Ecosystem Services and Beyond: Using Multiple Metaphors to Understand Human-Environment Relationships

Ecosystem services research has been focused on the ways that humans directly benefit from goods and services, and economic valuation techniques have been used to measure those benefits. We argue that, although it is appropriate in some cases, this focus on direct use and economic quantification is...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioscience 2013-07, Vol.63 (7), p.536-546
Hauptverfasser: Raymond, Christopher M, Singh, Gerald G, Benessaiah, Karina, Bernhardt, Joanna R, Levine, Jordan, Nelson, Harry, Turner, Nancy J, Norton, Bryan, Tam, Jordan, Chan, Kai M. A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 546
container_issue 7
container_start_page 536
container_title Bioscience
container_volume 63
creator Raymond, Christopher M
Singh, Gerald G
Benessaiah, Karina
Bernhardt, Joanna R
Levine, Jordan
Nelson, Harry
Turner, Nancy J
Norton, Bryan
Tam, Jordan
Chan, Kai M. A
description Ecosystem services research has been focused on the ways that humans directly benefit from goods and services, and economic valuation techniques have been used to measure those benefits. We argue that, although it is appropriate in some cases, this focus on direct use and economic quantification is often limiting and can detract from environmental research and effective management, in part by crowding out other understandings of human—environment relationships. Instead, we make the case that the systematic consideration of multiple metaphors of such relationships in assessing social—ecological systems will foster better understanding of the many ways in which humans relate to, care for, and value ecosystems. Where it is possible, we encourage a deliberative approach to ecosystem management whereby ecosystem researchers actively engage conservationists and local resource users to make explicit, through open deliberation, the types of metaphors salient to their conservation problem.
doi_str_mv 10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1427011732</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b453t-21045d4d0f883e0f6d153f242906fe691269359a42dce33b3cf5903ab23562603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0E1r3DAQBmBRGug2yblXQS6l1I6-bffWhs0HJASS7llo7XGixZZcSQ7sv48W95RLchKSnhlmXoS-UVJSyeT51vqSEcpLxcuqrD6h1eG54EyIz2hFCFEFl6r-gr7GuMtXKnizQrBufdzHBCN-hPBiW4jYuA7_gb133S-8idY94bt5SHYaAN9BMtOzDxEnjzeugxDTgV_Po3HF2r3Y4N0ILuEHGEyy3sVnO8UTdNSbIcLp__MYbS7Xfy-ui9v7q5uL37fFVkieCkaJkJ3oSF_XHEivOip5zwRriOpBNZSphsvGCNa1wPmWt71sCDdbljdjivBj9H3pOwX_b4aY9GhjC8NgHPg5aipYRSitOMv07A3d-Tm4PF1WtGaqllxldb6oNvgYA_R6CnY0Ya8p0Yd8dY5dH2LXiutKV7nix1Lh5-kD-OeCdzH58AFeLDx_eAfv-ldpsJ-T</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1418268536</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecosystem Services and Beyond: Using Multiple Metaphors to Understand Human-Environment Relationships</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Raymond, Christopher M ; Singh, Gerald G ; Benessaiah, Karina ; Bernhardt, Joanna R ; Levine, Jordan ; Nelson, Harry ; Turner, Nancy J ; Norton, Bryan ; Tam, Jordan ; Chan, Kai M. A</creator><creatorcontrib>Raymond, Christopher M ; Singh, Gerald G ; Benessaiah, Karina ; Bernhardt, Joanna R ; Levine, Jordan ; Nelson, Harry ; Turner, Nancy J ; Norton, Bryan ; Tam, Jordan ; Chan, Kai M. A</creatorcontrib><description>Ecosystem services research has been focused on the ways that humans directly benefit from goods and services, and economic valuation techniques have been used to measure those benefits. We argue that, although it is appropriate in some cases, this focus on direct use and economic quantification is often limiting and can detract from environmental research and effective management, in part by crowding out other understandings of human—environment relationships. Instead, we make the case that the systematic consideration of multiple metaphors of such relationships in assessing social—ecological systems will foster better understanding of the many ways in which humans relate to, care for, and value ecosystems. Where it is possible, we encourage a deliberative approach to ecosystem management whereby ecosystem researchers actively engage conservationists and local resource users to make explicit, through open deliberation, the types of metaphors salient to their conservation problem.