Routine duodenal biopsy to screen for coeliac disease is not effective

Routine duodenal biopsies during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) have been suggested to be useful in detecting coeliac disease (CD). However results from previous studies are not conclusive. The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic yield and cost-effectiveness of routine duodena...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Netherlands journal of medicine 2013-07, Vol.71 (6), p.308-312
Hauptverfasser: Burger, J P W, Meijer, J W R, Wahab, P J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 312
container_issue 6
container_start_page 308
container_title Netherlands journal of medicine
container_volume 71
creator Burger, J P W
Meijer, J W R
Wahab, P J
description Routine duodenal biopsies during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) have been suggested to be useful in detecting coeliac disease (CD). However results from previous studies are not conclusive. The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic yield and cost-effectiveness of routine duodenal biopsy during UGE. In this retrospective single-centre study, we studied 6442 patients undergoing first-time UGE at the Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands, from January 2009 to December 2010. All UGE reports were analysed for indication, duodenal intubation, and endoscopic aspect of duodenal mucosa. Endomysium and tissue transglutaminase antibody titre, when present, were scored as positive or negative. CD was defined as Marsh 3a or higher. Costs of duodenal biopsies and pathology analysis were calculated. Comparisons were done with T-tests for continuous data and Chi-square tests for categorical data. Forty-one patients had newly diagnosed CD; 34 of these 41 patients had definite indications for biopsy prior to UGE, e.g. positive serology or symptoms. Thus, routine duodenal biopsies identified seven patients as having CD, who otherwise would not have been biopsied. The number needed to biopsy was therefore 577, spending more than v 30,000 per case. We do not recommend routine duodenal biopsy to screen for coeliac disease because of the high number needed to biopsy as well as high costs.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1426510542</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1426510542</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-58e77ed823f6c301da08cd4714224987b0b79472d332d18a062301782bb6bf653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1z81KxDAUhuEgiDOO3oJk6aaQnDQ_XcrgqDAwILou-TmBSNvUphXm7i04rr7NwwvfFdlyo6FqmOIbclvKF2NM6UbekA2IRirBYUsO73mZ04A0LDngYDvqUh7Lmc6ZFj8hDjTmifqMXbKehlTQFqSp0CHPFGNEP6cfvCPX0XYF7y-7I5-H54_9a3U8vbztn47VCJzPlTSoNQYDIiovGA-WGR9qzWuAujHaMaebWkMQAgI3lilYlTbgnHJRSbEjj3_dccrfC5a57VPx2HV2wLyUdg0pyZmsYaUPF7q4HkM7Tqm307n9_y5-AQ-fUvY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1426510542</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Routine duodenal biopsy to screen for coeliac disease is not effective</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Burger, J P W ; Meijer, J W R ; Wahab, P J</creator><creatorcontrib>Burger, J P W ; Meijer, J W R ; Wahab, P J</creatorcontrib><description>Routine duodenal biopsies during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) have been suggested to be useful in detecting coeliac disease (CD). However results from previous studies are not conclusive. The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic yield and cost-effectiveness of routine duodenal biopsy during UGE. In this retrospective single-centre study, we studied 6442 patients undergoing first-time UGE at the Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands, from January 2009 to December 2010. All UGE reports were analysed for indication, duodenal intubation, and endoscopic aspect of duodenal mucosa. Endomysium and tissue transglutaminase antibody titre, when present, were scored as positive or negative. CD was defined as Marsh 3a or higher. Costs of duodenal biopsies and pathology analysis were calculated. Comparisons were done with T-tests for continuous data and Chi-square tests for categorical data. Forty-one patients had newly diagnosed CD; 34 of these 41 patients had definite indications for biopsy prior to UGE, e.g. positive serology or symptoms. Thus, routine duodenal biopsies identified seven patients as having CD, who otherwise would not have been biopsied. The number needed to biopsy was therefore 577, spending more than v 30,000 per case. We do not recommend routine duodenal biopsy to screen for coeliac disease because of the high number needed to biopsy as well as high costs.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9061</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23956312</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biopsy - economics ; Celiac Disease - diagnosis ; Celiac Disease - pathology ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine - economics ; Duodenum - pathology ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Netherlands journal of medicine, 2013-07, Vol.71 (6), p.308-312</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23956312$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burger, J P W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijer, J W R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wahab, P J</creatorcontrib><title>Routine duodenal biopsy to screen for coeliac disease is not effective</title><title>Netherlands journal of medicine</title><addtitle>Neth J Med</addtitle><description>Routine duodenal biopsies during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) have been suggested to be useful in detecting coeliac disease (CD). However results from previous studies are not conclusive. The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic yield and cost-effectiveness of routine duodenal biopsy during UGE. In this retrospective single-centre study, we studied 6442 patients undergoing first-time