The Acute Effect of Different Half Squat Set Configurations on Jump Potentiation

ABSTRACTBoullosa, DA, Abreu, L, Beltrame, LGN, and Behm, DG. The acute effect of different half squat set configurations on jump potentiation. J Strength Cond Res 27(8)2059–2066, 2013—The aim of this study was to evaluate the acute effect of a half squat exercise performed with different set configu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of strength and conditioning research 2013-08, Vol.27 (8), p.2059-2066
Hauptverfasser: Boullosa, Daniel A, Abreu, Laurinda, Beltrame, Luis G.N, Behm, David G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2066
container_issue 8
container_start_page 2059
container_title Journal of strength and conditioning research
container_volume 27
creator Boullosa, Daniel A
Abreu, Laurinda
Beltrame, Luis G.N
Behm, David G
description ABSTRACTBoullosa, DA, Abreu, L, Beltrame, LGN, and Behm, DG. The acute effect of different half squat set configurations on jump potentiation. J Strength Cond Res 27(8)2059–2066, 2013—The aim of this study was to evaluate the acute effect of a half squat exercise performed with different set configurations on jump potentiation. Twelve resistance-trained men were evaluated on 3 occasions separated by 48–96 hours. First, they performed a 5 repetitions maximum (5RM) test. Subsequently, they performed in a randomized order 2 sessionsone session with 5RM until failure and the other with the same workload but with 30-second rest intervals between repetitions (i.e., cluster set [CS]). Countermovement jump performance was examined during the second and third sessions for jump height and force-time parameters using a force platform at the following time intervalsbefore and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 minutes. Separate comparisons for each variable at the different time intervals were analyzed using analysis of variance, effect size, and qualitative inferences. The majority of the parameters improved independently of the time they occurred, except for peak force and vertical stiffness after a set until failure. For peak power, it appears that the cluster treatment resulted in superior potentiation at 1 minute, whereas the 5RM treatment resulted in greater potentiation at 9 minutes. Effect size analysis and qualitative outcomes revealed an improvement in vertical stiffness and a lowering in the depth of the countermovement in CS. There were significant correlations between participants’ 5RM relative performance and various force-time parameters only in CS. It appears that a CS induces greater peak power than a 5RM set at 1 minute, although the reverse occurs at 9 minutes. Delayed potentiation associated with the 5RM may be attributed to greater fatigue versus the CS approach. Therefore, it follows that the optimal method for inducing peak power potentiation is dependent on the available time between heavy half squat exercise and the subsequent jump performance.
doi_str_mv 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31827ddf15
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1427011995</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1412513474</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4635-647b0b6d83f9e1ff86ddd729cf466e023272c4e0c5462ace4b3da6285e2165923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtLHEEUhYuQEB_xH0goyCabNvWu6qWMxgdChNF1U119y2nT0zXWA8m_T-moCxchq3u5fOdwDwehQ0qOqKTtj8vl4oj0hHLg1DA9DJ7KD2iXSs4bwYz-WHeiRGMIpTtoL6V7QpiUkn9GO4wzok3LdtH1zQrwsSsZ8Kn34DIOHp-MdY0wZ3xuJ4-XD8VmvISMF2H2412JNo9hTjjM-LKsN_g65AqPz9cv6JO3U4KDl7mPbn-e3izOm6tfZxeL46vGCcVlo4TuSa8Gw30L1HujhmHQrHVeKAWkPqiZE0CcFIpZB6Lng1XMSGBUyZbxffR967uJ4aFAyt16TA6myc4QSuqoYLomb1v5HyhlknKhRUW_vUPvQ4lzDfJEacINb3WlxJZyMaQUwXebOK5t_NNR0j2V09VyuvflVNnXF_PSr2F4E722UQGzBR7DlCGm31N5hNitwE559W_vv3eCm3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1417038397</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Acute Effect of Different Half Squat Set Configurations on Jump Potentiation</title><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Boullosa, Daniel A ; Abreu, Laurinda ; Beltrame, Luis G.N ; Behm, David G</creator><creatorcontrib>Boullosa, Daniel A ; Abreu, Laurinda ; Beltrame, Luis G.N ; Behm, David G</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACTBoullosa, DA, Abreu, L, Beltrame, LGN, and Behm, DG. The acute effect of different half squat set configurations on jump potentiation. J Strength Cond Res 27(8)2059–2066, 2013—The aim of this study was to evaluate the acute effect of a half squat exercise performed with different set configurations on jump potentiation. Twelve resistance-trained men were evaluated on 3 occasions separated by 48–96 hours. First, they performed a 5 repetitions maximum (5RM) test. Subsequently, they performed in a randomized order 2 sessionsone session with 5RM until failure and the other with the same workload but with 30-second rest intervals between repetitions (i.e., cluster set [CS]). Countermovement jump performance was examined during the second and third sessions for jump height and force-time parameters using a force platform at the following time intervalsbefore and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 minutes. Separate comparisons for each variable at the different time intervals were analyzed using analysis of variance, effect size, and qualitative inferences. The majority of the parameters improved independently of the time they occurred, except for peak force and vertical stiffness after a set until failure. For peak power, it appears that the cluster treatment resulted in