"THE LAST POSSIBLE RESORT": A Forgotten Prod and the in Situ Standardization of Stanley Milgram's Voice-Feedback Condition

This article uses previously unpublished data from Stanley Milgram's obedience experiments to draw attention to a hitherto neglected procedural innovation of the voice-feedback condition. In 3 experimental sessions in this condition, the experimenter responded to a participant's attempted...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:History of psychology 2013-08, Vol.16 (3), p.177-194
1. Verfasser: Gibson, Stephen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 194
container_issue 3
container_start_page 177
container_title History of psychology
container_volume 16
creator Gibson, Stephen
description This article uses previously unpublished data from Stanley Milgram's obedience experiments to draw attention to a hitherto neglected procedural innovation of the voice-feedback condition. In 3 experimental sessions in this condition, the experimenter responded to a participant's attempted defiance by leaving the room, apparently to speak to the learner, before returning to assure the participant that the learner was willing or able to continue. This article documents the use of this tactic during the voice-feedback condition and highlights the negotiation surrounding the use of the tactic between Milgram and his confederate John Williams, who played the role of the experimenter. It is shown that the subsequent use of this tactic did not conform to the conditions for its use agreed by Milgram and Williams. Moreover, the tactic seems to have been dropped from both subsequent experimental conditions and Milgram's published accounts of his work. These observations are discussed in relation to historical work on experimentation in social psychology, research on standardization in the sociology of scientific knowledge, and in terms of their implications for theory and research on dis/obedience.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/a0032430
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1428519550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1428519550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-33560c683ba469df93b33400e25402cf2d8a57a50159a6bf938718b78dc33caa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0V1rFDEUBuAgiv1Q8BdIqIiCjJ5M5tO77bJrCytbOqu34Uwm06bOJmOSudj-erN2a8GrJCcPh8N7CHnD4DMDXn5BAJ5mHJ6RY1bzOoGCwfN4h5onWc7giJx4fwcAVXy8JEcpr1gOZXFM7s82Fwu6mjUberVumsvz1YJeL5r19ebsK53RpXU3NgRl6JWzHUXT0XCrqDa00WGiTYgVdJ2-x6Ctobb_WxrUjn7Xw43D7QdPf1otVbJUqmtR_qJzazq916_Iix4Hr14fzlPyY7nYzC-S1frb5Xy2SjBjLCSc5wXIouItZkXd9TVvOc8AVJpnkMo-7SrMS8yB5TUWbfyvSla1ZdVJziUiPyUfH_qOzv6elA9iq71Uw4BG2ckLlqUxljrPIdJ3_9E7OzkTpxMsRhZDLoA_NZTOeu9UL0ant-h2goHY70M87iPSt4eGU7tV3T_4uIAI3h8AeolD79BI7Z9cWdRlyffu04PDEcXodxJd0HJQXk7OKRPErR0FKwQXLPo__WOczQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1381032603</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>"THE LAST POSSIBLE RESORT": A Forgotten Prod and the in Situ Standardization of Stanley Milgram's Voice-Feedback Condition</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Gibson, Stephen</creator><contributor>Pickren, Wade E</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Stephen ; Pickren, Wade E</creatorcontrib><description>This article uses previously unpublished data from Stanley Milgram's obedience experiments to draw attention to a hitherto neglected procedural innovation of the voice-feedback condition. In 3 experimental sessions in this condition, the experimenter responded to a participant's attempted defiance by leaving the room, apparently to speak to the learner, before returning to assure the participant that the learner was willing or able to continue. This article documents the use of this tactic during the voice-feedback condition and highlights the negotiation surrounding the use of the tactic between Milgram and his confederate John Williams, who played the role of the experimenter. It is shown that the subsequent use of this tactic did not conform to the conditions for its use agreed by Milgram and Williams. Moreover, the tactic seems to have been dropped from both subsequent experimental conditions and Milgram's published accounts of his work. These observations are discussed in relation to historical work on experimentation in social psychology, research on standardization in the sociology of scientific knowledge, and in terms of their implications for theory and research on dis/obedience.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1093-4510</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-0610</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0032430</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23815076</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Experimentation ; Feedback ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; History of Psychology ; Human ; Methodology ; Obedience ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Social interactions. Communication. Group processes ; Social Psychology ; Vocalization</subject><ispartof>History of psychology, 2013-08, Vol.16 (3), p.177-194</ispartof><rights>2013 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2013, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-33560c683ba469df93b33400e25402cf2d8a57a50159a6bf938718b78dc33caa3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27697736$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23815076$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Pickren, Wade E</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Stephen</creatorcontrib><title>"THE LAST POSSIBLE RESORT": A Forgotten Prod and the in Situ Standardization of Stanley Milgram's Voice-Feedback Condition</title><title>History of psychology</title><addtitle>Hist Psychol</addtitle><description>This article uses previously unpublished data from Stanley Milgram's obedience experiments to draw attention to a