Vocabulary influences older and younger listeners' processing of dysarthric speech

This study examined younger (n = 16) and older (n = 16) listeners' processing of dysarthric speech-a naturally occurring form of signal degradation. It aimed to determine how age, hearing acuity, memory, and vocabulary knowledge interacted in speech recognition and lexical segmentation. Listene...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2013-08, Vol.134 (2), p.1358-1368
Hauptverfasser: McAuliffe, Megan J, Gibson, Elizabeth M R, Kerr, Sarah E, Anderson, Tim, LaShell, Patrick J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1368
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1358
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 134
creator McAuliffe, Megan J
Gibson, Elizabeth M R
Kerr, Sarah E
Anderson, Tim
LaShell, Patrick J
description This study examined younger (n = 16) and older (n = 16) listeners' processing of dysarthric speech-a naturally occurring form of signal degradation. It aimed to determine how age, hearing acuity, memory, and vocabulary knowledge interacted in speech recognition and lexical segmentation. Listener transcripts were coded for accuracy and pattern of lexical boundary errors. For younger listeners, transcription accuracy was predicted by receptive vocabulary. For older listeners, this same effect existed but was moderated by pure-tone hearing thresholds. While both groups employed syllabic stress cues to inform lexical segmentation, older listeners were less reliant on this perceptual strategy. The results were interpreted to suggest that individuals with larger receptive vocabularies, with their presumed greater language familiarity, were better able to leverage cue redundancies within the speech signal to form lexical hypothesis-leading to an improved ability to comprehend dysarthric speech. This advantage was minimized as hearing thresholds increased. While the differing levels of reliance on stress cues across the listener groups could not be attributed to specific individual differences, it was hypothesized that some combination of larger vocabularies and reduced hearing thresholds in the older participant group led to them prioritize lexical cues as a segmentation frame.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/1.4812764
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1419343913</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1419343913</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-78525a6aecd2b536bb265d549ecc9987fb5ead59d053ce0208cd46b7e4b56c443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtKw0AUhgdRbK0ufAGZnbpInXsySyneoCCIug1zOWkj06TOJIu-vSOtrs458PHznw-hS0rmlDJ6R-eioqxU4ghNqWSkqCQTx2hKCKGF0EpN0FlKX_mUFdenaMK4ZiXlbIrePntn7BhM3OG2a8IInYOE--AhYtN5vOvHbpX30KYBOojpGm9jn5nUdivcN9jvkonDOrYOpy2AW5-jk8aEBBeHOUMfjw_vi-di-fr0srhfFo5LOhRlLimNMuA8s5Ira5mSXgoNzmldlY2VYLzUnkjugDBSOS-ULUFYqZwQfIZu9rm5z_cIaag3bXIQgumgH1NNBdVccE15Rm_3qIt9ShGaehvbTf65pqT-VVjT-qAws1eH2NFuwP-Tf874Dxu3bAY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1419343913</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vocabulary influences older and younger listeners' processing of dysarthric speech</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>McAuliffe, Megan J ; Gibson, Elizabeth M R ; Kerr, Sarah E ; Anderson, Tim ; LaShell, Patrick J</creator><creatorcontrib>McAuliffe, Megan J ; Gibson, Elizabeth M R ; Kerr, Sarah E ; Anderson, Tim ; LaShell, Patrick J</creatorcontrib><description>This study examined younger (n = 16) and older (n = 16) listeners' processing of dysarthric speech-a naturally occurring form of signal degradation. It aimed to determine how age, hearing acuity, memory, and vocabulary knowledge interacted in speech recognition and lexical segmentation. Listener transcripts were coded for accuracy and pattern of lexical boundary errors. For younger listeners, transcription accuracy was predicted by receptive vocabulary. For older listeners, this same effect existed but was moderated by pure-tone hearing thresholds. While both groups employed syllabic stress cues to inform lexical segmentation, older listeners were less reliant on this perceptual strategy. The results were interpreted to suggest that individuals with larger receptive vocabularies, with their presumed greater language familiarity, were better able to leverage cue redundancies within the speech signal to form lexical hypothesis-leading to an improved ability to comprehend dysarthric speech. This advantage was minimized as hearing thresholds increased. While the differing levels of reliance on stress cues across the listener groups could not be attributed to specific individual differences, it was hypothesized that some combination of larger vocabularies and reduced hearing thresholds in the older participant group led to them prioritize lexical cues as a segmentation frame.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.4812764</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23927132</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Adolescent ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Audiometry, Pure-Tone ; Audiometry, Speech ; Auditory Threshold ; Cues ; Dysarthria - physiopathology ; Dysarthria - psychology ; Female ; Hearing ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pattern Recognition, Physiological ; Phonetics ; Recognition (Psychology) ; Speech Acoustics ; Speech Perception ; Vocabulary ; Voice Quality ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2013-08, Vol.134 (2), p.1358-1368</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-78525a6aecd2b536bb265d549ecc9987fb5ead59d053ce0208cd46b7e4b56c443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-78525a6aecd2b536bb265d549ecc9987fb5ead59d053ce0208cd46b7e4b56c443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>207,208,314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23927132$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McAuliffe, Megan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Elizabeth M R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerr, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaShell, Patrick J</creatorcontrib><title>Vocabulary influences older and younger listeners' processing of dysarthric speech</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><description>This study examined younger (n = 16) and older (n = 16) listeners' processing of dysarthric speech-a naturally occurring form of signal degradation. It aimed to determine how age, hearing acuity, memory, and vocabulary knowledge interacted in speech recognition and lexical segmentation. Listener