Comparing costs for different conservation strategies of garlic (Allium sativum L.) germplasm in genebanks

The maintenance of plant genetic resources in living plant collections (genebanks) causes costs due to employment of staff, usage of buildings, equipment and consumables. Since this is especially challenging in vegetatively propagated material, studies were performed for the case of garlic, which is...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Genetic resources and crop evolution 2013-03, Vol.60 (3), p.913-926
Hauptverfasser: Keller, E. R. Joachim, Zanke, Christine D, Senula, Angelika, Breuing, Andreas, Hardeweg, Bernd, Winkelmann, Traud
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 926
container_issue 3
container_start_page 913
container_title Genetic resources and crop evolution
container_volume 60
creator Keller, E. R. Joachim
Zanke, Christine D
Senula, Angelika
Breuing, Andreas
Hardeweg, Bernd
Winkelmann, Traud
description The maintenance of plant genetic resources in living plant collections (genebanks) causes costs due to employment of staff, usage of buildings, equipment and consumables. Since this is especially challenging in vegetatively propagated material, studies were performed for the case of garlic, which is one of the major vegetatively maintained crops in the genebank of IPK Gatersleben. Data were recorded to compare various scenarios of the main strategies field maintenance and cryopreservation. A spreadsheet tool was developed to be used for cost assessment and for drawing conclusions concerning the most effective way of maintenance. Field culture is cheaper in the short term, whereas after a break-even point cryopreservation becomes the more efficient storage method in the long term. This break-even point depends on the particular scenario, which is determined by various factors such as field and in vitro multiplication rates of various genotypes, presence of bulbils in a part of the genepool, the sample size of the accessions as well as the number of stored accessions in cryopreservation. The comparative discussion is exemplified for a 1-year field rotation versus cryopreservation using either in vitro plantlets or a combination of bulbils and unripe inflorescence bases as organ sources. For the more expensive use of in vitro plants cryopreservation becomes less costly than field culture only after 13 years, whereas this is the case already after 8–9 years when using a combination of bulbils in winter and inflorescence bases in summer.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10722-012-9888-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1427001346</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1427001346</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-a2e9e09c6cdf4832e7968870d6dd1de305ca01a7c62ecf3bd1b190595aa5dbcb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMoOK7-AE8GvKyHXivpfHSOy-AXDHjQPYd0Ot1k7E7aVM-C_94MLQgePBVVed6ieELIawZ3DEC_Rwaa8wYYb0zXdY18Qg5M6raRDMxTcgDDZX1R4jl5gXgGAKNVdyDnY15WV2KaqM-4IR1zoUMcx1BC2uosYSiPbos5UdyK28IUA9I80smVOXp6ez_P8bJQrMxjrae7d3QKZVlnhwuNqTYp9C79wJfk2ehmDK_-1Bvy8PHD9-Pn5vT105fj_anxgqmtcTyYAMYrP4yia3nQRnWdhkENAxtCC9I7YE57xYMf235gPTMgjXRODr3v2xtyu-9dS_55CbjZJaIP8-xSyBe0THANwFqhKvr2H_ScLyXV6yzn0nRGgGorxXbKl4xYwmjXEhdXflkG9mrf7vZttW-v9q2sGb5ncL3KDeXv5v-F3uyh0WXrphLRPnzjwET9LqElE-1vCZKRzA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259894063</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing costs for different conservation strategies of garlic (Allium sativum L.) germplasm in genebanks</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Keller, E. R. Joachim ; Zanke, Christine D ; Senula, Angelika ; Breuing, Andreas ; Hardeweg, Bernd ; Winkelmann, Traud</creator><creatorcontrib>Keller, E. R. Joachim ; Zanke, Christine D ; Senula, Angelika ; Breuing, Andreas ; Hardeweg, Bernd ; Winkelmann, Traud</creatorcontrib><description>The maintenance of plant genetic resources in living plant collections (genebanks) causes costs due to employment of staff, usage of buildings, equipment and consumables. Since this is especially challenging in vegetatively propagated material, studies were performed for the case of garlic, which is one of the major vegetatively maintained crops in the genebank of IPK Gatersleben. Data were recorded to compare various scenarios of the main strategies field maintenance and cryopreservation. A spreadsheet tool was developed to be used for cost assessment and for drawing conclusions concerning the most effective way of maintenance. Field culture is cheaper in the short term, whereas after a break-even point cryopreservation becomes the more efficient storage method in the long term. This break-even point depends on the particular scenario, which is determined by various factors such as field and in vitro multiplication rates of various genotypes, presence of bulbils in a part of the genepool, the sample size of the accessions as well as the number of stored accessions in cryopreservation. The comparative discussion is exemplified for a 1-year field rotation versus cryopreservation using either in vitro plantlets or a combination of bulbils and unripe inflorescence bases as organ sources. For the more expensive use of in vitro plants cryopreservation becomes less costly than field culture only after 13 years, whereas this is the case already after 8–9 years when using a combination