UGE at the Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands, from January 2009 to December 2010. All UGE reports were analysed for indication, duodenal intubation, and endoscopic aspect of duodenal mucosa. Endomysium and tissue transglutaminase antibody titre, when present, were scored as positive or negative. CD was defined as Marsh 3a or higher. Costs of duodenal biopsies and pathology analysis were calculated. Comparisons were done with T-tests for continuous data and Chi-square tests for categorical data. Forty-one patients had newly diagnosed CD; 34 of these 41 patients had definite indications for biopsy prior to UGE, e.g. positive serology or symptoms. Thus, routine duodenal biopsies identified seven patients as having CD, who otherwise would not have been biopsied. The number needed to biopsy was therefore 577, spending more than v 30,000 per case. We do not recommend routine duodenal biopsy to screen for coeliac disease because of the high number needed to biopsy as well as high costs.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biopsy - economics</subject><subject>Celiac Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Celiac Disease - pathology</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Diagnostic Tests, Routine - economics</subject><subject>Duodenum - pathology</subject><subject>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>1872-9061</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1z81KxDAUhuEgiDOO3oJk6aaQnDQ_XcrgqDAwILou-TmBSNvUphXm7i04rr7NwwvfFdlyo6FqmOIbclvKF2NM6UbekA2IRirBYUsO73mZ04A0LDngYDvqUh7Lmc6ZFj8hDjTmifqMXbKehlTQFqSp0CHPFGNEP6cfvCPX0XYF7y-7I5-H54_9a3U8vbztn47VCJzPlTSoNQYDIiovGA-WGR9qzWuAujHaMaebWkMQAgI3lilYlTbgnHJRSbEjj3_dccrfC5a57VPx2HV2wLyUdg0pyZmsYaUPF7q4HkM7Tqm307n9_y5-AQ-fUvY</recordid><startdate>201307</startdate><enddate>201307</enddate><creator>Burger, J P W</creator><creator>Meijer, J W R</creator><creator>Wahab, P J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201307</creationdate><title>Routine duodenal biopsy to screen for coeliac disease is not effective</title><author>Burger, J P W ; Meijer, J W R ; Wahab, P J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-58e77ed823f6c301da08cd4714224987b0b79472d332d18a062301782bb6bf653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biopsy - economics</topic><topic>Celiac Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Celiac Disease - pathology</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Diagnostic Tests, Routine - economics</topic><topic>Duodenum - pathology</topic><topic>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burger, J P W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijer, J W R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wahab, P J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Netherlands journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burger, J P W</au><au>Meijer, J W R</au><au>Wahab, P J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Routine duodenal biopsy to screen for coeliac disease is not effective</atitle><jtitle>Netherlands journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Neth J Med</addtitle><date>2013-07</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>308</spage><epage>312</epage><pages>308-312</pages><eissn>1872-9061</eissn><abstract>Routine duodenal biopsies during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) have been suggested to be useful in detecting coeliac disease (CD). However results from previous studies are not conclusive. The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic yield and cost-effectiveness of routine duodenal biopsy during UGE. In this retrospective single-centre study, we studied 6442 patients undergoing first-time UGE at the Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands, from January 2009 to December 2010. All UGE reports were analysed for indication, duodenal intubation, and endoscopic aspect of duodenal mucosa. Endomysium and tissue transglutaminase antibody titre, when present, were scored as positive or negative. CD was defined as Marsh 3a or higher. Costs of duodenal biopsies and pathology analysis were calculated. Comparisons were done with T-tests for continuous data and Chi-square tests for categorical data. Forty-one patients had newly diagnosed CD; 34 of these 41 patients had definite indications for biopsy prior to UGE, e.g. positive serology or symptoms. Thus, routine duodenal biopsies identified seven patients as having CD, who otherwise would not have been biopsied. The number needed to biopsy was therefore 577, spending more than v 30,000 per case. We do not recommend routine duodenal biopsy to screen for coeliac disease because of the high number needed to biopsy as well as high costs.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pmid>23956312</pmid><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1872-9061
ispartof Netherlands journal of medicine, 2013-07, Vol.71 (6), p.308-312
issn 1872-9061
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1426510542
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Biopsy - economics
Celiac Disease - diagnosis
Celiac Disease - pathology
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Diagnostic Tests, Routine - economics
Duodenum - pathology
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
title Routine duodenal biopsy to screen for coeliac disease is not effective
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T19%3A53%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Routine%20duodenal%20biopsy%20to%20screen%20for%20coeliac%20disease%20is%20not%20effective&rft.jtitle=Netherlands%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.au=Burger,%20J%20P%20W&rft.date=2013-07&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=308&rft.epage=312&rft.pages=308-312&rft.eissn=1872-9061&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1426510542%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1426510542&rft_id=info:pmid/23956312&rfr_iscdi=true