"THE LAST POSSIBLE RESORT": A Forgotten Prod and the in Situ Standardization of Stanley Milgram's Voice-Feedback Condition
This article uses previously unpublished data from Stanley Milgram's obedience experiments to draw attention to a hitherto neglected procedural innovation of the voice-feedback condition. In 3 experimental sessions in this condition, the experimenter responded to a participant's attempted...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | History of psychology 2013-08, Vol.16 (3), p.177-194 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 194 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 177 |
container_title | History of psychology |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Gibson, Stephen |
description | This article uses previously unpublished data from Stanley Milgram's obedience experiments to draw attention to a hitherto neglected procedural innovation of the voice-feedback condition. In 3 experimental sessions in this condition, the experimenter responded to a participant's attempted defiance by leaving the room, apparently to speak to the learner, before returning to assure the participant that the learner was willing or able to continue. This article documents the use of this tactic during the voice-feedback condition and highlights the negotiation surrounding the use of the tactic between Milgram and his confederate John Williams, who played the role of the experimenter. It is shown that the subsequent use of this tactic did not conform to the conditions for its use agreed by Milgram and Williams. Moreover, the tactic seems to have been dropped from both subsequent experimental conditions and Milgram's published accounts of his work. These observations are discussed in relation to historical work on experimentation in social psychology, research on standardization in the sociology of scientific knowledge, and in terms of their implications for theory and research on dis/obedience. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/a0032430 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1428519550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1428519550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-33560c683ba469df93b33400e25402cf2d8a57a50159a6bf938718b78dc33caa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0V1rFDEUBuAgiv1Q8BdIqIiCjJ5M5tO77bJrCytbOqu34Uwm06bOJmOSudj-erN2a8GrJCcPh8N7CHnD4DMDXn5BAJ5mHJ6RY1bzOoGCwfN4h5onWc7giJx4fwcAVXy8JEcpr1gOZXFM7s82Fwu6mjUberVumsvz1YJeL5r19ebsK53RpXU3NgRl6JWzHUXT0XCrqDa00WGiTYgVdJ2-x6Ctobb_WxrUjn7Xw43D7QdPf1otVbJUqmtR_qJzazq916_Iix4Hr14fzlPyY7nYzC-S1frb5Xy2SjBjLCSc5wXIouItZkXd9TVvOc8AVJpnkMo-7SrMS8yB5TUWbfyvSla1ZdVJziUiPyUfH_qOzv6elA9iq71Uw4BG2ckLlqUxljrPIdJ3_9E7OzkTpxMsRhZDLoA_NZTOeu9UL0ant-h2goHY70M87iPSt4eGU7tV3T_4uIAI3h8AeolD79BI7Z9cWdRlyffu04PDEcXodxJd0HJQXk7OKRPErR0FKwQXLPo__WOczQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1381032603</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>"THE LAST POSSIBLE RESORT": A Forgotten Prod and the in Situ Standardization of Stanley Milgram's Voice-Feedback Condition</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Gibson, Stephen</creator><contributor>Pickren, Wade E</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Stephen ; Pickren, Wade E</creatorcontrib><description>This article uses previously unpublished data from Stanley Milgram's obedience experiments to draw attention to a hitherto neglected procedural innovation of the voice-feedback condition. In 3 experimental sessions in this condition, the experimenter responded to a participant's attempted defiance by leaving the room, apparently to speak to the learner, before returning to assure the participant that the learner was willing or able to continue. This article documents the use of this tactic during the voice-feedback condition and highlights the negotiation surrounding the use of the tactic between Milgram and his confederate John Williams, who played the role of the experimenter. It is shown that the subsequent use of this tactic did not conform to the conditions for its use agreed by Milgram and Williams. Moreover, the tactic seems to have been dropped from both subsequent experimental conditions and Milgram's published accounts of his work. These observations are discussed in relation to historical work on experimentation in social psychology, research on standardization in the sociology of scientific knowledge, and in terms of their implications for theory and research on dis/obedience.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1093-4510</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-0610</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0032430</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23815076</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Experimentation ; Feedback ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; History of Psychology ; Human ; Methodology ; Obedience ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Social interactions. Communication. Group processes ; Social Psychology ; Vocalization</subject><ispartof>History of psychology, 2013-08, Vol.16 (3), p.177-194</ispartof><rights>2013 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2013, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-33560c683ba469df93b33400e25402cf2d8a57a50159a6bf938718b78dc33caa3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27697736$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23815076$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Pickren, Wade E</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Stephen</creatorcontrib><title>"THE LAST POSSIBLE RESORT": A Forgotten Prod and the in Situ Standardization of Stanley Milgram's Voice-Feedback Condition</title><title>History of psychology</title><addtitle>Hist Psychol</addtitle><description>This article uses previously unpublished data from Stanley Milgram's obedience experiments to draw attention to a