Knowledge Management through the Lens of Library and Information Science: A Study of Job Advertisements

Knowledge management (KM) is influential as a concept and practice, referring to the capture, codification, and interpretation of knowledge. KM can be viewed as a form of library and information science (LIS) or a distinct professional area. Wider debates around the skills of newly qualified LIS wor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Library trends 2013, Vol.61 (3), p.703-734
1. Verfasser: Harper, Ray
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 734
container_issue 3
container_start_page 703
container_title Library trends
container_volume 61
creator Harper, Ray
description Knowledge management (KM) is influential as a concept and practice, referring to the capture, codification, and interpretation of knowledge. KM can be viewed as a form of library and information science (LIS) or a distinct professional area. Wider debates around the skills of newly qualified LIS workers, the LIS curriculum, and the current employment market have meant that KM roles present opportunities to LIS professionals. The reported study investigated similarities between KM and LIS jobs by examining 165 U.K.-based KM jobs in 2011. Job advertisements were coded using keywords derived from the Quality Assurance Agency’s Subject Benchmark Statement for LIS. Findings showed KM jobs required and prized the development of information architecture, Web 2.0 tools, databases, and other applications and emphasized the capture and dissemination of knowledge through brokerage. Advertisements showed the importance of “contextual” skills, including relationship management, strategic management, and compliance. Numerous areas in the LIS benchmark statement are shared with KM job roles, particularly facilitating access to information, structuring information, and providing an “expert advisor” service. LIS and KM have similar traits but not necessarily of the same type. LIS can be conceptualized as a profession with clearly defined boundaries, professional routes, and frameworks, while KM is more of a cross-cutting “practice” that embodies a range of professional skills, including, but not limited to, LIS.
doi_str_mv 10.1353/lib.2013.0009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1429835304</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3013767431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-ef9b39f209dca938b4bddd5aa90d29b2709923855fd5ef161a4da75badfbfe4a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1r3DAQhkVJoJtNj70LeunFG316rdyWkLRJNvSw7VlI1mjjxZYSyW7Jv4_cDS3kNDA88zI8L0KfKVlRLvlF39kVI5SvCCHqA1pQKVVF6oadoAUhTFRMKvERneV8KERZiAXa34f4pwe3B_xggtnDAGHE42OK0_6xTMBbCBlHj7edTSa9YBMcvg0-psGMXQx413YQWrjEG7wbJ_cys3fR4o37DWns8t_EfI5OvekzfHqbS_Tr5vrn1fdq--Pb7dVmW7W8bsYKvLJceUaUa43ijRXWOSeNUcQxZdmaKMV4I6V3EjytqRHOrKU1zlsPwvAl-nrMfUrxeYI86qHLLfS9CRCnrKlgqimyiCjol3foIU4plO805QWqqax5oaoj1aaYcwKvn1I3FBGaEj1r10W7nrXrWXvhxb_UA7TjMGX4HyxJUzOqd3M1czOU8_mK8Fehd4ZU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1398361563</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Knowledge Management through the Lens of Library and Information Science: A Study of Job Advertisements</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Harper, Ray</creator><creatorcontrib>Harper, Ray</creatorcontrib><description>Knowledge management (KM) is influential as a concept and practice, referring to the capture, codification, and interpretation of knowledge. KM can be viewed as a form of library and information science (LIS) or a distinct professional area. Wider debates around the skills of newly qualified LIS workers, the LIS curriculum, and the current employment market have meant that KM roles present opportunities to LIS professionals. The reported study investigated similarities between KM and LIS jobs by examining 165 U.K.-based KM jobs in 2011. Job advertisements were coded using keywords derived from the Quality Assurance Agency’s Subject Benchmark Statement for LIS. Findings showed KM jobs required and prized the development of information architecture, Web 2.0 tools, databases, and other applications and emphasized the capture and dissemination of knowledge through brokerage. Advertisements showed the importance of “contextual” skills, including relationship management, strategic management, and compliance. Numerous areas in the LIS benchmark statement are shared with KM job roles, particularly facilitating access to information, structuring information, and providing an “expert advisor” service. LIS and KM have similar traits but not necessarily of the same type. LIS can be conceptualized as a profession with clearly defined boundaries, professional routes, and frameworks, while KM is more of a cross-cutting “practice” that embodies a range of professional skills, including, but not limited