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3568</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3244</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BISNAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Circulation, AIBS, 1313 Dolley Madison Blvd., Suite 402, McLean, VA 22101. USA: University of California Press</publisher><subject>Commercial production ; Conservation ; deliberative approach ; Economics ; Ecosystem management ; ecosystem research ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Environmental conservation ; Environmental management ; Environmental research ; Human-environment relationship ; Humans ; Land management ; Metaphor ; Metaphors ; OVERVIEW ARTICLES ; Provisioning ecosystem services ; Social interaction ; Social-ecological systems ; stewardship</subject><ispartof>Bioscience, 2013-07, Vol.63 (7), p.536-546</ispartof><rights>2013 by American Institute of Biological Sciences. All rights reserved. Request permission to photocopy or reproduce article content at the University of California Press's Rights and Permissions Web site at www.ucpressjournals.com/reprintinfo.asp.</rights><rights>2013 by American Institute of Biological Sciences. All rights reserved. Request permission to photocopy or reproduce article content at the University of California Press’s Rights and Permissions Web site at http://www.ucpressjournals.com/reprintinfo.asp.</rights><rights>2013 American Institute of Biological Sciences 2013</rights><rights>Copyright University of California Press Jul 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b453t-21045d4d0f883e0f6d153f242906fe691269359a42dce33b3cf5903ab23562603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b453t-21045d4d0f883e0f6d153f242906fe691269359a42dce33b3cf5903ab23562603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raymond, Christopher M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Gerald G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benessaiah, Karina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernhardt, Joanna R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Harry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Nancy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norton, Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tam, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Kai M. A</creatorcontrib><title>Ecosystem Services and Beyond: Using Multiple Metaphors to Understand Human-Environment Relationships</title><title>Bioscience</title><description>Ecosystem services research has been focused on the ways that humans directly benefit from goods and services, and economic valuation techniques have been used to measure those benefits. We argue that, although it is appropriate in some cases, this focus on direct use and economic quantification is often limiting and can detract from environmental research and effective management, in part by crowding out other understandings of human—environment relationships. Instead, we make the case that the systematic consideration of multiple metaphors of such relationships in assessing social—ecological systems will foster better understanding of the many ways in which humans relate to, care for, and value ecosystems. Where it is possible, we encourage a deliberative approach to ecosystem management whereby ecosystem researchers actively engage conservationists and local resource users to make explicit, through open deliberation, the types of metaphors salient to their conservation problem.</description><subject>Commercial production</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>deliberative approach</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Ecosystem management</subject><subject>ecosystem research</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental research</subject><subject>Human-environment relationship</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Metaphor</subject><subject>Metaphors</subject><subject>OVERVIEW ARTICLES</subject><subject>Provisioning ecosystem services</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social-ecological systems</subject><subject>stewardship</subject><issn>0006-3568</issn><issn>1525-3244</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0E1r3DAQBmBRGug2yblXQS6l1I6-bffWhs0HJASS7llo7XGixZZcSQ7sv48W95RLchKSnhlmXoS-UVJSyeT51vqSEcpLxcuqrD6h1eG54EyIz2hFCFEFl6r-gr7GuMtXKnizQrBufdzHBCN-hPBiW4jYuA7_gb133S-8idY94bt5SHYaAN9BMtOzDxEnjzeugxDTgV_Po3HF2r3Y4N0ILuEHGEyy3sVnO8UTdNSbIcLp__MYbS7Xfy-ui9v7q5uL37fFVkieCkaJkJ3oSF_XHEivOip5zwRriOpBNZSphsvGCNa1wPmWt71sCDdbljdjivBj9H3pOwX_b4aY9GhjC8NgHPg5aipYRSitOMv07A3d-Tm4PF1WtGaqllxldb6oNvgYA_R6CnY0Ya8p0Yd8dY5dH2LXiutKV7nix1Lh5-kD-OeCdzH58AFeLDx_eAfv-ldpsJ-T</recordid><startdate>201307</startdate><enddate>201307</enddate><creator>Raymond, Christopher M</creator><creator>Singh, Gerald G</creator><creator>Benessaiah, Karina</creator><creator>Bernhardt, Joanna R</creator><creator>Levine, Jordan</creator><creator>Nelson, Harry</creator><creator>Turner, Nancy J</creator><creator>Norton, Bryan</creator><creator>Tam, Jordan</creator><creator>Chan, Kai M. A</creator><general>University of California Press</general><general>American Institute of Biological Sciences</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201307</creationdate><title>Ecosystem Services and Beyond: Using