Comparing costs for different conservation strategies of garlic (Allium sativum L.) germplasm in genebanks
The maintenance of plant genetic resources in living plant collections (genebanks) causes costs due to employment of staff, usage of buildings, equipment and consumables. Since this is especially challenging in vegetatively propagated material, studies were performed for the case of garlic, which is...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Genetic resources and crop evolution 2013-03, Vol.60 (3), p.913-926 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 926 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 913 |
container_title | Genetic resources and crop evolution |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Keller, E. R. Joachim Zanke, Christine D Senula, Angelika Breuing, Andreas Hardeweg, Bernd Winkelmann, Traud |
description | The maintenance of plant genetic resources in living plant collections (genebanks) causes costs due to employment of staff, usage of buildings, equipment and consumables. Since this is especially challenging in vegetatively propagated material, studies were performed for the case of garlic, which is one of the major vegetatively maintained crops in the genebank of IPK Gatersleben. Data were recorded to compare various scenarios of the main strategies field maintenance and cryopreservation. A spreadsheet tool was developed to be used for cost assessment and for drawing conclusions concerning the most effective way of maintenance. Field culture is cheaper in the short term, whereas after a break-even point cryopreservation becomes the more efficient storage method in the long term. This break-even point depends on the particular scenario, which is determined by various factors such as field and in vitro multiplication rates of various genotypes, presence of bulbils in a part of the genepool, the sample size of the accessions as well as the number of stored accessions in cryopreservation. The comparative discussion is exemplified for a 1-year field rotation versus cryopreservation using either in vitro plantlets or a combination of bulbils and unripe inflorescence bases as organ sources. For the more expensive use of in vitro plants cryopreservation becomes less costly than field culture only after 13 years, whereas this is the case already after 8–9 years when using a combination of bulbils in winter and inflorescence bases in summer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10722-012-9888-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1427001346</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1427001346</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-a2e9e09c6cdf4832e7968870d6dd1de305ca01a7c62ecf3bd1b190595aa5dbcb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMoOK7-AE8GvKyHXivpfHSOy-AXDHjQPYd0Ot1k7E7aVM-C_94MLQgePBVVed6ieELIawZ3DEC_Rwaa8wYYb0zXdY18Qg5M6raRDMxTcgDDZX1R4jl5gXgGAKNVdyDnY15WV2KaqM-4IR1zoUMcx1BC2uosYSiPbos5UdyK28IUA9I80smVOXp6ez_P8bJQrMxjrae7d3QKZVlnhwuNqTYp9C79wJfk2ehmDK_-1Bvy8PHD9-Pn5vT105fj_anxgqmtcTyYAMYrP4yia3nQRnWdhkENAxtCC9I7YE57xYMf235gPTMgjXRODr3v2xtyu-9dS_55CbjZJaIP8-xSyBe0THANwFqhKvr2H_ScLyXV6yzn0nRGgGorxXbKl4xYwmjXEhdXflkG9mrf7vZttW-v9q2sGb5ncL3KDeXv5v-F3uyh0WXrphLRPnzjwET9LqElE-1vCZKRzA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259894063</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing costs for different conservation strategies of garlic (Allium sativum L.) germplasm in genebanks</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Keller, E. R. Joachim ; Zanke, Christine D ; Senula, Angelika ; Breuing, Andreas ; Hardeweg, Bernd ; Winkelmann, Traud</creator><creatorcontrib>Keller, E. R. Joachim ; Zanke, Christine D ; Senula, Angelika ; Breuing, Andreas ; Hardeweg, Bernd ; Winkelmann, Traud</creatorcontrib><description>The maintenance of plant genetic resources in living plant collections (genebanks) causes costs due to employment of staff, usage of buildings, equipment and consumables. Since this is especially challenging in vegetatively propagated material, studies were performed for the case of garlic, which is one of the major vegetatively maintained crops in the genebank of IPK Gatersleben. Data were recorded to compare various scenarios of the main strategies field maintenance and cryopreservation. A spreadsheet tool was developed to be used for cost assessment and for drawing conclusions concerning the most effective way of maintenance. Field culture is cheaper in the short term, whereas after a break-even point cryopreservation becomes the more efficient storage method in the long term. This break-even point depends on the particular scenario, which is determined by various factors such as field and in vitro multiplication rates of various genotypes, presence of bulbils in a part of the genepool, the sample size of the accessions as well as the number of stored accessions in cryopreservation. The comparative discussion is exemplified for a 1-year field rotation versus cryopreservation using either in vitro plantlets or a combination of bulbils and unripe inflorescence bases as organ sources. For the more expensive use of in vitro plants cryopreservation becomes less costly than field culture only after 13 years, whereas this is the case already after 8–9 years when using a combination of bulbils in winter and inflorescence bases in