Improving Patient Safety in the ICU by Prospective Identification of Missing Safety Barriers Using the Bow-Tie Prospective Risk Analysis Model
OBJECTIVESTo improve patient safety, potential critical events should be analyzed for the existence of preventive barriers. The aim of this study was to prospectively identify existing and missing barriers using the Bow-Tie model. We expected that the analysis of these barriers would lead to feasibl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of patient safety 2013-09, Vol.9 (3), p.154-159 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 159 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 154 |
container_title | Journal of patient safety |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Kerckhoffs, Monika C. van der Sluijs, Alexander F. Binnekade, Jan M. Dongelmans, Dave A. |
description | OBJECTIVESTo improve patient safety, potential critical events should be analyzed for the existence of preventive barriers. The aim of this study was to prospectively identify existing and missing barriers using the Bow-Tie model. We expected that the analysis of these barriers would lead to feasible recommendations to improve safety in daily patient care.
METHODSMultidisciplinary teams of doctors and nurses on a 28 bed ICU conducted the study. The Bow-Tie analysis was performed on intrahospital transportation, unplanned extubation, and communication, which led to 9 critical events. For each event, potential threats and consequences were defined and placed in a Bow-Tie diagram. Then, barriers were determined, ways to prevent the threat or limit the consequences. The barriers were defined as existing or missing and analyzed for feasibility.
RESULTSIntrahospital transportationthis hazard led to 7 critical events, the Bow-Tie analysis to 52 missing but implementable barriers and 8 practical recommendations. For example, a pretransportation checklist.Unplanned extubationthis Bow-Tie analysis revealed 15 implementable missing barriers (of a total of 32) and led to 22 recommendations. One of them was optimizing treatment of delirium.Communicationthis analysis showed 21 barriers, of which, 12 were missing but feasible to implement. These barriers led to7 recommendations such as the need to cosign after the handover of a patient.
CONCLUSIONSProspective risk analysis using the Bow-Tie model proved usable to identify existing and missing barriers for potential critical events. Many missing barriers seemed feasible to implement and led to practical recommendations and improvements in patient safety. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/PTS.0b013e318288a476 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1427749930</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26633019</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26633019</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4048-d05570f6619d926011f8b37a707316c2811e1ef620e6622484b4432bbff50b8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkdtuEzEQhlcIREvhDQD5BombLePD-nDZRhwitSKiyfXKuzsmbp3dYG8a5SV4ZhwSWuDCsjX6_-8fzxTFawrnFIz6MJvfnEMDlCOnmmlthZJPilNaCVNqwaqnD2-qTooXKd0CcKk1e16cMG5kpbk-LX5OV-s43Pv-O5nZ0WM_khvrcNwR35NxiWQ6WZBmR2ZxSGtsR3-fS12WeefbbBh6Mjhy7VPaI47WSxujx5jI4nd1j7kctuXc4z-cbz7dkYvehl3yiVwPHYaXxTNnQ8JXx_usWHz6OJ98Ka--fp5OLq7KVoDQZQdVpcBJSU1nmARKnW64sgoUp7JlmlKk6CQDlJIxoUUjBGdN41wFje74WfH-wM2f_7HBNNYrn1oMwfY4bFJNBVNKGMMhS8VB2ubWU0RXr6Nf2birKdT7TdR5E_X_m8i2t8eETbPC7sH0Z_RZ8O4osKm1wUXbtz496pRSVOi_8rdDGPNQ78Jmi7Feog3jsgbKwDDgJcv5YACgzAf2-DcH220ah_iIlZJzoIb_ArOdq0o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1427749930</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving Patient Safety in the ICU by Prospective Identification of Missing Safety Barriers Using the Bow-Tie Prospective Risk Analysis Model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Kerckhoffs, Monika C. ; van der Sluijs, Alexander F. ; Binnekade, Jan M. ; Dongelmans, Dave A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kerckhoffs, Monika C. ; van der Sluijs, Alexander F. ; Binnekade, Jan M. ; Dongelmans, Dave A.</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVESTo improve patient safety, potential critical events should be analyzed for the existence of preventive barriers. The aim of this study was to prospectively identify existing and missing barriers using the Bow-Tie model. We expected that the analysis of these barriers would lead to feasible recommendations to improve safety in daily patient care.
METHODSMultidisciplinary teams of doctors and nurses on a 28 bed ICU conducted the study. The Bow-Tie analysis was performed on intrahospital transportation, unplanned extubation, and communication, which led to 9 critical events. For each event, potential threats and consequences were defined and placed in a Bow-Tie diagram. Then, barriers were determined, ways to prevent the threat or limit the consequences. The barriers were defined as existing or missing and analyzed for feasibility.
