Dental visiting by insurance and oral health impact
Background The aim of this study was to explore whether oral health has an influence on the association between dental insurance and dental visiting. Methods A random sample of adults aged 30–61 years living in Australia was drawn from the Australian Electoral Roll. Data were collected by mailed sur...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Australian dental journal 2013-09, Vol.58 (3), p.344-349 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 349 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 344 |
container_title | Australian dental journal |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Brennan, DS Anikeeva, O Teusner, DN |
description | Background
The aim of this study was to explore whether oral health has an influence on the association between dental insurance and dental visiting.
Methods
A random sample of adults aged 30–61 years living in Australia was drawn from the Australian Electoral Roll. Data were collected by mailed survey in 2009–2010, including age, gender, household income, dental insurance status, dental visiting and oral health impact.
Results
Responses were collected from n = 1096 persons (response rate = 39.1%). Dental insurance was positively associated with visiting a dentist in the last 12 months (prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.48; 95% CI: 1.31–1.67), while oral health impact was not associated with recent visiting PR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.89–1.14). Visiting for the purpose of pain relief was less prevalent among insured participants (PR = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.44–0.81), but more prevalent among those with poor oral health (PR = 2.85; 95% CI: 2.15–3.76). It was found that oral health impact did not alter the relationship between dental insurance and visiting.
Conclusions
Oral health impacts were not associated with recent dental visits, but were associated with visits for pain relief. Dental insurance was associated with a greater likelihood of recent visits and lower levels of relief of pain visits. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/adj.12082 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1428774407</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1428774407</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3252-9fd8d2465af24981e26b09dd6a5ae3a88ce427832795e1d8607b12edd0d502a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQQC0EoqUw8AdQRhjS2mcndsaq5VOVWGC2nPhCXeWjxAko_55AChu33HBP76RHyCWjczbMwtjdnAFVcESmTHERSsWSYzKlVEQhFcAm5Mz7HaUguKSnZAI8UQyYnBK-xqo1RfDhvGtd9RakfeAq3zWmyjAwlQ3qZjhv0RTtNnDl3mTtOTnJTeHx4rBn5PXu9mX1EG6e7x9Xy02YcYggTHKrLIg4MjmI4R9CnNLE2thEBrlRKkMBUnGQSYTMqpjKlAFaS21EwUR8Rq5H776p3zv0rS6dz7AoTIV15zUToKQUgsoBvRnRrKm9bzDX-8aVpuk1o_q7kR4a6Z9GA3t10HZpifaP_I0yAIsR-HQF9v-b9HL9NCq_AAvCblg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1428774407</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dental visiting by insurance and oral health impact</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Brennan, DS ; Anikeeva, O ; Teusner, DN</creator><creatorcontrib>Brennan, DS ; Anikeeva, O ; Teusner, DN</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The aim of this study was to explore whether oral health has an influence on the association between dental insurance and dental visiting.
Methods
A random sample of adults aged 30–61 years living in Australia was drawn from the Australian Electoral Roll. Data were collected by mailed survey in 2009–2010, including age, gender, household income, dental insurance status, dental visiting and oral health impact.
Results
Responses were collected from n = 1096 persons (response rate = 39.1%). Dental insurance was positively associated with visiting a dentist in the last 12 months (prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.48; 95% CI: 1.31–1.67), while oral health impact was not associated with recent visiting PR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.89–1.14). Visiting for the purpose of pain relief was less prevalent among insured participants (PR = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.44–0.81), but more prevalent among those with poor oral health (PR = 2.85; 95% CI: 2.15–3.76). It was found that oral health impact did not alter the relationship between dental insurance and visiting.
Conclusions
Oral health impacts were not associated with recent dental visits, but were associated with visits for pain relief. Dental insurance was associated with a greater likelihood of recent visits and lower levels of relief of pain visits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-0421</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1834-7819</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/adj.12082</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23981217</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia</publisher><subject>access ; Adult ; Australia ; Dental care ; Dental Care - economics ; Dental Care - utilization ; Dentistry ; Female ; Humans ; insurance ; Insurance, Dental - economics ; Insurance, Dental - statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Oral Health - standards ; Oral Health - statistics & numerical data ; oral health impact ; Prevalence</subject><ispartof>Australian dental journal, 2013-09, Vol.58 (3), p.344-349</ispartof><rights>2013 Australian Dental Association</rights><rights>2013 Australian Dental Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3252-9fd8d2465af24981e26b09dd6a5ae3a88ce427832795e1d8607b12edd0d502a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3252-9fd8d2465af24981e26b09dd6a5ae3a88ce427832795e1d8607b12edd0d502a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fadj.12082$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fadj.12082$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23981217$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brennan, DS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anikeeva, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teusner, DN</creatorcontrib><title>Dental visiting by insurance and oral health impact</title><title>Australian dental journal</title><addtitle>Aust Dent J</addtitle><description>Background
The aim of this study was to explore whether oral health has an influence on the association between dental insurance and dental visiting.
Methods
A random sample of adults aged 30–61 years living in Australia was drawn from the Australian Electoral Roll. Data were collected by mailed survey in 2009–2010, including age, gender, household income, dental insurance status, dental visiting and oral health impact.