of bulbils in winter and inflorescence bases in summer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-9864</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5109</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10722-012-9888-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Agriculture ; Allium sativum ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Conservation ; crops ; Cryopreservation ; Culture ; Data collection ; Garlic ; Genetic resources ; genotype ; Genotypes ; Germplasm ; Life Sciences ; Maintenance ; Multiplication ; plant collections ; plant genetic resources ; Plant Genetics and Genomics ; Plant Physiology ; Plant resources ; Plant Sciences ; Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography ; Plantlets ; Research Article ; Spreadsheets ; summer ; winter</subject><ispartof>Genetic resources and crop evolution, 2013-03, Vol.60 (3), p.913-926</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2012</rights><rights>Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution is a copyright of Springer, (2012). All Rights Reserved. © 2012. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-a2e9e09c6cdf4832e7968870d6dd1de305ca01a7c62ecf3bd1b190595aa5dbcb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-a2e9e09c6cdf4832e7968870d6dd1de305ca01a7c62ecf3bd1b190595aa5dbcb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10722-012-9888-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10722-012-9888-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keller, E. R. Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanke, Christine D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senula, Angelika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breuing, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardeweg, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkelmann, Traud</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing costs for different conservation strategies of garlic (Allium sativum L.) germplasm in genebanks</title><title>Genetic resources and crop evolution</title><addtitle>Genet Resour Crop Evol</addtitle><description>The maintenance of plant genetic resources in living plant collections (genebanks) causes costs due to employment of staff, usage of buildings, equipment and consumables. Since this is especially challenging in vegetatively propagated material, studies were performed for the case of garlic, which is one of the major vegetatively maintained crops in the genebank of IPK Gatersleben. Data were recorded to compare various scenarios of the main strategies field maintenance and cryopreservation. A spreadsheet tool was developed to be used for cost assessment and for drawing conclusions concerning the most effective way of maintenance. Field culture is cheaper in the short term, whereas after a break-even point cryopreservation becomes the more efficient storage method in the long term. This break-even point depends on the particular scenario, which is determined by various factors such as field and in vitro multiplication rates of various genotypes, presence of bulbils in a part of the genepool, the sample size of the accessions as well as the number of stored accessions in cryopreservation. The comparative discussion is exemplified for a 1-year field rotation versus cryopreservation using either in vitro plantlets or a combination of bulbils and unripe inflorescence bases as organ sources. For the more expensive use of in vitro plants cryopreservation becomes less costly than field culture only after 13 years, whereas this is the case already after 8–9 years when using a combination of bulbils in winter and inflorescence bases in summer.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Allium sativum</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>crops</subject><subject>Cryopreservation</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Garlic</subject><subject>Genetic resources</subject><subject>genotype</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Germplasm</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Maintenance</subject><subject>Multiplication</subject><subject>plant collections</subject><subject>plant genetic resources</subject><subject>Plant Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Plant resources</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</subject><subject>Plantlets</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Spreadsheets</subject><subject>summer</subject><subject>winter</subject><issn>0925-9864</issn><issn>1573-5109</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMoOK7-AE8GvKyHXivpfHSOy-AXDHjQPYd0Ot1k7E7aVM-C_94MLQgePBVVed6ieELIawZ3DEC_Rwaa8wYYb0zXdY18Qg5M6raRDMxTcgDDZX1R4jl5gXgGAKNVdyDnY15WV2KaqM-4IR1zoUMcx1BC2uosYSiPbos5UdyK28IUA9I80smVOXp6ez_P8bJQrMxjrae7d3QKZVlnhwuNqTYp9C79wJfk2ehmDK_-1Bvy8PHD9-Pn5vT105fj_anxgqmtcTyYAMYrP4yia3nQRnWdhkENAxtCC9I7YE57xYMf235gPTMgjXRODr3v2xtyu-9dS_55CbjZJaIP8-xSyBe0THANwFqhKvr2H_ScLyXV6yzn0nRGgGorxXbKl4xYwmjXEhdXflkG9mrf7vZttW-v9q2sGb5ncL3KDeXv5v-F3uyh0WXrphLRPnzjwET9LqElE-1vCZKRzA</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Keller, E. R. Joachim</creator><creator>Zanke, Christine D</creator><creator>Senula, Angelika</creator><creator>Breuing, Andreas</creator><creator>Hardeweg, Bernd</creator><creator>Winkelmann, Traud</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Comparing costs for different conservation