Permeability of Roads to Movement of Scrubland Lizards and Small Mammals

A primary objective of road ecology is to understand and predict how roads affect connectivity of wildlife populations. Road avoidance behavior can fragment populations, whereas lack of road avoidance can result in high mortality due to wildlife-vehicle collisions. Many small animal species focus th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology 2013-08, Vol.27 (4), p.710-720
Hauptverfasser: BREHME, CHERYL S., TRACEY, JEFF A., MCCLENAGHAN, LEROY R., FISHER, ROBERT N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 720
container_issue 4
container_start_page 710
container_title Conservation biology
container_volume 27
creator BREHME, CHERYL S.
TRACEY, JEFF A.
MCCLENAGHAN, LEROY R.
FISHER, ROBERT N.
description A primary objective of road ecology is to understand and predict how roads affect connectivity of wildlife populations. Road avoidance behavior can fragment populations, whereas lack of road avoidance can result in high mortality due to wildlife-vehicle collisions. Many small animal species focus their activities to particular microhabitats within their larger habitat. We sought to assess how different types of roads affect the movement of small vertebrates and to explore whether responses to roads may be predictable on the basis of animal life history or microhabitat preferences preferences. We tracked the movements of fluorescently marked animals at 24 sites distributed among 3 road types: low-use dirt, low-use secondary paved, and rural 2-lane highway. Most data we collected were on the San Diego pocket mouse (Chaetodipus fallax), cactus mouse (Peromyscus eremicus), western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis), orange-throated whiptail (Aspidoscelis hyperythra), Dulzura kangaroo rat (Dipodomys simulans) (dirt, secondary paved), and deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) (highway only). San Diego pocket mice and cactus mice moved onto dirt roads but not onto a low-use paved road of similar width or onto the highway, indicating they avoid paved road substrate. Both lizard species moved onto the dirt and secondary paved roads but avoided the rural 2-lane rural highway, indicating they may avoid noise, vibration, or visual disturbance from a steady flow of traffic. Kangaroo rats did not avoid the dirt or secondary paved roads. Overall, dirt and secondary roads were more permeable to species that prefer to forage or bask in open areas of their habitat, rather than under the cover of rocks or shrubs. However, all study species avoided the rural 2-lane highway. Our results suggest that microhabitat use preferences and road substrate help predict species responses to low-use roads, but roads with heavy traffic may deter movement of a much wider range of small animal species. Un objetivo principal de la ecología de caminos es entender y predecir como afectan los caminos la conectividad de las poblaciones silvestres. El comportamiento de evitación de caminos puede fragmentar poblaciones, mientras que la falta de evitación puede resultar en alta mortandad debido a colisiones. Muchas especies animales pequeñas enfocan sus actividades a microhábitats particulares dentro de su hábitat mayor. Buscamos estudiar como los diferentes tipos de caminos afectan el movimiento
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cobi.12081
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1419368004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23525299</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23525299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4801-b6c03ceff422751fd12533d6418c34b68f5017a71ae645f213c96b78927f7e743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkd9rFDEQx4Mo9qy--K4siFCErZlk82Mf7WGvhastrSL4ErLZBPbcvbTJbuv1rzfrXlvpg5iXCTOfzOQ7X4ReA96HdD4aXzX7QLCEJ2gGjNAcBC2fohmWUuZSlmQHvYhxhTEuGRTP0Q6hQpCS8xk6OrOhs7pq2qbfZN5l517XMet9duKvbWfX_Zi8MGGoWr2us2Vzq0MCxvtFp9s2O9FdivEleuZSsK-2cRd9O_z8dX6UL08Xx_NPy9wUEkNecYOpsc4VhAgGrgbCKK15AdLQouLSMQxCC9CWF8wRoKbklUgahBNWFHQX7U19L4O_GmzsVddEY9v0O-uHqKCAknKJ8f-gmIOQhIuEvnuErvwQ1knISGHJqOQsUR8mygQfY7BOXYam02GjAKvRCjVaof5YkeC325ZD1dn6Hr3bfQLebwEdjW5d0GvTxAdO8IICH2XAxN00rd38Y6Sanx4c3w1_M71Zxd6Hv2YzwkhZpno-1ZvY21_3dR1-qrQNwdT3Lwslzg4O8Y_zhcL0N6urtZU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1400853865</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Permeability of Roads to Movement of Scrubland Lizards and Small Mammals</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>BREHME, CHERYL S. ; TRACEY, JEFF A. ; MCCLENAGHAN, LEROY R. ; FISHER, ROBERT N.