summer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-9864</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5109</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10722-012-9888-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Agriculture ; Allium sativum ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Conservation ; crops ; Cryopreservation ; Culture ; Data collection ; Garlic ; Genetic resources ; genotype ; Genotypes ; Germplasm ; Life Sciences ; Maintenance ; Multiplication ; plant collections ; plant genetic resources ; Plant Genetics and Genomics ; Plant Physiology ; Plant resources ; Plant Sciences ; Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography ; Plantlets ; Research Article ; Spreadsheets ; summer ; winter</subject><ispartof>Genetic resources and crop evolution, 2013-03, Vol.60 (3), p.913-926</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2012</rights><rights>Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution is a copyright of Springer, (2012). All Rights Reserved. © 2012. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-a2e9e09c6cdf4832e7968870d6dd1de305ca01a7c62ecf3bd1b190595aa5dbcb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-a2e9e09c6cdf4832e7968870d6dd1de305ca01a7c62ecf3bd1b190595aa5dbcb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10722-012-9888-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10722-012-9888-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keller, E. R. Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanke, Christine D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senula, Angelika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breuing, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardeweg, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkelmann, Traud</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing costs for different conservation strategies of garlic (Allium sativum L.) germplasm in genebanks</title><title>Genetic resources and crop evolution</title><addtitle>Genet Resour Crop Evol</addtitle><description>The maintenance of plant genetic resources in living plant collections (genebanks) causes costs due to employment of staff, usage of buildings, equipment and consumables. Since this is especially challenging in vegetatively propagated material, studies were performed for the case of garlic, which is one of the major vegetatively maintained crops in the genebank of IPK Gatersleben. Data were recorded to compare various scenarios of the main strategies field maintenance and cryopreservation. A spreadsheet tool was developed to be used for cost assessment and for drawing conclusions concerning the most effective way of maintenance. Field culture is cheaper in the short term, whereas after a break-even point cryopreservation becomes the more efficient storage method in the long term. This break-even point depends on the particular scenario, which is determined by various factors such as field and in vitro multiplication rates of various genotypes, presence of bulbils in a part of the genepool, the sample size of the accessions as well as the number of stored accessions in cryopreservation. The comparative discussion is exemplified for a 1-year field rotation versus cryopreservation using either in vitro plantlets or a combination of bulbils and unripe inflorescence bases as organ sources. For the more expensive use of in vitro plants cryopreservation becomes less costly than field culture only after 13 years, whereas this is the case already after 8–9 years when using a combination of bulbils in winter and inflorescence bases in summer.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Allium sativum</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>crops</subject><subject>Cryopreservation</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Garlic</subject><subject>Genetic resources</subject><subject>genotype</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Germplasm</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Maintenance</subject><subject>Multiplication</subject><subject>plant collections</subject><subject>plant genetic resources</subject><subject>Plant Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Plant resources</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</subject><subject>Plantlets</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Spreadsheets</subject><subject>summer</subject><subject>winter</subject><issn>0925-9864</issn><issn>1573-5109</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMoOK7-AE8GvKyHXivpfHSOy-AXDHjQPYd0Ot1k7E7aVM-C_94MLQgePBVVed6ieELIawZ3DEC_Rwaa8wYYb0zXdY18Qg5M6raRDMxTcgDDZX1R4jl5gXgGAKNVdyDnY15WV2KaqM-4IR1zoUMcx1BC2uosYSiPbos5UdyK28IUA9I80smVOXp6ez_P8bJQrMxjrae7d3QKZVlnhwuNqTYp9C79wJfk2ehmDK_-1Bvy8PHD9-Pn5vT105fj_anxgqmtcTyYAMYrP4yia3nQRnWdhkENAxtCC9I7YE57xYMf235gPTMgjXRODr3v2xtyu-9dS_55CbjZJaIP8-xSyBe0THANwFqhKvr2H_ScLyXV6yzn0nRGgGorxXbKl4xYwmjXEhdXflkG9mrf7vZttW-v9q2sGb5ncL3KDeXv5v-F3uyh0WXrphLRPnzjwET9LqElE-1vCZKRzA</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Keller, E. R. Joachim</creator><creator>Zanke, Christine D</creator><creator>Senula, Angelika</creator><creator>Breuing, Andreas</creator><creator>Hardeweg, Bernd</creator><creator>Winkelmann, Traud</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Comparing costs for different conservation strategies of