Costal Cartilage Is a Superior Implant Material than Conchal Cartilage in the Treatment of Empty Nose Syndrome

Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of endonasal microplasty in treating empty nose syndrome by comparing the use of costal and conchal cartilage implants to construct neoturbinates. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting Tertiary referral center. Subjects...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery 2013-09, Vol.149 (3), p.500-505
Hauptverfasser: Jung, Jae Hoon, Baguindali, Mohammad Ariff, Park, Jin Taek, Jang, Yong Ju
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 505
container_issue 3
container_start_page 500
container_title Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery
container_volume 149
creator Jung, Jae Hoon
Baguindali, Mohammad Ariff
Park, Jin Taek
Jang, Yong Ju
description Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of endonasal microplasty in treating empty nose syndrome by comparing the use of costal and conchal cartilage implants to construct neoturbinates. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting Tertiary referral center. Subjects and Methods A total of 31 patients who were diagnosed with empty nose syndrome and underwent endonasal microplasty with conchal cartilage (n = 17) or costal cartilage implants (n = 14) were included. Each patient’s clinico-demographic profile was reviewed to compare the conchal cartilage group and the costal cartilage groups. Pre- and postoperative Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-25) scores were also compared. Results Both groups showed a significant improvement in SNOT-25 scores following surgery (P < .05). The group who received costal cartilage implants demonstrated more significant improvements than the conchal cartilage group in terms of the mean difference between pre- and postoperative SNOT-25 scores (P = .023). Symptom outcomes related to depression demonstrated significant improvements in the conchal cartilage group (P < .05), while in the costal cartilage group, in addition to these 3 variables, 7 items related to functional problems also demonstrated significant improvements (P < .05). Conclusions Costal cartilage is a more useful material than conchal cartilage as implants for the treatment of empty nose syndrome patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0194599813491223
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1428514659</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0194599813491223</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1428514659</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3862-d5b9774fb9f162ae7edb8e528ea853d80868d0c5a44fdf177411710418627df03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1LwzAchoMobn7cPUmOXqpJmjbpUcvmBnM7bJ5L1v7qOtqmJi3S_96MTkFBPAXyvs9L8iB0Q8k9pUI8EBrxIIok9XlEGfNP0JiSSHihpOIUjQ-xd8hH6MLaPSEkDIU4RyPmCyZJKMeojrVtVYljZdqiVG-A5xYrvO4aMIU2eF41papb_KJad-GK7U7VONZ1uvtBFbVLAG8MqLYCB-gcT6qm7fFSW8Drvs6MruAKneWqtHB9PC_R63SyiWfeYvU8jx8XXurLkHlZsI2E4Pk2ymnIFAjIthICJkHJwM8kkaHMSBoozvMsdya400EJpw4WWU78S3Q37DZGv3dg26QqbAql-wvoziaUMxlQHgaRq5KhmhptrYE8aUxRKdMnlCQHy8lvyw65Pa532wqyb-BLqyvIofBRlND_O5isZsunKSWCMod6A2qd1mSvO1M7UX-_5ROrJJOy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1428514659</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Costal Cartilage Is a Superior Implant Material than Conchal Cartilage in the Treatment of Empty Nose Syndrome</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Jung, Jae Hoon ; Baguindali, Mohammad Ariff ; Park, Jin Taek ; Jang, Yong Ju</creator><creatorcontrib>Jung, Jae Hoon ; Baguindali, Mohammad Ariff ; Park, Jin Taek ; Jang, Yong Ju</creatorcontrib><description>Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of endonasal microplasty in treating empty nose syndrome by comparing the use of costal and conchal cartilage implants to construct neoturbinates. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting Tertiary referral center. Subjects and Methods A total of 31 patients who were diagnosed with empty nose syndrome and underwent endonasal microplasty with conchal cartilage (n = 17) or costal cartilage implants (n = 14) were included. Each patient’s clinico-demographic profile was reviewed to compare the conchal cartilage group and the costal cartilage groups. Pre- and postoperative Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-25) scores were also compared. Results Both groups showed a significant improvement in SNOT-25 scores following surgery (P &lt; .05). The group who received costal cartilage implants demonstrated more significant improvements than the conchal cartilage group in terms of the mean difference between pre- and postoperative SNOT-25 scores (P = .023). Symptom outcomes related to depression demonstrated significant improvements in the conchal cartilage group (P &lt; .05), while in the costal cartilage group, in addition to these 3 variables, 7 items related to functional problems also demonstrated significant improvements (P &lt; .05). Conclusions Costal cartilage is a more useful material than conchal cartilage as implants for the treatment of empty nose