to, LIS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-2594</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1559-0682</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-0682</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/lib.2013.0009</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LIBTA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press</publisher><subject>Access to Information ; Advertisements ; Communication Skills ; Comparative analysis ; Comparisons ; Curricula ; Emotional intelligence ; Evidence ; Focus Groups ; Government (Administrative Body) ; Individualized Instruction ; Information management ; Information science ; Information Science Education ; Information Scientists ; International Organizations ; Job Skills ; Keywords ; Knowledge management ; Labor Market ; Librarians ; Libraries ; Library and information science ; Library Associations ; Library Personnel ; Library Services ; Occupations ; Professional Identity ; Quality Assurance ; Quality Control ; Recruitment ; Skills ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Library trends, 2013, Vol.61 (3), p.703-734</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois.</rights><rights>Copyright Johns Hopkins University Press Winter 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-ef9b39f209dca938b4bddd5aa90d29b2709923855fd5ef161a4da75badfbfe4a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harper, Ray</creatorcontrib><title>Knowledge Management through the Lens of Library and Information Science: A Study of Job Advertisements</title><title>Library trends</title><description>Knowledge management (KM) is influential as a concept and practice, referring to the capture, codification, and interpretation of knowledge. KM can be viewed as a form of library and information science (LIS) or a distinct professional area. Wider debates around the skills of newly qualified LIS workers, the LIS curriculum, and the current employment market have meant that KM roles present opportunities to LIS professionals. The reported study investigated similarities between KM and LIS jobs by examining 165 U.K.-based KM jobs in 2011. Job advertisements were coded using keywords derived from the Quality Assurance Agency’s Subject Benchmark Statement for LIS. Findings showed KM jobs required and prized the development of information architecture, Web 2.0 tools, databases, and other applications and emphasized the capture and dissemination of knowledge through brokerage. Advertisements showed the importance of “contextual” skills, including relationship management, strategic management, and compliance. Numerous areas in the LIS benchmark statement are shared with KM job roles, particularly facilitating access to information, structuring information, and providing an “expert advisor” service. LIS and KM have similar traits but not necessarily of the same type. LIS can be conceptualized as a profession with clearly defined boundaries, professional routes, and frameworks, while KM is more of a cross-cutting “practice” that embodies a range of professional skills, including, but not limited to, LIS.</description><subject>Access to Information</subject><subject>Advertisements</subject><subject>Communication Skills</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Comparisons</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Emotional intelligence</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Government (Administrative Body)</subject><subject>Individualized Instruction</subject><subject>Information management</subject><subject>Information science</subject><subject>Information Science Education</subject><subject>Information Scientists</subject><subject>International Organizations</subject><subject>Job Skills</subject><subject>Keywords</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Labor Market</subject><subject>Librarians</subject><subject>Libraries</subject><subject>Library and information science</subject><subject>Library Associations</subject><subject>Library Personnel</subject><subject>Library Services</subject><subject>Occupations</subject><subject>Professional Identity</subject><subject>Quality Assurance</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0024-2594</issn><issn>1559-0682</issn><issn>1559-0682</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1r3DAQhkVJoJtNj70LeunFG316rdyWkLRJNvSw7VlI1mjjxZYSyW7Jv4_cDS3kNDA88zI8L0KfKVlRLvlF39kVI5SvCCHqA1pQKVVF6oadoAUhTFRMKvERneV8KERZiAXa34f4pwe3B_xggtnDAGHE42OK0_6xTMBbCBlHj7edTSa9YBMcvg0-psGMXQx413YQWrjEG7wbJ_cys3fR4o37DWns8t_EfI5OvekzfHqbS_Tr5vrn1fdq--Pb7dVmW7W8bsYKvLJceUaUa43ijRXWOSeNUcQxZdmaKMV4I6V3EjytqRHOrKU1zlsPwvAl-nrMfUrxeYI86qHLLfS9CRCnrKlgqimyiCjol3foIU4plO805QWqqax5oaoj1aaYcwKvn1I3FBGaEj1r10W7nrXrWXvhxb_UA7TjMGX4HyxJUzOqd3M1czOU8_mK8Fehd4ZU</recordid><startdate>2013</startdate><enddate>2013</enddate><creator>Harper, Ray</creator><general>Johns Hopkins University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2013</creationdate><title>Knowledge Management through the Lens of Library and Information Science: A Study of Job