Identifying priority target areas for the Knoxville–Knox County hillside and ridgetop protection plan: using the value of visual amenity during the real estate boom of 2002–2007 and the recession of 2008

In support of the Joint City–County Taskforce on Ridge, Slope, and Hillside Development and Protection, the goal of this research was to identify areas within Knox County, Tennessee, where views of hillsides and ridges were most valued and how those values were affected by different economic climate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Annals of regional science 2013-06, Vol.50 (3), p.911-934
Hauptverfasser: Chadourne, Matthew, Cho, Seong-Hoon, Roberts, Roland K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 934
container_issue 3
container_start_page 911
container_title The Annals of regional science
container_volume 50
creator Chadourne, Matthew
Cho, Seong-Hoon
Roberts, Roland K.
description In support of the Joint City–County Taskforce on Ridge, Slope, and Hillside Development and Protection, the goal of this research was to identify areas within Knox County, Tennessee, where views of hillsides and ridges were most valued and how those values were affected by different economic climates. The amenity values added to houses by their views were quantified for houses sold during a housing boom and again during a recession. The results of this study show that forest views add significant value to homes during both periods. However, the amenity value added to houses decreased 13 % from the boom period to the recession period, implying that forest views decrease in value when there is an economic recession. Additionally, the value of the view of barren/scrub land, which was not significant in the boom period, became significant during the recession, reducing house value almost $112 per visible acre and showing that while consumers are less inclined to pay more for views of forest, they are also less willing to endure disamenity views during a recession. When the forest land values were mapped to highlight planned areas with consistently high visual amenity values across both periods, some areas exhibited amenity values in excess of $100 per visible acre of forest land. The areas with the highest amenity values of forest land views roughly correspond to the areas with the highest disamenity values of barren/scrub view. These results imply that these areas represent the highest potential return on investment for preservation and reforestation efforts.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00168-012-0519-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1429655097</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1418121303</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-804826d30a3bffc2e83d67f56212946cce164e3d6fce949463406a9e020f90e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks2KFDEQxxtRcBx9AG8BEby0Vj463fEmix-LC1703GTTld0sPZ0x6R6cPfkOPpjv4JNYsVcRQfRUSfGr_7-Kqqp6yOEpB2ifZQCuuxq4qKHhpr6-VW24kuVnxO1qA00LNe-0ulvdy_kKqEZyvqm-ng44zcEfw3TB9inEFOYjm226wJnZhDYzHxObL5G9neKnQxhH_Pb5S3mzk7hMBF9SLocBmZ0GlsJAlXFPWnFGN4c4sf1op-dsycWiCB3suCCLnh1CXuzI7A6n4jos6SdCxiPDPNsZ2XmMu0ILAEHWFNofVivnMOdisgLd_eqOt2PGBzdxW3149fL9yZv67N3r05MXZ7VrwMx1B6oTepBg5bn3TmAnB936RgsujNLOIdcKKecdGkUZqUBbgyDAG0Aut9WTVZfm_LhQp_0uZIcjjYpxyT1XwuiGvNr_QHnHBZcg_41K3SrDC7utHv2BXsUlTTQzUY0UujOytMlXyqWYc0Lf0453Nh17Dn05nH49nJ4Opy-H019TzeMbZZudHX2ykwv5V6FotVDUBHFi5fK-7A3Tbx38Vfw7qY3VSQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1353268931</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identifying priority target areas for the Knoxville–Knox County hillside and ridgetop protection plan: using the value of visual amenity during the real estate boom of 2002–2007 and the recession of 2008</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Chadourne, Matthew ; Cho, Seong-Hoon ; Roberts, Roland K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chadourne, Matthew ; Cho, Seong-Hoon ; Roberts, Roland K.</creatorcontrib><description>In support of the Joint City–County Taskforce on Ridge, Slope, and Hillside Development and Protection, the goal of this research was to identify areas within Knox County, Tennessee, where views of hillsides and ridges were most valued and how those values were affected by different economic climates. The amenity values added to houses by their views were quantified for houses sold during a housing boom and again during a recession. The results of this study show that forest views add significant value to homes during both periods. However, the amenity value added to houses decreased 13 % from the boom period to the recession period, implying that forest views decrease in value when there is an economic recession. Additionally, the value of the view of barren/scrub land, which was not significant in the boom period, became significant during the recession, reducing house value almost $112 per visible acre and showing that while consumers are less inclined to pay more for views of forest, they are also less willing to endure disamenity views during a recession. When the forest land values were mapped to highlight planned areas with consistently high visual amenity values across both periods, some areas exhibited amenity values in excess of $100 per visible acre of forest land. The areas with the highest amenity values of forest land views roughly correspond to the areas with the highest disamenity values of barren/scrub view. These results imply that these areas represent the highest potential return on investment for preservation and reforestation efforts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0570-1864</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0592</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00168-012-0519-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>America ; Bgi / Prodig ; Climate ; Consumers ; Counties ; East south Central ; Economic conditions ; Economic models ; Economic statistics ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Environmental Economics ; Forests ; Geography ; Housing ; Housing conditions ; Housing prices ; Investments ; Land ; Land appraisals ; Land use ; Land values ; Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning ; Microeconomics ; Original Paper ; Property values ; Real estate ; Real estate business ; Recession ; Recessions ; Reforestation ; Regional economics ; Regional/Spatial Science ; Residential areas ; Return on investment ; Studies ; Tennessee ; United States of America ; Value added ; Water quality</subject><ispartof>The Annals of regional science, 2013-06, Vol.50 (3), p.911-934</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2012</rights><rights>Tous droits réservés © Prodig - Bibliographie Géographique Internationale (BGI), 2013</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-804826d30a3bffc2e83d67f56212946cce164e3d6fce949463406a9e020f90e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-804826d30a3bffc2e83d67f56212946cce164e3d6fce949463406a9e020f90e13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00168-012-0519-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00168-012-0519-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27844,27845,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27624491$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chadourne, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Seong-Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Roland K.</creatorcontrib><title>Identifying priority target areas for the Knoxville–Knox County hillside and ridgetop protection plan: using the value of visual amenity during the real estate boom of 2002–2007 and the recession of 2008</title><title>The Annals of regional science</title><addtitle>Ann Reg Sci</addtitle><description>In support of the Joint City–County Taskforce on Ridge, Slope, and Hillside Development and Protection, the goal of this research was to identify areas within Knox County, Tennessee, where views of hillsides and ridges were most valued and how those values were affected by different economic climates. The amenity values added to houses by their views were quantified for houses sold during a housing boom and again during a recession. The results of this study show that forest views add significant value to homes during both periods. However, the amenity value added to houses decreased 13 % from the boom period to the recession period, implying that forest views decrease in value when there is an economic recession. Additionally, the value of the view of barren/scrub land, which was not significant in the boom period, became significant during the recession, reducing house value almost $112 per visible acre and showing that while consumers are less inclined to pay more for views of forest, they are also less willing to endure disamenity views during a recession. When the forest land values were mapped to highlight planned areas with consistently high visual amenity values across both periods, some areas exhibited amenity values in excess of $100 per visible acre of forest land. The areas with the highest amenity values of forest land views roughly correspond to the areas with the highest disamenity values of barren/scrub view. These results imply that these areas represent the highest potential return on investment for preservation and reforestation efforts.</description><subject>America</subject><subject>Bgi / Prodig</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Counties</subject><subject>East south Central</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economic statistics</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Environmental Economics</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Housing conditions</subject><subject>Housing prices</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>Land appraisals</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Land values</subject><subject>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Property values</subject><subject>Real estate</subject><subject>Real estate business</subject><subject>Recession</subject><subject>Recessions</subject><subject>Reforestation</subject><subject>Regional economics</subject><subject>Regional/Spatial Science</subject><subject>Residential areas</subject><subject>Return on investment</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tennessee</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>Value added</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><issn>0570-1864</issn><issn>1432-0592</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks2KFDEQxxtRcBx9AG8BEby0Vj463fEmix-LC1703GTTld0sPZ0x6R6cPfkOPpjv4JNYsVcRQfRUSfGr_7-Kqqp6yOEpB2ifZQCuuxq4qKHhpr6-VW24kuVnxO1qA00LNe-0ulvdy_kKqEZyvqm-ng44zcEfw3TB9inEFOYjm226wJnZhDYzHxObL5G9neKnQxhH_Pb5S3mzk7hMBF9SLocBmZ0GlsJAlXFPWnFGN4c4sf1op-dsycWiCB3suCCLnh1CXuzI7A6n4jos6SdCxiPDPNsZ2XmMu0ILAEHWFNofVivnMOdisgLd_eqOt2PGBzdxW3149fL9yZv67N3r05MXZ7VrwMx1B6oTepBg5bn3TmAnB936RgsujNLOIdcKKecdGkUZqUBbgyDAG0Aut9WTVZfm_LhQp_0uZIcjjYpxyT1XwuiGvNr_QHnHBZcg_41K3SrDC7utHv2BXsUlTTQzUY0UujOytMlXyqWYc0Lf0453Nh17Dn05nH49nJ4Opy-H019TzeMbZZudHX2ykwv5V6FotVDUBHFi5fK-7A3Tbx38Vfw7qY3VSQ</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Chadourne, Matthew</creator><creator>Cho, Seong-Hoon</creator><creator>Roberts, Roland K.