hitherto neglected procedural innovation of the voice-feedback condition. In 3 experimental sessions in this condition, the experimenter responded to a participant's attempted defiance by leaving the room, apparently to speak to the learner, before returning to assure the participant that the learner was willing or able to continue. This article documents the use of this tactic during the voice-feedback condition and highlights the negotiation surrounding the use of the tactic between Milgram and his confederate John Williams, who played the role of the experimenter. It is shown that the subsequent use of this tactic did not conform to the conditions for its use agreed by Milgram and Williams. Moreover, the tactic seems to have been dropped from both subsequent experimental conditions and Milgram's published accounts of his work. These observations are discussed in relation to historical work on experimentation in social psychology, research on standardization in the sociology of scientific knowledge, and in terms of their implications for theory and research on dis/obedience.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>History of Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Obedience</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</subject><subject>Social Psychology</subject><subject>Vocalization</subject><issn>1093-4510</issn><issn>1939-0610</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpd0V1rFDEUBuAgiv1Q8BdIqIiCjJ5M5tO77bJrCytbOqu34Uwm06bOJmOSudj-erN2a8GrJCcPh8N7CHnD4DMDXn5BAJ5mHJ6RY1bzOoGCwfN4h5onWc7giJx4fwcAVXy8JEcpr1gOZXFM7s82Fwu6mjUberVumsvz1YJeL5r19ebsK53RpXU3NgRl6JWzHUXT0XCrqDa00WGiTYgVdJ2-x6Ctobb_WxrUjn7Xw43D7QdPf1otVbJUqmtR_qJzazq916_Iix4Hr14fzlPyY7nYzC-S1frb5Xy2SjBjLCSc5wXIouItZkXd9TVvOc8AVJpnkMo-7SrMS8yB5TUWbfyvSla1ZdVJziUiPyUfH_qOzv6elA9iq71Uw4BG2ckLlqUxljrPIdJ3_9E7OzkTpxMsRhZDLoA_NZTOeu9UL0ant-h2goHY70M87iPSt4eGU7tV3T_4uIAI3h8AeolD79BI7Z9cWdRlyffu04PDEcXodxJd0HJQXk7OKRPErR0FKwQXLPo__WOczQ</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Gibson, Stephen</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>"THE LAST POSSIBLE RESORT": A Forgotten Prod and the in Situ Standardization of Stanley Milgram's Voice-Feedback Condition</title><author>Gibson, Stephen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-33560c683ba469df93b33400e25402cf2d8a57a50159a6bf938718b78dc33caa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>History of Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Obedience</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</topic><topic>Social Psychology</topic><topic>Vocalization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Stephen</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>History of psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gibson, Stephen</au><au>Pickren, Wade E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>"THE LAST POSSIBLE RESORT": A Forgotten Prod and the in Situ Standardization of Stanley Milgram's Voice-Feedback Condition</atitle><jtitle>History of psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Hist Psychol</addtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>177</spage><epage>194</epage><pages>177-194</pages><issn>1093-4510</issn><eissn>1939-0610</eissn><abstract>This article uses previously unpublished data from Stanley Milgram's obedience experiments to draw attention to a hitherto neglected procedural innovation of the voice-feedback condition. In 3 experimental sessions in this condition, the experimenter responded to a participant's attempted defiance by leaving the room, apparently to speak to the learner, before returning to assure the participant that the learner was willing or able to continue. This article documents the use of this tactic during the voice-feedback condition and highlights the negotiation surrounding the use of the tactic between Milgram and his confederate John Williams, who played the role of the experimenter. It is shown that the subsequent use of this tactic did not conform to the conditions for its use agreed by Milgram and Williams. Moreover, the tactic seems to have been dropped from both subsequent experimental conditions and Milgram's published accounts of his work. These observations are discussed in relation to historical work on experimentation in social psychology, research on standardization in the sociology of scientific knowledge, and in terms of their implications for theory and research on dis/obedience.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><pmid>23815076</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0032430</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1093-4510
ispartof History of psychology, 2013-08, Vol.16 (3), p.177-194
issn 1093-4510
1939-0610
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1428519550
source EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Experimentation
Feedback
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
History of Psychology
Human
Methodology
Obedience
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Social interactions. Communication. Group processes
Social Psychology
Vocalization
title "THE LAST POSSIBLE RESORT": A Forgotten Prod and the in Situ Standardization of Stanley Milgram's Voice-Feedback Condition
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T02%3A01%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%22THE%20LAST%20POSSIBLE%20RESORT%22:%20A%20Forgotten%20Prod%20and%20the%20in%20Situ%20Standardization%20of%20Stanley%20Milgram's%20Voice-Feedback%20Condition&rft.jtitle=History%20of%20psychology&rft.au=Gibson,%20Stephen&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=177&rft.epage=194&rft.pages=177-194&rft.issn=1093-4510&rft.eissn=1939-0610&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0032430&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1428519550%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1381032603&rft_id=info:pmid/23815076&rfr_iscdi=true