Vocabulary influences older and younger listeners' processing of dysarthric speech
This study examined younger (n = 16) and older (n = 16) listeners' processing of dysarthric speech-a naturally occurring form of signal degradation. It aimed to determine how age, hearing acuity, memory, and vocabulary knowledge interacted in speech recognition and lexical segmentation. Listene...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2013-08, Vol.134 (2), p.1358-1368 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1368 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 1358 |
container_title | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America |
container_volume | 134 |
creator | McAuliffe, Megan J Gibson, Elizabeth M R Kerr, Sarah E Anderson, Tim LaShell, Patrick J |
description | This study examined younger (n = 16) and older (n = 16) listeners' processing of dysarthric speech-a naturally occurring form of signal degradation. It aimed to determine how age, hearing acuity, memory, and vocabulary knowledge interacted in speech recognition and lexical segmentation. Listener transcripts were coded for accuracy and pattern of lexical boundary errors. For younger listeners, transcription accuracy was predicted by receptive vocabulary. For older listeners, this same effect existed but was moderated by pure-tone hearing thresholds. While both groups employed syllabic stress cues to inform lexical segmentation, older listeners were less reliant on this perceptual strategy. The results were interpreted to suggest that individuals with larger receptive vocabularies, with their presumed greater language familiarity, were better able to leverage cue redundancies within the speech signal to form lexical hypothesis-leading to an improved ability to comprehend dysarthric speech. This advantage was minimized as hearing thresholds increased. While the differing levels of reliance on stress cues across the listener groups could not be attributed to specific individual differences, it was hypothesized that some combination of larger vocabularies and reduced hearing thresholds in the older participant group led to them prioritize lexical cues as a segmentation frame. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1121/1.4812764 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1419343913</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1419343913</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-78525a6aecd2b536bb265d549ecc9987fb5ead59d053ce0208cd46b7e4b56c443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtKw0AUhgdRbK0ufAGZnbpInXsySyneoCCIug1zOWkj06TOJIu-vSOtrs458PHznw-hS0rmlDJ6R-eioqxU4ghNqWSkqCQTx2hKCKGF0EpN0FlKX_mUFdenaMK4ZiXlbIrePntn7BhM3OG2a8IInYOE--AhYtN5vOvHbpX30KYBOojpGm9jn5nUdivcN9jvkonDOrYOpy2AW5-jk8aEBBeHOUMfjw_vi-di-fr0srhfFo5LOhRlLimNMuA8s5Ira5mSXgoNzmldlY2VYLzUnkjugDBSOS-ULUFYqZwQfIZu9rm5z_cIaag3bXIQgumgH1NNBdVccE15Rm_3qIt9ShGaehvbTf65pqT-VVjT-qAws1eH2NFuwP-Tf874Dxu3bAY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1419343913</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vocabulary influences older and younger listeners' processing of dysarthric speech</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>McAuliffe, Megan J ; Gibson, Elizabeth M R ; Kerr, Sarah E ; Anderson, Tim ; LaShell, Patrick J</creator><creatorcontrib>McAuliffe, Megan J ; Gibson, Elizabeth M R ; Kerr, Sarah E ; Anderson, Tim ; LaShell, Patrick J</creatorcontrib><description>This study examined younger (n = 16) and older (n = 16) listeners' processing of dysarthric speech-a naturally occurring form of signal degradation. It aimed to determine how age, hearing acuity, memory, and vocabulary knowledge interacted in speech recognition and lexical segmentation. Listener transcripts were coded for accuracy and pattern of lexical boundary errors. For younger listeners, transcription accuracy was predicted by receptive vocabulary. For older listeners, this same effect existed but was moderated by pure-tone hearing thresholds. While both groups employed syllabic stress cues to inform lexical segmentation, older listeners were less reliant on this perceptual strategy. The results were interpreted to suggest that individuals with larger receptive vocabularies, with their presumed greater language familiarity, were better able to leverage cue redundancies within the speech signal to form lexical hypothesis-leading to an improved ability to comprehend dysarthric speech. This advantage was minimized as hearing thresholds increased. While the differing levels of reliance on stress cues across the listener groups could not be attributed to specific individual differences, it was hypothesized that some combination of larger vocabularies and reduced hearing thresholds in the older participant group led to them prioritize lexical cues as a segmentation frame.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.4812764</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23927132</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Adolescent ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Audiometry, Pure-Tone ; Audiometry, Speech ; Auditory Threshold ; Cues ; Dysarthria - physiopathology ; Dysarthria - psychology ; Female ; Hearing ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pattern Recognition, Physiological ; Phonetics ; Recognition (Psychology) ; Speech Acoustics ; Speech Perception ; Vocabulary ; Voice Quality ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2013-08, Vol.134 (2), p.1358-1368</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-78525a6aecd2b536bb265d549ecc9987fb5ead59d053ce0208cd46b7e4b56c443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-78525a6aecd2b536bb265d549ecc9987fb5ead59d053ce0208cd46b7e4b56c443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>207,208,314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23927132$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McAuliffe, Megan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Elizabeth M R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerr, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaShell, Patrick J</creatorcontrib><title>Vocabulary influences older and younger listeners' processing of dysarthric speech</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><description>This study examined younger (n = 16) and older (n = 16) listeners' processing of dysarthric speech-a naturally occurring form of signal degradation. It aimed to determine how age, hearing acuity, memory, and vocabulary knowledge interacted in speech recognition and lexical segmentation. Listener transcripts were coded for accuracy and pattern of lexical boundary errors. For younger listeners, transcription accuracy was predicted by receptive vocabulary. For older listeners, this same effect existed but was moderated by pure-tone hearing thresholds. While both groups employed syllabic stress cues to inform lexical segmentation, older listeners were less reliant on this perceptual strategy. The results were interpreted to suggest that individuals with larger receptive vocabularies, with their presumed greater language familiarity, were better able to leverage cue redundancies within the speech signal to form lexical hypothesis-leading to an improved ability to comprehend dysarthric speech. This advantage was minimized as hearing thresholds increased. While the differing levels of reliance on stress cues across the listener groups could not be attributed to specific individual differences, it was hypothesized that some combination of larger vocabularies and reduced hearing thresholds in the older participant group led to them prioritize lexical cues as a segmentation frame.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Audiometry, Pure-Tone</subject><subject>Audiometry, Speech</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Dysarthria - physiopathology</subject><subject>Dysarthria - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Physiological</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Speech Acoustics</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Voice Quality</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtKw0AUhgdRbK0ufAGZnbpInXsySyneoCCIug1zOWkj06TOJIu-vSOtrs458PHznw-hS0rmlDJ6R-eioqxU4ghNqWSkqCQTx2hKCKGF0EpN0FlKX_mUFdenaMK4ZiXlbIrePntn7BhM3OG2a8IInYOE--AhYtN5vOvHbpX30KYBOojpGm9jn5nUdivcN9jvkonDOrYOpy2AW5-jk8aEBBeHOUMfjw_vi-di-fr0srhfFo5LOhRlLimNMuA8s5Ira5mSXgoNzmldlY2VYLzUnkjugDBSOS-ULUFYqZwQfIZu9rm5z_cIaag3bXIQgumgH1NNBdVccE15Rm_3qIt9ShGaehvbTf65pqT-VVjT-qAws1eH2NFuwP-Tf874Dxu3bAY</recordid><startdate>201308</startdate><enddate>201308</enddate><creator>McAuliffe, Megan J</creator><creator>Gibson, Elizabeth M R</creator><creator>Kerr, Sarah E</creator><creator>Anderson, Tim</creator><creator>LaShell, Patrick J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201308</creationdate><title>Vocabulary influences older and younger listeners' processing of dysarthric speech</title><author>McAuliffe, Megan J ; Gibson, Elizabeth M R ; Kerr, Sarah E ; Anderson, Tim ; LaShell, Patrick J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-78525a6aecd2b536bb265d549ecc9987fb5ead59d053ce0208cd46b7e4b56c443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Audiometry, Pure-Tone</topic><topic>Audiometry, Speech</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Dysarthria - physiopathology</topic><topic>Dysarthria - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Physiological</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Speech Acoustics</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Voice Quality</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McAuliffe, Megan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Elizabeth M R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerr, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaShell, Patrick J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McAuliffe, Megan J</au><au>Gibson, Elizabeth M R</au><au>Kerr, Sarah E</au><au>Anderson, Tim</au><au>LaShell, Patrick J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vocabulary influences older and younger listeners' processing of dysarthric speech</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><date>2013-08</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1358</spage><epage>1368</epage><pages>1358-1368</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><abstract>This study examined younger (n = 16) and older (n = 16) listeners' processing of dysarthric speech-a naturally occurring form of signal degradation. It aimed to determine how age, hearing acuity, memory, and vocabulary knowledge interacted in speech recognition and lexical segmentation. Listener transcripts were coded for accuracy and pattern of lexical boundary errors. For younger listeners, transcription accuracy was predicted by receptive vocabulary. For older listeners, this same effect existed but was moderated by pure-tone hearing thresholds. While both groups employed syllabic stress cues to inform lexical segmentation, older listeners were less reliant on this perceptual strategy. The results were interpreted to suggest that individuals with larger receptive vocabularies, with their presumed greater language familiarity, were better able to leverage cue redundancies within the speech signal to form lexical hypothesis-leading to an improved ability to comprehend dysarthric speech. This advantage was minimized as hearing thresholds increased. While the differing levels of reliance on stress cues across the listener groups could not be attributed to specific individual differences, it was hypothesized that some combination of larger vocabularies and reduced hearing thresholds in the older participant group led to them prioritize lexical cues as a segmentation frame.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>23927132</pmid><doi>10.1121/1.4812764</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-4966 |
ispartof | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2013-08, Vol.134 (2), p.1358-1368 |
issn | 0001-4966 1520-8524 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1419343913 |
source | MEDLINE; AIP Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection; AIP Acoustical Society of America |
subjects | Acoustic Stimulation Adolescent Age Factors Aged Audiometry, Pure-Tone Audiometry, Speech Auditory Threshold Cues Dysarthria - physiopathology Dysarthria - psychology Female Hearing Humans Male Middle Aged Pattern Recognition, Physiological Phonetics Recognition (Psychology) Speech Acoustics Speech Perception Vocabulary Voice Quality Young Adult |
title | Vocabulary influences older and younger listeners' processing of dysarthric speech |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T11%3A57%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vocabulary%20influences%20older%20and%20younger%20listeners'%20processing%20of%20dysarthric%20speech&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=McAuliffe,%20Megan%20J&rft.date=2013-08&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1358&rft.epage=1368&rft.pages=1358-1368&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.4812764&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1419343913%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1419343913&rft_id=info:pmid/23927132&rfr_iscdi=true |