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Identifying priority target areas for the Knoxville–Knox County hillside and ridgetop protection plan: using the value of visual amenity during the real estate boom of 2002–2007 and the recession of 2008</title><author>Chadourne, Matthew ; Cho, Seong-Hoon ; Roberts, Roland K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-804826d30a3bffc2e83d67f56212946cce164e3d6fce949463406a9e020f90e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>America</topic><topic>Bgi / Prodig</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Counties</topic><topic>East south Central</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economic statistics</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Environmental Economics</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Housing conditions</topic><topic>Housing prices</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>Land appraisals</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Land values</topic><topic>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Property values</topic><topic>Real estate</topic><topic>Real estate business</topic><topic>Recession</topic><topic>Recessions</topic><topic>Reforestation</topic><topic>Regional economics</topic><topic>Regional/Spatial Science</topic><topic>Residential areas</topic><topic>Return on investment</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tennessee</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>Value added</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chadourne, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Seong-Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Roland K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>The Annals of regional science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chadourne, Matthew</au><au>Cho, Seong-Hoon</au><au>Roberts, Roland K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identifying priority target areas for the Knoxville–Knox County hillside and ridgetop protection plan: using the value of visual amenity during the real estate boom of 2002–2007 and the recession of 2008</atitle><jtitle>The Annals of regional science</jtitle><stitle>Ann Reg Sci</stitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>911</spage><epage>934</epage><pages>911-934</pages><issn>0570-1864</issn><eissn>1432-0592</eissn><abstract>In support of the Joint City–County Taskforce on Ridge, Slope, and Hillside Development and Protection, the goal of this research was to identify areas within Knox County, Tennessee, where views of hillsides and ridges were most valued and how those values were affected by different economic climates. The amenity values added to houses by their views were quantified for houses sold during a housing boom and again during a recession. The results of this study show that forest views add significant value to homes during both periods. However, the amenity value added to houses decreased 13 % from the boom period to the recession period, implying that forest views decrease in value when there is an economic recession. Additionally, the value of the view of barren/scrub land, which was not significant in the boom period, became significant during the recession, reducing house value almost $112 per visible acre and showing that while consumers are less inclined to pay more for views of forest, they are also less willing to endure disamenity views during a recession. When the forest land values were mapped to highlight planned areas with consistently high visual amenity values across both periods, some areas exhibited amenity values in excess of $100 per visible acre of forest land. The areas with the highest amenity values of forest land views roughly correspond to the areas with the highest disamenity values of barren/scrub view. These results imply that these areas represent the highest potential return on investment for preservation and reforestation efforts.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s00168-012-0519-z</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0570-1864
ispartof The Annals of regional science, 2013-06, Vol.50 (3), p.911-934
issn 0570-1864
1432-0592
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1429655097
source PAIS Index; SpringerLink Journals; Business Source Complete
subjects America
Bgi / Prodig
Climate
Consumers
Counties
East south Central
Economic conditions
Economic models
Economic statistics
Economics
Economics and Finance
Environmental Economics
Forests
Geography
Housing
Housing conditions
Housing prices
Investments
Land
Land appraisals
Land use
Land values
Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning
Microeconomics
Original Paper
Property values
Real estate
Real estate business
Recession
Recessions
Reforestation
Regional economics
Regional/Spatial Science
Residential areas
Return on investment
Studies
Tennessee
United States of America
Value added
Water quality
title Identifying priority target areas for the Knoxville–Knox County hillside and ridgetop protection plan: using the value of visual amenity during the real estate boom of 2002–2007 and the recession of 2008
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T11%3A20%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identifying%20priority%20target%20areas%20for%20the%20Knoxville%E2%80%93Knox%20County%20hillside%20and%20ridgetop%20protection%20plan:%20using%20the%20value%20of%20visual%20amenity%20during%20the%20real%20estate%20boom%20of%202002%E2%80%932007%20and%20the%20recession%20of%202008&rft.jtitle=The%20Annals%20of%20regional%20science&rft.au=Chadourne,%20Matthew&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=911&rft.epage=934&rft.pages=911-934&rft.issn=0570-1864&rft.eissn=1432-0592&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00168-012-0519-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1418121303%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1353268931&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true