Improving Patient Safety in the ICU by Prospective Identification of Missing Safety Barriers Using the Bow-Tie Prospective Risk Analysis Model

OBJECTIVESTo improve patient safety, potential critical events should be analyzed for the existence of preventive barriers. The aim of this study was to prospectively identify existing and missing barriers using the Bow-Tie model. We expected that the analysis of these barriers would lead to feasibl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of patient safety 2013-09, Vol.9 (3), p.154-159
Hauptverfasser: Kerckhoffs, Monika C., van der Sluijs, Alexander F., Binnekade, Jan M., Dongelmans, Dave A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 159
container_issue 3
container_start_page 154
container_title Journal of patient safety
container_volume 9
creator Kerckhoffs, Monika C.
van der Sluijs, Alexander F.
Binnekade, Jan M.
Dongelmans, Dave A.
description OBJECTIVESTo improve patient safety, potential critical events should be analyzed for the existence of preventive barriers. The aim of this study was to prospectively identify existing and missing barriers using the Bow-Tie model. We expected that the analysis of these barriers would lead to feasible recommendations to improve safety in daily patient care. METHODSMultidisciplinary teams of doctors and nurses on a 28 bed ICU conducted the study. The Bow-Tie analysis was performed on intrahospital transportation, unplanned extubation, and communication, which led to 9 critical events. For each event, potential threats and consequences were defined and placed in a Bow-Tie diagram. Then, barriers were determined, ways to prevent the threat or limit the consequences. The barriers were defined as existing or missing and analyzed for feasibility. RESULTSIntrahospital transportationthis hazard led to 7 critical events, the Bow-Tie analysis to 52 missing but implementable barriers and 8 practical recommendations. For example, a pretransportation checklist.Unplanned extubationthis Bow-Tie analysis revealed 15 implementable missing barriers (of a total of 32) and led to 22 recommendations. One of them was optimizing treatment of delirium.Communicationthis analysis showed 21 barriers, of which, 12 were missing but feasible to implement. These barriers led to7 recommendations such as the need to cosign after the handover of a patient. CONCLUSIONSProspective risk analysis using the Bow-Tie model proved usable to identify existing and missing barriers for potential critical events. Many missing barriers seemed feasible to implement and led to practical recommendations and improvements in patient safety.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/PTS.0b013e318288a476
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1427749930</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26633019</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26633019</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4048-d05570f6619d926011f8b37a707316c2811e1ef620e6622484b4432bbff50b8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkdtuEzEQhlcIREvhDQD5BombLePD-nDZRhwitSKiyfXKuzsmbp3dYG8a5SV4ZhwSWuDCsjX6_-8fzxTFawrnFIz6MJvfnEMDlCOnmmlthZJPilNaCVNqwaqnD2-qTooXKd0CcKk1e16cMG5kpbk-LX5OV-s43Pv-O5nZ0WM_khvrcNwR35NxiWQ6WZBmR2ZxSGtsR3-fS12WeefbbBh6Mjhy7VPaI47WSxujx5jI4nd1j7kctuXc4z-cbz7dkYvehl3yiVwPHYaXxTNnQ8JXx_usWHz6OJ98Ka--fp5OLq7KVoDQZQdVpcBJSU1nmARKnW64sgoUp7JlmlKk6CQDlJIxoUUjBGdN41wFje74WfH-wM2f_7HBNNYrn1oMwfY4bFJNBVNKGMMhS8VB2ubWU0RXr6Nf2birKdT7TdR5E_X_m8i2t8eETbPC7sH0Z_RZ8O4osKm1wUXbtz496pRSVOi_8rdDGPNQ78Jmi7Feog3jsgbKwDDgJcv5YACgzAf2-DcH220ah_iIlZJzoIb_ArOdq0o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1427749930</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving Patient Safety in the ICU by Prospective Identification of Missing Safety Barriers Using the Bow-Tie Prospective Risk Analysis Model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Kerckhoffs, Monika C. ; van der Sluijs, Alexander F. ; Binnekade, Jan M. ; Dongelmans, Dave A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kerckhoffs, Monika C. ; van der Sluijs, Alexander F. ; Binnekade, Jan M. ; Dongelmans, Dave A.</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVESTo improve patient safety, potential critical events should be analyzed for the existence of preventive barriers. The aim of this study was to prospectively identify existing and missing barriers using the Bow-Tie model. We expected that the analysis of these barriers would lead to feasible recommendations to improve safety in daily patient care. METHODSMultidisciplinary teams of doctors and nurses on a 28 bed ICU conducted the study. The Bow-Tie analysis was performed on intrahospital transportation, unplanned extubation, and communication, which led to 9 critical events. For each event, potential threats and consequences were defined and placed in a Bow-Tie diagram. Then, barriers were determined, ways to prevent the threat or limit the consequences. The barriers were defined as existing or missing and analyzed for feasibility. RESULTSIntrahospital transportationthis hazard led to 7 critical events, the Bow-Tie analysis to 52 missing but implementable barriers and 8 practical recommendations. For example, a pretransportation checklist.Unplanned extubationthis Bow-Tie analysis revealed 15 implementable missing barriers (of a total of 32) and led to 22 recommendations. One of them was optimizing treatment of delirium.Communicationthis analysis showed 21 barriers, of which, 12 were missing but feasible to implement. These barriers led to7 recommendations such as the need to cosign after the handover of a patient. CONCLUSIONSProspective risk analysis using the Bow-Tie model proved usable to identify existing and missing barriers for potential critical events. Many missing barriers seemed feasible to implement and led to practical recommendations and improvements in patient safety.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1549-8417</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-8425</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e318288a476</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23965838</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, a business of Wolters Kluwer Health</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units - standards ; Intensive Care Units - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Netherlands ; Original Article ; Patient Safety - standards ; Prevention and actions ; Prospective Studies ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Tertiary Care Centers ; Transportation of Patients</subject><ispartof>Journal of patient safety, 2013-09, Vol.9 (3), p.154-159</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 by Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>2013 by Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4048-d05570f6619d926011f8b37a707316c2811e1ef620e6622484b4432bbff50b8d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4048-d05570f6619d926011f8b37a707316c2811e1ef620e6622484b4432bbff50b8d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26633019$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26633019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27771480$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23965838$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kerckhoffs, Monika C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Sluijs, Alexander F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binnekade, Jan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dongelmans, Dave A.</creatorcontrib><title>Improving Patient Safety in the ICU by Prospective Identification of Missing Safety Barriers Using the Bow-Tie Prospective Risk Analysis Model</title><title>Journal of patient safety</title><addtitle>J Patient Saf</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVESTo improve patient safety, potential critical events should be analyzed for the existence of preventive barriers. The aim of this study was to prospectively identify existing and missing barriers using the Bow-Tie model. We expected that the analysis of these barriers would lead to feasible recommendations to improve safety in daily patient care. METHODSMultidisciplinary teams of doctors and nurses on a 28 bed ICU conducted the study. The Bow-Tie analysis was performed on intrahospital transportation, unplanned extubation, and communication, which led to 9 critical events. For each event, potential threats and consequences were defined and placed in a Bow-Tie diagram. Then, barriers were determined, ways to prevent the threat or limit the consequences. The barriers were defined as existing or missing and analyzed for feasibility. RESULTSIntrahospital transportationthis hazard led to 7 critical events, the Bow-Tie analysis to 52 missing but implementable barriers and 8 practical recommendations. For example, a pretransportation checklist.Unplanned extubationthis Bow-Tie analysis revealed 15 implementable missing barriers (of a total of 32) and led to 22 recommendations. One of them was optimizing treatment of delirium.Communicationthis analysis showed 21 barriers, of which, 12 were missing but feasible to implement. These barriers led to7 recommendations such as the need to cosign after the handover of a patient. CONCLUSIONSProspective risk analysis using the Bow-Tie model proved usable to identify existing and missing barriers for potential critical events. Many missing barriers seemed feasible to implement and led to practical recommendations and improvements in patient safety.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - standards</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patient Safety - standards</subject><subject>Prevention and actions</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Tertiary Care Centers</subject><subject>Transportation of Patients</subject><issn>1549-8417</issn><issn>1549-8425</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkdtuEzEQhlcIREvhDQD5BombLePD-nDZRhwitSKiyfXKuzsmbp3dYG8a5SV4ZhwSWuDCsjX6_-8fzxTFawrnFIz6MJvfnEMDlCOnmmlthZJPilNaCVNqwaqnD2-qTooXKd0CcKk1e16cMG5kpbk-LX5OV-s43Pv-O5nZ0WM_khvrcNwR35NxiWQ6WZBmR2ZxSGtsR3-fS12WeefbbBh6Mjhy7VPaI47WSxujx5jI4nd1j7kctuXc4z-cbz7dkYvehl3yiVwPHYaXxTNnQ8JXx_usWHz6OJ98Ka--fp5OLq7KVoDQZQdVpcBJSU1nmARKnW64sgoUp7JlmlKk6CQDlJIxoUUjBGdN41wFje74WfH-wM2f_7HBNNYrn1oMwfY4bFJNBVNKGMMhS8VB2ubWU0RXr6Nf2birKdT7TdR5E_X_m8i2t8eETbPC7sH0Z_RZ8O4osKm1wUXbtz496pRSVOi_8rdDGPNQ78Jmi7Feog3jsgbKwDDgJcv5YACgzAf2-DcH220ah_iIlZJzoIb_ArOdq0o</recordid><startdate>201309</startdate><enddate>201309</enddate><creator>Kerckhoffs, Monika C.</creator><creator>van der Sluijs, Alexander F.</creator><creator>Binnekade, Jan M.</creator><creator>Dongelmans, Dave A.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, a business of Wolters Kluwer Health</general><general>by Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201309</creationdate><title>Improving Patient Safety in the ICU by Prospective Identification of Missing Safety Barriers Using the Bow-Tie Prospective Risk Analysis Model</title><author>Kerckhoffs, Monika C. ; van der Sluijs, Alexander F. ; Binnekade, Jan M. ; Dongelmans, Dave A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4048-d05570f6619d926011f8b37a707316c2811e1ef620e6622484b4432bbff50b8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - standards</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patient Safety - standards</topic><topic>Prevention and actions</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Tertiary Care Centers</topic><topic>Transportation of Patients</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kerckhoffs, Monika C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Sluijs, Alexander F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binnekade, Jan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dongelmans, Dave A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of patient safety</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kerckhoffs, Monika C.</au><au>van der Sluijs, Alexander F.</au><au>Binnekade, Jan M.</au><au>Dongelmans, Dave A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving Patient Safety in the ICU by Prospective Identification of Missing Safety Barriers Using the Bow-Tie Prospective Risk Analysis Model</atitle><jtitle>Journal of patient safety</jtitle><addtitle>J Patient Saf</addtitle><date>2013-09</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>154</spage><epage>159</epage><pages>154-159</pages><issn>1549-8417</issn><eissn>1549-8425</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVESTo improve patient safety, potential critical events should be analyzed for the existence of preventive barriers. The aim of this study was to prospectively identify existing and missing barriers using the Bow-Tie model. We expected that the analysis of these barriers would lead to feasible recommendations to improve safety in daily patient care. METHODSMultidisciplinary teams of doctors and nurses on a 28 bed ICU conducted the study. The Bow-Tie analysis was performed on intrahospital transportation, unplanned extubation, and communication, which led to 9 critical events. For each event, potential threats and consequences were defined and placed in a Bow-Tie diagram. Then, barriers were determined, ways to prevent the threat or limit the consequences. The barriers were defined as existing or missing and analyzed for feasibility. RESULTSIntrahospital transportationthis hazard led to 7 critical events, the Bow-Tie analysis to 52 missing but implementable barriers and 8 practical recommendations. For example, a pretransportation checklist.Unplanned extubationthis Bow-Tie analysis revealed 15 implementable missing barriers (of a total of 32) and led to 22 recommendations. One of them was optimizing treatment of delirium.Communicationthis analysis showed 21 barriers, of which, 12 were missing but feasible to implement. These barriers led to7 recommendations such as the need to cosign after the handover of a patient. CONCLUSIONSProspective risk analysis using the Bow-Tie model proved usable to identify existing and missing barriers for potential critical events. Many missing barriers seemed feasible to implement and led to practical recommendations and improvements in patient safety.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, Pa</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, a business of Wolters Kluwer Health</pub><pmid>23965838</pmid><doi>10.1097/PTS.0b013e318288a476</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1549-8417
ispartof Journal of patient safety, 2013-09, Vol.9 (3), p.154-159
issn 1549-8417
1549-8425
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1427749930
source MEDLINE; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Humans
Intensive Care Units - standards
Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data
Medical sciences
Miscellaneous
Netherlands
Original Article
Patient Safety - standards
Prevention and actions
Prospective Studies
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Risk Assessment - methods
Tertiary Care Centers
Transportation of Patients
title Improving Patient Safety in the ICU by Prospective Identification of Missing Safety Barriers Using the Bow-Tie Prospective Risk Analysis Model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T17%3A09%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20Patient%20Safety%20in%20the%20ICU%20by%20Prospective%20Identification%20of%20Missing%20Safety%20Barriers%20Using%20the%20Bow-Tie%20Prospective%20Risk%20Analysis%20Model&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20patient%20safety&rft.au=Kerckhoffs,%20Monika%20C.&rft.date=2013-09&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=154&rft.epage=159&rft.pages=154-159&rft.issn=1549-8417&rft.eissn=1549-8425&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/PTS.0b013e318288a476&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26633019%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1427749930&rft_id=info:pmid/23965838&rft_jstor_id=26633019&rfr_iscdi=true