garlic (Allium sativum L.) germplasm in genebanks</title><author>Keller, E. R. Joachim ; Zanke, Christine D ; Senula, Angelika ; Breuing, Andreas ; Hardeweg, Bernd ; Winkelmann, Traud</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-a2e9e09c6cdf4832e7968870d6dd1de305ca01a7c62ecf3bd1b190595aa5dbcb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Allium sativum</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>crops</topic><topic>Cryopreservation</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Garlic</topic><topic>Genetic resources</topic><topic>genotype</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Germplasm</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Maintenance</topic><topic>Multiplication</topic><topic>plant collections</topic><topic>plant genetic resources</topic><topic>Plant Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Plant resources</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</topic><topic>Plantlets</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Spreadsheets</topic><topic>summer</topic><topic>winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keller, E. R. Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanke, Christine D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senula, Angelika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breuing, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardeweg, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkelmann, Traud</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Genetic resources and crop evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keller, E. R. Joachim</au><au>Zanke, Christine D</au><au>Senula, Angelika</au><au>Breuing, Andreas</au><au>Hardeweg, Bernd</au><au>Winkelmann, Traud</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing costs for different conservation strategies of garlic (Allium sativum L.) germplasm in genebanks</atitle><jtitle>Genetic resources and crop evolution</jtitle><stitle>Genet Resour Crop Evol</stitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>913</spage><epage>926</epage><pages>913-926</pages><issn>0925-9864</issn><eissn>1573-5109</eissn><abstract>The maintenance of plant genetic resources in living plant collections (genebanks) causes costs due to employment of staff, usage of buildings, equipment and consumables. Since this is especially challenging in vegetatively propagated material, studies were performed for the case of garlic, which is one of the major vegetatively maintained crops in the genebank of IPK Gatersleben. Data were recorded to compare various scenarios of the main strategies field maintenance and cryopreservation. A spreadsheet tool was developed to be used for cost assessment and for drawing conclusions concerning the most effective way of maintenance. Field culture is cheaper in the short term, whereas after a break-even point cryopreservation becomes the more efficient storage method in the long term. This break-even point depends on the particular scenario, which is determined by various factors such as field and in vitro multiplication rates of various genotypes, presence of bulbils in a part of the genepool, the sample size of the accessions as well as the number of stored accessions in cryopreservation. The comparative discussion is exemplified for a 1-year field rotation versus cryopreservation using either in vitro plantlets or a combination of bulbils and unripe inflorescence bases as organ sources. For the more expensive use of in vitro plants cryopreservation becomes less costly than field culture only after 13 years, whereas this is the case already after 8–9 years when using a combination of bulbils in winter and inflorescence bases in summer.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s10722-012-9888-5</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0925-9864 |
ispartof | Genetic resources and crop evolution, 2013-03, Vol.60 (3), p.913-926 |
issn | 0925-9864 1573-5109 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1427001346 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Agricultural economics Agriculture Allium sativum Biomedical and Life Sciences Conservation crops Cryopreservation Culture Data collection Garlic Genetic resources genotype Genotypes Germplasm Life Sciences Maintenance Multiplication plant collections plant genetic resources Plant Genetics and Genomics Plant Physiology Plant resources Plant Sciences Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography Plantlets Research Article Spreadsheets summer winter |
title | Comparing costs for different conservation strategies of garlic (Allium sativum L.) germplasm in genebanks |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T10%3A25%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20costs%20for%20different%20conservation%20strategies%20of%20garlic%20(Allium%20sativum%20L.)%20germplasm%20in%20genebanks&rft.jtitle=Genetic%20resources%20and%20crop%20evolution&rft.au=Keller,%20E.%20R.%20Joachim&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=913&rft.epage=926&rft.pages=913-926&rft.issn=0925-9864&rft.eissn=1573-5109&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10722-012-9888-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1427001346%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259894063&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |