Failure-to-Rescue After Colorectal Cancer Surgery and the Association with Three Structural Hospital Factors
Background This study was designed to evaluate the association between structural hospital characteristics and failure-to-rescue (FTR) after colorectal cancer surgery. A growing body of evidence suggests a large hospital variation concerning mortality rates in patients with a severe complication (FT...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of surgical oncology 2013-10, Vol.20 (11), p.3370-3376 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3376 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 3370 |
container_title | Annals of surgical oncology |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Henneman, D. van Leersum, N. J. ten Berge, M. Snijders, H. S. Fiocco, M. Wiggers, T. Tollenaar, R. A. E. M. Wouters, M. W. J. M. |
description | Background
This study was designed to evaluate the association between structural hospital characteristics and failure-to-rescue (FTR) after colorectal cancer surgery. A growing body of evidence suggests a large hospital variation concerning mortality rates in patients with a severe complication (FTR) in colorectal cancer surgery. Which structural hospital factors are associated with better FTR rates remains largely unclear.
Methods
All patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery from 2009 through 2011 in 92 Dutch hospitals were analysed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models, including casemix, hospital volume, teaching status, and different levels of intensive care unit (ICU) facilities, were used to analyse risk-adjusted FTR rates.
Results
A total of 25,591 patients from 92 hospitals were included. The FTR rate ranged between 0 and 39 %. In univariate analysis, high hospital volume (>200 vs. ≤200 patients/year), teaching status (academic vs. teaching vs. nonteaching hospitals) and high level of ICU facilities (highest level 3 vs. lowest level 1) were associated with lower FTR rates. Only the higher levels of ICU facilities (2 or 3 compared with level 1) were independently associated with lower failure-to-rescue rates (odds ratio 0.72; 95 % confidence interval 0.65–0.88) in multivariate analysis.
Discussion
Hospital type and annual hospital volume were not independently associated with FTR rates in colorectal cancer surgery. Instead, the lowest level of ICU facilities was independently associated with higher rates. This suggests that a more advanced ICU may be an important factor that contributes to better failure-to-rescue rates, although individual hospitals perform well with lower ICU levels. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1245/s10434-013-3037-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1430848432</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1430848432</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-8dc2db79b48322175d483d54dfda8b505c3ad9a362797e12c0a29b52d3cc721a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctKBDEQRYMovj_AjTS4cRNNUkmneymDo4Ig-FiHdJJxWno6Yx6Ifr0ZRkUEV1VUnXsT6iJ0RMkZZVycR0o4cEwoYCAg8ccG2qWiTHjd0M3Sk7rBLavFDtqL8YUQKoGIbbTDQAJrRLuLhqnuhxwcTh7fu2iyqy5myYVq4gcfnEl6qCZ6NGXykMOzC--VHm2V5oWL0Ztep96P1Vuf5tXjPDhXPaSQTcqhCK99XPYrh6k2yYd4gLZmeoju8Kvuo6fp5ePkGt_eXd1MLm6xAckSbqxhtpNtxxtgjEphS2MFtzOrm04QYUDbVkPNZCsdZYZo1naCWTBGMqphH52ufZfBv2YXk1r00bhh0KPzOSrKgTS84cAKevIHffE5jOV3KwpILTnQQtE1ZYKPMbiZWoZ-ocO7okStolDrKFSJQq2iUB9Fc_zlnLuFsz-K79sXgK2BWFZjOe2vp_91_QRGzpR9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1433067431</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Failure-to-Rescue After Colorectal Cancer Surgery and the Association with Three Structural Hospital Factors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Henneman, D. ; van Leersum, N. J. ; ten Berge, M. ; Snijders, H. S. ; Fiocco, M. ; Wiggers, T. ; Tollenaar, R. A. E. M. ; Wouters, M. W. J. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Henneman, D. ; van Leersum, N. J. ; ten Berge, M. ; Snijders, H. S. ; Fiocco, M. ; Wiggers, T. ; Tollenaar, R. A. E. M. ; Wouters, M. W. J. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
This study was designed to evaluate the association between structural hospital characteristics and failure-to-rescue (FTR) after colorectal cancer surgery. A growing body of evidence suggests a large hospital variation concerning mortality rates in patients with a severe complication (FTR) in colorectal cancer surgery. Which structural hospital factors are associated with better FTR rates remains largely unclear.
Methods
All patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery from 2009 through 2011 in 92 Dutch hospitals were analysed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models, including casemix, hospital volume, teaching status, and different levels of intensive care unit (ICU) facilities, were used to analyse risk-adjusted FTR rates.