transcripts were coded for accuracy and pattern of lexical boundary errors. For younger listeners, transcription accuracy was predicted by receptive vocabulary. For older listeners, this same effect existed but was moderated by pure-tone hearing thresholds. While both groups employed syllabic stress cues to inform lexical segmentation, older listeners were less reliant on this perceptual strategy. The results were interpreted to suggest that individuals with larger receptive vocabularies, with their presumed greater language familiarity, were better able to leverage cue redundancies within the speech signal to form lexical hypothesis-leading to an improved ability to comprehend dysarthric speech. This advantage was minimized as hearing thresholds increased. While the differing levels of reliance on stress cues across the listener groups could not be attributed to specific individual differences, it was hypothesized that some combination of larger vocabularies and reduced hearing thresholds in the older participant group led to them prioritize lexical cues as a segmentation frame.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Audiometry, Pure-Tone</subject><subject>Audiometry, Speech</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Dysarthria - physiopathology</subject><subject>Dysarthria - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Physiological</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Speech Acoustics</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Voice Quality</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtKw0AUhgdRbK0ufAGZnbpInXsySyneoCCIug1zOWkj06TOJIu-vSOtrs458PHznw-hS0rmlDJ6R-eioqxU4ghNqWSkqCQTx2hKCKGF0EpN0FlKX_mUFdenaMK4ZiXlbIrePntn7BhM3OG2a8IInYOE--AhYtN5vOvHbpX30KYBOojpGm9jn5nUdivcN9jvkonDOrYOpy2AW5-jk8aEBBeHOUMfjw_vi-di-fr0srhfFo5LOhRlLimNMuA8s5Ira5mSXgoNzmldlY2VYLzUnkjugDBSOS-ULUFYqZwQfIZu9rm5z_cIaag3bXIQgumgH1NNBdVccE15Rm_3qIt9ShGaehvbTf65pqT-VVjT-qAws1eH2NFuwP-Tf874Dxu3bAY</recordid><startdate>201308</startdate><enddate>201308</enddate><creator>McAuliffe, Megan J</creator><creator>Gibson, Elizabeth M R</creator><creator>Kerr, Sarah E</creator><creator>Anderson, Tim</creator><creator>LaShell, Patrick J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201308</creationdate><title>Vocabulary influences older and younger listeners' processing of dysarthric speech</title><author>McAuliffe, Megan J ; Gibson, Elizabeth M R ; Kerr, Sarah E ; Anderson, Tim ; LaShell, Patrick J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-78525a6aecd2b536bb265d549ecc9987fb5ead59d053ce0208cd46b7e4b56c443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Audiometry, Pure-Tone</topic><topic>Audiometry, Speech</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Dysarthria - physiopathology</topic><topic>Dysarthria - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Physiological</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Speech Acoustics</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Voice Quality</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McAuliffe, Megan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Elizabeth M R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerr, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaShell, Patrick J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McAuliffe, Megan J</au><au>Gibson, Elizabeth M R</au><au>Kerr, Sarah E</au><au>Anderson, Tim</au><au>LaShell, Patrick J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vocabulary influences older and younger listeners' processing of dysarthric speech</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><date>2013-08</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1358</spage><epage>1368</epage><pages>1358-1368</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><abstract>This study examined younger (n = 16) and older (n = 16) listeners' processing of dysarthric speech-a naturally occurring form of signal degradation. It aimed to determine how age, hearing acuity, memory, and vocabulary knowledge interacted in speech recognition and lexical segmentation. Listener transcripts were coded for accuracy and pattern of lexical boundary errors. For younger listeners, transcription accuracy was predicted by receptive vocabulary. For older listeners, this same effect existed but was moderated by pure-tone hearing thresholds. While both groups employed syllabic stress cues to inform lexical segmentation, older listeners were less reliant on this perceptual strategy. The results were interpreted to suggest that individuals with larger receptive vocabularies, with their presumed greater language familiarity, were better able to leverage cue redundancies within the speech signal to form lexical hypothesis-leading to an improved ability to comprehend dysarthric speech. This advantage was minimized as hearing thresholds increased. While the differing levels of reliance on stress cues across the listener groups could not be attributed to specific individual differences, it was hypothesized that some combination of larger vocabularies and reduced hearing thresholds in the older participant group led to them prioritize lexical cues as a segmentation frame.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>23927132</pmid><doi>10.1121/1.4812764</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2013-08, Vol.134 (2), p.1358-1368
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1419343913
source MEDLINE; AIP Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection; AIP Acoustical Society of America
subjects Acoustic Stimulation
Adolescent
Age Factors
Aged
Audiometry, Pure-Tone
Audiometry, Speech
Auditory Threshold
Cues
Dysarthria - physiopathology
Dysarthria - psychology
Female
Hearing
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pattern Recognition, Physiological
Phonetics
Recognition (Psychology)
Speech Acoustics
Speech Perception
Vocabulary
Voice Quality
Young Adult
title Vocabulary influences older and younger listeners' processing of dysarthric speech
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T11%3A57%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vocabulary%20influences%20older%20and%20younger%20listeners'%20processing%20of%20dysarthric%20speech&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=McAuliffe,%20Megan%20J&rft.date=2013-08&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1358&rft.epage=1368&rft.pages=1358-1368&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.4812764&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1419343913%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1419343913&rft_id=info:pmid/23927132&rfr_iscdi=true