Results
Responses were collected from n = 1096 persons (response rate = 39.1%). Dental insurance was positively associated with visiting a dentist in the last 12 months (prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.48; 95% CI: 1.31–1.67), while oral health impact was not associated with recent visiting PR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.89–1.14). Visiting for the purpose of pain relief was less prevalent among insured participants (PR = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.44–0.81), but more prevalent among those with poor oral health (PR = 2.85; 95% CI: 2.15–3.76). It was found that oral health impact did not alter the relationship between dental insurance and visiting.
Conclusions
Oral health impacts were not associated with recent dental visits, but were associated with visits for pain relief. Dental insurance was associated with a greater likelihood of recent visits and lower levels of relief of pain visits.</description><subject>access</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Dental care</subject><subject>Dental Care - economics</subject><subject>Dental Care - utilization</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>insurance</subject><subject>Insurance, Dental - economics</subject><subject>Insurance, Dental - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Oral Health - standards</subject><subject>Oral Health - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>oral health impact</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><issn>0045-0421</issn><issn>1834-7819</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQQC0EoqUw8AdQRhjS2mcndsaq5VOVWGC2nPhCXeWjxAko_55AChu33HBP76RHyCWjczbMwtjdnAFVcESmTHERSsWSYzKlVEQhFcAm5Mz7HaUguKSnZAI8UQyYnBK-xqo1RfDhvGtd9RakfeAq3zWmyjAwlQ3qZjhv0RTtNnDl3mTtOTnJTeHx4rBn5PXu9mX1EG6e7x9Xy02YcYggTHKrLIg4MjmI4R9CnNLE2thEBrlRKkMBUnGQSYTMqpjKlAFaS21EwUR8Rq5H776p3zv0rS6dz7AoTIV15zUToKQUgsoBvRnRrKm9bzDX-8aVpuk1o_q7kR4a6Z9GA3t10HZpifaP_I0yAIsR-HQF9v-b9HL9NCq_AAvCblg</recordid><startdate>201309</startdate><enddate>201309</enddate><creator>Brennan, DS</creator><creator>Anikeeva, O</creator><creator>Teusner, DN</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201309</creationdate><title>Dental visiting by insurance and oral health impact</title><author>Brennan, DS ; Anikeeva, O ; Teusner, DN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3252-9fd8d2465af24981e26b09dd6a5ae3a88ce427832795e1d8607b12edd0d502a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>access</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Dental care</topic><topic>Dental Care - economics</topic><topic>Dental Care - utilization</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>insurance</topic><topic>Insurance, Dental - economics</topic><topic>Insurance, Dental - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Oral Health - standards</topic><topic>Oral Health - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>oral health impact</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brennan, DS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anikeeva, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teusner, DN</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Australian dental journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brennan, DS</au><au>Anikeeva, O</au><au>Teusner, DN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dental visiting by insurance and oral health impact</atitle><jtitle>Australian dental journal</jtitle><addtitle>Aust Dent J</addtitle><date>2013-09</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>344</spage><epage>349</epage><pages>344-349</pages><issn>0045-0421</issn><eissn>1834-7819</eissn><abstract>Background
The aim of this study was to explore whether oral health has an influence on the association between dental insurance and dental visiting.
Methods
A random sample of adults aged 30–61 years living in Australia was drawn from the Australian Electoral Roll. Data were collected by mailed survey in 2009–2010, including age, gender, household income, dental insurance status, dental visiting and oral health impact.
Results
Responses were collected from n = 1096 persons (response rate = 39.1%). Dental insurance was positively associated with visiting a dentist in the last 12 months (prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.48; 95% CI: 1.31–1.67), while oral health impact was not associated with recent visiting PR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.89–1.14). Visiting for the purpose of pain relief was less prevalent among insured participants (PR = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.44–0.81), but more prevalent among those with poor oral health (PR = 2.85; 95% CI: 2.15–3.76). It was found that oral health impact did not alter the relationship between dental insurance and visiting.
Conclusions
Oral health impacts were not associated with recent dental visits, but were associated with visits for pain relief. Dental insurance was associated with a greater likelihood of recent visits and lower levels of relief of pain visits.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pmid>23981217</pmid><doi>10.1111/adj.12082</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0045-0421 |
ispartof | Australian dental journal, 2013-09, Vol.58 (3), p.344-349 |
issn | 0045-0421 1834-7819 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1428774407 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | access Adult Australia Dental care Dental Care - economics Dental Care - utilization Dentistry Female Humans insurance Insurance, Dental - economics Insurance, Dental - statistics & numerical data Male Middle Aged Oral Health - standards Oral Health - statistics & numerical data oral health impact Prevalence |
title | Dental visiting by insurance and oral health impact |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T17%3A26%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dental%20visiting%20by%20insurance%20and%20oral%20health%20impact&rft.jtitle=Australian%20dental%20journal&rft.au=Brennan,%20DS&rft.date=2013-09&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=344&rft.epage=349&rft.pages=344-349&rft.issn=0045-0421&rft.eissn=1834-7819&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/adj.12082&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1428774407%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1428774407&rft_id=info:pmid/23981217&rfr_iscdi=true |