</creator><creatorcontrib>BREHME, CHERYL S. ; TRACEY, JEFF A. ; MCCLENAGHAN, LEROY R. ; FISHER, ROBERT N.</creatorcontrib><description>A primary objective of road ecology is to understand and predict how roads affect connectivity of wildlife populations. Road avoidance behavior can fragment populations, whereas lack of road avoidance can result in high mortality due to wildlife-vehicle collisions. Many small animal species focus their activities to particular microhabitats within their larger habitat. We sought to assess how different types of roads affect the movement of small vertebrates and to explore whether responses to roads may be predictable on the basis of animal life history or microhabitat preferences preferences. We tracked the movements of fluorescently marked animals at 24 sites distributed among 3 road types: low-use dirt, low-use secondary paved, and rural 2-lane highway. Most data we collected were on the San Diego pocket mouse (Chaetodipus fallax), cactus mouse (Peromyscus eremicus), western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis), orange-throated whiptail (Aspidoscelis hyperythra), Dulzura kangaroo rat (Dipodomys simulans) (dirt, secondary paved), and deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) (highway only). San Diego pocket mice and cactus mice moved onto dirt roads but not onto a low-use paved road of similar width or onto the highway, indicating they avoid paved road substrate. Both lizard species moved onto the dirt and secondary paved roads but avoided the rural 2-lane rural highway, indicating they may avoid noise, vibration, or visual disturbance from a steady flow of traffic. Kangaroo rats did not avoid the dirt or secondary paved roads. Overall, dirt and secondary roads were more permeable to species that prefer to forage or bask in open areas of their habitat, rather than under the cover of rocks or shrubs. However, all study species avoided the rural 2-lane highway. Our results suggest that microhabitat use preferences and road substrate help predict species responses to low-use roads, but roads with heavy traffic may deter movement of a much wider range of small animal species. Un objetivo principal de la ecología de caminos es entender y predecir como afectan los caminos la conectividad de las poblaciones silvestres. El comportamiento de evitación de caminos puede fragmentar poblaciones, mientras que la falta de evitación puede resultar en alta mortandad debido a colisiones. Muchas especies animales pequeñas enfocan sus actividades a microhábitats particulares dentro de su hábitat mayor. Buscamos estudiar como los diferentes tipos de caminos afectan el movimiento de pequeños vertebrados y conocer si ciertas respuestas hacia los caminos pueden ser predecibles basándose en la historia de vida del animal o el microhábitat. Rastreamos los movimientos de animales marcados con fluorescencia en 24 sitios distribuidos entre 3 tipos de caminos: tierra de bajo uso, camino secundario pavimentado de bajo uso, y carretera rural de 2 carriles. La mayoría de los datos que colectamos fueron sobre Chaetodipus fallax, Peromyscus eremicus, Sceloporus occidentalis, Aspidoscelis hyperythra, Dipodomys simulans (tierra, pavimentación secundaria), y P. maniculatus (solamente en carretera). C. fallax y P. eremicus se movían hacia los caminos de tierra pero no hacia una carretera de baja pavimentación de anchura similar o hacia la carretera, indicando que evitan los caminos con sustrato pavimentado. S. occidentalis y. A. hyperythra se movían hacia la tierra y los caminos secundarios pavimentados pero evitaban la carretera rural de 2 carriles, indicando que pueden evitar el ruido, las vibraciones o el disturbio visual de un constante flujo de tráfico. D. simulans no evitaba el camino de tierra ni los caminos secundarios con pavimento. En general, el camino de tierra y los caminos secundarios fueron más permeables para las especies que prefieren forrajear o tomar el sol en áreas abiertas de su hábitat en lugar de bajo rocas o arbustos. D. simulans no evitó el camino de tierra ni los caminos secundarios pavimentados. Sin embargo todas las especies estudiadas evitaron la carretera de 2 carriles. Nuestros resultados sugieren que las preferencias de uso de microhábitat y sustrato de caminos ayudan a predecir las respuestas de las especies hacia caminos de bajo uso, pero los caminos con tráfico pesado pueden disuadir el movimiento de un rango mucho mayor de especies animales pequeñas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-8892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1739</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12081</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23772966</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CBIOEF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Amphibia. Reptilia ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Applied ecology ; avoidance ; Biological and medical sciences ; California ; Chaetodipus ; conectividad ; connectivity ; Conservation biology ; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods ; conservation planning ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Dipodomys simulans ; Earth roads ; ecología de caminos ; ecología urbana ; Ecosystem ; evitación ; Fluorescence ; fragmentación de hábitat ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Habitat conservation ; habitat fragmentation ; heteromyid ; heterómido ; Highways ; Lacertilia ; Lizards ; Lizards - physiology ; Locomotion - physiology ; Mammalia ; Mammals ; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking ; Peromyscus eremicus ; Peromyscus maniculatus ; planificación de la conservación ; Rats ; reptiles ; road ecology ; Roads ; Roads &amp; highways ; Rodentia - physiology ; Sceloporus occidentalis ; Species ; Species Specificity ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Transportation ; urban ecology ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Conservation biology, 2013-08, Vol.27 (4), p.710-720</ispartof><rights>2013 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2013 Society for Conservation Biology.</rights><rights>2013, Society for Conservation Biology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4801-b6c03ceff422751fd12533d6418c34b68f5017a71ae645f213c96b78927f7e743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4801-b6c03ceff422751fd12533d6418c34b68f5017a71ae645f213c96b78927f7e743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23525299$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23525299$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554,57996,58229</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27643164$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23772966$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BREHME, CHERYL S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TRACEY, JEFF A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCCLENAGHAN, LEROY R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FISHER, ROBERT N.</creatorcontrib><title>Permeability of Roads to Movement of Scrubland Lizards and Small Mammals</title><title>Conservation biology</title><addtitle>Conservation Biology</addtitle><description>A primary objective of road ecology is to understand and predict how roads affect connectivity of wildlife populations. Road avoidance behavior can fragment populations, whereas lack of road avoidance can result in high mortality due to wildlife-vehicle collisions. Many small animal species focus their activities to particular microhabitats within their larger habitat. We sought to assess how different types of roads affect the movement of small vertebrates and to explore whether responses to roads may be predictable on the basis of animal life history or microhabitat preferences preferences. We tracked the movements of fluorescently marked animals at 24 sites distributed among 3 road types: low-use dirt, low-use secondary paved, and rural 2-lane highway. Most data we collected were on the San Diego pocket mouse (Chaetodipus fallax), cactus mouse (Peromyscus eremicus), western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis), orange-throated whiptail (Aspidoscelis hyperythra), Dulzura kangaroo rat (Dipodomys simulans) (dirt, secondary paved), and deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) (highway only). San Diego pocket mice and cactus mice moved onto dirt roads but not onto a low-use paved road of similar width or onto the highway, indicating they avoid paved road substrate. Both lizard species moved onto the dirt and secondary paved roads but avoided the rural 2-lane rural highway, indicating they may avoid noise, vibration, or visual disturbance from a steady flow of traffic. Kangaroo rats did not avoid the dirt or secondary paved roads. Overall, dirt and secondary roads were more permeable to species that prefer to forage or bask in open areas of their habitat, rather than under the cover of rocks or shrubs. However, all study species avoided the rural 2-lane highway. Our results suggest that microhabitat use preferences and road substrate help predict species responses to low-use roads, but roads with heavy traffic may deter movement of a much wider range of small animal species. Un objetivo principal de la ecología de caminos es entender y predecir como afectan los caminos la conectividad de las poblaciones silvestres. El comportamiento de evitación de caminos puede fragmentar poblaciones, mientras que la falta de evitación puede resultar en alta mortandad debido a colisiones. Muchas especies animales pequeñas enfocan sus actividades a microhábitats particulares dentro de su hábitat mayor. Buscamos estudiar como los diferentes tipos de caminos afectan el movimiento de pequeños vertebrados y conocer si ciertas respuestas hacia los caminos pueden ser predecibles basándose en la historia de vida del animal o el microhábitat. Rastreamos los movimientos de animales marcados con fluorescencia en 24 sitios distribuidos entre 3 tipos de caminos: tierra de bajo uso, camino secundario pavimentado de bajo uso, y carretera rural de 2 carriles. La mayoría de los datos que colectamos fueron sobre Chaetodipus fallax, Peromyscus eremicus, Sceloporus occidentalis, Aspidoscelis hyperythra, Dipodomys simulans (tierra, pavimentación secundaria), y P. maniculatus (solamente en carretera). C. fallax y P. eremicus se movían hacia los caminos de tierra pero no hacia una carretera de baja pavimentación de anchura similar o hacia la carretera, indicando que evitan los caminos con sustrato pavimentado. S. occidentalis y. A. hyperythra se movían hacia la tierra y los caminos secundarios pavimentados pero evitaban la carretera rural de 2 carriles, indicando que pueden evitar el ruido, las vibraciones o el disturbio visual de un constante flujo de tráfico. D. simulans no evitaba el camino de tierra ni los caminos secundarios con pavimento. En general, el camino de tierra y los caminos secundarios fueron más permeables para las especies que prefieren forrajear o tomar el sol en áreas abiertas de su hábitat en lugar de bajo rocas o arbustos. D. simulans no evitó el camino de tierra ni los caminos secundarios pavimentados. Sin embargo todas las especies estudiadas evitaron la carretera de 2 carriles. Nuestros resultados sugieren que las preferencias de uso de microhábitat y sustrato de caminos ayudan a predecir las respuestas de las especies hacia caminos de bajo uso, pero los caminos con tráfico pesado pueden disuadir el movimiento de un rango mucho mayor de especies animales pequeñas.</description><subject>Amphibia. Reptilia</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>avoidance</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Chaetodipus</subject><subject>conectividad</subject><subject>connectivity</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</subject><subject>conservation planning</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Dipodomys simulans</subject><subject>Earth roads</subject><subject>ecología de caminos</subject><subject>ecología urbana</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>evitación</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>fragmentación de hábitat</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>heteromyid</subject><subject>heterómido</subject><subject>Highways</subject><subject>Lacertilia</subject><subject>Lizards</subject><subject>Lizards - physiology</subject><subject>Locomotion - physiology</subject><subject>Mammalia</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</subject><subject>Peromyscus eremicus</subject><subject>Peromyscus maniculatus</subject><subject>planificación de la conservación</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>reptiles</subject><subject>road ecology</subject><subject>Roads</subject><subject>Roads &amp; highways</subject><subject>Rodentia - physiology</subject><subject>Sceloporus occidentalis</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Transportation</subject><subject>urban ecology</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0888-8892</issn><issn>1523-1739</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkd9rFDEQx4Mo9qy--K4siFCErZlk82Mf7WGvhastrSL4ErLZBPbcvbTJbuv1rzfrXlvpg5iXCTOfzOQ7X4ReA96HdD4aXzX7QLCEJ2gGjNAcBC2fohmWUuZSlmQHvYhxhTEuGRTP0Q6hQpCS8xk6OrOhs7pq2qbfZN5l517XMet9duKvbWfX_Zi8MGGoWr2us2Vzq0MCxvtFp9s2O9FdivEleuZSsK-2cRd9O_z8dX6UL08Xx_NPy9wUEkNecYOpsc4VhAgGrgbCKK15AdLQouLSMQxCC9CWF8wRoKbklUgahBNWFHQX7U19L4O_GmzsVddEY9v0O-uHqKCAknKJ8f-gmIOQhIuEvnuErvwQ1knISGHJqOQsUR8mygQfY7BOXYam02GjAKvRCjVaof5YkeC325ZD1dn6Hr3bfQLebwEdjW5d0GvTxAdO8IICH2XAxN00rd38Y6Sanx4c3w1_M71Zxd6Hv2YzwkhZpno-1ZvY21_3dR1-qrQNwdT3Lwslzg4O8Y_zhcL0N6urtZU</recordid><startdate>201308</startdate><enddate>201308</enddate><creator>BREHME, CHERYL S.</creator><creator>TRACEY, JEFF A.</creator><creator>MCCLENAGHAN, LEROY R.</creator><creator>FISHER, ROBERT N.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201308</creationdate><title>Permeability of Roads to Movement of Scrubland Lizards and Small Mammals</title><author>BREHME, CHERYL S. ; TRACEY, JEFF A. ; MCCLENAGHAN, LEROY R. ; FISHER, ROBERT N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4801-b6c03ceff422751fd12533d6418c34b68f5017a71ae645f213c96b78927f7e743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Amphibia. Reptilia</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>avoidance</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Chaetodipus</topic><topic>conectividad</topic><topic>connectivity</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</topic><topic>conservation planning</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Dipodomys simulans</topic><topic>Earth roads</topic><topic>ecología de caminos</topic><topic>ecología urbana</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>evitación</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>fragmentación de hábitat</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>heteromyid</topic><topic>heterómido</topic><topic>Highways</topic><topic>Lacertilia</topic><topic>Lizards</topic><topic>Lizards - physiology</topic><topic>Locomotion - physiology</topic><topic>Mammalia</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</topic><topic>Peromyscus eremicus</topic><topic>Peromyscus maniculatus</topic><topic>planificación de la conservación</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>reptiles</topic><topic>road ecology</topic><topic>Roads</topic><topic>Roads &amp; highways</topic><topic>Rodentia - physiology</topic><topic>Sceloporus occidentalis</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Transportation</topic><topic>urban ecology</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BREHME, CHERYL S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TRACEY, JEFF A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCCLENAGHAN, LEROY R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FISHER, ROBERT N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BREHME, CHERYL S.</au><au>TRACEY, JEFF A.</au><au>MCCLENAGHAN, LEROY R.</au><au>FISHER, ROBERT N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Permeability of Roads to Movement of Scrubland Lizards and Small Mammals</atitle><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle><addtitle>Conservation Biology</addtitle><date>2013-08</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>710</spage><epage>720</epage><pages>710-720</pages><issn>0888-8892</issn><eissn>1523-1739</eissn><coden>CBIOEF</coden><abstract>A primary objective of road ecology is to understand and predict how roads affect connectivity of wildlife populations. Road avoidance behavior can fragment populations, whereas lack of road avoidance can result in high mortality due to wildlife-vehicle collisions. Many small animal species focus their activities to particular microhabitats within their larger habitat. We sought to assess how different types of roads affect the movement of small vertebrates and to explore whether responses to roads may be predictable on the basis of animal life history or microhabitat preferences preferences. We tracked the movements of fluorescently marked animals at 24 sites distributed among 3 road types: low-use dirt, low-use secondary paved, and rural 2-lane highway. Most data we collected were on the San Diego pocket mouse (Chaetodipus fallax), cactus mouse (Peromyscus eremicus), western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis), orange-throated whiptail (Aspidoscelis hyperythra), Dulzura kangaroo rat (Dipodomys simulans) (dirt, secondary paved), and deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) (highway only). San Diego pocket mice and cactus mice moved onto dirt roads but not onto a low-use paved road of similar width or onto the highway, indicating they avoid paved road substrate. Both lizard species moved onto the dirt and secondary paved roads but avoided the rural 2-lane rural highway, indicating they may avoid noise, vibration, or visual disturbance from a steady flow of traffic. Kangaroo rats did not avoid the dirt or secondary paved roads. Overall, dirt and secondary roads were more permeable to species that prefer to forage or bask in open areas of their habitat, rather than under the cover of rocks or shrubs. However, all study species avoided the rural 2-lane highway. Our results suggest that microhabitat use preferences and road substrate help predict species responses to low-use roads, but roads with heavy traffic may deter movement of a much wider range of small animal species. Un objetivo principal de la ecología de caminos es entender y predecir como afectan los caminos la conectividad de las poblaciones silvestres. El comportamiento de evitación de caminos puede fragmentar poblaciones, mientras que la falta de evitación puede resultar en alta mortandad debido a colisiones. Muchas especies animales pequeñas enfocan sus actividades a microhábitats particulares dentro de su hábitat mayor. Buscamos estudiar como los diferentes tipos de caminos afectan el movimiento de pequeños vertebrados y conocer si ciertas respuestas hacia los caminos pueden ser predecibles basándose en la historia de vida del animal o el microhábitat. Rastreamos los movimientos de animales marcados con fluorescencia en 24 sitios distribuidos entre 3 tipos de caminos: tierra de bajo uso, camino secundario pavimentado de bajo uso, y carretera rural de 2 carriles. La mayoría de los datos que colectamos fueron sobre Chaetodipus fallax, Peromyscus eremicus, Sceloporus occidentalis, Aspidoscelis hyperythra, Dipodomys simulans (tierra, pavimentación secundaria), y P. maniculatus (solamente en carretera). C. fallax y P. eremicus se movían hacia los caminos de tierra pero no hacia una carretera de baja pavimentación de anchura similar o hacia la carretera, indicando que evitan los caminos con sustrato pavimentado. S. occidentalis y. A. hyperythra se movían hacia la tierra y los caminos secundarios pavimentados pero evitaban la carretera rural de 2 carriles, indicando que pueden evitar el ruido, las vibraciones o el disturbio visual de un constante flujo de tráfico. D. simulans no evitaba el camino de tierra ni los caminos secundarios con pavimento. En general, el camino de tierra y los caminos secundarios fueron más permeables para las especies que prefieren forrajear o tomar el sol en áreas abiertas de su hábitat en lugar de bajo rocas o arbustos. D. simulans no evitó el camino de tierra ni los caminos secundarios pavimentados. Sin embargo todas las especies estudiadas evitaron la carretera de 2 carriles. Nuestros resultados sugieren que las preferencias de uso de microhábitat y sustrato de caminos ayudan a predecir las respuestas de las especies hacia caminos de bajo uso, pero los caminos con tráfico pesado pueden disuadir el movimiento de un rango mucho mayor de especies animales pequeñas.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23772966</pmid><doi>10.1111/cobi.12081</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0888-8892
ispartof Conservation biology, 2013-08, Vol.27 (4), p.710-720
issn 0888-8892
1523-1739
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1419368004
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Amphibia. Reptilia
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Applied ecology
avoidance
Biological and medical sciences
California
Chaetodipus
conectividad
connectivity
Conservation biology
Conservation of Natural Resources - methods
conservation planning
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Dipodomys simulans
Earth roads
ecología de caminos
ecología urbana
Ecosystem
evitación
Fluorescence
fragmentación de hábitat
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Habitat conservation
habitat fragmentation
heteromyid
heterómido
Highways
Lacertilia
Lizards
Lizards - physiology
Locomotion - physiology
Mammalia
Mammals
Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking
Peromyscus eremicus
Peromyscus maniculatus
planificación de la conservación
Rats
reptiles
road ecology
Roads
Roads & highways
Rodentia - physiology
Sceloporus occidentalis
Species
Species Specificity
Terrestrial ecosystems
Transportation
urban ecology
Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution
Wildlife conservation
title Permeability of Roads to Movement of Scrubland Lizards and Small Mammals
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T17%3A51%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Permeability%20of%20Roads%20to%20Movement%20of%20Scrubland%20Lizards%20and%20Small%20Mammals&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20biology&rft.au=BREHME,%20CHERYL%20S.&rft.date=2013-08&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=710&rft.epage=720&rft.pages=710-720&rft.issn=0888-8892&rft.eissn=1523-1739&rft.coden=CBIOEF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cobi.12081&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23525299%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1400853865&rft_id=info:pmid/23772966&rft_jstor_id=23525299&rfr_iscdi=true