Esophagectomies With Thoracic Incisions Carry Increased Pulmonary Morbidity

IMPORTANCE Thoracic incisions are not required for all esophagectomies and may increase pulmonary morbidity. OBJECTIVE To compare the pulmonary and overall morbidity of esophagectomies with and without thoracic incisions. DESIGN Observational study. SETTING Hospitals participating in the National Su...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JAMA surgery 2013-08, Vol.148 (8), p.733-738
Hauptverfasser: Bhayani, Neil H, Gupta, Aditya, Dunst, Christy M, Kurian, Ashwin A, Reavis, Kevin M, Swanström, Lee L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 738
container_issue 8
container_start_page 733
container_title JAMA surgery
container_volume 148
creator Bhayani, Neil H
Gupta, Aditya
Dunst, Christy M
Kurian, Ashwin A
Reavis, Kevin M
Swanström, Lee L
description IMPORTANCE Thoracic incisions are not required for all esophagectomies and may increase pulmonary morbidity. OBJECTIVE To compare the pulmonary and overall morbidity of esophagectomies with and without thoracic incisions. DESIGN Observational study. SETTING Hospitals participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project. PARTICIPANTS Patients without metastatic cancer undergoing nonemergency total esophagectomies with reconstruction from 2005 through 2010. Patients who underwent transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) were compared with a THORACIC group (Ivor Lewis and McKeown techniques). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Pulmonary and overall morbidity, infection, and thromboembolic complications. RESULTS Of 1568 patients, 717 (45.7%) underwent THE, and 851 (54.3%) were in the THORACIC group (Ivor Lewis technique in 487 [31.1%] and McKeown technique in 364 [23.2%]). The population was 80.5% male, with a mean age of 62.9 years. Patients undergoing THE were older (P = .02). Diabetes mellitus was less common in the THORACIC group (11.2% vs 15.9% for THE; P = .02), and cancer was more common (91.0% vs 87.0%; P = .01). Morbidity was 49.2% and mortality was 3.3%, without differences between groups. The mean length of stay was 1.6 days shorter (P = .009) in the THE group. Multivariable analysis showed that thoracic incisions increased rates of pneumonia (odds ratio [OR], 1.47; P = .007), ventilator dependence (OR, 1.35; P = .04), and septic shock (OR, 1.86; P = .001) but not mortality. Compared with the Ivor Lewis technique, the McKeown technique worsened the odds of superficial wound infections (OR, 1.71; P = .02) but not septic shock (OR, 0.84; P = .47). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Esophagectomies have an acceptable mortality rate but a significant morbidity rate. We demonstrated that rates of pneumonia, ventilator dependence, and septic shock are increased with the use of thoracic incision. Avoiding thoracic incisions may therefore decrease the risk of pulmonary morbidity and septic shock.
doi_str_mv 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2356
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1432618097</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>1698656</ama_id><sourcerecordid>1432618097</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a322t-2907362df465fa6f2546fa0a1550f6da831d64f812d83c41893f941450c3d4a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEtPAjEUhRujEYL8ARZmlm4G-5rSWRqCSsTogsRlU_qAkpkptjML_r2d8PBu7iPnnNx8AEwQnCII0fNe1jJ2YTvFEJEpJgW7AUOMGM8ZZvj2Ohd0AMYx7mEqDiEl5T0YYDLjFEMyBB-L6A87uTWq9bUzMftx7S5b73yQyqls2SgXnW9iNpchHPs9GBmNzr67qvaNTLdPHzZOu_b4AO6srKIZn_sIrF8X6_l7vvp6W85fVrkkGLc5LuGMMKwtZYWVzKYXmZVQoqKAlmnJCdKMWo6w5kRRxEtiS4poARXRVJIReDrFHoL_7UxsRe2iMlUlG-O7KBAlmCEOy1mS4pNUBR9jMFYcgqvT0wJB0WMUF4yixyh6jMn0eM7vNrXRV8sFWhJMToLk_Q9kJWfJ_QcpBnef</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1432618097</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Esophagectomies With Thoracic Incisions Carry Increased Pulmonary Morbidity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><creator>Bhayani, Neil H ; Gupta, Aditya ; Dunst, Christy M ; Kurian, Ashwin A ; Reavis, Kevin M ; Swanström, Lee L</creator><creatorcontrib>Bhayani, Neil H ; Gupta, Aditya ; Dunst, Christy M ; Kurian, Ashwin A ; Reavis, Kevin M ; Swanström, Lee L</creatorcontrib><description>IMPORTANCE Thoracic incisions are not required for all esophagectomies and may increase pulmonary morbidity. OBJECTIVE To compare the pulmonary and overall morbidity of esophagectomies with and without thoracic incisions. DESIGN Observational study. SETTING Hospitals participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project. PARTICIPANTS Patients without metastatic cancer undergoing nonemergency total esophagectomies with reconstruction from 2005 through 2010. Patients who underwent transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) were compared with a THORACIC group (Ivor Lewis and McKeown techniques). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Pulmonary and overall morbidity, infection, and thromboembolic complications. RESULTS Of 1568 patients, 717 (45.7%) underwent THE, and 851 (54.3%) were in the THORACIC group (Ivor Lewis technique in 487 [31.1%] and McKeown technique in 364 [23.2%]). The population was 80.5% male, with a mean age of 62.9 years. Patients undergoing THE were older (P = .02). Diabetes mellitus was less common in the THORACIC group (11.2% vs 15.9% for THE; P = .02), and cancer was more common (91.0% vs 87.0%; P = .01). Morbidity was 49.2% and mortality was 3.3%, without differences between groups. The mean length of stay was 1.6 days shorter (P = .009) in the THE group. Multivariable analysis showed that thoracic incisions increased rates of pneumonia (odds ratio [OR], 1.47; P = .007), ventilator dependence (OR, 1.35; P = .04), and septic shock (OR, 1.86; P = .001) but not mortality. Compared with the Ivor Lewis technique, the McKeown technique worsened the odds of superficial wound infections (OR, 1.71; P = .02) but not septic shock (OR, 0.84; P = .47). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Esophagectomies have an acceptable mortality rate but a significant morbidity rate. We demonstrated that rates of pneumonia, ventilator dependence, and septic shock are increased with the use of thoracic incision. Avoiding thoracic incisions may therefore decrease the risk of pulmonary morbidity and septic shock.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-6254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-6262</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2356</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23784203</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Aged ; Esophageal Neoplasms - mortality ; Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology ; Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery ; Esophagectomy - adverse effects ; Esophagectomy - methods ; Female ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Intubation, Intratracheal ; Lung Diseases - epidemiology ; Lung Diseases - pathology ; Lung Diseases - therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Respiration, Artificial ; Stomach Neoplasms - mortality ; Stomach Neoplasms - pathology ; Stomach Neoplasms - surgery ; Thoracotomy - adverse effects ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>JAMA surgery, 2013-08, Vol.148 (8), p.733-738</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a322t-2907362df465fa6f2546fa0a1550f6da831d64f812d83c41893f941450c3d4a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/articlepdf/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2356$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2356$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,314,780,784,3340,27924,27925,76489,76492</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23784203$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bhayani, Neil H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Aditya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunst, Christy M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurian, Ashwin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reavis, Kevin M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanström, Lee L</creatorcontrib><title>Esophagectomies With Thoracic Incisions Carry Increased Pulmonary Morbidity</title><title>JAMA surgery</title><addtitle>JAMA Surg</addtitle><description>IMPORTANCE Thoracic incisions are not required for all esophagectomies and may increase pulmonary morbidity. OBJECTIVE To compare the pulmonary and overall morbidity of esophagectomies with and without thoracic incisions. DESIGN Observational study. SETTING Hospitals participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project. PARTICIPANTS Patients without metastatic cancer undergoing nonemergency total esophagectomies with reconstruction from 2005 through 2010. Patients who underwent transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) were compared with a THORACIC group (Ivor Lewis and McKeown techniques). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Pulmonary and overall morbidity, infection, and thromboembolic complications. RESULTS Of 1568 patients, 717 (45.7%) underwent THE, and 851 (54.3%) were in the THORACIC group (Ivor Lewis technique in 487 [31.1%] and McKeown technique in 364 [23.2%]). The population was 80.5% male, with a mean age of 62.9 years. Patients undergoing THE were older (P = .02). Diabetes mellitus was less common in the THORACIC group (11.2% vs 15.9% for THE; P = .02), and cancer was more common (91.0% vs 87.0%; P = .01). Morbidity was 49.2% and mortality was 3.3%, without differences between groups. The mean length of stay was 1.6 days shorter (P = .009) in the THE group. Multivariable analysis showed that thoracic incisions increased rates of pneumonia (odds ratio [OR], 1.47; P = .007), ventilator dependence (OR, 1.35; P = .04), and septic shock (OR, 1.86; P = .001) but not mortality. Compared with the Ivor Lewis technique, the McKeown technique worsened the odds of superficial wound infections (OR, 1.71; P = .02) but not septic shock (OR, 0.84; P = .47). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Esophagectomies have an acceptable mortality rate but a significant morbidity rate. We demonstrated that rates of pneumonia, ventilator dependence, and septic shock are increased with the use of thoracic incision. Avoiding thoracic incisions may therefore decrease the risk of pulmonary morbidity and septic shock.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Esophagectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Esophagectomy - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal</subject><subject>Lung Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Lung Diseases - pathology</subject><subject>Lung Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Thoracotomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>2168-6254</issn><issn>2168-6262</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEtPAjEUhRujEYL8ARZmlm4G-5rSWRqCSsTogsRlU_qAkpkptjML_r2d8PBu7iPnnNx8AEwQnCII0fNe1jJ2YTvFEJEpJgW7AUOMGM8ZZvj2Ohd0AMYx7mEqDiEl5T0YYDLjFEMyBB-L6A87uTWq9bUzMftx7S5b73yQyqls2SgXnW9iNpchHPs9GBmNzr67qvaNTLdPHzZOu_b4AO6srKIZn_sIrF8X6_l7vvp6W85fVrkkGLc5LuGMMKwtZYWVzKYXmZVQoqKAlmnJCdKMWo6w5kRRxEtiS4poARXRVJIReDrFHoL_7UxsRe2iMlUlG-O7KBAlmCEOy1mS4pNUBR9jMFYcgqvT0wJB0WMUF4yixyh6jMn0eM7vNrXRV8sFWhJMToLk_Q9kJWfJ_QcpBnef</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Bhayani, Neil H</creator><creator>Gupta, Aditya</creator><creator>Dunst, Christy M</creator><creator>Kurian, Ashwin A</creator><creator>Reavis, Kevin M</creator><creator>Swanström, Lee L</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Esophagectomies With Thoracic Incisions Carry Increased Pulmonary Morbidity</title><author>Bhayani, Neil H ; Gupta, Aditya ; Dunst, Christy M ; Kurian, Ashwin A ; Reavis, Kevin M ; Swanström, Lee L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a322t-2907362df465fa6f2546fa0a1550f6da831d64f812d83c41893f941450c3d4a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Esophagectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Esophagectomy - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal</topic><topic>Lung Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Lung Diseases - pathology</topic><topic>Lung Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Thoracotomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bhayani, Neil H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Aditya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunst, Christy M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurian, Ashwin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reavis, Kevin M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanström, Lee L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JAMA surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bhayani, Neil H</au><au>Gupta, Aditya</au><au>Dunst, Christy M</au><au>Kurian, Ashwin A</au><au>Reavis, Kevin M</au><au>Swanström, Lee L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Esophagectomies With Thoracic Incisions Carry Increased Pulmonary Morbidity</atitle><jtitle>JAMA surgery</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA Surg</addtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>148</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>733</spage><epage>738</epage><pages>733-738</pages><issn>2168-6254</issn><eissn>2168-6262</eissn><abstract>IMPORTANCE Thoracic incisions are not required for all esophagectomies and may increase pulmonary morbidity. OBJECTIVE To compare the pulmonary and overall morbidity of esophagectomies with and without thoracic incisions. DESIGN Observational study. SETTING Hospitals participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project. PARTICIPANTS Patients without metastatic cancer undergoing nonemergency total esophagectomies with reconstruction from 2005 through 2010. Patients who underwent transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) were compared with a THORACIC group (Ivor Lewis and McKeown techniques). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Pulmonary and overall morbidity, infection, and thromboembolic complications. RESULTS Of 1568 patients, 717 (45.7%) underwent THE, and 851 (54.3%) were in the THORACIC group (Ivor Lewis technique in 487 [31.1%] and McKeown technique in 364 [23.2%]). The population was 80.5% male, with a mean age of 62.9 years. Patients undergoing THE were older (P = .02). Diabetes mellitus was less common in the THORACIC group (11.2% vs 15.9% for THE; P = .02), and cancer was more common (91.0% vs 87.0%; P = .01). Morbidity was 49.2% and mortality was 3.3%, without differences between groups. The mean length of stay was 1.6 days shorter (P = .009) in the THE group. Multivariable analysis showed that thoracic incisions increased rates of pneumonia (odds ratio [OR], 1.47; P = .007), ventilator dependence (OR, 1.35; P = .04), and septic shock (OR, 1.86; P = .001) but not mortality. Compared with the Ivor Lewis technique, the McKeown technique worsened the odds of superficial wound infections (OR, 1.71; P = .02) but not septic shock (OR, 0.84; P = .47). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Esophagectomies have an acceptable mortality rate but a significant morbidity rate. We demonstrated that rates of pneumonia, ventilator dependence, and septic shock are increased with the use of thoracic incision. Avoiding thoracic incisions may therefore decrease the risk of pulmonary morbidity and septic shock.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>23784203</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2356</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-6254
ispartof JAMA surgery, 2013-08, Vol.148 (8), p.733-738
issn 2168-6254
2168-6262
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1432618097
source MEDLINE; American Medical Association Journals
subjects Aged
Esophageal Neoplasms - mortality
Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology
Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery
Esophagectomy - adverse effects
Esophagectomy - methods
Female
Hospitalization
Humans
Intubation, Intratracheal
Lung Diseases - epidemiology
Lung Diseases - pathology
Lung Diseases - therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Respiration, Artificial
Stomach Neoplasms - mortality
Stomach Neoplasms - pathology
Stomach Neoplasms - surgery
Thoracotomy - adverse effects
Treatment Outcome
title Esophagectomies With Thoracic Incisions Carry Increased Pulmonary Morbidity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A17%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Esophagectomies%20With%20Thoracic%20Incisions%20Carry%20Increased%20Pulmonary%20Morbidity&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20surgery&rft.au=Bhayani,%20Neil%20H&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=148&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=733&rft.epage=738&rft.pages=733-738&rft.issn=2168-6254&rft.eissn=2168-6262&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2356&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1432618097%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1432618097&rft_id=info:pmid/23784203&rft_ama_id=1698656&rfr_iscdi=true