The prevalence of PFS and prevalence and characteristics of reported food allergy; a survey of UK adults aged 18-75 incorporating a validated PFS diagnostic questionnaire
Summary Background Pollen‐food syndrome (PFS), a food allergy affecting pollen‐sensitized individuals, is likely to be the most prevalent food allergy in adults, estimated to affect 50–90% of people allergic to birch tree pollen. Objective A validated PFS diagnostic questionnaire (PFSDQ2) was used t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical and experimental allergy 2013-08, Vol.43 (8), p.928-940 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Summary
Background
Pollen‐food syndrome (PFS), a food allergy affecting pollen‐sensitized individuals, is likely to be the most prevalent food allergy in adults, estimated to affect 50–90% of people allergic to birch tree pollen.
Objective
A validated PFS diagnostic questionnaire (PFSDQ2) was used to determine the prevalence of PFS and also to characterize those who report reactions to foods.
Methods
Five UK General practices each sent the PFSDQ2 by post to 2000 patients aged 18–75 years randomly selected from their practice database. The validated questionnaire was accompanied by an additional set of questions to ascertain the demographic of the population, the foods involved and the age of onset.
Results
There were 3590 subjects who returned completed questionnaires, with an average return rate from each practice of 36% (range 22–47%). Of these, 73 were diagnosed with PFS according to the questionnaire (PFS+ve) giving a population prevalence of 2%. A further 482 subjects reported reactions to foods but did not fulfil the diagnostic criteria for PFS. The greatest prevalence of PFS was in the Croydon (SE England) urban practice (4.1%) and the lowest in the Aberdeen (Scotland) urban practice (0.8%) (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0954-7894 1365-2222 |
DOI: | 10.1111/cea.12104 |