Formation and distribution of methylmercury in sediments at a mariculture site: a mesocosm study

Purpose The aim of the present study was to investigate the differences of methylmercury (MeHg) formation and distribution between mariculture (aquaculture) sediments (MS) and reference sediments (RS) collected from a site in Hong Kong. Materials and methods The MS and RS samples were split into fou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of soils and sediments 2013-08, Vol.13 (7), p.1301-1308
Hauptverfasser: Liang, Peng, Lam, Cheung-Lung, Chen, Zhang, Wang, Hong-Sheng, Shi, Jian-Bo, Wu, Sheng-Chun, Wang, Wen-Xiong, Zhang, Jin, Wang, Hailong, Wong, Ming-Hung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1308
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1301
container_title Journal of soils and sediments
container_volume 13
creator Liang, Peng
Lam, Cheung-Lung
Chen, Zhang
Wang, Hong-Sheng
Shi, Jian-Bo
Wu, Sheng-Chun
Wang, Wen-Xiong
Zhang, Jin
Wang, Hailong
Wong, Ming-Hung
description Purpose The aim of the present study was to investigate the differences of methylmercury (MeHg) formation and distribution between mariculture (aquaculture) sediments (MS) and reference sediments (RS) collected from a site in Hong Kong. Materials and methods The MS and RS samples were split into four batches, three of which were spiked with HgCl 2 aqueous solution to a concentration of 0.8, ,2 and 8 mg k g −1 in sediment samples SP1, SP2, and SP3, respectively, while the rest served as a control batch (referred to as C). Results and discussion The results showed that the highly Hg-polluted sediment produced greater amounts of MeHg. During the culture period, MeHg concentrations in sediments decreased over time. The decreasing percentage increased in the order of SP3 
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11368-013-0719-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1419363361</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1419363361</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-283463ace684892688542d3b73941c8138493288328244b05b88a16fd41ec56b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFPAyEQhYnRxFr9Ad5IvHhZZRbKst5MY9WkiRc9I8tSpdldKsMm9t9LrQdj4oFAZr73ZniEnAO7AsaqawTgUhUMeMEqqIvPAzIBCaKohGKH-S14nbtMHZMTxDVjvMrtCXldhNib5MNAzdDS1mOKvhm_C2FFe5fet13voh3jlvqBomt974aE1CRqaG-it2OXxugo-uRudjWHwQbsKaax3Z6So5Xp0J393FPysrh7nj8Uy6f7x_ntsrBc1KkoFReSG-ukEqoupVIzUba8qXgtwCrgStS8VCqfUoiGzRqlDMhVK8DZmWz4lFzufTcxfIwOk-49Wtd1ZnBhRA0Cai45l5DRiz_oOoxxyNvtqFLMSp4HTQnsKRsDYnQrvYk-_3ergeld5nqfuc6Z613m-jNryr0GMzu8ufjL-V_RF9Dtg6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1412452388</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Formation and distribution of methylmercury in sediments at a mariculture site: a mesocosm study</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Liang, Peng ; Lam, Cheung-Lung ; Chen, Zhang ; Wang, Hong-Sheng ; Shi, Jian-Bo ; Wu, Sheng-Chun ; Wang, Wen-Xiong ; Zhang, Jin ; Wang, Hailong ; Wong, Ming-Hung</creator><creatorcontrib>Liang, Peng ; Lam, Cheung-Lung ; Chen, Zhang ; Wang, Hong-Sheng ; Shi, Jian-Bo ; Wu, Sheng-Chun ; Wang, Wen-Xiong ; Zhang, Jin ; Wang, Hailong ; Wong, Ming-Hung</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The aim of the present study was to investigate the differences of methylmercury (MeHg) formation and distribution between mariculture (aquaculture) sediments (MS) and reference sediments (RS) collected from a site in Hong Kong. Materials and methods The MS and RS samples were split into four batches, three of which were spiked with HgCl 2 aqueous solution to a concentration of 0.8, ,2 and 8 mg k g −1 in sediment samples SP1, SP2, and SP3, respectively, while the rest served as a control batch (referred to as C). Results and discussion The results showed that the highly Hg-polluted sediment produced greater amounts of MeHg. During the culture period, MeHg concentrations in sediments decreased over time. The decreasing percentage increased in the order of SP3 &lt; SP2 &lt; SP1, which might be due to the inhibition of MeHg degradation by high Hg concentrations. The mean value of MeHg concentrations and %MeHg of the total Hg (THg) in MS was significantly lower than those in RS, possibly due to the complexation of Hg with organic ligands, leading to lower Hg bioavailability for methylation bacteria. The distribution coefficient of THg (K d T) was relatively high in MS compared to RS, indicating that the former had a greater number of binding sites for Hg adsorption. Conclusions Methylmercury formation was inhibited in MS, probably due to increased complexation of Hg 2+ with organic matter and adsorption of Hg to MS. Furthermore, the mean value of K d T in MS was relatively high when compared to RS, which illustrates that MS sediments have more binding sites than RS for adsorption of Hg.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1439-0108</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7480</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11368-013-0719-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adsorption ; Aquaculture ; Bioavailability ; Contaminated sediments ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Environment ; Environmental Physics ; Environmental science ; Marine ; Marine aquaculture ; Mercury ; Methylmercury ; Organic matter ; Pollutants ; Sec 2 • Physical and Biogeochemical Processes • Research Article ; Sediment pollution ; Sediment samplers ; Sediments ; Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><ispartof>Journal of soils and sediments, 2013-08, Vol.13 (7), p.1301-1308</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-283463ace684892688542d3b73941c8138493288328244b05b88a16fd41ec56b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-283463ace684892688542d3b73941c8138493288328244b05b88a16fd41ec56b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11368-013-0719-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11368-013-0719-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liang, Peng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Cheung-Lung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hong-Sheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Jian-Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Sheng-Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wen-Xiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hailong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Ming-Hung</creatorcontrib><title>Formation and distribution of methylmercury in sediments at a mariculture site: a mesocosm study</title><title>Journal of soils and sediments</title><addtitle>J Soils Sediments</addtitle><description>Purpose The aim of the present study was to investigate the differences of methylmercury (MeHg) formation and distribution between mariculture (aquaculture) sediments (MS) and reference sediments (RS) collected from a site in Hong Kong. Materials and methods The MS and RS samples were split into four batches, three of which were spiked with HgCl 2 aqueous solution to a concentration of 0.8, ,2 and 8 mg k g −1 in sediment samples SP1, SP2, and SP3, respectively, while the rest served as a control batch (referred to as C). Results and discussion The results showed that the highly Hg-polluted sediment produced greater amounts of MeHg. During the culture period, MeHg concentrations in sediments decreased over time. The decreasing percentage increased in the order of SP3 &lt; SP2 &lt; SP1, which might be due to the inhibition of MeHg degradation by high Hg concentrations. The mean value of MeHg concentrations and %MeHg of the total Hg (THg) in MS was significantly lower than those in RS, possibly due to the complexation of Hg with organic ligands, leading to lower Hg bioavailability for methylation bacteria. The distribution coefficient of THg (K d T) was relatively high in MS compared to RS, indicating that the former had a greater number of binding sites for Hg adsorption. Conclusions Methylmercury formation was inhibited in MS, probably due to increased complexation of Hg 2+ with organic matter and adsorption of Hg to MS. Furthermore, the mean value of K d T in MS was relatively high when compared to RS, which illustrates that MS sediments have more binding sites than RS for adsorption of Hg.</description><subject>Adsorption</subject><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Bioavailability</subject><subject>Contaminated sediments</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Physics</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine aquaculture</subject><subject>Mercury</subject><subject>Methylmercury</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Sec 2 • Physical and Biogeochemical Processes • Research Article</subject><subject>Sediment pollution</subject><subject>Sediment samplers</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><issn>1439-0108</issn><issn>1614-7480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFPAyEQhYnRxFr9Ad5IvHhZZRbKst5MY9WkiRc9I8tSpdldKsMm9t9LrQdj4oFAZr73ZniEnAO7AsaqawTgUhUMeMEqqIvPAzIBCaKohGKH-S14nbtMHZMTxDVjvMrtCXldhNib5MNAzdDS1mOKvhm_C2FFe5fet13voh3jlvqBomt974aE1CRqaG-it2OXxugo-uRudjWHwQbsKaax3Z6So5Xp0J393FPysrh7nj8Uy6f7x_ntsrBc1KkoFReSG-ukEqoupVIzUba8qXgtwCrgStS8VCqfUoiGzRqlDMhVK8DZmWz4lFzufTcxfIwOk-49Wtd1ZnBhRA0Cai45l5DRiz_oOoxxyNvtqFLMSp4HTQnsKRsDYnQrvYk-_3ergeld5nqfuc6Z613m-jNryr0GMzu8ufjL-V_RF9Dtg6Q</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Liang, Peng</creator><creator>Lam, Cheung-Lung</creator><creator>Chen, Zhang</creator><creator>Wang, Hong-Sheng</creator><creator>Shi, Jian-Bo</creator><creator>Wu, Sheng-Chun</creator><creator>Wang, Wen-Xiong</creator><creator>Zhang, Jin</creator><creator>Wang, Hailong</creator><creator>Wong, Ming-Hung</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Formation and distribution of methylmercury in sediments at a mariculture site: a mesocosm study</title><author>Liang, Peng ; Lam, Cheung-Lung ; Chen, Zhang ; Wang, Hong-Sheng ; Shi, Jian-Bo ; Wu, Sheng-Chun ; Wang, Wen-Xiong ; Zhang, Jin ; Wang, Hailong ; Wong, Ming-Hung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-283463ace684892688542d3b73941c8138493288328244b05b88a16fd41ec56b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adsorption</topic><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Bioavailability</topic><topic>Contaminated sediments</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Physics</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine aquaculture</topic><topic>Mercury</topic><topic>Methylmercury</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Sec 2 • Physical and Biogeochemical Processes • Research Article</topic><topic>Sediment pollution</topic><topic>Sediment samplers</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liang, Peng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Cheung-Lung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hong-Sheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Jian-Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Sheng-Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wen-Xiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hailong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Ming-Hung</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of soils and sediments</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liang, Peng</au><au>Lam, Cheung-Lung</au><au>Chen, Zhang</au><au>Wang, Hong-Sheng</au><au>Shi, Jian-Bo</au><au>Wu, Sheng-Chun</au><au>Wang, Wen-Xiong</au><au>Zhang, Jin</au><au>Wang, Hailong</au><au>Wong, Ming-Hung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Formation and distribution of methylmercury in sediments at a mariculture site: a mesocosm study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of soils and sediments</jtitle><stitle>J Soils Sediments</stitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1301</spage><epage>1308</epage><pages>1301-1308</pages><issn>1439-0108</issn><eissn>1614-7480</eissn><abstract>Purpose The aim of the present study was to investigate the differences of methylmercury (MeHg) formation and distribution between mariculture (aquaculture) sediments (MS) and reference sediments (RS) collected from a site in Hong Kong. Materials and methods The MS and RS samples were split into four batches, three of which were spiked with HgCl 2 aqueous solution to a concentration of 0.8, ,2 and 8 mg k g −1 in sediment samples SP1, SP2, and SP3, respectively, while the rest served as a control batch (referred to as C). Results and discussion The results showed that the highly Hg-polluted sediment produced greater amounts of MeHg. During the culture period, MeHg concentrations in sediments decreased over time. The decreasing percentage increased in the order of SP3 &lt; SP2 &lt; SP1, which might be due to the inhibition of MeHg degradation by high Hg concentrations. The mean value of MeHg concentrations and %MeHg of the total Hg (THg) in MS was significantly lower than those in RS, possibly due to the complexation of Hg with organic ligands, leading to lower Hg bioavailability for methylation bacteria. The distribution coefficient of THg (K d T) was relatively high in MS compared to RS, indicating that the former had a greater number of binding sites for Hg adsorption. Conclusions Methylmercury formation was inhibited in MS, probably due to increased complexation of Hg 2+ with organic matter and adsorption of Hg to MS. Furthermore, the mean value of K d T in MS was relatively high when compared to RS, which illustrates that MS sediments have more binding sites than RS for adsorption of Hg.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11368-013-0719-x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1439-0108
ispartof Journal of soils and sediments, 2013-08, Vol.13 (7), p.1301-1308
issn 1439-0108
1614-7480
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1419363361
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adsorption
Aquaculture
Bioavailability
Contaminated sediments
Earth and Environmental Science
Environment
Environmental Physics
Environmental science
Marine
Marine aquaculture
Mercury
Methylmercury
Organic matter
Pollutants
Sec 2 • Physical and Biogeochemical Processes • Research Article
Sediment pollution
Sediment samplers
Sediments
Soil Science & Conservation
title Formation and distribution of methylmercury in sediments at a mariculture site: a mesocosm study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A59%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Formation%20and%20distribution%20of%20methylmercury%20in%20sediments%20at%20a%20mariculture%20site:%20a%20mesocosm%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20soils%20and%20sediments&rft.au=Liang,%20Peng&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1301&rft.epage=1308&rft.pages=1301-1308&rft.issn=1439-0108&rft.eissn=1614-7480&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11368-013-0719-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1419363361%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1412452388&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true