Ecosystem Services and Beyond: Using Multiple Metaphors to Understand Human-Environment Relationships
Ecosystem services research has been focused on the ways that humans directly benefit from goods and services, and economic valuation techniques have been used to measure those benefits. We argue that, although it is appropriate in some cases, this focus on direct use and economic quantification is...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bioscience 2013-07, Vol.63 (7), p.536-546 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 546 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 536 |
container_title | Bioscience |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Raymond, Christopher M Singh, Gerald G Benessaiah, Karina Bernhardt, Joanna R Levine, Jordan Nelson, Harry Turner, Nancy J Norton, Bryan Tam, Jordan Chan, Kai M. A |
description | Ecosystem services research has been focused on the ways that humans directly benefit from goods and services, and economic valuation techniques have been used to measure those benefits. We argue that, although it is appropriate in some cases, this focus on direct use and economic quantification is often limiting and can detract from environmental research and effective management, in part by crowding out other understandings of human—environment relationships. Instead, we make the case that the systematic consideration of multiple metaphors of such relationships in assessing social—ecological systems will foster better understanding of the many ways in which humans relate to, care for, and value ecosystems. Where it is possible, we encourage a deliberative approach to ecosystem management whereby ecosystem researchers actively engage conservationists and local resource users to make explicit, through open deliberation, the types of metaphors salient to their conservation problem. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1427011732</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b453t-21045d4d0f883e0f6d153f242906fe691269359a42dce33b3cf5903ab23562603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0E1r3DAQBmBRGug2yblXQS6l1I6-bffWhs0HJASS7llo7XGixZZcSQ7sv48W95RLchKSnhlmXoS-UVJSyeT51vqSEcpLxcuqrD6h1eG54EyIz2hFCFEFl6r-gr7GuMtXKnizQrBufdzHBCN-hPBiW4jYuA7_gb133S-8idY94bt5SHYaAN9BMtOzDxEnjzeugxDTgV_Po3HF2r3Y4N0ILuEHGEyy3sVnO8UTdNSbIcLp__MYbS7Xfy-ui9v7q5uL37fFVkieCkaJkJ3oSF_XHEivOip5zwRriOpBNZSphsvGCNa1wPmWt71sCDdbljdjivBj9H3pOwX_b4aY9GhjC8NgHPg5aipYRSitOMv07A3d-Tm4PF1WtGaqllxldb6oNvgYA_R6CnY0Ya8p0Yd8dY5dH2LXiutKV7nix1Lh5-kD-OeCdzH58AFeLDx_eAfv-ldpsJ-T</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1418268536</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecosystem Services and Beyond: Using Multiple Metaphors to Understand Human-Environment Relationships</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Raymond, Christopher M ; Singh, Gerald G ; Benessaiah, Karina ; Bernhardt, Joanna R ; Levine, Jordan ; Nelson, Harry ; Turner, Nancy J ; Norton, Bryan ; Tam, Jordan ; Chan, Kai M. A</creator><creatorcontrib>Raymond, Christopher M ; Singh, Gerald G ; Benessaiah, Karina ; Bernhardt, Joanna R ; Levine, Jordan ; Nelson, Harry ; Turner, Nancy J ; Norton, Bryan ; Tam, Jordan ; Chan, Kai M. A</creatorcontrib><description>Ecosystem services research has been focused on the ways that humans directly benefit from goods and services, and economic valuation techniques have been used to measure those benefits. We argue that, although it is appropriate in some cases, this focus on direct use and economic quantification is often limiting and can detract from environmental research and effective management, in part by crowding out other understandings of human—environment relationships. Instead, we make the case that the systematic consideration of multiple metaphors of such relationships in assessing social—ecological systems will foster better understanding of the many ways in which humans relate to, care for, and value ecosystems. Where it is possible, we encourage a deliberative approach to ecosystem management whereby ecosystem researchers actively engage conservationists and local resource users to make explicit, through open deliberation, the types of metaphors salient to their conservation problem.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3568</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3244</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BISNAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Circulation, AIBS, 1313 Dolley Madison Blvd., Suite 402, McLean, VA 22101. USA: University of California Press</publisher><subject>Commercial production ; Conservation ; deliberative approach ; Economics ; Ecosystem management ; ecosystem research ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Environmental conservation ; Environmental management ; Environmental research ; Human-environment relationship ; Humans ; Land management ; Metaphor ; Metaphors ; OVERVIEW ARTICLES ; Provisioning ecosystem services ; Social interaction ; Social-ecological systems ; stewardship</subject><ispartof>Bioscience, 2013-07, Vol.63 (7), p.536-546</ispartof><rights>2013 by American Institute of Biological Sciences. All rights reserved. Request permission to photocopy or reproduce article content at the University of California Press's Rights and Permissions Web site at www.ucpressjournals.com/reprintinfo.asp.