superior potentiation at 1 minute, whereas the 5RM treatment resulted in greater potentiation at 9 minutes. Effect size analysis and qualitative outcomes revealed an improvement in vertical stiffness and a lowering in the depth of the countermovement in CS. There were significant correlations between participants’ 5RM relative performance and various force-time parameters only in CS. It appears that a CS induces greater peak power than a 5RM set at 1 minute, although the reverse occurs at 9 minutes. Delayed potentiation associated with the 5RM may be attributed to greater fatigue versus the CS approach. Therefore, it follows that the optimal method for inducing peak power potentiation is dependent on the available time between heavy half squat exercise and the subsequent jump performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31827ddf15</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23207892</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright by the National Strength &amp; Conditioning Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Athletic Performance - physiology ; Effects ; Exercise ; Exercise - physiology ; Human performance ; Humans ; Load ; Lower Extremity - physiology ; Male ; Men ; Motor ability ; Movement - physiology ; Muscle Strength ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Time Factors ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2013-08, Vol.27 (8), p.2059-2066</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 by the National Strength &amp; Conditioning Association.</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Aug 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4635-647b0b6d83f9e1ff86ddd729cf466e023272c4e0c5462ace4b3da6285e2165923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4635-647b0b6d83f9e1ff86ddd729cf466e023272c4e0c5462ace4b3da6285e2165923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23207892$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boullosa, Daniel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abreu, Laurinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beltrame, Luis G.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Behm, David G</creatorcontrib><title>The Acute Effect of Different Half Squat Set Configurations on Jump Potentiation</title><title>Journal of strength and conditioning research</title><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><description>ABSTRACTBoullosa, DA, Abreu, L, Beltrame, LGN, and Behm, DG. The acute effect of different half squat set configurations on jump potentiation. J Strength Cond Res 27(8)2059–2066, 2013—The aim of this study was to evaluate the acute effect of a half squat exercise performed with different set configurations on jump potentiation. Twelve resistance-trained men were evaluated on 3 occasions separated by 48–96 hours. First, they performed a 5 repetitions maximum (5RM) test. Subsequently, they performed in a randomized order 2 sessionsone session with 5RM until failure and the other with the same workload but with 30-second rest intervals between repetitions (i.e., cluster set [CS]). Countermovement jump performance was examined during the second and third sessions for jump height and force-time parameters using a force platform at the following time intervalsbefore and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 minutes. Separate comparisons for each variable at the different time intervals were analyzed using analysis of variance, effect size, and qualitative inferences. The majority of the parameters improved independently of the time they occurred, except for peak force and vertical stiffness after a set until failure. For peak power, it appears that the cluster treatment resulted in superior potentiation at 1 minute, whereas the 5RM treatment resulted in greater potentiation at 9 minutes. Effect size analysis and qualitative outcomes revealed an improvement in vertical stiffness and a lowering in the depth of the countermovement in CS. There were significant correlations between participants’ 5RM relative performance and various force-time parameters only in CS. It appears that a CS induces greater peak power than a 5RM set at 1 minute, although the reverse occurs at 9 minutes. Delayed potentiation associated with the 5RM may be attributed to greater fatigue versus the CS approach. Therefore, it follows that the optimal method for inducing peak power potentiation is dependent on the available time between heavy half squat exercise and the subsequent jump performance.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Athletic Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Effects</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Exercise - physiology</subject><subject>Human performance</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Load</subject><subject>Lower Extremity - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Motor ability</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle Strength</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1064-8011</issn><issn>1533-4287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtLHEEUhYuQEB_xH0goyCabNvWu6qWMxgdChNF1U119y2nT0zXWA8m_T-moCxchq3u5fOdwDwehQ0qOqKTtj8vl4oj0hHLg1DA9DJ7KD2iXSs4bwYz-WHeiRGMIpTtoL6V7QpiUkn9GO4wzok3LdtH1zQrwsSsZ8Kn34DIOHp-MdY0wZ3xuJ4-XD8VmvISMF2H2412JNo9hTjjM-LKsN_g65AqPz9cv6JO3U4KDl7mPbn-e3izOm6tfZxeL46vGCcVlo4TuSa8Gw30L1HujhmHQrHVeKAWkPqiZE0CcFIpZB6Lng1XMSGBUyZbxffR967uJ4aFAyt16TA6myc4QSuqoYLomb1v5HyhlknKhRUW_vUPvQ4lzDfJEacINb3WlxJZyMaQUwXebOK5t_NNR0j2V09VyuvflVNnXF_PSr2F4E722UQGzBR7DlCGm31N5hNitwE559W_vv3eCm3Q</recordid><startdate>201308</startdate><enddate>201308</enddate><creator>Boullosa, Daniel