Predator‐Prey Relationships in an Estuarine Littoral Copepod Community

Seasonal divergences of planktonic copepod communities in a marine eelgrass bed and adjacent unvegetated channel habitats were associated with increases in predator abundance in the littoral habitat. During midsummer, when planktivorous silversides, Menidia menidia, were abundant in the eelgrass bed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecology (Durham) 1985-02, Vol.66 (1), p.21-29
1. Verfasser: Fulton, Rolland S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 29
container_issue 1
container_start_page 21
container_title Ecology (Durham)
container_volume 66
creator Fulton, Rolland S.
description Seasonal divergences of planktonic copepod communities in a marine eelgrass bed and adjacent unvegetated channel habitats were associated with increases in predator abundance in the littoral habitat. During midsummer, when planktivorous silversides, Menidia menidia, were abundant in the eelgrass bed, pelagic copepod densities were significantly reduced in the eelgrass bed, relative to channel abundances. Differences declined overnight, when fish were not feeding, and were reestablished after dawn. In late winter, coincident with the arrival of large numbers of postlarval fish in the eelgrass bed, there was selective reduction of juvenile Centropages spp. in the eelgrass bed, relative to channel abundances. Field and laboratory experiments indicate that these differences were due to intense predation by planktivorous fish. However, the littoral copepod Pseudodiaptomus coronatus appeared unaffected by the intense predation in the eelgrass bed. Laboratory experiments demonstrated that its epibenthic habit and cryptic coloration allow P. coronatus to utilize refuges in the littoral habitat, and that prey selection by two fish species differed due to differences in foraging behavior.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/1941303
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14211569</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1941303</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1941303</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4061-d860f4d1e2f2e04cb556ca6f6899be19cd9a384829df1f0422aa00e7e760d08e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90d9qFDEUBvAgCq61-AgOVOrV2HMymUxyKcvWCguW_rnoVTidSTTL7GSazFD2zkfoM_okRnZREDQ3Jxc_vhy-MPYG4QOvoDlDLbCC6hlboK50qbGB52wBgLzUslYv2auUNpAPCrVgF5fRdjSF-OP7U77uiivb0-TDkL75MRV-KGgoVmmaKfrBFms_ZUt9sQyjHUOX53Y7D37avWYvHPXJHh_mEbs9X90sL8r1l0-flx_XZStAYtkpCU50aLnjFkR7X9eyJemk0vreom47TZUSiuvOoQPBORGAbWwjoQNlqyN2us8dY3iYbZrM1qfW9j0NNszJoOCItdQZnvwFN2GOQ97NINdScCG4yur9XrUxpBStM2P0W4o7g2B-9WkOfWb57pBHqaXeRRpan35zjVI10GSGe_boe7v7V5pZLe9Qq1pK5PgnepNyu__Z4O2eOQqGvsb8-u01B5T5L5scg9VPBDOWQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1296424428</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predator‐Prey Relationships in an Estuarine Littoral Copepod Community</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Fulton, Rolland S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fulton, Rolland S.</creatorcontrib><description>Seasonal divergences of planktonic copepod communities in a marine eelgrass bed and adjacent unvegetated channel habitats were associated with increases in predator abundance in the littoral habitat. During midsummer, when planktivorous silversides, Menidia menidia, were abundant in the eelgrass bed, pelagic copepod densities were significantly reduced in the eelgrass bed, relative to channel abundances. Differences declined overnight, when fish were not feeding, and were reestablished after dawn. In late winter, coincident with the arrival of large numbers of postlarval fish in the eelgrass bed, there was selective reduction of juvenile Centropages spp. in the eelgrass bed, relative to channel abundances. Field and laboratory experiments indicate that these differences were due to intense predation by planktivorous fish. However, the littoral copepod Pseudodiaptomus coronatus appeared unaffected by the intense predation in the eelgrass bed. Laboratory experiments demonstrated that its epibenthic habit and cryptic coloration allow P. coronatus to utilize refuges in the littoral habitat, and that prey selection by two fish species differed due to differences in foraging behavior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1941303</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECGYAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Aquatic habitats ; Biological and medical sciences ; Copepoda ; Demecology ; Fish ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Habitat selection ; Marine ecology ; Marine fishes ; Microcosms ; Predation ; Predators ; Synecology ; Zooplankton</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 1985-02, Vol.66 (1), p.21-29</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1985 The Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1985 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1985 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4061-d860f4d1e2f2e04cb556ca6f6899be19cd9a384829df1f0422aa00e7e760d08e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1941303$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1941303$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27846,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=9168707$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fulton, Rolland S.