</rights><rights>2013 by American Institute of Biological Sciences. All rights reserved. Request permission to photocopy or reproduce article content at the University of California Press’s Rights and Permissions Web site at http://www.ucpressjournals.com/reprintinfo.asp.</rights><rights>2013 American Institute of Biological Sciences 2013</rights><rights>Copyright University of California Press Jul 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b453t-21045d4d0f883e0f6d153f242906fe691269359a42dce33b3cf5903ab23562603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b453t-21045d4d0f883e0f6d153f242906fe691269359a42dce33b3cf5903ab23562603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raymond, Christopher M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Gerald G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benessaiah, Karina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernhardt, Joanna R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Harry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Nancy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norton, Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tam, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Kai M. A</creatorcontrib><title>Ecosystem Services and Beyond: Using Multiple Metaphors to Understand Human-Environment Relationships</title><title>Bioscience</title><description>Ecosystem services research has been focused on the ways that humans directly benefit from goods and services, and economic valuation techniques have been used to measure those benefits. We argue that, although it is appropriate in some cases, this focus on direct use and economic quantification is often limiting and can detract from environmental research and effective management, in part by crowding out other understandings of human—environment relationships. Instead, we make the case that the systematic consideration of multiple metaphors of such relationships in assessing social—ecological systems will foster better understanding of the many ways in which humans relate to, care for, and value ecosystems. Where it is possible, we encourage a deliberative approach to ecosystem management whereby ecosystem researchers actively engage conservationists and local resource users to make explicit, through open deliberation, the types of metaphors salient to their conservation problem.</description><subject>Commercial production</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>deliberative approach</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Ecosystem management</subject><subject>ecosystem research</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental research</subject><subject>Human-environment relationship</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Metaphor</subject><subject>Metaphors</subject><subject>OVERVIEW ARTICLES</subject><subject>Provisioning ecosystem services</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social-ecological systems</subject><subject>stewardship</subject><issn>0006-3568</issn><issn>1525-3244</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0E1r3DAQBmBRGug2yblXQS6l1I6-bffWhs0HJASS7llo7XGixZZcSQ7sv48W95RLchKSnhlmXoS-UVJSyeT51vqSEcpLxcuqrD6h1eG54EyIz2hFCFEFl6r-gr7GuMtXKnizQrBufdzHBCN-hPBiW4jYuA7_gb133S-8idY94bt5SHYaAN9BMtOzDxEnjzeugxDTgV_Po3HF2r3Y4N0ILuEHGEyy3sVnO8UTdNSbIcLp__MYbS7Xfy-ui9v7q5uL37fFVkieCkaJkJ3oSF_XHEivOip5zwRriOpBNZSphsvGCNa1wPmWt71sCDdbljdjivBj9H3pOwX_b4aY9GhjC8NgHPg5aipYRSitOMv07A3d-Tm4PF1WtGaqllxldb6oNvgYA_R6CnY0Ya8p0Yd8dY5dH2LXiutKV7nix1Lh5-kD-OeCdzH58AFeLDx_eAfv-ldpsJ-T</recordid><startdate>201307</startdate><enddate>201307</enddate><creator>Raymond, Christopher M</creator><creator>Singh, Gerald G</creator><creator>Benessaiah, Karina</creator><creator>Bernhardt, Joanna R</creator><creator>Levine, Jordan</creator><creator>Nelson, Harry</creator><creator>Turner, Nancy J</creator><creator>Norton, Bryan</creator><creator>Tam, Jordan</creator><creator>Chan, Kai M. A</creator><general>University of California Press</general><general>American Institute of Biological Sciences</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201307</creationdate><title>Ecosystem Services and Beyond: Using Multiple Metaphors to Understand Human-Environment Relationships</title><author>Raymond, Christopher M ; Singh, Gerald G ; Benessaiah, Karina ; Bernhardt, Joanna R ; Levine, Jordan ; Nelson, Harry ; Turner, Nancy J ; Norton, Bryan ; Tam, Jordan ; Chan, Kai M. A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b453t-21045d4d0f883e0f6d153f242906fe691269359a42dce33b3cf5903ab23562603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Commercial production</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>deliberative approach</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Ecosystem management</topic><topic>ecosystem research</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental research</topic><topic>Human-environment relationship</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Metaphor</topic><topic>Metaphors</topic><topic>OVERVIEW ARTICLES</topic><topic>Provisioning ecosystem services</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social-ecological systems</topic><topic>stewardship</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raymond, Christopher M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Gerald G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benessaiah, Karina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernhardt, Joanna R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Harry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Nancy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norton, Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tam, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Kai M. A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Bioscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raymond, Christopher M</au><au>Singh, Gerald G</au><au>Benessaiah, Karina</au><au>Bernhardt, Joanna R</au><au>Levine, Jordan</au><au>Nelson, Harry</au><au>Turner, Nancy J</au><au>Norton, Bryan</au><au>Tam, Jordan</au><au>Chan, Kai M. A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecosystem Services and Beyond: Using Multiple Metaphors to Understand Human-Environment Relationships</atitle><jtitle>Bioscience</jtitle><date>2013-07</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>536</spage><epage>546</epage><pages>536-546</pages><issn>0006-3568</issn><eissn>1525-3244</eissn><coden>BISNAS</coden><abstract>Ecosystem services research has been focused on the ways that humans directly benefit from goods and services, and economic valuation techniques have been used to measure those benefits. We argue that, although it is appropriate in some cases, this focus on direct use and economic quantification is often limiting and can detract from environmental research and effective management, in part by crowding out other understandings of human—environment relationships. Instead, we make the case that the systematic consideration of multiple metaphors of such relationships in assessing social—ecological systems will foster better understanding of the many ways in which humans relate to, care for, and value ecosystems. Where it is possible, we encourage a deliberative approach to ecosystem management whereby ecosystem researchers actively engage conservationists and local resource users to make explicit, through open deliberation, the types of metaphors salient to their conservation problem.</abstract><cop>Circulation, AIBS, 1313 Dolley Madison Blvd., Suite 402, McLean, VA 22101. USA</cop><pub>University of California Press</pub><doi>10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0006-3568 |
ispartof | Bioscience, 2013-07, Vol.63 (7), p.536-546 |
issn | 0006-3568 1525-3244 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1427011732 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Commercial production Conservation deliberative approach Economics Ecosystem management ecosystem research Ecosystem services Ecosystems Environmental conservation Environmental management Environmental research Human-environment relationship Humans Land management Metaphor Metaphors OVERVIEW ARTICLES Provisioning ecosystem services Social interaction Social-ecological systems stewardship |
title | Ecosystem Services and Beyond: Using Multiple Metaphors to Understand Human-Environment Relationships |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T15%3A29%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecosystem%20Services%20and%20Beyond:%20Using%20Multiple%20Metaphors%20to%20Understand%20Human-Environment%20Relationships&rft.jtitle=Bioscience&rft.au=Raymond,%20Christopher%20M&rft.date=2013-07&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=536&rft.epage=546&rft.pages=536-546&rft.issn=0006-3568&rft.eissn=1525-3244&rft.coden=BISNAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1418268536&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7&rft_oup_id=10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7&rfr_iscdi=true |