Koineization in the present-day Dutch dialect landscape: postvocalic /r/ and more
This contribution addresses a number of conceptual and methodological issues regarding processes of dialect change leading to koineization. After a discussion of some notions and key findings from a few recent relevant studies concerning present-day Dutch dialects, two paradigms of linguistic theor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Taal en tongval 2011-01, Vol.63 (1), p.99-126 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 126 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 99 |
container_title | Taal en tongval |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Hinskens, Frans |
description | This contribution addresses a number of conceptual and methodological issues regarding processes of dialect change leading to koineization. After a discussion of some notions and key findings from a few recent relevant studies concerning present-day Dutch dialects, two paradigms of linguistic theorizing will be briefly presented. Next, these paradigms will be compared on the basis of the findings from a recent diachronic study of the deletion of postvocalic /r/ before coronal obstruents. It will be shown that only one of the paradigms survives this test. As to the internal factors, the study offers evidence for the claim that, as far as phonological and morphophonological variation is concerned, the place of a given dialect feature in the typology of phonological rules plays a determining role in its chances for survival in situations of long-lasting, extensive dialect contact. Finally, attention will be paid to some desiderata and possibilities for further research which are either of a methodological (especially data related) or of a more theoretical nature. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5117/TET2011.1.HINS |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1430172518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1430172518</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c140s-fb0a40c01dfd025a9d32ec67c5bbe54b5e8b9b1cc02ae60469916d1931a524fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMFLwzAUxoMoOOaungNevHTLS5N28SZzuuFQxHkOafrKIl1Tk1aYf72V7eTle4fvx-PjR8g1sKkEyGfb5ZYzgClMV-uX9zMy4hxkAhzEORkxlqpknim4JJMYXcF4pnIOwEbk7dm7Bt2P6ZxvqGtot0PaBozYdElpDvSh7-yOls7UaDtam6aM1rR4R1sfu29vTe0snYUZHRq69wGvyEVl6oiT0x2Tj8fldrFKNq9P68X9JrEgWEyqghnBLIOyKhmXRpUpR5vlVhYFSlFInBeqAGsZN5gxkSkFWQkqBSO5qDAdk9vj3zb4rx5jp_cuWqyHiej7qEGkDHIuYT6gN__QT9-HZlinuWQc8iHEQE2PlA0-xoCVboPbm3DQwPSfZH2SrEH_SU5_Abvhbsw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2502175024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Koineization in the present-day Dutch dialect landscape: postvocalic /r/ and more</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hinskens, Frans</creator><creatorcontrib>Hinskens, Frans</creatorcontrib><description>This contribution addresses a number of conceptual and methodological issues regarding processes of dialect change leading to koineization. After a discussion of some notions and key findings from a few recent relevant studies concerning present-day Dutch dialects, two paradigms of linguistic theorizing will be briefly presented. Next, these paradigms will be compared on the basis of the findings from a recent diachronic study of the deletion of postvocalic /r/ before coronal obstruents. It will be shown that only one of the paradigms survives this test. As to the internal factors, the study offers evidence for the claim that, as far as phonological and morphophonological variation is concerned, the place of a given dialect feature in the typology of phonological rules plays a determining role in its chances for survival in situations of long-lasting, extensive dialect contact. Finally, attention will be paid to some desiderata and possibilities for further research which are either of a methodological (especially data related) or of a more theoretical nature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-8691</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2215-1214</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5117/TET2011.1.HINS</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TATOFD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press</publisher><subject>Diachronic linguistics ; Dialects ; Dutch language ; Language contact ; Language typology ; Morphology ; Obstruents ; Phonological rules ; Phonology</subject><ispartof>Taal en tongval, 2011-01, Vol.63 (1), p.99-126</ispartof><rights>2011. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. This is sourced from HRČAK - Portal of scientific journals of Croatia.