hitherto neglected procedural innovation of the voice-feedback condition. In 3 experimental sessions in this condition, the experimenter responded to a participant's attempted defiance by leaving the room, apparently to speak to the learner, before returning to assure the participant that the learner was willing or able to continue. This article documents the use of this tactic during the voice-feedback condition and highlights the negotiation surrounding the use of the tactic between Milgram and his confederate John Williams, who played the role of the experimenter. It is shown that the subsequent use of this tactic did not conform to the conditions for its use agreed by Milgram and Williams. Moreover, the tactic seems to have been dropped from both subsequent experimental conditions and Milgram's published accounts of his work. These observations are discussed in relation to historical work on experimentation in social psychology, research on standardization in the sociology of scientific knowledge, and in terms of their implications for theory and research on dis/obedience.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>History of Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Obedience</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</subject><subject>Social Psychology</subject><subject>Vocalization</subject><issn>1093-4510</issn><issn>1939-0610</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpd0V1rFDEUBuAgiv1Q8BdIqIiCjJ5M5tO77bJrCytbOqu34Uwm06bOJmOSudj-erN2a8GrJCcPh8N7CHnD4DMDXn5BAJ5mHJ6RY1bzOoGCwfN4h5onWc7giJx4fwcAVXy8JEcpr1gOZXFM7s82Fwu6mjUberVumsvz1YJeL5r19ebsK53RpXU3NgRl6JWzHUXT0XCrqDa00WGiTYgVdJ2-x6Ctobb_WxrUjn7Xw43D7QdPf1otVbJUqmtR_qJzazq916_Iix4Hr14fzlPyY7nYzC-S1frb5Xy2SjBjLCSc5wXIouItZkXd9TVvOc8AVJpnkMo-7SrMS8yB5TUWbfyvSla1ZdVJziUiPyUfH_qOzv6elA9iq71Uw4BG2ckLlqUxljrPIdJ3_9E7OzkTpxMsRhZDLoA_NZTOeu9UL0ant-h2goHY70M87iPSt4eGU7tV3T_4uIAI3h8AeolD79BI7Z9cWdRlyffu04PDEcXodxJd0HJQXk7OKRPErR0FKwQXLPo__WOczQ</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Gibson, Stephen</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>"THE LAST POSSIBLE RESORT": A Forgotten Prod and the in Situ Standardization of Stanley Milgram's Voice-Feedback Condition</title><author>Gibson, Stephen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-33560c683ba469df93b33400e25402cf2d8a57a50159a6bf938718b78dc33caa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>History of Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Obedience</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</topic><topic>Social Psychology</topic><topic>Vocalization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Stephen</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>History of psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gibson, Stephen</au><au>Pickren, Wade E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>"THE LAST POSSIBLE RESORT": A Forgotten Prod and the in Situ Standardization of Stanley Milgram's Voice-Feedback Condition</atitle><jtitle>History of psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Hist Psychol</addtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>177</spage><epage>194</epage><pages>177-194</pages><issn>1093-4510</issn><eissn>1939-0610</eissn><abstract>This article uses previously unpublished data from Stanley Milgram's obedience experiments to draw attention to a hitherto neglected procedural innovation of the voice-feedback condition. In 3 experimental sessions in this condition, the experimenter responded to a participant's attempted defiance by leaving the room, apparently to speak to the learner, before returning to assure the participant that the learner was willing or able to continue. This article documents the use of this tactic during the voice-feedback condition and highlights the negotiation surrounding the use of the tactic between Milgram and his confederate John Williams, who played the role of the experimenter. It is shown that the subsequent use of this tactic did not conform to the conditions for its use agreed by Milgram and Williams. Moreover, the tactic seems to have been dropped from both subsequent experimental conditions and Milgram's published accounts of his work. These observations are discussed in relation to historical work on experimentation in social psychology, research on standardization in the sociology of scientific knowledge, and in terms of their implications for theory and research on dis/obedience.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><pmid>23815076</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0032430</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1093-4510 |
ispartof | History of psychology, 2013-08, Vol.16 (3), p.177-194 |
issn | 1093-4510 1939-0610 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1428519550 |
source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Experimentation Feedback Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology History of Psychology Human Methodology Obedience Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Social interactions. Communication. Group processes Social Psychology Vocalization |
title | "THE LAST POSSIBLE RESORT": A Forgotten Prod and the in Situ Standardization of Stanley Milgram's Voice-Feedback Condition |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T02%3A01%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%22THE%20LAST%20POSSIBLE%20RESORT%22:%20A%20Forgotten%20Prod%20and%20the%20in%20Situ%20Standardization%20of%20Stanley%20Milgram's%20Voice-Feedback%20Condition&rft.jtitle=History%20of%20psychology&rft.au=Gibson,%20Stephen&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=177&rft.epage=194&rft.pages=177-194&rft.issn=1093-4510&rft.eissn=1939-0610&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0032430&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1428519550%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1381032603&rft_id=info:pmid/23815076&rfr_iscdi=true |