Anterior cervical discectomy plus intervertebral polyetheretherketone cage fusion over three and four levels without plating is safe and effective long-term

Abstract Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is an established treatment for single-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy, yet its stand-alone use for multi-level disease of the subaxial cervical spine remains controversial. We report a prospectively studied case series...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical neuroscience 2013-09, Vol.20 (9), p.1250-1255
Hauptverfasser: Pereira, Erlick A.C, Chari, Aswin, Hempenstall, Jonathan, Leach, John C.D, Chandran, Hari, Cadoux-Hudson, Tom A.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1255
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1250
container_title Journal of clinical neuroscience
container_volume 20
creator Pereira, Erlick A.C
Chari, Aswin
Hempenstall, Jonathan
Leach, John C.D
Chandran, Hari
Cadoux-Hudson, Tom A.D
description Abstract Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is an established treatment for single-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy, yet its stand-alone use for multi-level disease of the subaxial cervical spine remains controversial. We report a prospectively studied case series of 30 patients receiving polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage fusion over three and four cervical levels without anterior plating. Seven (23.3%) four-level procedures (all C3 to C7) were performed, the other 23 (76.7%) being three-level, with 19 (64.4%) at C4 to C7 and four (12.3%) at C3 to C6. Long-term follow-up of more than 2 years was available in 67% of patients. This cohort showed statistically significant improvements in visual analogue score for neck pain ( p = 0.0006), arm pain ( p = 0.0003) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association myelopathy score ( p = 0.002). Fused segment heights increased by 0.6–1.1%. Adjacent segment disease requiring ACDF at C3–4 was seen in 6.7% of patients (one after trauma) at a mean follow-up of 62 months. Same segment recurrence requiring posterior decompression with instrumented fusion was found in 10% of patients at a mean follow-up of 49 months, only one of whom had radiological evidence of cage subsidence. The results suggest the procedure is safe and effective with potentially less morbidity than anterior plating, shorter inpatient stays than posterior approaches, acceptable same segment recurrence and lower than predicted adjacent segment disease rates.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.10.028
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1420608607</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0967586813000416</els_id><sourcerecordid>1420608607</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-17fbbbbe6f6a81e3ad6c635fe50a47b1f5086a78d62dbab838d027efc37ac1ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhS0EokPhBVggL9lk8E_iZCSEVFVAK1ViAawtx7mecerYg-2kmnfhYXGYwoIFXtiS_d1z5XMuQq8p2VJCxbtxOwbtt4xQVi62hHVP0IY2nFVMNPwp2pCdaKumE90FepHSSAjZ1Zw8RxeMdztSU7pBP698hmhDxBriYrVyeLBJg85hOuGjmxO2K7FAzNDH8nwM7gT5APH3dg85eMBa7QGbOdngcSgszocIgJUfsAlzxA4WcAk_2HwIcy66Klu_xzbhpMyZA2NKV7sAdsHvq9JzeomeGeUSvHo8L9H3Tx-_Xd9Ud18-315f3VW6_CFXtDV9WSCMUB0FrgahBW8MNETVbU9NQzqh2m4QbOhV3_FuIKwFo3mrNAXgl-jtWfcYw48ZUpbT6oFzykOYk6Q1I6JokLag7IzqGFKKYOQx2knFk6RErqnIUa6pyDWV9a6kUorePOrP_QTD35I_MRTg_RkoJsFiIcqkLXgNg43FFDkE-3_9D_-Ua2f9GuY9nCCNJQFf_JNUJiaJ_LrOxToWlJeRqKngvwAgU7iU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1420608607</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anterior cervical discectomy plus intervertebral polyetheretherketone cage fusion over three and four levels without plating is safe and effective long-term</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Pereira, Erlick A.C ; Chari, Aswin ; Hempenstall, Jonathan ; Leach, John C.D ; Chandran, Hari ; Cadoux-Hudson, Tom A.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Erlick A.C ; Chari, Aswin ; Hempenstall, Jonathan ; Leach, John C.D ; Chandran, Hari ; Cadoux-Hudson, Tom A.D</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is an established treatment for single-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy, yet its stand-alone use for multi-level disease of the subaxial cervical spine remains controversial. We report a prospectively studied case series of 30 patients receiving polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage fusion over three and four cervical levels without anterior plating. Seven (23.3%) four-level procedures (all C3 to C7) were performed, the other 23 (76.7%) being three-level, with 19 (64.4%) at C4 to C7 and four (12.3%) at C3 to C6. Long-term follow-up of more than 2 years was available in 67% of patients. This cohort showed statistically significant improvements in visual analogue score for neck pain ( p = 0.0006), arm pain ( p = 0.0003) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association myelopathy score ( p = 0.002). Fused segment heights increased by 0.6–1.1%. Adjacent segment disease requiring ACDF at C3–4 was seen in 6.7% of patients (one after trauma) at a mean follow-up of 62 months. Same segment recurrence requiring posterior decompression with instrumented fusion was found in 10% of patients at a mean follow-up of 49 months, only one of whom had radiological evidence of cage subsidence. The results suggest the procedure is safe and effective with potentially less morbidity than anterior plating, shorter inpatient stays than posterior approaches, acceptable same segment recurrence and lower than predicted adjacent segment disease rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0967-5868</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.10.028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23890411</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>ACDF ; Adjacent segment disease ; Adult ; Aged ; Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion ; Bone Plates ; Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging ; Cervical Vertebrae - surgery ; Complications ; Diskectomy - methods ; Diskectomy - trends ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc - diagnostic imaging ; Intervertebral Disc - surgery ; Ketones - administration &amp; dosage ; Long-term follow-up ; Middle Aged ; Multi-level ; Neurology ; PEEK ; Polyethylene Glycols - administration &amp; dosage ; Prospective Studies ; Radiography ; Spinal Fusion - methods ; Spinal Fusion - trends ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical neuroscience, 2013-09, Vol.20 (9), p.1250-1255</ispartof><rights>2013</rights><rights>Crown Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-17fbbbbe6f6a81e3ad6c635fe50a47b1f5086a78d62dbab838d027efc37ac1ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-17fbbbbe6f6a81e3ad6c635fe50a47b1f5086a78d62dbab838d027efc37ac1ee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586813000416$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23890411$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Erlick A.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chari, Aswin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hempenstall, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leach, John C.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandran, Hari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cadoux-Hudson, Tom A.D</creatorcontrib><title>Anterior cervical discectomy plus intervertebral polyetheretherketone cage fusion over three and four levels without plating is safe and effective long-term</title><title>Journal of clinical neuroscience</title><addtitle>J Clin Neurosci</addtitle><description>Abstract Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is an established treatment for single-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy, yet its stand-alone use for multi-level disease of the subaxial cervical spine remains controversial. We report a prospectively studied case series of 30 patients receiving polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage fusion over three and four cervical levels without anterior plating. Seven (23.3%) four-level procedures (all C3 to C7) were performed, the other 23 (76.7%) being three-level, with 19 (64.4%) at C4 to C7 and four (12.3%) at C3 to C6. Long-term follow-up of more than 2 years was available in 67% of patients. This cohort showed statistically significant improvements in visual analogue score for neck pain ( p = 0.0006), arm pain ( p = 0.0003) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association myelopathy score ( p = 0.002). Fused segment heights increased by 0.6–1.1%. Adjacent segment disease requiring ACDF at C3–4 was seen in 6.7% of patients (one after trauma) at a mean follow-up of 62 months. Same segment recurrence requiring posterior decompression with instrumented fusion was found in 10% of patients at a mean follow-up of 49 months, only one of whom had radiological evidence of cage subsidence. The results suggest the procedure is safe and effective with potentially less morbidity than anterior plating, shorter inpatient stays than posterior approaches, acceptable same segment recurrence and lower than predicted adjacent segment disease rates.</description><subject>ACDF</subject><subject>Adjacent segment disease</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion</subject><subject>Bone Plates</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Diskectomy - methods</subject><subject>Diskectomy - trends</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervertebral Disc - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Intervertebral Disc - surgery</subject><subject>Ketones - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Long-term follow-up</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multi-level</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>PEEK</subject><subject>Polyethylene Glycols - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - methods</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - trends</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0967-5868</issn><issn>1532-2653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhS0EokPhBVggL9lk8E_iZCSEVFVAK1ViAawtx7mecerYg-2kmnfhYXGYwoIFXtiS_d1z5XMuQq8p2VJCxbtxOwbtt4xQVi62hHVP0IY2nFVMNPwp2pCdaKumE90FepHSSAjZ1Zw8RxeMdztSU7pBP698hmhDxBriYrVyeLBJg85hOuGjmxO2K7FAzNDH8nwM7gT5APH3dg85eMBa7QGbOdngcSgszocIgJUfsAlzxA4WcAk_2HwIcy66Klu_xzbhpMyZA2NKV7sAdsHvq9JzeomeGeUSvHo8L9H3Tx-_Xd9Ud18-315f3VW6_CFXtDV9WSCMUB0FrgahBW8MNETVbU9NQzqh2m4QbOhV3_FuIKwFo3mrNAXgl-jtWfcYw48ZUpbT6oFzykOYk6Q1I6JokLag7IzqGFKKYOQx2knFk6RErqnIUa6pyDWV9a6kUorePOrP_QTD35I_MRTg_RkoJsFiIcqkLXgNg43FFDkE-3_9D_-Ua2f9GuY9nCCNJQFf_JNUJiaJ_LrOxToWlJeRqKngvwAgU7iU</recordid><startdate>20130901</startdate><enddate>20130901</enddate><creator>Pereira, Erlick A.C</creator><creator>Chari, Aswin</creator><creator>Hempenstall, Jonathan</creator><creator>Leach, John C.D</creator><creator>Chandran, Hari</creator><creator>Cadoux-Hudson, Tom A.D</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130901</creationdate><title>Anterior cervical discectomy plus intervertebral polyetheretherketone cage fusion over three and four levels without plating is safe and effective long-term</title><author>Pereira, Erlick A.C ; Chari, Aswin ; Hempenstall, Jonathan ; Leach, John C.D ; Chandran, Hari ; Cadoux-Hudson, Tom A.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-17fbbbbe6f6a81e3ad6c635fe50a47b1f5086a78d62dbab838d027efc37ac1ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>ACDF</topic><topic>Adjacent segment disease</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion</topic><topic>Bone Plates</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Diskectomy - methods</topic><topic>Diskectomy - trends</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervertebral Disc - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Intervertebral Disc - surgery</topic><topic>Ketones - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Long-term follow-up</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multi-level</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>PEEK</topic><topic>Polyethylene Glycols - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - methods</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - trends</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Erlick A.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chari, Aswin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hempenstall, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leach, John C.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandran, Hari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cadoux-Hudson, Tom A.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pereira, Erlick A.C</au><au>Chari, Aswin</au><au>Hempenstall, Jonathan</au><au>Leach, John C.D</au><au>Chandran, Hari</au><au>Cadoux-Hudson, Tom A.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anterior cervical discectomy plus intervertebral polyetheretherketone cage fusion over three and four levels without plating is safe and effective long-term</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Neurosci</addtitle><date>2013-09-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1250</spage><epage>1255</epage><pages>1250-1255</pages><issn>0967-5868</issn><eissn>1532-2653</eissn><abstract>Abstract Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is an established treatment for single-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy, yet its stand-alone use for multi-level disease of the subaxial cervical spine remains controversial. We report a prospectively studied case series of 30 patients receiving polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage fusion over three and four cervical levels without anterior plating. Seven (23.3%) four-level procedures (all C3 to C7) were performed, the other 23 (76.7%) being three-level, with 19 (64.4%) at C4 to C7 and four (12.3%) at C3 to C6. Long-term follow-up of more than 2 years was available in 67% of patients. This cohort showed statistically significant improvements in visual analogue score for neck pain ( p = 0.0006), arm pain ( p = 0.0003) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association myelopathy score ( p = 0.002). Fused segment heights increased by 0.6–1.1%. Adjacent segment disease requiring ACDF at C3–4 was seen in 6.7% of patients (one after trauma) at a mean follow-up of 62 months. Same segment recurrence requiring posterior decompression with instrumented fusion was found in 10% of patients at a mean follow-up of 49 months, only one of whom had radiological evidence of cage subsidence. The results suggest the procedure is safe and effective with potentially less morbidity than anterior plating, shorter inpatient stays than posterior approaches, acceptable same segment recurrence and lower than predicted adjacent segment disease rates.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23890411</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jocn.2012.10.028</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0967-5868
ispartof Journal of clinical neuroscience, 2013-09, Vol.20 (9), p.1250-1255
issn 0967-5868
1532-2653
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1420608607
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects ACDF
Adjacent segment disease
Adult
Aged
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
Bone Plates
Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging
Cervical Vertebrae - surgery
Complications
Diskectomy - methods
Diskectomy - trends
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Intervertebral Disc - diagnostic imaging
Intervertebral Disc - surgery
Ketones - administration & dosage
Long-term follow-up
Middle Aged
Multi-level
Neurology
PEEK
Polyethylene Glycols - administration & dosage
Prospective Studies
Radiography
Spinal Fusion - methods
Spinal Fusion - trends
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title Anterior cervical discectomy plus intervertebral polyetheretherketone cage fusion over three and four levels without plating is safe and effective long-term
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T14%3A50%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anterior%20cervical%20discectomy%20plus%20intervertebral%20polyetheretherketone%20cage%20fusion%20over%20three%20and%20four%20levels%20without%20plating%20is%20safe%20and%20effective%20long-term&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20neuroscience&rft.au=Pereira,%20Erlick%20A.C&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1250&rft.epage=1255&rft.pages=1250-1255&rft.issn=0967-5868&rft.eissn=1532-2653&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jocn.2012.10.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1420608607%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1420608607&rft_id=info:pmid/23890411&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0967586813000416&rfr_iscdi=true