RESULTSIntrahospital transportationthis hazard led to 7 critical events, the Bow-Tie analysis to 52 missing but implementable barriers and 8 practical recommendations. For example, a pretransportation checklist.Unplanned extubationthis Bow-Tie analysis revealed 15 implementable missing barriers (of a total of 32) and led to 22 recommendations. One of them was optimizing treatment of delirium.Communicationthis analysis showed 21 barriers, of which, 12 were missing but feasible to implement. These barriers led to7 recommendations such as the need to cosign after the handover of a patient.
CONCLUSIONSProspective risk analysis using the Bow-Tie model proved usable to identify existing and missing barriers for potential critical events. Many missing barriers seemed feasible to implement and led to practical recommendations and improvements in patient safety.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1549-8417</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-8425</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e318288a476</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23965838</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a business of Wolters Kluwer Health</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units - standards ; Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Netherlands ; Original Article ; Patient Safety - standards ; Prevention and actions ; Prospective Studies ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Tertiary Care Centers ; Transportation of Patients</subject><ispartof>Journal of patient safety, 2013-09, Vol.9 (3), p.154-159</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</rights><rights>2013 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4048-d05570f6619d926011f8b37a707316c2811e1ef620e6622484b4432bbff50b8d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4048-d05570f6619d926011f8b37a707316c2811e1ef620e6622484b4432bbff50b8d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26633019$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26633019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27771480$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23965838$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kerckhoffs, Monika C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Sluijs, Alexander F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binnekade, Jan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dongelmans, Dave A.</creatorcontrib><title>Improving Patient Safety in the ICU by Prospective Identification of Missing Safety Barriers Using the Bow-Tie Prospective Risk Analysis Model</title><title>Journal of patient safety</title><addtitle>J Patient Saf</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVESTo improve patient safety, potential critical events should be analyzed for the existence of preventive barriers. The aim of this study was to prospectively identify existing and missing barriers using the Bow-Tie model. We expected that the analysis of these barriers would lead to feasible recommendations to improve safety in daily patient care.
METHODSMultidisciplinary teams of doctors and nurses on a 28 bed ICU conducted the study. The Bow-Tie analysis was performed on intrahospital transportation, unplanned extubation, and communication, which led to 9 critical events. For each event, potential threats and consequences were defined and placed in a Bow-Tie diagram. Then, barriers were determined, ways to prevent the threat or limit the consequences. The barriers were defined as existing or missing and analyzed for feasibility.
RESULTSIntrahospital transportationthis hazard led to 7 critical events, the Bow-Tie analysis to 52 missing but implementable barriers and 8 practical recommendations. For example, a pretransportation checklist.Unplanned extubationthis Bow-Tie analysis revealed 15 implementable missing barriers (of a total of 32) and led to 22 recommendations. One of them was optimizing treatment of delirium.Communicationthis analysis showed 21 barriers, of which, 12 were missing but feasible to implement. These barriers led to7 recommendations such as the need to cosign after the handover of a patient.
CONCLUSIONSProspective risk analysis using the Bow-Tie model proved usable to identify existing and missing barriers for potential critical events. Many missing barriers seemed feasible to implement and led to practical recommendations and improvements in patient safety.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - standards</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patient Safety - standards</subject><subject>Prevention and actions</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Tertiary Care Centers</subject><subject>Transportation of Patients</subject><issn>1549-8417</issn><issn>1549-8425</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkdtuEzEQhlcIREvhDQD5BombLePD-nDZRhwitSKiyfXKuzsmbp3dYG8a5SV4ZhwSWuDCsjX6_-8fzxTFawrnFIz6MJvfnEMDlCOnmmlthZJPilNaCVNqwaqnD2-qTooXKd0CcKk1e16cMG5kpbk-LX5OV-s43Pv-O5nZ0WM_khvrcNwR35NxiWQ6WZBmR2ZxSGtsR3-fS12WeefbbBh6Mjhy7VPaI47WSxujx5jI4nd1j7kctuXc4z-cbz7dkYvehl3yiVwPHYaXxTNnQ8JXx_usWHz6OJ98Ka--fp5OLq7KVoDQZQdVpcBJSU1nmARKnW64sgoUp7JlmlKk6CQDlJIxoUUjBGdN41wFje74WfH-wM2f_7HBNNYrn1oMwfY4bFJNBVNKGMMhS8VB2ubWU0RXr6Nf2birKdT7TdR5E_X_m8i2t8eETbPC7sH0Z_RZ8O4osKm1wUXbtz496pRSVOi_8rdDGPNQ78Jmi7Feog3jsgbKwDDgJcv5YACgzAf2-DcH220ah_iIlZJzoIb_ArOdq0o</recordid><startdate>201309</startdate><enddate>201309</enddate><creator>Kerckhoffs, Monika C.