Quantitative proteomics to study the response of wheat to contrasting fertilisation regimes

Negative environmental impacts from mineral fertilisers and pesticides used in conventional cropping have raised concern over the sustainability of arable crop production. Organic cropping uses alternatives that avoid many of these negative environmental effects; however, crop yields can be signific...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Molecular breeding 2013-02, Vol.31 (2), p.379-393
Hauptverfasser: Tétard-Jones, Catherine, Shotton, Peter N, Rempelos, Leonidas, Cooper, Julia, Eyre, Mick, Orr, Caroline H, Leifert, Carlo, Gatehouse, Angharad M. R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 393
container_issue 2
container_start_page 379
container_title Molecular breeding
container_volume 31
creator Tétard-Jones, Catherine
Shotton, Peter N
Rempelos, Leonidas
Cooper, Julia
Eyre, Mick
Orr, Caroline H
Leifert, Carlo
Gatehouse, Angharad M. R
description Negative environmental impacts from mineral fertilisers and pesticides used in conventional cropping have raised concern over the sustainability of arable crop production. Organic cropping uses alternatives that avoid many of these negative environmental effects; however, crop yields can be significantly reduced, possibly due to a lower proportion of plant-available nutrients. To gain insights into the molecular effects of organic compared to conventional cropping systems on plant utilisation of nutrients, we used proteomics to analyse winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Our aim was to investigate the effects of contrasting fertility management and crop protection regimes in organic and conventional cropping systems on the wheat flag leaf proteome and the association between the proteome and physiological traits. Wheat flag leaves were flash-frozen, lyophilised and milled prior to protein extraction (TCA/acetone) and analysed using 2D gel electrophoresis and MALDI-TOF MS. The abundance of 111 protein spots varied significantly between fertilisation regimes. Flag leaf N and P composition were significant drivers of differences in protein spot abundance, including major proteins involved in nitrogen remobilisation, photosynthesis, metabolism and stress response. These results indicate that molecular-based mechanisms are involved in the effect of contrasting cropping systems on nutrient utilisation and wheat grain yield. Using a functional genomics approach, we were able to identify proteins that are linked to causal genes, enabling the potential development of functional molecular markers for crop improvement in nutrient use efficiency.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11032-012-9796-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1427011764</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2259492275</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-925dd5bb52673071709027686d19056c92827a3cc44fa927c68d1c64227491ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9LwzAYhosoOKd_gCcLXrxU86tJc5ThLxiI6E4eQpamXcbWzHypsv_elAqCB09J-J7n5eNNlp1jdI0REjeAMaKkQJgUUkhe8INsgksxvKrqMN1phQoqGD3OTgDWKDmS80n2_tLrLrqoo_u0-S74aP3WGcijzyH29T6PK5sHCzvfgc19k3-trI7D2PguBg3RdW3e2BDdxkGK8V3CW7e1cJodNXoD9uznnGaL-7u32WMxf354mt3OC0MFjYUkZV2Xy2VJuKBIYIEkIoJXvMYSldxIUhGhqTGMNVoSYXhVY8MZIYJJbBs6za7G3LT-R28hqq0DYzcb3Vnfg8KMCISx4Cyhl3_Qte9Dl7ZThJSSyRRaJgqPlAkeINhG7YLb6rBXGKmhbjXWrVLdaqhb8eSQ0YHEdq0Nv8n_SRej1GivdBscqMUrQZil_-GcSEm_AYTFizA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259492275</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative proteomics to study the response of wheat to contrasting fertilisation regimes</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Tétard-Jones, Catherine ; Shotton, Peter N ; Rempelos, Leonidas ; Cooper, Julia ; Eyre, Mick ; Orr, Caroline H ; Leifert, Carlo ; Gatehouse, Angharad M. R</creator><creatorcontrib>Tétard-Jones, Catherine ; Shotton, Peter N ; Rempelos, Leonidas ; Cooper, Julia ; Eyre, Mick ; Orr, Caroline H ; Leifert, Carlo ; Gatehouse, Angharad M. R</creatorcontrib><description>Negative environmental impacts from mineral fertilisers and pesticides used in conventional cropping have raised concern over the sustainability of arable crop production. Organic cropping uses alternatives that avoid many of these negative environmental effects; however, crop yields can be significantly reduced, possibly due to a lower proportion of plant-available nutrients. To gain insights into the molecular effects of organic compared to conventional cropping systems on plant utilisation of nutrients, we used proteomics to analyse winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Our aim was to investigate the effects of contrasting fertility management and crop protection regimes in organic and conventional cropping systems on the wheat flag leaf proteome and the association between the proteome and physiological traits. Wheat flag leaves were flash-frozen, lyophilised and milled prior to protein extraction (TCA/acetone) and analysed using 2D gel electrophoresis and MALDI-TOF MS. The abundance of 111 protein spots varied significantly between fertilisation regimes. Flag leaf N and P composition were significant drivers of differences in protein spot abundance, including major proteins involved in nitrogen remobilisation, photosynthesis, metabolism and stress response. These results indicate that molecular-based mechanisms are involved in the effect of contrasting cropping systems on nutrient utilisation and wheat grain yield. Using a functional genomics approach, we were able to identify proteins that are linked to causal genes, enabling the potential development of functional molecular markers for crop improvement in nutrient use efficiency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1380-3743</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9788</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11032-012-9796-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Acetone ; Arable land ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biotechnology ; Cellular stress response ; Crop improvement ; Crop production ; Crop yield ; Cropping systems ; Electrophoresis ; Environmental effects ; Environmental impact ; Fertility ; Fertilization ; Fertilizers ; Gel electrophoresis ; genes ; genetic markers ; Genomics ; grain yield ; Leaves ; Life Sciences ; Mineral fertilizers ; Molecular biology ; Nitrogen ; Nutrient availability ; nutrient use efficiency ; nutrient utilization ; Nutrients ; Pesticides ; Photosynthesis ; Plant biology ; Plant Genetics and Genomics ; Plant Pathology ; Plant Physiology ; Plant protection ; Plant Sciences ; Proteins ; proteome ; Proteomics ; stress response ; Triticum aestivum ; Two dimensional analysis ; Wheat ; Winter wheat</subject><ispartof>Molecular breeding, 2013-02, Vol.31 (2), p.379-393</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012</rights><rights>Molecular Breeding is a copyright of Springer, (2012). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-925dd5bb52673071709027686d19056c92827a3cc44fa927c68d1c64227491ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-925dd5bb52673071709027686d19056c92827a3cc44fa927c68d1c64227491ef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11032-012-9796-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11032-012-9796-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27913,27914,41477,42546,51308</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tétard-Jones, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shotton, Peter N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rempelos, Leonidas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eyre, Mick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orr, Caroline H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leifert, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gatehouse, Angharad M. R</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative proteomics to study the response of wheat to contrasting fertilisation regimes</title><title>Molecular breeding</title><addtitle>Mol Breeding</addtitle><description>Negative environmental impacts from mineral fertilisers and pesticides used in conventional cropping have raised concern over the sustainability of arable crop production. Organic cropping uses alternatives that avoid many of these negative environmental effects; however, crop yields can be significantly reduced, possibly due to a lower proportion of plant-available nutrients. To gain insights into the molecular effects of organic compared to conventional cropping systems on plant utilisation of nutrients, we used proteomics to analyse winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Our aim was to investigate the effects of contrasting fertility management and crop protection regimes in organic and conventional cropping systems on the wheat flag leaf proteome and the association between the proteome and physiological traits. Wheat flag leaves were flash-frozen, lyophilised and milled prior to protein extraction (TCA/acetone) and analysed using 2D gel electrophoresis and MALDI-TOF MS. The abundance of 111 protein spots varied significantly between fertilisation regimes. Flag leaf N and P composition were significant drivers of differences in protein spot abundance, including major proteins involved in nitrogen remobilisation, photosynthesis, metabolism and stress response. These results indicate that molecular-based mechanisms are involved in the effect of contrasting cropping systems on nutrient utilisation and wheat grain yield. Using a functional genomics approach, we were able to identify proteins that are linked to causal genes, enabling the potential development of functional molecular markers for crop improvement in nutrient use efficiency.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Acetone</subject><subject>Arable land</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Cellular stress response</subject><subject>Crop improvement</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Cropping systems</subject><subject>Electrophoresis</subject><subject>Environmental effects</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Fertilization</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Gel electrophoresis</subject><subject>genes</subject><subject>genetic markers</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>grain yield</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mineral fertilizers</subject><subject>Molecular biology</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nutrient availability</subject><subject>nutrient use efficiency</subject><subject>nutrient utilization</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>Plant biology</subject><subject>Plant Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Plant protection</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>proteome</subject><subject>Proteomics</subject><subject>stress response</subject><subject>Triticum aestivum</subject><subject>Two dimensional analysis</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><subject>Winter wheat</subject><issn>1380-3743</issn><issn>1572-9788</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9LwzAYhosoOKd_gCcLXrxU86tJc5ThLxiI6E4eQpamXcbWzHypsv_elAqCB09J-J7n5eNNlp1jdI0REjeAMaKkQJgUUkhe8INsgksxvKrqMN1phQoqGD3OTgDWKDmS80n2_tLrLrqoo_u0-S74aP3WGcijzyH29T6PK5sHCzvfgc19k3-trI7D2PguBg3RdW3e2BDdxkGK8V3CW7e1cJodNXoD9uznnGaL-7u32WMxf354mt3OC0MFjYUkZV2Xy2VJuKBIYIEkIoJXvMYSldxIUhGhqTGMNVoSYXhVY8MZIYJJbBs6za7G3LT-R28hqq0DYzcb3Vnfg8KMCISx4Cyhl3_Qte9Dl7ZThJSSyRRaJgqPlAkeINhG7YLb6rBXGKmhbjXWrVLdaqhb8eSQ0YHEdq0Nv8n_SRej1GivdBscqMUrQZil_-GcSEm_AYTFizA</recordid><startdate>20130201</startdate><enddate>20130201</enddate><creator>Tétard-Jones, Catherine</creator><creator>Shotton, Peter N</creator><creator>Rempelos, Leonidas</creator><creator>Cooper, Julia</creator><creator>Eyre, Mick</creator><creator>Orr, Caroline H</creator><creator>Leifert, Carlo</creator><creator>Gatehouse, Angharad M. R</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130201</creationdate><title>Quantitative proteomics to study the response of wheat to contrasting fertilisation regimes</title><author>Tétard-Jones, Catherine ; Shotton, Peter N ; Rempelos, Leonidas ; Cooper, Julia ; Eyre, Mick ; Orr, Caroline H ; Leifert, Carlo ; Gatehouse, Angharad M. R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-925dd5bb52673071709027686d19056c92827a3cc44fa927c68d1c64227491ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Acetone</topic><topic>Arable land</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Cellular stress response</topic><topic>Crop improvement</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Cropping systems</topic><topic>Electrophoresis</topic><topic>Environmental effects</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Fertilization</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Gel electrophoresis</topic><topic>genes</topic><topic>genetic markers</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>grain yield</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mineral fertilizers</topic><topic>Molecular biology</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nutrient availability</topic><topic>nutrient use efficiency</topic><topic>nutrient utilization</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>Plant biology</topic><topic>Plant Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Plant protection</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>proteome</topic><topic>Proteomics</topic><topic>stress response</topic><topic>Triticum aestivum</topic><topic>Two dimensional analysis</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><topic>Winter wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tétard-Jones, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shotton, Peter N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rempelos, Leonidas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eyre, Mick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orr, Caroline H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leifert, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gatehouse, Angharad M. R</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Molecular breeding</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tétard-Jones, Catherine</au><au>Shotton, Peter N</au><au>Rempelos, Leonidas</au><au>Cooper, Julia</au><au>Eyre, Mick</au><au>Orr, Caroline H</au><au>Leifert, Carlo</au><au>Gatehouse, Angharad M. R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative proteomics to study the response of wheat to contrasting fertilisation regimes</atitle><jtitle>Molecular breeding</jtitle><stitle>Mol Breeding</stitle><date>2013-02-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>379</spage><epage>393</epage><pages>379-393</pages><issn>1380-3743</issn><eissn>1572-9788</eissn><abstract>Negative environmental impacts from mineral fertilisers and pesticides used in conventional cropping have raised concern over the sustainability of arable crop production. Organic cropping uses alternatives that avoid many of these negative environmental effects; however, crop yields can be significantly reduced, possibly due to a lower proportion of plant-available nutrients. To gain insights into the molecular effects of organic compared to conventional cropping systems on plant utilisation of nutrients, we used proteomics to analyse winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Our aim was to investigate the effects of contrasting fertility management and crop protection regimes in organic and conventional cropping systems on the wheat flag leaf proteome and the association between the proteome and physiological traits. Wheat flag leaves were flash-frozen, lyophilised and milled prior to protein extraction (TCA/acetone) and analysed using 2D gel electrophoresis and MALDI-TOF MS. The abundance of 111 protein spots varied significantly between fertilisation regimes. Flag leaf N and P composition were significant drivers of differences in protein spot abundance, including major proteins involved in nitrogen remobilisation, photosynthesis, metabolism and stress response. These results indicate that molecular-based mechanisms are involved in the effect of contrasting cropping systems on nutrient utilisation and wheat grain yield. Using a functional genomics approach, we were able to identify proteins that are linked to causal genes, enabling the potential development of functional molecular markers for crop improvement in nutrient use efficiency.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s11032-012-9796-6</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1380-3743
ispartof Molecular breeding, 2013-02, Vol.31 (2), p.379-393
issn 1380-3743
1572-9788
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1427011764
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Abundance
Acetone
Arable land
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biotechnology
Cellular stress response
Crop improvement
Crop production
Crop yield
Cropping systems
Electrophoresis
Environmental effects
Environmental impact
Fertility
Fertilization
Fertilizers
Gel electrophoresis
genes
genetic markers
Genomics
grain yield
Leaves
Life Sciences
Mineral fertilizers
Molecular biology
Nitrogen
Nutrient availability
nutrient use efficiency
nutrient utilization
Nutrients
Pesticides
Photosynthesis
Plant biology
Plant Genetics and Genomics
Plant Pathology
Plant Physiology
Plant protection
Plant Sciences
Proteins
proteome
Proteomics
stress response
Triticum aestivum
Two dimensional analysis
Wheat
Winter wheat
title Quantitative proteomics to study the response of wheat to contrasting fertilisation regimes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T09%3A45%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20proteomics%20to%20study%20the%20response%20of%20wheat%20to%20contrasting%20fertilisation%20regimes&rft.jtitle=Molecular%20breeding&rft.au=T%C3%A9tard-Jones,%20Catherine&rft.date=2013-02-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=379&rft.epage=393&rft.pages=379-393&rft.issn=1380-3743&rft.eissn=1572-9788&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11032-012-9796-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2259492275%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259492275&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true