Prognostic utility of biochemical markers of cardiovascular risk: impact of biological variability

Although a variety of biochemical markers are used to help predict the risk of cardiovascular disease, the prognostic utility of any marker used as a risk assessment tool is dependent on the long- and short-term biological variability that the marker shows in different individuals. We measured total...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 2013-09, Vol.51 (9), p.1875-1882
Hauptverfasser: Alexander, Kristine S., Kazmierczak, Steven C., Snyder, Caryn K., Oberdorf, Jon A., Farrell, David H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Although a variety of biochemical markers are used to help predict the risk of cardiovascular disease, the prognostic utility of any marker used as a risk assessment tool is dependent on the long- and short-term biological variability that the marker shows in different individuals. We measured total, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol; triglycerides; high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP); total fibrinogen; and γ′ fibrinogen in blood samples collected from 15 apparently healthy individuals over the course of 1 year. Repeated measures variation estimates were used to calculate short- and long-term intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), within- and between-subject coefficients of variation (CV and CV , respectively), validity coefficients, and indices of individuality for each marker. HDL cholesterol demonstrated the lowest variability profile, with an ICC of 0.84 and CV of 11.1 (95% CI: 8.3, 17.0). hsCRP showed the highest levels of short- and long-term within-subject variability [CV (95% CI): 54.8 (32.8, 196.3) and 77.1 (53.3, 141.3), respectively]. Stated differently, it would require five separate measurements of hsCRP, performed on samples collected over multiple days, to provide the risk assessment information provided by a single measurement of HDL cholesterol. γ′ Fibrinogen demonstrated an ICC of 0.79 and CV of 14.3 (95% CI: 10.6, 21.9). hsCRP showed very high biological variability, such that a single measurement of hsCRP lacks sufficient clinical utility to justify routine measurement. The variability profile of γ′ fibrinogen was not markedly different than HDL cholesterol, necessitating only a limited number of measurements to establish an individual’s risk of cardiovascular disease.
ISSN:1434-6621
1437-4331
DOI:10.1515/cclm-2012-0750