strategies of garlic (Allium sativum L.) germplasm in genebanks</title><author>Keller, E. R. Joachim ; Zanke, Christine D ; Senula, Angelika ; Breuing, Andreas ; Hardeweg, Bernd ; Winkelmann, Traud</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-a2e9e09c6cdf4832e7968870d6dd1de305ca01a7c62ecf3bd1b190595aa5dbcb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Allium sativum</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>crops</topic><topic>Cryopreservation</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Garlic</topic><topic>Genetic resources</topic><topic>genotype</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Germplasm</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Maintenance</topic><topic>Multiplication</topic><topic>plant collections</topic><topic>plant genetic resources</topic><topic>Plant Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Plant resources</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</topic><topic>Plantlets</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Spreadsheets</topic><topic>summer</topic><topic>winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keller, E. R. Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanke, Christine D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senula, Angelika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breuing, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardeweg, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkelmann, Traud</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Genetic resources and crop evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keller, E. R. Joachim</au><au>Zanke, Christine D</au><au>Senula, Angelika</au><au>Breuing, Andreas</au><au>Hardeweg, Bernd</au><au>Winkelmann, Traud</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing costs for different conservation strategies of garlic (Allium sativum L.) germplasm in genebanks</atitle><jtitle>Genetic resources and crop evolution</jtitle><stitle>Genet Resour Crop Evol</stitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>913</spage><epage>926</epage><pages>913-926</pages><issn>0925-9864</issn><eissn>1573-5109</eissn><abstract>The maintenance of plant genetic resources in living plant collections (genebanks) causes costs due to employment of staff, usage of buildings, equipment and consumables. Since this is especially challenging in vegetatively propagated material, studies were performed for the case of garlic, which is one of the major vegetatively maintained crops in the genebank of IPK Gatersleben. Data were recorded to compare various scenarios of the main strategies field maintenance and cryopreservation. A spreadsheet tool was developed to be used for cost assessment and for drawing conclusions concerning the most effective way of maintenance. Field culture is cheaper in the short term, whereas after a break-even point cryopreservation becomes the more efficient storage method in the long term. This break-even point depends on the particular scenario, which is determined by various factors such as field and in vitro multiplication rates of various genotypes, presence of bulbils in a part of the genepool, the sample size of the accessions as well as the number of stored accessions in cryopreservation. The comparative discussion is exemplified for a 1-year field rotation versus cryopreservation using either in vitro plantlets or a combination of bulbils and unripe inflorescence bases as organ sources. For the more expensive use of in vitro plants cryopreservation becomes less costly than field culture only after 13 years, whereas this is the case already after 8–9 years when using a combination of bulbils in winter and inflorescence bases in summer.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s10722-012-9888-5</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0925-9864
ispartof Genetic resources and crop evolution, 2013-03, Vol.60 (3), p.913-926
issn 0925-9864
1573-5109
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1427001346
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Agricultural economics
Agriculture
Allium sativum
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Conservation
crops
Cryopreservation
Culture
Data collection
Garlic
Genetic resources
genotype
Genotypes
Germplasm
Life Sciences
Maintenance
Multiplication
plant collections
plant genetic resources
Plant Genetics and Genomics
Plant Physiology
Plant resources
Plant Sciences
Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography
Plantlets
Research Article
Spreadsheets
summer
winter
title Comparing costs for different conservation strategies of garlic (Allium sativum L.) germplasm in genebanks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T10%3A25%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20costs%20for%20different%20conservation%20strategies%20of%20garlic%20(Allium%20sativum%20L.)%20germplasm%20in%20genebanks&rft.jtitle=Genetic%20resources%20and%20crop%20evolution&rft.au=Keller,%20E.%20R.%20Joachim&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=913&rft.epage=926&rft.pages=913-926&rft.issn=0925-9864&rft.eissn=1573-5109&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10722-012-9888-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1427001346%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259894063&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true