Koineization in the present-day Dutch dialect landscape: postvocalic /r/ and more

This contribution addresses a number of conceptual and methodological issues regarding processes of dialect change leading to koineization. After a discussion of some notions and key findings from  a few recent relevant studies concerning present-day Dutch dialects, two paradigms of linguistic theor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Taal en tongval 2011-01, Vol.63 (1), p.99-126
1. Verfasser: Hinskens, Frans
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 126
container_issue 1
container_start_page 99
container_title Taal en tongval
container_volume 63
creator Hinskens, Frans
description This contribution addresses a number of conceptual and methodological issues regarding processes of dialect change leading to koineization. After a discussion of some notions and key findings from  a few recent relevant studies concerning present-day Dutch dialects, two paradigms of linguistic theorizing will be briefly presented. Next, these paradigms will be compared on the basis of the findings from a recent diachronic study of the deletion of postvocalic /r/ before coronal obstruents. It will be shown that only one of the paradigms survives this test. As to the internal factors, the study offers evidence for the claim that, as far as phonological and morphophonological variation is concerned, the  place of a given dialect feature in the typology of phonological rules plays a determining role in its chances for survival in situations of long-lasting, extensive dialect contact. Finally, attention will be paid to some desiderata and possibilities for further research which are either of a methodological (especially data related) or of a more theoretical nature.
doi_str_mv 10.5117/TET2011.1.HINS
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1430172518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1430172518</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c140s-fb0a40c01dfd025a9d32ec67c5bbe54b5e8b9b1cc02ae60469916d1931a524fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMFLwzAUxoMoOOaungNevHTLS5N28SZzuuFQxHkOafrKIl1Tk1aYf72V7eTle4fvx-PjR8g1sKkEyGfb5ZYzgClMV-uX9zMy4hxkAhzEORkxlqpknim4JJMYXcF4pnIOwEbk7dm7Bt2P6ZxvqGtot0PaBozYdElpDvSh7-yOls7UaDtam6aM1rR4R1sfu29vTe0snYUZHRq69wGvyEVl6oiT0x2Tj8fldrFKNq9P68X9JrEgWEyqghnBLIOyKhmXRpUpR5vlVhYFSlFInBeqAGsZN5gxkSkFWQkqBSO5qDAdk9vj3zb4rx5jp_cuWqyHiej7qEGkDHIuYT6gN__QT9-HZlinuWQc8iHEQE2PlA0-xoCVboPbm3DQwPSfZH2SrEH_SU5_Abvhbsw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2502175024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Koineization in the present-day Dutch dialect landscape: postvocalic /r/ and more</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hinskens, Frans</creator><creatorcontrib>Hinskens, Frans</creatorcontrib><description>This contribution addresses a number of conceptual and methodological issues regarding processes of dialect change leading to koineization. After a discussion of some notions and key findings from  a few recent relevant studies concerning present-day Dutch dialects, two paradigms of linguistic theorizing will be briefly presented. Next, these paradigms will be compared on the basis of the findings from a recent diachronic study of the deletion of postvocalic /r/ before coronal obstruents. It will be shown that only one of the paradigms survives this test. As to the internal factors, the study offers evidence for the claim that, as far as phonological and morphophonological variation is concerned, the  place of a given dialect feature in the typology of phonological rules plays a determining role in its chances for survival in situations of long-lasting, extensive dialect contact. Finally, attention will be paid to some desiderata and possibilities for further research which are either of a methodological (especially data related) or of a more theoretical nature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-8691</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2215-1214</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5117/TET2011.1.HINS</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TATOFD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press</publisher><subject>Diachronic linguistics ; Dialects ; Dutch language ; Language contact ; Language typology ; Morphology ; Obstruents ; Phonological rules ; Phonology</subject><ispartof>Taal en tongval, 2011-01, Vol.63 (1), p.99-126</ispartof><rights>2011. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. This is sourced from HRČAK - Portal of scientific journals of Croatia.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hinskens, Frans</creatorcontrib><title>Koineization in the present-day Dutch dialect landscape: postvocalic /r/ and more</title><title>Taal en tongval</title><description>This contribution addresses a number of conceptual and methodological issues regarding processes of dialect change leading to koineization. After a discussion of some notions and key findings from  a few recent relevant studies concerning present-day Dutch dialects, two paradigms of linguistic theorizing will be briefly presented. Next, these paradigms will be compared on the basis of the findings from a recent diachronic study of the deletion of postvocalic /r/ before coronal obstruents. It will be shown that only one of the paradigms survives this test. As to the internal factors, the study offers evidence for the claim that, as far as phonological and morphophonological variation is concerned, the  place of a given dialect feature in the typology of phonological rules plays a determining role in its chances for survival in situations of long-lasting, extensive dialect contact. Finally, attention will be paid to some desiderata and possibilities for further research which are either of a methodological (especially data related) or of a more theoretical nature.</description><subject>Diachronic linguistics</subject><subject>Dialects</subject><subject>Dutch language</subject><subject>Language contact</subject><subject>Language typology</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Obstruents</subject><subject>Phonological rules</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><issn>0039-8691</issn><issn>2215-1214</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkMFLwzAUxoMoOOaungNevHTLS5N28SZzuuFQxHkOafrKIl1Tk1aYf72V7eTle4fvx-PjR8g1sKkEyGfb5ZYzgClMV-uX9zMy4hxkAhzEORkxlqpknim4JJMYXcF4pnIOwEbk7dm7Bt2P6ZxvqGtot0PaBozYdElpDvSh7-yOls7UaDtam6aM1rR4R1sfu29vTe0snYUZHRq69wGvyEVl6oiT0x2Tj8fldrFKNq9P68X9JrEgWEyqghnBLIOyKhmXRpUpR5vlVhYFSlFInBeqAGsZN5gxkSkFWQkqBSO5qDAdk9vj3zb4rx5jp_cuWqyHiej7qEGkDHIuYT6gN__QT9-HZlinuWQc8iHEQE2PlA0-xoCVboPbm3DQwPSfZH2SrEH_SU5_Abvhbsw</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Hinskens, Frans</creator><general>Amsterdam University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Koineization in the present-day Dutch dialect landscape: postvocalic /r/ and more</title><author>Hinskens, Frans</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c140s-fb0a40c01dfd025a9d32ec67c5bbe54b5e8b9b1cc02ae60469916d1931a524fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Diachronic linguistics</topic><topic>Dialects</topic><topic>Dutch language</topic><topic>Language contact</topic><topic>Language typology</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Obstruents</topic><topic>Phonological rules</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hinskens, Frans</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Taal en tongval</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hinskens, Frans</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Koineization in the present-day Dutch dialect landscape: postvocalic /r/ and more</atitle><jtitle>Taal en tongval</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>99</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>99-126</pages><issn>0039-8691</issn><eissn>2215-1214</eissn><coden>TATOFD</coden><abstract>This contribution addresses a number of conceptual and methodological issues regarding processes of dialect change leading to koineization. After a discussion of some notions and key findings from  a few recent relevant studies concerning present-day Dutch dialects, two paradigms of linguistic theorizing will be briefly presented. Next, these paradigms will be compared on the basis of the findings from a recent diachronic study of the deletion of postvocalic /r/ before coronal obstruents. It will be shown that only one of the paradigms survives this test. As to the internal factors, the study offers evidence for the claim that, as far as phonological and morphophonological variation is concerned, the  place of a given dialect feature in the typology of phonological rules plays a determining role in its chances for survival in situations of long-lasting, extensive dialect contact. Finally, attention will be paid to some desiderata and possibilities for further research which are either of a methodological (especially data related) or of a more theoretical nature.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Amsterdam University Press</pub><doi>10.5117/TET2011.1.HINS</doi><tpages>28</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-8691
ispartof Taal en tongval, 2011-01, Vol.63 (1), p.99-126
issn 0039-8691
2215-1214
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1430172518
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Diachronic linguistics
Dialects
Dutch language
Language contact
Language typology
Morphology
Obstruents
Phonological rules
Phonology
title Koineization in the present-day Dutch dialect landscape: postvocalic /r/ and more
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T14%3A46%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Koineization%20in%20the%20present-day%20Dutch%20dialect%20landscape:%20postvocalic%20/r/%20and%20more&rft.jtitle=Taal%20en%20tongval&rft.au=Hinskens,%20Frans&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=99-126&rft.issn=0039-8691&rft.eissn=2215-1214&rft.coden=TATOFD&rft_id=info:doi/10.5117/TET2011.1.HINS&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1430172518%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2502175024&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true