Multiple Metaphors to Understand Human-Environment Relationships</title><author>Raymond, Christopher M ; Singh, Gerald G ; Benessaiah, Karina ; Bernhardt, Joanna R ; Levine, Jordan ; Nelson, Harry ; Turner, Nancy J ; Norton, Bryan ; Tam, Jordan ; Chan, Kai M. A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b453t-21045d4d0f883e0f6d153f242906fe691269359a42dce33b3cf5903ab23562603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Commercial production</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>deliberative approach</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Ecosystem management</topic><topic>ecosystem research</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental research</topic><topic>Human-environment relationship</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Metaphor</topic><topic>Metaphors</topic><topic>OVERVIEW ARTICLES</topic><topic>Provisioning ecosystem services</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social-ecological systems</topic><topic>stewardship</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raymond, Christopher M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Gerald G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benessaiah, Karina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernhardt, Joanna R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Harry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Nancy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norton, Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tam, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Kai M. A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Bioscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raymond, Christopher M</au><au>Singh, Gerald G</au><au>Benessaiah, Karina</au><au>Bernhardt, Joanna R</au><au>Levine, Jordan</au><au>Nelson, Harry</au><au>Turner, Nancy J</au><au>Norton, Bryan</au><au>Tam, Jordan</au><au>Chan, Kai M. A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecosystem Services and Beyond: Using Multiple Metaphors to Understand Human-Environment Relationships</atitle><jtitle>Bioscience</jtitle><date>2013-07</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>536</spage><epage>546</epage><pages>536-546</pages><issn>0006-3568</issn><eissn>1525-3244</eissn><coden>BISNAS</coden><abstract>Ecosystem services research has been focused on the ways that humans directly benefit from goods and services, and economic valuation techniques have been used to measure those benefits. We argue that, although it is appropriate in some cases, this focus on direct use and economic quantification is often limiting and can detract from environmental research and effective management, in part by crowding out other understandings of human—environment relationships. Instead, we make the case that the systematic consideration of multiple metaphors of such relationships in assessing social—ecological systems will foster better understanding of the many ways in which humans relate to, care for, and value ecosystems. Where it is possible, we encourage a deliberative approach to ecosystem management whereby ecosystem researchers actively engage conservationists and local resource users to make explicit, through open deliberation, the types of metaphors salient to their conservation problem.</abstract><cop>Circulation, AIBS, 1313 Dolley Madison Blvd., Suite 402, McLean, VA 22101. USA</cop><pub>University of California Press</pub><doi>10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-3568
ispartof Bioscience, 2013-07, Vol.63 (7), p.536-546
issn 0006-3568
1525-3244
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1427011732
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Commercial production
Conservation
deliberative approach
Economics
Ecosystem management
ecosystem research
Ecosystem services
Ecosystems
Environmental conservation
Environmental management
Environmental research
Human-environment relationship
Humans
Land management
Metaphor
Metaphors
OVERVIEW ARTICLES
Provisioning ecosystem services
Social interaction
Social-ecological systems
stewardship
title Ecosystem Services and Beyond: Using Multiple Metaphors to Understand Human-Environment Relationships
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T15%3A29%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecosystem%20Services%20and%20Beyond:%20Using%20Multiple%20Metaphors%20to%20Understand%20Human-Environment%20Relationships&rft.jtitle=Bioscience&rft.au=Raymond,%20Christopher%20M&rft.date=2013-07&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=536&rft.epage=546&rft.pages=536-546&rft.issn=0006-3568&rft.eissn=1525-3244&rft.coden=BISNAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1418268536&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7&rft_oup_id=10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7&rfr_iscdi=true