Results
A total of 25,591 patients from 92 hospitals were included. The FTR rate ranged between 0 and 39 %. In univariate analysis, high hospital volume (>200 vs. ≤200 patients/year), teaching status (academic vs. teaching vs. nonteaching hospitals) and high level of ICU facilities (highest level 3 vs. lowest level 1) were associated with lower FTR rates. Only the higher levels of ICU facilities (2 or 3 compared with level 1) were independently associated with lower failure-to-rescue rates (odds ratio 0.72; 95 % confidence interval 0.65–0.88) in multivariate analysis.
Discussion
Hospital type and annual hospital volume were not independently associated with FTR rates in colorectal cancer surgery. Instead, the lowest level of ICU facilities was independently associated with higher rates. This suggests that a more advanced ICU may be an important factor that contributes to better failure-to-rescue rates, although individual hospitals perform well with lower ICU levels.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-9265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3037-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23732859</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Aged ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal Neoplasms - complications ; Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality ; Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Colorectal Surgery - mortality ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Healthcare Policy and Outcomes ; Hospital Mortality ; Hospitals, High-Volume ; Hospitals, Teaching ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Multivariate Analysis ; Oncology ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Risk Factors ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Failure</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgical oncology, 2013-10, Vol.20 (11), p.3370-3376</ispartof><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-8dc2db79b48322175d483d54dfda8b505c3ad9a362797e12c0a29b52d3cc721a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-8dc2db79b48322175d483d54dfda8b505c3ad9a362797e12c0a29b52d3cc721a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1245/s10434-013-3037-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1245/s10434-013-3037-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23732859$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Henneman, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Leersum, N. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ten Berge, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snijders, H. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiocco, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiggers, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tollenaar, R. A. E. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wouters, M. W. J. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Failure-to-Rescue After Colorectal Cancer Surgery and the Association with Three Structural Hospital Factors</title><title>Annals of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Background
This study was designed to evaluate the association between structural hospital characteristics and failure-to-rescue (FTR) after colorectal cancer surgery. A growing body of evidence suggests a large hospital variation concerning mortality rates in patients with a severe complication (FTR) in colorectal cancer surgery. Which structural hospital factors are associated with better FTR rates remains largely unclear.
Methods
All patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery from 2009 through 2011 in 92 Dutch hospitals were analysed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models, including casemix, hospital volume, teaching status, and different levels of intensive care unit (ICU) facilities, were used to analyse risk-adjusted FTR rates.
Results
A total of 25,591 patients from 92 hospitals were included. The FTR rate ranged between 0 and 39 %. In univariate analysis, high hospital volume (>200 vs. ≤200 patients/year), teaching status (academic vs. teaching vs. nonteaching hospitals) and high level of ICU facilities (highest level 3 vs. lowest level 1) were associated with lower FTR rates. Only the higher levels of ICU facilities (2 or 3 compared with level 1) were independently associated with lower failure-to-rescue rates (odds ratio 0.72; 95 % confidence interval 0.65–0.88) in multivariate analysis.
Discussion
Hospital type and annual hospital volume were not independently associated with FTR rates in colorectal cancer surgery. Instead, the lowest level of ICU facilities was independently associated with higher rates. This suggests that a more advanced ICU may be an important factor that contributes to better failure-to-rescue rates, although individual hospitals perform well with lower ICU levels.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Colorectal Surgery - mortality</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Healthcare Policy and Outcomes</subject><subject>Hospital Mortality</subject><subject>Hospitals, High-Volume</subject><subject>Hospitals, Teaching</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><issn>1068-9265</issn><issn>1534-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctKBDEQRYMovj_AjTS4cRNNUkmneymDo4Ig-FiHdJJxWno6Yx6Ifr0ZRkUEV1VUnXsT6iJ0RMkZZVycR0o4cEwoYCAg8ccG2qWiTHjd0M3Sk7rBLavFDtqL8YUQKoGIbbTDQAJrRLuLhqnuhxwcTh7fu2iyqy5myYVq4gcfnEl6qCZ6NGXykMOzC--VHm2V5oWL0Ztep96P1Vuf5tXjPDhXPaSQTcqhCK99XPYrh6k2yYd4gLZmeoju8Kvuo6fp5ePkGt_eXd1MLm6xAckSbqxhtpNtxxtgjEphS2MFtzOrm04QYUDbVkPNZCsdZYZo1naCWTBGMqphH52ufZfBv2YXk1r00bhh0KPzOSrKgTS84cAKevIHffE5jOV3KwpILTnQQtE1ZYKPMbiZWoZ-ocO7okStolDrKFSJQq2iUB9Fc_zlnLuFsz-K79sXgK2BWFZjOe2vp_91_QRGzpR9</recordid><startdate>20131001</startdate><enddate>20131001</enddate><creator>Henneman, D.