Sensitivity and specificity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) among adults from the general population

This population-based study focused on the validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening major depressive episodes in the general population in Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Households were selected by multi-stage sampling, and adults (> 20 years) were invited t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cadernos de saúde pública 2013-08, Vol.29 (8), p.1533-1543
Hauptverfasser: Santos, Iná S, Tavares, Beatriz Franck, Munhoz, Tiago N, Almeida, Laura Sigaran Pio de, Silva, Nathália Tessele Barreto da, Tams, Bernardo Dias, Patella, André Machado, Matijasevich, Alicia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:por
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1543
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1533
container_title Cadernos de saúde pública
container_volume 29
creator Santos, Iná S
Tavares, Beatriz Franck
Munhoz, Tiago N
Almeida, Laura Sigaran Pio de
Silva, Nathália Tessele Barreto da
Tams, Bernardo Dias
Patella, André Machado
Matijasevich, Alicia
description This population-based study focused on the validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening major depressive episodes in the general population in Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Households were selected by multi-stage sampling, and adults (> 20 years) were invited to participate. The gold standard was the structured diagnostic Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), applied by psychiatrists and psychologists. Both the PHQ-9 and the MINI were applied in the subjects' homes. In a total of 447 participants (191 men and 256 women), the continuous analysis identified > 9 as the cutoff point with the highest sensitivity (77.5%; 61.5-89.2) and specificity (86.7%; 83.0- 89.9). Use of the test's algorithm decreased the sensitivity to 42.5% (27.0-59.1), while the specificity increased to 95.3% (92.8-97.2). The PHQ-9 proved appropriate for screening major depressive episodes. For greater sensitivity, the continuously scored PHQ-9 proved more adequate than the algorithm for screening major depressive episodes in the community.
doi_str_mv 10.1590/S0102-311X2013001200006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1430853427</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1430853427</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-a1d5ff251c416e37e60f0bf90e9b33c5c447f49bb768315f2edbf2e00b2053543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kE9Lw0AQxRdBbK1-Bd1jPURn_yXdoxS1gmBLFbyFTTLbriSbmN0I_fa2Wucwjwe_NzyGkGsGt0xpuFsDA54Ixj44MAHAOOwnPSFjlmazRMpUjsh5CJ8AXHChzsiISwClmR6Tfo0-uOi-XdxR4ysaOiyddeXBt5bGLdKliQ59pAs0ddzS1YAhutZ743pMNJ0uF6tE31DTtH5DTTXUMVDbt81veIMee1PTru2G2hxyF-TUmjrg5VEn5P3x4W2-SF5en57n9y9JxySLiWGVspYrVkqWosgwBQuF1YC6EKJUpZSZlboosnQmmLIcq2K_AAoOSigpJmT6d7fr269D57xxocS6Nh7bIeRMCpgpIXm2R6-O6FA0WOVd7xrT7_L_P4kfHjhp-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1430853427</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sensitivity and specificity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) among adults from the general population</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Santos, Iná S ; Tavares, Beatriz Franck ; Munhoz, Tiago N ; Almeida, Laura Sigaran Pio de ; Silva, Nathália Tessele Barreto da ; Tams, Bernardo Dias ; Patella, André Machado ; Matijasevich, Alicia</creator><creatorcontrib>Santos, Iná S ; Tavares, Beatriz Franck ; Munhoz, Tiago N ; Almeida, Laura Sigaran Pio de ; Silva, Nathália Tessele Barreto da ; Tams, Bernardo Dias ; Patella, André Machado ; Matijasevich, Alicia</creatorcontrib><description>This population-based study focused on the validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening major depressive episodes in the general population in Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Households were selected by multi-stage sampling, and adults (&gt; 20 years) were invited to participate. The gold standard was the structured diagnostic Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), applied by psychiatrists and psychologists. Both the PHQ-9 and the MINI were applied in the subjects' homes. In a total of 447 participants (191 men and 256 women), the continuous analysis identified &gt; 9 as the cutoff point with the highest sensitivity (77.5%; 61.5-89.2) and specificity (86.7%; 83.0- 89.9). Use of the test's algorithm decreased the sensitivity to 42.5% (27.0-59.1), while the specificity increased to 95.3% (92.8-97.2). The PHQ-9 proved appropriate for screening major depressive episodes. For greater sensitivity, the continuously scored PHQ-9 proved more adequate than the algorithm for screening major depressive episodes in the community.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1678-4464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/S0102-311X2013001200006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24005919</identifier><language>por</language><publisher>Brazil</publisher><subject>Adult ; Brazil ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Interview, Psychological ; Male ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Cadernos de saúde pública, 2013-08, Vol.29 (8), p.1533-1543</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24005919$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Santos, Iná S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavares, Beatriz Franck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munhoz, Tiago N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Laura Sigaran Pio de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Nathália Tessele Barreto da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tams, Bernardo Dias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patella, André Machado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matijasevich, Alicia</creatorcontrib><title>Sensitivity and specificity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) among adults from the general population</title><title>Cadernos de saúde pública</title><addtitle>Cad Saude Publica</addtitle><description>This population-based study focused on the validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening major depressive episodes in the general population in Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Households were selected by multi-stage sampling, and adults (&gt; 20 years) were invited to participate. The gold standard was the structured diagnostic Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), applied by psychiatrists and psychologists. Both the PHQ-9 and the MINI were applied in the subjects' homes. In a total of 447 participants (191 men and 256 women), the continuous analysis identified &gt; 9 as the cutoff point with the highest sensitivity (77.5%; 61.5-89.2) and specificity (86.7%; 83.0- 89.9). Use of the test's algorithm decreased the sensitivity to 42.5% (27.0-59.1), while the specificity increased to 95.3% (92.8-97.2). The PHQ-9 proved appropriate for screening major depressive episodes. For greater sensitivity, the continuously scored PHQ-9 proved more adequate than the algorithm for screening major depressive episodes in the community.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interview, Psychological</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1678-4464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kE9Lw0AQxRdBbK1-Bd1jPURn_yXdoxS1gmBLFbyFTTLbriSbmN0I_fa2Wucwjwe_NzyGkGsGt0xpuFsDA54Ixj44MAHAOOwnPSFjlmazRMpUjsh5CJ8AXHChzsiISwClmR6Tfo0-uOi-XdxR4ysaOiyddeXBt5bGLdKliQ59pAs0ddzS1YAhutZ743pMNJ0uF6tE31DTtH5DTTXUMVDbt81veIMee1PTru2G2hxyF-TUmjrg5VEn5P3x4W2-SF5en57n9y9JxySLiWGVspYrVkqWosgwBQuF1YC6EKJUpZSZlboosnQmmLIcq2K_AAoOSigpJmT6d7fr269D57xxocS6Nh7bIeRMCpgpIXm2R6-O6FA0WOVd7xrT7_L_P4kfHjhp-w</recordid><startdate>201308</startdate><enddate>201308</enddate><creator>Santos, Iná S</creator><creator>Tavares, Beatriz Franck</creator><creator>Munhoz, Tiago N</creator><creator>Almeida, Laura Sigaran Pio de</creator><creator>Silva, Nathália Tessele Barreto da</creator><creator>Tams, Bernardo Dias</creator><creator>Patella, André Machado</creator><creator>Matijasevich, Alicia</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201308</creationdate><title>Sensitivity and specificity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) among adults from the general population</title><author>Santos, Iná S ; Tavares, Beatriz Franck ; Munhoz, Tiago N ; Almeida, Laura Sigaran Pio de ; Silva, Nathália Tessele Barreto da ; Tams, Bernardo Dias ; Patella, André Machado ; Matijasevich, Alicia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-a1d5ff251c416e37e60f0bf90e9b33c5c447f49bb768315f2edbf2e00b2053543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>por</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interview, Psychological</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Santos, Iná S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavares, Beatriz Franck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munhoz, Tiago N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Laura Sigaran Pio de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Nathália Tessele Barreto da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tams, Bernardo Dias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patella, André Machado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matijasevich, Alicia</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cadernos de saúde pública</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Santos, Iná S</au><au>Tavares, Beatriz Franck</au><au>Munhoz, Tiago N</au><au>Almeida, Laura Sigaran Pio de</au><au>Silva, Nathália Tessele Barreto da</au><au>Tams, Bernardo Dias</au><au>Patella, André Machado</au><au>Matijasevich, Alicia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sensitivity and specificity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) among adults from the general population</atitle><jtitle>Cadernos de saúde pública</jtitle><addtitle>Cad Saude Publica</addtitle><date>2013-08</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1533</spage><epage>1543</epage><pages>1533-1543</pages><eissn>1678-4464</eissn><abstract>This population-based study focused on the validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening major depressive episodes in the general population in Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Households were selected by multi-stage sampling, and adults (&gt; 20 years) were invited to participate. The gold standard was the structured diagnostic Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), applied by psychiatrists and psychologists. Both the PHQ-9 and the MINI were applied in the subjects' homes. In a total of 447 participants (191 men and 256 women), the continuous analysis identified &gt; 9 as the cutoff point with the highest sensitivity (77.5%; 61.5-89.2) and specificity (86.7%; 83.0- 89.9). Use of the test's algorithm decreased the sensitivity to 42.5% (27.0-59.1), while the specificity increased to 95.3% (92.8-97.2). The PHQ-9 proved appropriate for screening major depressive episodes. For greater sensitivity, the continuously scored PHQ-9 proved more adequate than the algorithm for screening major depressive episodes in the community.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pmid>24005919</pmid><doi>10.1590/S0102-311X2013001200006</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1678-4464
ispartof Cadernos de saúde pública, 2013-08, Vol.29 (8), p.1533-1543
issn 1678-4464
language por
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1430853427
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Brazil
Cross-Sectional Studies
Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis
Female
Humans
Interview, Psychological
Male
Sensitivity and Specificity
Socioeconomic Factors
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Sensitivity and specificity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) among adults from the general population
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A49%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensitivity%20and%20specificity%20of%20the%20Patient%20Health%20Questionnaire-9%20(PHQ-9)%20among%20adults%20from%20the%20general%20population&rft.jtitle=Cadernos%20de%20sa%C3%BAde%20p%C3%BAblica&rft.au=Santos,%20In%C3%A1%20S&rft.date=2013-08&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1533&rft.epage=1543&rft.pages=1533-1543&rft.eissn=1678-4464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/S0102-311X2013001200006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1430853427%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1430853427&rft_id=info:pmid/24005919&rfr_iscdi=true