When compensation fails: Attentional deficits in healthy ageing caused by visual distraction
Age related changes in frontal lobe functions are often related to attentional deficits that lead to increased distractibility by irrelevant stimuli. However, attentional functions have been reported not to decline in general with increasing age but simply be too slow to deal properly with distracti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neuropsychologia 2012-12, Vol.50 (14), p.3185-3192 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3192 |
---|---|
container_issue | 14 |
container_start_page | 3185 |
container_title | Neuropsychologia |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Wascher, Edmund Schneider, Daniel Hoffmann, Sven Beste, Christian Sänger, Jessica |
description | Age related changes in frontal lobe functions are often related to attentional deficits that lead to increased distractibility by irrelevant stimuli. However, attentional functions have been reported not to decline in general with increasing age but simply be too slow to deal properly with distraction in time. Therefore older people might be able to compensate for distraction quite efficiently with sufficient processing time. Compensation, however, might fail when early perceptual processing is affected by distraction already. In the present study, a change in luminance or in orientation had to be detected in a sequence of two visual frames. Older participants showed reduced performance only when luminance and orientation changes were presented simultaneously at separate locations (perceptual conflict condition). Sensory ERP components were not overall altered with increasing age. Only in conflicting trials, a strong bias towards physically more salient information was observed. Additionally, older adults showed markedly delayed ERP-correlates of fronto-central control mechanisms in the conflict condition. The data indicate that processing deceleration cannot compensate for perceptual conflicts induced by mis-weighting of incoming information.
► Identifying very specific deficits in information processing with increasing age. ► Assigning these deficits to distinct ERP components assigned to stimulus weighting and executive control. ► Providing a concept why compensation of low level distraction fails with increasing age. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.033 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1426998990</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0028393212004058</els_id><sourcerecordid>1426998990</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-38d9dcbca24319e37c47fd9106f6c48a2c48fab46347d4ba3cf610b4e2a747153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtrGzEUhUVpqF0nf6FoVbqZqV7zUBeBEJImEMgmoZuC0Eh3bJmx5EiagP99ZnCaRTbp5l64fOdcOAeh75SUlND657b0MMawTwezCUNYO10yQllJZEk4_4SWtG14wSsqPqMlIawtuORsgb6mtCWEiIq1X9CCcSIEa-ol-vtnAx6bsNuDTzq74HGv3ZB-4Yucwc8HPWALvTMuJ-w83oAe8uaA9RqcX2OjxwQWdwf87NI4sy7lqM2sPEUnvR4SnL3uFXq8vnq4vCnu7n_fXl7cFUawKhe8tdKazmgmOJXAGyOa3kpK6r42otVsGr3uRM1FY0WnuelrSjoBTDeioRVfoR9H330MTyOkrHYuGRgG7SGMSVHBailbKcnHKONNRafgxISeH1ETQ0oRerWPbqfjQVGi5jLUVr0vQ81lKCLVVMZk8O3119jtwL7J_6U_ATdHAKZwnh1ElYwDb8C6CCYrG9z__noBXGym7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1237510024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When compensation fails: Attentional deficits in healthy ageing caused by visual distraction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Wascher, Edmund ; Schneider, Daniel ; Hoffmann, Sven ; Beste, Christian ; Sänger, Jessica</creator><creatorcontrib>Wascher, Edmund ; Schneider, Daniel ; Hoffmann, Sven ; Beste, Christian ; Sänger, Jessica</creatorcontrib><description>Age related changes in frontal lobe functions are often related to attentional deficits that lead to increased distractibility by irrelevant stimuli. However, attentional functions have been reported not to decline in general with increasing age but simply be too slow to deal properly with distraction in time. Therefore older people might be able to compensate for distraction quite efficiently with sufficient processing time. Compensation, however, might fail when early perceptual processing is affected by distraction already. In the present study, a change in luminance or in orientation had to be detected in a sequence of two visual frames. Older participants showed reduced performance only when luminance and orientation changes were presented simultaneously at separate locations (perceptual conflict condition). Sensory ERP components were not overall altered with increasing age. Only in conflicting trials, a strong bias towards physically more salient information was observed. Additionally, older adults showed markedly delayed ERP-correlates of fronto-central control mechanisms in the conflict condition. The data indicate that processing deceleration cannot compensate for perceptual conflicts induced by mis-weighting of incoming information.
► Identifying very specific deficits in information processing with increasing age. ► Assigning these deficits to distinct ERP components assigned to stimulus weighting and executive control. ► Providing a concept why compensation of low level distraction fails with increasing age.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-3932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3514</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.033</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23044276</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Aged ; Aging ; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - etiology ; Cognitive control ; Competitive processing ; Conflicting information ; ERP ; Female ; Functional Laterality ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Photic Stimulation ; Reaction Time ; Vision Disorders - complications ; Visual Perception - physiology</subject><ispartof>Neuropsychologia, 2012-12, Vol.50 (14), p.3185-3192</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-38d9dcbca24319e37c47fd9106f6c48a2c48fab46347d4ba3cf610b4e2a747153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-38d9dcbca24319e37c47fd9106f6c48a2c48fab46347d4ba3cf610b4e2a747153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393212004058$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23044276$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wascher, Edmund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beste, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sänger, Jessica</creatorcontrib><title>When compensation fails: Attentional deficits in healthy ageing caused by visual distraction</title><title>Neuropsychologia</title><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><description>Age related changes in frontal lobe functions are often related to attentional deficits that lead to increased distractibility by irrelevant stimuli. However, attentional functions have been reported not to decline in general with increasing age but simply be too slow to deal properly with distraction in time. Therefore older people might be able to compensate for distraction quite efficiently with sufficient processing time. Compensation, however, might fail when early perceptual processing is affected by distraction already. In the present study, a change in luminance or in orientation had to be detected in a sequence of two visual frames. Older participants showed reduced performance only when luminance and orientation changes were presented simultaneously at separate locations (perceptual conflict condition). Sensory ERP components were not overall altered with increasing age. Only in conflicting trials, a strong bias towards physically more salient information was observed. Additionally, older adults showed markedly delayed ERP-correlates of fronto-central control mechanisms in the conflict condition. The data indicate that processing deceleration cannot compensate for perceptual conflicts induced by mis-weighting of incoming information.