</creator><creator>van der Sluijs, Alexander F.</creator><creator>Binnekade, Jan M.</creator><creator>Dongelmans, Dave A.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a business of Wolters Kluwer Health</general><general>by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201309</creationdate><title>Improving Patient Safety in the ICU by Prospective Identification of Missing Safety Barriers Using the Bow-Tie Prospective Risk Analysis Model</title><author>Kerckhoffs, Monika C. ; van der Sluijs, Alexander F. ; Binnekade, Jan M. ; Dongelmans, Dave A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4048-d05570f6619d926011f8b37a707316c2811e1ef620e6622484b4432bbff50b8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - standards</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patient Safety - standards</topic><topic>Prevention and actions</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Tertiary Care Centers</topic><topic>Transportation of Patients</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kerckhoffs, Monika C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Sluijs, Alexander F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binnekade, Jan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dongelmans, Dave A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of patient safety</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kerckhoffs, Monika C.</au><au>van der Sluijs, Alexander F.</au><au>Binnekade, Jan M.</au><au>Dongelmans, Dave A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving Patient Safety in the ICU by Prospective Identification of Missing Safety Barriers Using the Bow-Tie Prospective Risk Analysis Model</atitle><jtitle>Journal of patient safety</jtitle><addtitle>J Patient Saf</addtitle><date>2013-09</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>154</spage><epage>159</epage><pages>154-159</pages><issn>1549-8417</issn><eissn>1549-8425</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVESTo improve patient safety, potential critical events should be analyzed for the existence of preventive barriers. The aim of this study was to prospectively identify existing and missing barriers using the Bow-Tie model. We expected that the analysis of these barriers would lead to feasible recommendations to improve safety in daily patient care.
METHODSMultidisciplinary teams of doctors and nurses on a 28 bed ICU conducted the study. The Bow-Tie analysis was performed on intrahospital transportation, unplanned extubation, and communication, which led to 9 critical events. For each event, potential threats and consequences were defined and placed in a Bow-Tie diagram. Then, barriers were determined, ways to prevent the threat or limit the consequences. The barriers were defined as existing or missing and analyzed for feasibility.
RESULTSIntrahospital transportationthis hazard led to 7 critical events, the Bow-Tie analysis to 52 missing but implementable barriers and 8 practical recommendations. For example, a pretransportation checklist.Unplanned extubationthis Bow-Tie analysis revealed 15 implementable missing barriers (of a total of 32) and led to 22 recommendations. One of them was optimizing treatment of delirium.Communicationthis analysis showed 21 barriers, of which, 12 were missing but feasible to implement. These barriers led to7 recommendations such as the need to cosign after the handover of a patient.
CONCLUSIONSProspective risk analysis using the Bow-Tie model proved usable to identify existing and missing barriers for potential critical events. Many missing barriers seemed feasible to implement and led to practical recommendations and improvements in patient safety.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, Pa</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a business of Wolters Kluwer Health</pub><pmid>23965838</pmid><doi>10.1097/PTS.0b013e318288a476</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1549-8417 |
ispartof | Journal of patient safety, 2013-09, Vol.9 (3), p.154-159 |
issn | 1549-8417 1549-8425 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1427749930 |
source | MEDLINE; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Humans Intensive Care Units - standards Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data Medical sciences Miscellaneous Netherlands Original Article Patient Safety - standards Prevention and actions Prospective Studies Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Risk Assessment - methods Tertiary Care Centers Transportation of Patients |
title | Improving Patient Safety in the ICU by Prospective Identification of Missing Safety Barriers Using the Bow-Tie Prospective Risk Analysis Model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T17%3A09%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20Patient%20Safety%20in%20the%20ICU%20by%20Prospective%20Identification%20of%20Missing%20Safety%20Barriers%20Using%20the%20Bow-Tie%20Prospective%20Risk%20Analysis%20Model&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20patient%20safety&rft.au=Kerckhoffs,%20Monika%20C.&rft.date=2013-09&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=154&rft.epage=159&rft.pages=154-159&rft.issn=1549-8417&rft.eissn=1549-8425&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/PTS.0b013e318288a476&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26633019%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1427749930&rft_id=info:pmid/23965838&rft_jstor_id=26633019&rfr_iscdi=true |