syndrome patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0194-5998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0194599813491223</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23728068</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; autologous ; Cartilage - transplantation ; conchal cartilage ; costal cartilage ; Ear Cartilage - transplantation ; empty nose syndrome ; endonasal microplasty ; Female ; homologous ; Humans ; Iatrogenic Disease ; Male ; neoturbinate ; Nose Deformities, Acquired - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Rhinoplasty - methods ; Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test ; Syndrome ; Treatment Outcome ; turbinectomy</subject><ispartof>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, 2013-09, Vol.149 (3), p.500-505</ispartof><rights>American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2013</rights><rights>2013 American Association of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Foundation (AAO‐HNSF)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3862-d5b9774fb9f162ae7edb8e528ea853d80868d0c5a44fdf177411710418627df03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3862-d5b9774fb9f162ae7edb8e528ea853d80868d0c5a44fdf177411710418627df03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0194599813491223$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0194599813491223$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23728068$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jung, Jae Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baguindali, Mohammad Ariff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Jin Taek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Yong Ju</creatorcontrib><title>Costal Cartilage Is a Superior Implant Material than Conchal Cartilage in the Treatment of Empty Nose Syndrome</title><title>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</title><addtitle>Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</addtitle><description>Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of endonasal microplasty in treating empty nose syndrome by comparing the use of costal and conchal cartilage implants to construct neoturbinates. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting Tertiary referral center. Subjects and Methods A total of 31 patients who were diagnosed with empty nose syndrome and underwent endonasal microplasty with conchal cartilage (n = 17) or costal cartilage implants (n = 14) were included. Each patient’s clinico-demographic profile was reviewed to compare the conchal cartilage group and the costal cartilage groups. Pre- and postoperative Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-25) scores were also compared. Results Both groups showed a significant improvement in SNOT-25 scores following surgery (P &lt; .05). The group who received costal cartilage implants demonstrated more significant improvements than the conchal cartilage group in terms of the mean difference between pre- and postoperative SNOT-25 scores (P = .023). Symptom outcomes related to depression demonstrated significant improvements in the conchal cartilage group (P &lt; .05), while in the costal cartilage group, in addition to these 3 variables, 7 items related to functional problems also demonstrated significant improvements (P &lt; .05). Conclusions Costal cartilage is a more useful material than conchal cartilage as implants for the treatment of empty nose syndrome patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>autologous</subject><subject>Cartilage - transplantation</subject><subject>conchal cartilage</subject><subject>costal cartilage</subject><subject>Ear Cartilage - transplantation</subject><subject>empty nose syndrome</subject><subject>endonasal microplasty</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>homologous</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Iatrogenic Disease</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>neoturbinate</subject><subject>Nose Deformities, Acquired - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Rhinoplasty - methods</subject><subject>Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test</subject><subject>Syndrome</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>turbinectomy</subject><issn>0194-5998</issn><issn>1097-6817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1LwzAchoMobn7cPUmOXqpJmjbpUcvmBnM7bJ5L1v7qOtqmJi3S_96MTkFBPAXyvs9L8iB0Q8k9pUI8EBrxIIok9XlEGfNP0JiSSHihpOIUjQ-xd8hH6MLaPSEkDIU4RyPmCyZJKMeojrVtVYljZdqiVG-A5xYrvO4aMIU2eF41papb_KJad-GK7U7VONZ1uvtBFbVLAG8MqLYCB-gcT6qm7fFSW8Drvs6MruAKneWqtHB9PC_R63SyiWfeYvU8jx8XXurLkHlZsI2E4Pk2ymnIFAjIthICJkHJwM8kkaHMSBoozvMsdya400EJpw4WWU78S3Q37DZGv3dg26QqbAql-wvoziaUMxlQHgaRq5KhmhptrYE8aUxRKdMnlCQHy8lvyw65Pa532wqyb-BLqyvIofBRlND_O5isZsunKSWCMod6A2qd1mSvO1M7UX-_5ROrJJOy</recordid><startdate>201309</startdate><enddate>201309</enddate><creator>Jung, Jae Hoon</creator><creator>Baguindali, Mohammad Ariff</creator><creator>Park, Jin Taek</creator><creator>Jang, Yong Ju</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201309</creationdate><title>Costal Cartilage Is a Superior Implant