► Identifying very specific deficits in information processing with increasing age. ► Assigning these deficits to distinct ERP components assigned to stimulus weighting and executive control. ► Providing a concept why compensation of low level distraction fails with increasing age.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - etiology</subject><subject>Cognitive control</subject><subject>Competitive processing</subject><subject>Conflicting information</subject><subject>ERP</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Functional Laterality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Vision Disorders - complications</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><issn>0028-3932</issn><issn>1873-3514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtrGzEUhUVpqF0nf6FoVbqZqV7zUBeBEJImEMgmoZuC0Eh3bJmx5EiagP99ZnCaRTbp5l64fOdcOAeh75SUlND657b0MMawTwezCUNYO10yQllJZEk4_4SWtG14wSsqPqMlIawtuORsgb6mtCWEiIq1X9CCcSIEa-ol-vtnAx6bsNuDTzq74HGv3ZB-4Yucwc8HPWALvTMuJ-w83oAe8uaA9RqcX2OjxwQWdwf87NI4sy7lqM2sPEUnvR4SnL3uFXq8vnq4vCnu7n_fXl7cFUawKhe8tdKazmgmOJXAGyOa3kpK6r42otVsGr3uRM1FY0WnuelrSjoBTDeioRVfoR9H330MTyOkrHYuGRgG7SGMSVHBailbKcnHKONNRafgxISeH1ETQ0oRerWPbqfjQVGi5jLUVr0vQ81lKCLVVMZk8O3119jtwL7J_6U_ATdHAKZwnh1ElYwDb8C6CCYrG9z__noBXGym7w</recordid><startdate>201212</startdate><enddate>201212</enddate><creator>Wascher, Edmund</creator><creator>Schneider, Daniel</creator><creator>Hoffmann, Sven</creator><creator>Beste, Christian</creator><creator>Sänger, Jessica</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201212</creationdate><title>When compensation fails: Attentional deficits in healthy ageing caused by visual distraction</title><author>Wascher, Edmund ; Schneider, Daniel ; Hoffmann, Sven ; Beste, Christian ; Sänger, Jessica</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-38d9dcbca24319e37c47fd9106f6c48a2c48fab46347d4ba3cf610b4e2a747153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - etiology</topic><topic>Cognitive control</topic><topic>Competitive processing</topic><topic>Conflicting information</topic><topic>ERP</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Functional Laterality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Vision Disorders - complications</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wascher, Edmund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beste, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sänger, Jessica</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wascher, Edmund</au><au>Schneider, Daniel</au><au>Hoffmann, Sven</au><au>Beste, Christian</au><au>Sänger, Jessica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When compensation fails: Attentional deficits in healthy ageing caused by visual distraction</atitle><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><date>2012-12</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>3185</spage><epage>3192</epage><pages>3185-3192</pages><issn>0028-3932</issn><eissn>1873-3514</eissn><abstract>Age related changes in frontal lobe functions are often related to attentional deficits that lead to increased distractibility by irrelevant stimuli. However, attentional functions have been reported not to decline in general with increasing age but simply be too slow to deal properly with distraction in time. Therefore older people might be able to compensate for distraction quite efficiently with sufficient processing time. Compensation, however, might fail when early perceptual processing is affected by distraction already. In the present study, a change in luminance or in orientation had to be detected in a sequence of two visual frames. Older participants showed reduced performance only when luminance and orientation changes were presented simultaneously at separate locations (perceptual conflict condition). Sensory ERP components were not overall altered with increasing age. Only in conflicting trials, a strong bias towards physically more salient information was observed. Additionally, older adults showed markedly delayed ERP-correlates of fronto-central control mechanisms in the conflict condition. The data indicate that processing deceleration cannot compensate for perceptual conflicts induced by mis-weighting of incoming information.
► Identifying very specific deficits in information processing with increasing age. ► Assigning these deficits to distinct ERP components assigned to stimulus weighting and executive control. ► Providing a concept why compensation of low level distraction fails with increasing age.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23044276</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.033</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-3932 |
ispartof | Neuropsychologia, 2012-12, Vol.50 (14), p.3185-3192 |
issn | 0028-3932 1873-3514 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1426998990 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Age Factors Aged Aging Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - etiology Cognitive control Competitive processing Conflicting information ERP Female Functional Laterality Humans Male Middle Aged Pattern Recognition, Visual Photic Stimulation Reaction Time Vision Disorders - complications Visual Perception - physiology |
title | When compensation fails: Attentional deficits in healthy ageing caused by visual distraction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T19%3A50%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20compensation%20fails:%20Attentional%20deficits%20in%20healthy%20ageing%20caused%20by%20visual%20distraction&rft.jtitle=Neuropsychologia&rft.au=Wascher,%20Edmund&rft.date=2012-12&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=3185&rft.epage=3192&rft.pages=3185-3192&rft.issn=0028-3932&rft.eissn=1873-3514&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1426998990%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1237510024&rft_id=info:pmid/23044276&rft_els_id=S0028393212004058&rfr_iscdi=true |