A</creator><creator>Abreu, Laurinda</creator><creator>Beltrame, Luis G.N</creator><creator>Behm, David G</creator><general>Copyright by the National Strength &amp; Conditioning Association</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201308</creationdate><title>The Acute Effect of Different Half Squat Set Configurations on Jump Potentiation</title><author>Boullosa, Daniel A ; Abreu, Laurinda ; Beltrame, Luis G.N ; Behm, David G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4635-647b0b6d83f9e1ff86ddd729cf466e023272c4e0c5462ace4b3da6285e2165923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Athletic Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Effects</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Exercise - physiology</topic><topic>Human performance</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Load</topic><topic>Lower Extremity - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Motor ability</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle Strength</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boullosa, Daniel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abreu, Laurinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beltrame, Luis G.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Behm, David G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boullosa, Daniel A</au><au>Abreu, Laurinda</au><au>Beltrame, Luis G.N</au><au>Behm, David G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Acute Effect of Different Half Squat Set Configurations on Jump Potentiation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><date>2013-08</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2059</spage><epage>2066</epage><pages>2059-2066</pages><issn>1064-8011</issn><eissn>1533-4287</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACTBoullosa, DA, Abreu, L, Beltrame, LGN, and Behm, DG. The acute effect of different half squat set configurations on jump potentiation. J Strength Cond Res 27(8)2059–2066, 2013—The aim of this study was to evaluate the acute effect of a half squat exercise performed with different set configurations on jump potentiation. Twelve resistance-trained men were evaluated on 3 occasions separated by 48–96 hours. First, they performed a 5 repetitions maximum (5RM) test. Subsequently, they performed in a randomized order 2 sessionsone session with 5RM until failure and the other with the same workload but with 30-second rest intervals between repetitions (i.e., cluster set [CS]). Countermovement jump performance was examined during the second and third sessions for jump height and force-time parameters using a force platform at the following time intervalsbefore and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 minutes. Separate comparisons for each variable at the different time intervals were analyzed using analysis of variance, effect size, and qualitative inferences. The majority of the parameters improved independently of the time they occurred, except for peak force and vertical stiffness after a set until failure. For peak power, it appears that the cluster treatment resulted in superior potentiation at 1 minute, whereas the 5RM treatment resulted in greater potentiation at 9 minutes. Effect size analysis and qualitative outcomes revealed an improvement in vertical stiffness and a lowering in the depth of the countermovement in CS. There were significant correlations between participants’ 5RM relative performance and various force-time parameters only in CS. It appears that a CS induces greater peak power than a 5RM set at 1 minute, although the reverse occurs at 9 minutes. Delayed potentiation associated with the 5RM may be attributed to greater fatigue versus the CS approach. Therefore, it follows that the optimal method for inducing peak power potentiation is dependent on the available time between heavy half squat exercise and the subsequent jump performance.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright by the National Strength &amp; Conditioning Association</pub><pmid>23207892</pmid><doi>10.1519/JSC.0b013e31827ddf15</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1064-8011
ispartof Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2013-08, Vol.27 (8), p.2059-2066
issn 1064-8011
1533-4287
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1427011995
source Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload; MEDLINE
subjects Adult
Athletic Performance - physiology
Effects
Exercise
Exercise - physiology
Human performance
Humans
Load
Lower Extremity - physiology
Male
Men
Motor ability
Movement - physiology
Muscle Strength
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Time Factors
Young Adult
title The Acute Effect of Different Half Squat Set Configurations on Jump Potentiation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T19%3A43%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Acute%20Effect%20of%20Different%20Half%20Squat%20Set%20Configurations%20on%20Jump%20Potentiation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strength%20and%20conditioning%20research&rft.au=Boullosa,%20Daniel%20A&rft.date=2013-08&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2059&rft.epage=2066&rft.pages=2059-2066&rft.issn=1064-8011&rft.eissn=1533-4287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31827ddf15&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1412513474%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1417038397&rft_id=info:pmid/23207892&rfr_iscdi=true