</creator><creator>van Leersum, N. J.</creator><creator>ten Berge, M.</creator><creator>Snijders, H. S.</creator><creator>Fiocco, M.</creator><creator>Wiggers, T.</creator><creator>Tollenaar, R. A. E. M.</creator><creator>Wouters, M. W. J. M.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131001</creationdate><title>Failure-to-Rescue After Colorectal Cancer Surgery and the Association with Three Structural Hospital Factors</title><author>Henneman, D. ; van Leersum, N. J. ; ten Berge, M. ; Snijders, H. S. ; Fiocco, M. ; Wiggers, T. ; Tollenaar, R. A. E. M. ; Wouters, M. W. J. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-8dc2db79b48322175d483d54dfda8b505c3ad9a362797e12c0a29b52d3cc721a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Colorectal Surgery - mortality</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Healthcare Policy and Outcomes</topic><topic>Hospital Mortality</topic><topic>Hospitals, High-Volume</topic><topic>Hospitals, Teaching</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Henneman, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Leersum, N. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ten Berge, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snijders, H. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiocco, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiggers, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tollenaar, R. A. E. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wouters, M. W. J. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Henneman, D.</au><au>van Leersum, N. J.</au><au>ten Berge, M.</au><au>Snijders, H. S.</au><au>Fiocco, M.</au><au>Wiggers, T.</au><au>Tollenaar, R. A. E. M.</au><au>Wouters, M. W. J. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Failure-to-Rescue After Colorectal Cancer Surgery and the Association with Three Structural Hospital Factors</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle><stitle>Ann Surg Oncol</stitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2013-10-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3370</spage><epage>3376</epage><pages>3370-3376</pages><issn>1068-9265</issn><eissn>1534-4681</eissn><abstract>Background
This study was designed to evaluate the association between structural hospital characteristics and failure-to-rescue (FTR) after colorectal cancer surgery. A growing body of evidence suggests a large hospital variation concerning mortality rates in patients with a severe complication (FTR) in colorectal cancer surgery. Which structural hospital factors are associated with better FTR rates remains largely unclear.
Methods
All patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery from 2009 through 2011 in 92 Dutch hospitals were analysed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models, including casemix, hospital volume, teaching status, and different levels of intensive care unit (ICU) facilities, were used to analyse risk-adjusted FTR rates.
Results
A total of 25,591 patients from 92 hospitals were included. The FTR rate ranged between 0 and 39 %. In univariate analysis, high hospital volume (>200 vs. ≤200 patients/year), teaching status (academic vs. teaching vs. nonteaching hospitals) and high level of ICU facilities (highest level 3 vs. lowest level 1) were associated with lower FTR rates. Only the higher levels of ICU facilities (2 or 3 compared with level 1) were independently associated with lower failure-to-rescue rates (odds ratio 0.72; 95 % confidence interval 0.65–0.88) in multivariate analysis.
Discussion
Hospital type and annual hospital volume were not independently associated with FTR rates in colorectal cancer surgery. Instead, the lowest level of ICU facilities was independently associated with higher rates. This suggests that a more advanced ICU may be an important factor that contributes to better failure-to-rescue rates, although individual hospitals perform well with lower ICU levels.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>23732859</pmid><doi>10.1245/s10434-013-3037-z</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1068-9265 |
ispartof | Annals of surgical oncology, 2013-10, Vol.20 (11), p.3370-3376 |
issn | 1068-9265 1534-4681 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1430848432 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Aged Colorectal cancer Colorectal Neoplasms - complications Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery Colorectal Surgery - mortality Female Follow-Up Studies Healthcare Policy and Outcomes Hospital Mortality Hospitals, High-Volume Hospitals, Teaching Humans Intensive Care Units Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Multivariate Analysis Oncology Outcome Assessment (Health Care) Postoperative Complications - etiology Risk Factors Surgery Surgical Oncology Survival Rate Treatment Failure |
title | Failure-to-Rescue After Colorectal Cancer Surgery and the Association with Three Structural Hospital Factors |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T11%3A43%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Failure-to-Rescue%20After%20Colorectal%20Cancer%20Surgery%20and%20the%20Association%20with%20Three%20Structural%20Hospital%20Factors&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Henneman,%20D.&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3370&rft.epage=3376&rft.pages=3370-3376&rft.issn=1068-9265&rft.eissn=1534-4681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1245/s10434-013-3037-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1430848432%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1433067431&rft_id=info:pmid/23732859&rfr_iscdi=true |