Material than Conchal Cartilage in the Treatment of Empty Nose Syndrome</title><author>Jung, Jae Hoon ; Baguindali, Mohammad Ariff ; Park, Jin Taek ; Jang, Yong Ju</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3862-d5b9774fb9f162ae7edb8e528ea853d80868d0c5a44fdf177411710418627df03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>autologous</topic><topic>Cartilage - transplantation</topic><topic>conchal cartilage</topic><topic>costal cartilage</topic><topic>Ear Cartilage - transplantation</topic><topic>empty nose syndrome</topic><topic>endonasal microplasty</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>homologous</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Iatrogenic Disease</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>neoturbinate</topic><topic>Nose Deformities, Acquired - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Rhinoplasty - methods</topic><topic>Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test</topic><topic>Syndrome</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>turbinectomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jung, Jae Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baguindali, Mohammad Ariff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Jin Taek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Yong Ju</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jung, Jae Hoon</au><au>Baguindali, Mohammad Ariff</au><au>Park, Jin Taek</au><au>Jang, Yong Ju</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Costal Cartilage Is a Superior Implant Material than Conchal Cartilage in the Treatment of Empty Nose Syndrome</atitle><jtitle>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</addtitle><date>2013-09</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>149</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>500</spage><epage>505</epage><pages>500-505</pages><issn>0194-5998</issn><eissn>1097-6817</eissn><abstract>Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of endonasal microplasty in treating empty nose syndrome by comparing the use of costal and conchal cartilage implants to construct neoturbinates. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting Tertiary referral center. Subjects and Methods A total of 31 patients who were diagnosed with empty nose syndrome and underwent endonasal microplasty with conchal cartilage (n = 17) or costal cartilage implants (n = 14) were included. Each patient’s clinico-demographic profile was reviewed to compare the conchal cartilage group and the costal cartilage groups. Pre- and postoperative Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-25) scores were also compared. Results Both groups showed a significant improvement in SNOT-25 scores following surgery (P &lt; .05). The group who received costal cartilage implants demonstrated more significant improvements than the conchal cartilage group in terms of the mean difference between pre- and postoperative SNOT-25 scores (P = .023). Symptom outcomes related to depression demonstrated significant improvements in the conchal cartilage group (P &lt; .05), while in the costal cartilage group, in addition to these 3 variables, 7 items related to functional problems also demonstrated significant improvements (P &lt; .05). Conclusions Costal cartilage is a more useful material than conchal cartilage as implants for the treatment of empty nose syndrome patients.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>23728068</pmid><doi>10.1177/0194599813491223</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0194-5998
ispartof Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, 2013-09, Vol.149 (3), p.500-505
issn 0194-5998
1097-6817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1428514659
source Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Adult
autologous
Cartilage - transplantation
conchal cartilage
costal cartilage
Ear Cartilage - transplantation
empty nose syndrome
endonasal microplasty
Female
homologous
Humans
Iatrogenic Disease
Male
neoturbinate
Nose Deformities, Acquired - surgery
Retrospective Studies
Rhinoplasty - methods
Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test
Syndrome
Treatment Outcome
turbinectomy
title Costal Cartilage Is a Superior Implant Material than Conchal Cartilage in the Treatment of Empty Nose Syndrome
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T12%3A12%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Costal%20Cartilage%20Is%20a%20Superior%20Implant%20Material%20than%20Conchal%20Cartilage%20in%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Empty%20Nose%20Syndrome&rft.jtitle=Otolaryngology-head%20and%20neck%20surgery&rft.au=Jung,%20Jae%20Hoon&rft.date=2013-09&rft.volume=149&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=500&rft.epage=505&rft.pages=500-505&rft.issn=0194-5998&rft.eissn=1097-6817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0194599813491223&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1428514659%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1428514659&rft_id=info:pmid/23728068&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0194599813491223&rfr_iscdi=true