I3u692-Avp3x9M9poYBi0Az_FhpY8exUlO_TNA3Tjp-DydTtKVEzVUmWq3FMm-BgDdM022FGHm4aSZtdbk3trHvaWY6_v5FM7wvo-9LeoDMg9cO2HBCH-HKZrCE1_W9b_3K_20U1MPtyrSyYqmd_C_wDUNLJs</recordid><startdate>20131001</startdate><enddate>20131001</enddate><creator>Azevedo, Luís Filipe</creator><creator>Costa-Pereira, Altamiro</creator><creator>Mendonça, Liliane</creator><creator>Dias, Cláudia Camila</creator><creator>Castro-Lopes, José M.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><general>by Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131001</creationdate><title>Chronic Pain and Health Services Utilization: Is There Overuse of Diagnostic Tests and Inequalities in Nonpharmacologic Treatment Methods Utilization?</title><author>Azevedo, Luís Filipe ; Costa-Pereira, Altamiro ; Mendonça, Liliane ; Dias, Cláudia Camila ; Castro-Lopes, José M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355e-20a88b9fe5cb261f169008f3c45e931a6aaac23ae1827b0ab363c119d2645f383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Chronic pain</topic><topic>Chronic Pain - diagnosis</topic><topic>Chronic Pain - epidemiology</topic><topic>Chronic Pain - psychology</topic><topic>Chronic Pain - therapy</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Depressive disorders</topic><topic>Diagnostic tests</topic><topic>Diagnostic Tests, Routine - utilization</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Drug Utilization - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Health care services</topic><topic>Health care utilization</topic><topic>Health Services - utilization</topic><topic>Health Services Misuse</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Managed care</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain management</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Portugal - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation - utilization</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Azevedo, Luís Filipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa-Pereira, Altamiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendonça, Liliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias, Cláudia Camila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro-Lopes, José M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Azevedo, Luís Filipe</au><au>Costa-Pereira, Altamiro</au><au>Mendonça, Liliane</au><au>Dias, Cláudia Camila</au><au>Castro-Lopes, José M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chronic Pain and Health Services Utilization: Is There Overuse of Diagnostic Tests and Inequalities in Nonpharmacologic Treatment Methods Utilization?</atitle><jtitle>Medical care</jtitle><addtitle>Med Care</addtitle><date>2013-10-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>859</spage><epage>869</epage><pages>859-869</pages><issn>0025-7079</issn><eissn>1537-1948</eissn><coden>MELAAD</coden><abstract>Background: Few studies have described patterns and determinants of health services utilization (HSU) in chronic pain (CP) subjects. We aimed to describe these, in particular, regarding medical consultations (MCs), diagnostic tests (DTs), pain medicines (PMs) and nonpharmacologic treatment methods (NTM) utilization. Methods: A cross-sectional nationwide study was conducted in a representative sample of the Portuguese population. The 5094 participants were selected using random digit dialling and were contacted by computer-assisted telephone interviews. Questionnaires included the brief pain inventory and pain disability index. Estimates were adequately weighted for the population. Results: Prevalence of CP and CP with moderate to severe disability was 36.7% and 10.8%, respectively. Most CP subjects were being managed/treated by health professionals (81%) and had high levels of HSU. More than half of them had used imaging DT in the previous 6 months. Main factors associated with HSU were as follows: pain-related disability, intensity, duration, and depressive symptoms for MC utilization; sex, pain-related disability, and duration for PM utilization; and education level and depression diagnosis for NTM utilization. Conclusions: The main drivers behind HSU are pain severity, psychological distress, and socio-economic determinants. An important set of benchmarks are presented regarding HSU in CP subjects, comprising useful tools for public health policy and decision-making. Results presented may suggest possible inequalities in the access to NTM, and interventions to improve access are encouraged. Moreover, possible indirect evidence of imaging DT overuse is presented, and it is recommended that their use in CP subjects should more closely follow existing guidelines.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>23969588</pmid><doi>10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182a53e4e</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-7079
ispartof Medical care, 2013-10, Vol.51 (10), p.859-869
issn 0025-7079
1537-1948
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1432619108
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Chronic illnesses
Chronic pain
Chronic Pain - diagnosis
Chronic Pain - epidemiology
Chronic Pain - psychology
Chronic Pain - therapy
Cross-Sectional Studies
Depressive disorders
Diagnostic tests
Diagnostic Tests, Routine - utilization
Disabilities
Drug Utilization - statistics & numerical data
Female
Health care industry
Health care services
Health care utilization
Health Services - utilization
Health Services Misuse
Humans
Male
Managed care
Medical personnel
Medical treatment
Middle Aged
Pain
Pain management
Pain Measurement
Portugal - epidemiology
Prevalence
Referral and Consultation - utilization
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult
title Chronic Pain and Health Services Utilization: Is There Overuse of Diagnostic Tests and Inequalities in Nonpharmacologic Treatment Methods Utilization?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T12%3A52%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chronic%20Pain%20and%20Health%20Services%20Utilization:%20Is%20There%20Overuse%20of%20Diagnostic%20Tests%20and%20Inequalities%20in%20Nonpharmacologic%20Treatment%20Methods%20Utilization?&rft.jtitle=Medical%20care&rft.au=Azevedo,%20Lu%C3%ADs%20Filipe&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=859&rft.epage=869&rft.pages=859-869&rft.issn=0025-7079&rft.eissn=1537-1948&rft.coden=MELAAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182a53e4e&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E42568827%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1435629789&rft_id=info:pmid/23969588&rft_jstor_id=42568827&rfr_iscdi=true