</creatorcontrib><title>Predator‐Prey Relationships in an Estuarine Littoral Copepod Community</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><description>Seasonal divergences of planktonic copepod communities in a marine eelgrass bed and adjacent unvegetated channel habitats were associated with increases in predator abundance in the littoral habitat. During midsummer, when planktivorous silversides, Menidia menidia, were abundant in the eelgrass bed, pelagic copepod densities were significantly reduced in the eelgrass bed, relative to channel abundances. Differences declined overnight, when fish were not feeding, and were reestablished after dawn. In late winter, coincident with the arrival of large numbers of postlarval fish in the eelgrass bed, there was selective reduction of juvenile Centropages spp. in the eelgrass bed, relative to channel abundances. Field and laboratory experiments indicate that these differences were due to intense predation by planktivorous fish. However, the littoral copepod Pseudodiaptomus coronatus appeared unaffected by the intense predation in the eelgrass bed. Laboratory experiments demonstrated that its epibenthic habit and cryptic coloration allow P. coronatus to utilize refuges in the littoral habitat, and that prey selection by two fish species differed due to differences in foraging behavior.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquatic habitats</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Copepoda</subject><subject>Demecology</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>Marine fishes</subject><subject>Microcosms</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Zooplankton</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp90d9qFDEUBvAgCq61-AgOVOrV2HMymUxyKcvWCguW_rnoVTidSTTL7GSazFD2zkfoM_okRnZREDQ3Jxc_vhy-MPYG4QOvoDlDLbCC6hlboK50qbGB52wBgLzUslYv2auUNpAPCrVgF5fRdjSF-OP7U77uiivb0-TDkL75MRV-KGgoVmmaKfrBFms_ZUt9sQyjHUOX53Y7D37avWYvHPXJHh_mEbs9X90sL8r1l0-flx_XZStAYtkpCU50aLnjFkR7X9eyJemk0vreom47TZUSiuvOoQPBORGAbWwjoQNlqyN2us8dY3iYbZrM1qfW9j0NNszJoOCItdQZnvwFN2GOQ97NINdScCG4yur9XrUxpBStM2P0W4o7g2B-9WkOfWb57pBHqaXeRRpan35zjVI10GSGe_boe7v7V5pZLe9Qq1pK5PgnepNyu__Z4O2eOQqGvsb8-u01B5T5L5scg9VPBDOWQw</recordid><startdate>198502</startdate><enddate>198502</enddate><creator>Fulton, Rolland S.</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><general>Duke University Press</general><general>Brooklyn Botanic Garden, etc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198502</creationdate><title>Predator‐Prey Relationships in an Estuarine Littoral Copepod Community</title><author>Fulton, Rolland S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4061-d860f4d1e2f2e04cb556ca6f6899be19cd9a384829df1f0422aa00e7e760d08e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquatic habitats</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Copepoda</topic><topic>Demecology</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>Marine fishes</topic><topic>Microcosms</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Zooplankton</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fulton, Rolland S.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fulton, Rolland S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predator‐Prey Relationships in an Estuarine Littoral Copepod Community</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><date>1985-02</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>21-29</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><coden>ECGYAQ</coden><abstract>Seasonal divergences of planktonic copepod communities in a marine eelgrass bed and adjacent unvegetated channel habitats were associated with increases in predator abundance in the littoral habitat. During midsummer, when planktivorous silversides, Menidia menidia, were abundant in the eelgrass bed, pelagic copepod densities were significantly reduced in the eelgrass bed, relative to channel abundances. Differences declined overnight, when fish were not feeding, and were reestablished after dawn. In late winter, coincident with the arrival of large numbers of postlarval fish in the eelgrass bed, there was selective reduction of juvenile Centropages spp. in the eelgrass bed, relative to channel abundances. Field and laboratory experiments indicate that these differences were due to intense predation by planktivorous fish. However, the littoral copepod Pseudodiaptomus coronatus appeared unaffected by the intense predation in the eelgrass bed. Laboratory experiments demonstrated that its epibenthic habit and cryptic coloration allow P. coronatus to utilize refuges in the littoral habitat, and that prey selection by two fish species differed due to differences in foraging behavior.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.2307/1941303</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-9658
ispartof Ecology (Durham), 1985-02, Vol.66 (1), p.21-29
issn 0012-9658
1939-9170
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14211569
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Aquatic habitats
Biological and medical sciences
Copepoda
Demecology
Fish
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Habitat selection
Marine ecology
Marine fishes
Microcosms
Predation
Predators
Synecology
Zooplankton
title Predator‐Prey Relationships in an Estuarine Littoral Copepod Community
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T16%3A46%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predator%E2%80%90Prey%20Relationships%20in%20an%20Estuarine%20Littoral%20Copepod%20Community&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Fulton,%20Rolland%20S.&rft.date=1985-02&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=21-29&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft.coden=ECGYAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1941303&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1941303%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1296424428&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1941303&rfr_iscdi=true