Advertisements</title><author>Harper, Ray</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-ef9b39f209dca938b4bddd5aa90d29b2709923855fd5ef161a4da75badfbfe4a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Access to Information</topic><topic>Advertisements</topic><topic>Communication Skills</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Comparisons</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Emotional intelligence</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Government (Administrative Body)</topic><topic>Individualized Instruction</topic><topic>Information management</topic><topic>Information science</topic><topic>Information Science Education</topic><topic>Information Scientists</topic><topic>International Organizations</topic><topic>Job Skills</topic><topic>Keywords</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Labor Market</topic><topic>Librarians</topic><topic>Libraries</topic><topic>Library and information science</topic><topic>Library Associations</topic><topic>Library Personnel</topic><topic>Library Services</topic><topic>Occupations</topic><topic>Professional Identity</topic><topic>Quality Assurance</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harper, Ray</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Library trends</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harper, Ray</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Knowledge Management through the Lens of Library and Information Science: A Study of Job Advertisements</atitle><jtitle>Library trends</jtitle><date>2013</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>703</spage><epage>734</epage><pages>703-734</pages><issn>0024-2594</issn><issn>1559-0682</issn><eissn>1559-0682</eissn><coden>LIBTA3</coden><abstract>Knowledge management (KM) is influential as a concept and practice, referring to the capture, codification, and interpretation of knowledge. KM can be viewed as a form of library and information science (LIS) or a distinct professional area. Wider debates around the skills of newly qualified LIS workers, the LIS curriculum, and the current employment market have meant that KM roles present opportunities to LIS professionals. The reported study investigated similarities between KM and LIS jobs by examining 165 U.K.-based KM jobs in 2011. Job advertisements were coded using keywords derived from the Quality Assurance Agency’s Subject Benchmark Statement for LIS. Findings showed KM jobs required and prized the development of information architecture, Web 2.0 tools, databases, and other applications and emphasized the capture and dissemination of knowledge through brokerage. Advertisements showed the importance of “contextual” skills, including relationship management, strategic management, and compliance. Numerous areas in the LIS benchmark statement are shared with KM job roles, particularly facilitating access to information, structuring information, and providing an “expert advisor” service. LIS and KM have similar traits but not necessarily of the same type. LIS can be conceptualized as a profession with clearly defined boundaries, professional routes, and frameworks, while KM is more of a cross-cutting “practice” that embodies a range of professional skills, including, but not limited to, LIS.</abstract><cop>Baltimore</cop><pub>Johns Hopkins University Press</pub><doi>10.1353/lib.2013.0009</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0024-2594
ispartof Library trends, 2013, Vol.61 (3), p.703-734
issn 0024-2594
1559-0682
1559-0682
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1429835304
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Access to Information
Advertisements
Communication Skills
Comparative analysis
Comparisons
Curricula
Emotional intelligence
Evidence
Focus Groups
Government (Administrative Body)
Individualized Instruction
Information management
Information science
Information Science Education
Information Scientists
International Organizations
Job Skills
Keywords
Knowledge management
Labor Market
Librarians
Libraries
Library and information science
Library Associations
Library Personnel
Library Services
Occupations
Professional Identity
Quality Assurance
Quality Control
Recruitment
Skills
Studies
title Knowledge Management through the Lens of Library and Information Science: A Study of Job Advertisements
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A57%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Knowledge%20Management%20through%20the%20Lens%20of%20Library%20and%20Information%20Science:%20A%20Study%20of%20Job%20Advertisements&rft.jtitle=Library%20trends&rft.au=Harper,%20Ray&rft.date=2013&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=703&rft.epage=734&rft.pages=703-734&rft.issn=0024-2594&rft.eissn=1559-0682&rft.coden=LIBTA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/lib.2013.0009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3013767431%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1398361563&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true