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hinskens, Frans</creatorcontrib><title>Koineization in the present-day Dutch dialect landscape: postvocalic /r/ and more</title><title>Taal en tongval</title><description>This contribution addresses a number of conceptual and methodological issues regarding processes of dialect change leading to koineization. After a discussion of some notions and key findings from a few recent relevant studies concerning present-day Dutch dialects, two paradigms of linguistic theorizing will be briefly presented. Next, these paradigms will be compared on the basis of the findings from a recent diachronic study of the deletion of postvocalic /r/ before coronal obstruents. It will be shown that only one of the paradigms survives this test. As to the internal factors, the study offers evidence for the claim that, as far as phonological and morphophonological variation is concerned, the place of a given dialect feature in the typology of phonological rules plays a determining role in its chances for survival in situations of long-lasting, extensive dialect contact. Finally, attention will be paid to some desiderata and possibilities for further research which are either of a methodological (especially data related) or of a more theoretical nature.</description><subject>Diachronic linguistics</subject><subject>Dialects</subject><subject>Dutch language</subject><subject>Language contact</subject><subject>Language typology</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Obstruents</subject><subject>Phonological rules</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><issn>0039-8691</issn><issn>2215-1214</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkMFLwzAUxoMoOOaungNevHTLS5N28SZzuuFQxHkOafrKIl1Tk1aYf72V7eTle4fvx-PjR8g1sKkEyGfb5ZYzgClMV-uX9zMy4hxkAhzEORkxlqpknim4JJMYXcF4pnIOwEbk7dm7Bt2P6ZxvqGtot0PaBozYdElpDvSh7-yOls7UaDtam6aM1rR4R1sfu29vTe0snYUZHRq69wGvyEVl6oiT0x2Tj8fldrFKNq9P68X9JrEgWEyqghnBLIOyKhmXRpUpR5vlVhYFSlFInBeqAGsZN5gxkSkFWQkqBSO5qDAdk9vj3zb4rx5jp_cuWqyHiej7qEGkDHIuYT6gN__QT9-HZlinuWQc8iHEQE2PlA0-xoCVboPbm3DQwPSfZH2SrEH_SU5_Abvhbsw</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Hinskens, Frans</creator><general>Amsterdam University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Koineization in the present-day Dutch dialect landscape: postvocalic /r/ and more</title><author>Hinskens, Frans</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c140s-fb0a40c01dfd025a9d32ec67c5bbe54b5e8b9b1cc02ae60469916d1931a524fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Diachronic linguistics</topic><topic>Dialects</topic><topic>Dutch language</topic><topic>Language contact</topic><topic>Language typology</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Obstruents</topic><topic>Phonological rules</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hinskens, Frans</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Taal en tongval</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hinskens, Frans</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Koineization in the present-day Dutch dialect landscape: postvocalic /r/ and more</atitle><jtitle>Taal en tongval</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>99</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>99-126</pages><issn>0039-8691</issn><eissn>2215-1214</eissn><coden>TATOFD</coden><abstract>This contribution addresses a number of conceptual and methodological issues regarding processes of dialect change leading to koineization. After a discussion of some notions and key findings from a few recent relevant studies concerning present-day Dutch dialects, two paradigms of linguistic theorizing will be briefly presented. Next, these paradigms will be compared on the basis of the findings from a recent diachronic study of the deletion of postvocalic /r/ before coronal obstruents. It will be shown that only one of the paradigms survives this test. As to the internal factors, the study offers evidence for the claim that, as far as phonological and morphophonological variation is concerned, the place of a given dialect feature in the typology of phonological rules plays a determining role in its chances for survival in situations of long-lasting, extensive dialect contact. Finally, attention will be paid to some desiderata and possibilities for further research which are either of a methodological (especially data related) or of a more theoretical nature.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Amsterdam University Press</pub><doi>10.5117/TET2011.1.HINS</doi><tpages>28</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0039-8691 |
ispartof | Taal en tongval, 2011-01, Vol.63 (1), p.99-126 |
issn | 0039-8691 2215-1214 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1430172518 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Diachronic linguistics Dialects Dutch language Language contact Language typology Morphology Obstruents Phonological rules Phonology |
title | Koineization in the present-day Dutch dialect landscape: postvocalic /r/ and more |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T14%3A46%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Koineization%20in%20the%20present-day%20Dutch%20dialect%20landscape:%20postvocalic%20/r/%20and%20more&rft.jtitle=Taal%20en%20tongval&rft.au=Hinskens,%20Frans&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=99-126&rft.issn=0039-8691&rft.eissn=2215-1214&rft.coden=TATOFD&rft_id=info:doi/10.5117/TET2011.1.HINS&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1430172518%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2502175024&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |