Preference in the process of parturition: a comparison between primiparous and nulliparous women
It was to describe and compare the preference of nulliparous and primiparous women for a particular mode of delivery and to determine whether the previous experience of childbirth influences the delivery process. We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study. One-hundred interviews were held with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia 2013-06, Vol.35 (6), p.281-285 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | por |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 285 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 281 |
container_title | Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Benute, Gláucia Rosana Guerra Nomura, Roseli Yamamoto dos Santos, Amanda Maihara Zarvos, Mariana Arena de Lucia, Mara Cristina Souza Francisco, Rossana Pulcineli Vieira |
description | It was to describe and compare the preference of nulliparous and primiparous women for a particular mode of delivery and to determine whether the previous experience of childbirth influences the delivery process.
We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study. One-hundred interviews were held with 56 nulliparous and 44 primiparous women using previously prepared questionnaires. The quantitative and categorical data were evaluated by the chi-square or Fisher's Exact Test.
60.7% of nulliparous women and 70.5% of primiparous women reported to prefer vaginal delivery. When analyzing the answers about receiving sufficient information about the type of delivery, the presence or absence of influence on the choice of route of delivery and the preferred route of delivery by the partner, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. The level of significance used for the tests was 0.05.
This study permitted us to conclude that the previous experience of delivery does not influence the expectation of the delivery process or the choice for a specific mode of delivery. When choosing the route of delivery, women seek to ensure the health of mother and neonate, as well as to avoid the process of pain and suffering. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1419341867</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1419341867</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-964cd082de533878a5f0401b174364257a7acf8066ab9044e97ec99ab85cf86c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kEtLxDAUhYMgzjj6FyRLN4U0SfNwJ4MvGNCFrmua3mKkTWqSMvjvjczM6nI_Dveec87QulZEVJoxvUKXKX0TQiVT_AKtKNNUU0LX6PMtwgARvAXsPM5fgOcYLKSEw4BnE_MSXXbB32GDbZgKcSl43EHeA_gidpMrMCwJG99jv4zjad-HCfwVOh_MmOD6ODfo4_Hhfftc7V6fXrb3u2queZ0rLbjtiaI9NIwpqUwzEE7qrpacCU4baaSxQ8kjTKcJ56AlWK1Np5qChWUbdHu4W-z_LJByO7lkYRyNh2KmLV8047USskhvjtKlm6Bv_zOY-NueWmF_o3JeSA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1419341867</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preference in the process of parturition: a comparison between primiparous and nulliparous women</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Benute, Gláucia Rosana Guerra ; Nomura, Roseli Yamamoto ; dos Santos, Amanda Maihara ; Zarvos, Mariana Arena ; de Lucia, Mara Cristina Souza ; Francisco, Rossana Pulcineli Vieira</creator><creatorcontrib>Benute, Gláucia Rosana Guerra ; Nomura, Roseli Yamamoto ; dos Santos, Amanda Maihara ; Zarvos, Mariana Arena ; de Lucia, Mara Cristina Souza ; Francisco, Rossana Pulcineli Vieira</creatorcontrib><description>It was to describe and compare the preference of nulliparous and primiparous women for a particular mode of delivery and to determine whether the previous experience of childbirth influences the delivery process.
We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study. One-hundred interviews were held with 56 nulliparous and 44 primiparous women using previously prepared questionnaires. The quantitative and categorical data were evaluated by the chi-square or Fisher's Exact Test.
60.7% of nulliparous women and 70.5% of primiparous women reported to prefer vaginal delivery. When analyzing the answers about receiving sufficient information about the type of delivery, the presence or absence of influence on the choice of route of delivery and the preferred route of delivery by the partner, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. The level of significance used for the tests was 0.05.
This study permitted us to conclude that the previous experience of delivery does not influence the expectation of the delivery process or the choice for a specific mode of delivery. When choosing the route of delivery, women seek to ensure the health of mother and neonate, as well as to avoid the process of pain and suffering.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1806-9339</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23929202</identifier><language>por</language><publisher>Brazil</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Delivery, Obstetric ; Female ; Humans ; Parity ; Parturition ; Patient Preference ; Pregnancy ; Prospective Studies ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia, 2013-06, Vol.35 (6), p.281-285</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23929202$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Benute, Gláucia Rosana Guerra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nomura, Roseli Yamamoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dos Santos, Amanda Maihara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zarvos, Mariana Arena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Lucia, Mara Cristina Souza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francisco, Rossana Pulcineli Vieira</creatorcontrib><title>Preference in the process of parturition: a comparison between primiparous and nulliparous women</title><title>Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia</title><addtitle>Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet</addtitle><description>It was to describe and compare the preference of nulliparous and primiparous women for a particular mode of delivery and to determine whether the previous experience of childbirth influences the delivery process.
We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study. One-hundred interviews were held with 56 nulliparous and 44 primiparous women using previously prepared questionnaires. The quantitative and categorical data were evaluated by the chi-square or Fisher's Exact Test.
60.7% of nulliparous women and 70.5% of primiparous women reported to prefer vaginal delivery. When analyzing the answers about receiving sufficient information about the type of delivery, the presence or absence of influence on the choice of route of delivery and the preferred route of delivery by the partner, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. The level of significance used for the tests was 0.05.
This study permitted us to conclude that the previous experience of delivery does not influence the expectation of the delivery process or the choice for a specific mode of delivery. When choosing the route of delivery, women seek to ensure the health of mother and neonate, as well as to avoid the process of pain and suffering.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Delivery, Obstetric</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>Parturition</subject><subject>Patient Preference</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1806-9339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kEtLxDAUhYMgzjj6FyRLN4U0SfNwJ4MvGNCFrmua3mKkTWqSMvjvjczM6nI_Dveec87QulZEVJoxvUKXKX0TQiVT_AKtKNNUU0LX6PMtwgARvAXsPM5fgOcYLKSEw4BnE_MSXXbB32GDbZgKcSl43EHeA_gidpMrMCwJG99jv4zjad-HCfwVOh_MmOD6ODfo4_Hhfftc7V6fXrb3u2queZ0rLbjtiaI9NIwpqUwzEE7qrpacCU4baaSxQ8kjTKcJ56AlWK1Np5qChWUbdHu4W-z_LJByO7lkYRyNh2KmLV8047USskhvjtKlm6Bv_zOY-NueWmF_o3JeSA</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Benute, Gláucia Rosana Guerra</creator><creator>Nomura, Roseli Yamamoto</creator><creator>dos Santos, Amanda Maihara</creator><creator>Zarvos, Mariana Arena</creator><creator>de Lucia, Mara Cristina Souza</creator><creator>Francisco, Rossana Pulcineli Vieira</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>Preference in the process of parturition: a comparison between primiparous and nulliparous women</title><author>Benute, Gláucia Rosana Guerra ; Nomura, Roseli Yamamoto ; dos Santos, Amanda Maihara ; Zarvos, Mariana Arena ; de Lucia, Mara Cristina Souza ; Francisco, Rossana Pulcineli Vieira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-964cd082de533878a5f0401b174364257a7acf8066ab9044e97ec99ab85cf86c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>por</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Delivery, Obstetric</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>Parturition</topic><topic>Patient Preference</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Benute, Gláucia Rosana Guerra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nomura, Roseli Yamamoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dos Santos, Amanda Maihara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zarvos, Mariana Arena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Lucia, Mara Cristina Souza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francisco, Rossana Pulcineli Vieira</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Benute, Gláucia Rosana Guerra</au><au>Nomura, Roseli Yamamoto</au><au>dos Santos, Amanda Maihara</au><au>Zarvos, Mariana Arena</au><au>de Lucia, Mara Cristina Souza</au><au>Francisco, Rossana Pulcineli Vieira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preference in the process of parturition: a comparison between primiparous and nulliparous women</atitle><jtitle>Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet</addtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>281</spage><epage>285</epage><pages>281-285</pages><eissn>1806-9339</eissn><abstract>It was to describe and compare the preference of nulliparous and primiparous women for a particular mode of delivery and to determine whether the previous experience of childbirth influences the delivery process.
We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study. One-hundred interviews were held with 56 nulliparous and 44 primiparous women using previously prepared questionnaires. The quantitative and categorical data were evaluated by the chi-square or Fisher's Exact Test.
60.7% of nulliparous women and 70.5% of primiparous women reported to prefer vaginal delivery. When analyzing the answers about receiving sufficient information about the type of delivery, the presence or absence of influence on the choice of route of delivery and the preferred route of delivery by the partner, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. The level of significance used for the tests was 0.05.
This study permitted us to conclude that the previous experience of delivery does not influence the expectation of the delivery process or the choice for a specific mode of delivery. When choosing the route of delivery, women seek to ensure the health of mother and neonate, as well as to avoid the process of pain and suffering.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pmid>23929202</pmid><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1806-9339 |
ispartof | Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia, 2013-06, Vol.35 (6), p.281-285 |
issn | 1806-9339 |
language | por |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1419341867 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Cross-Sectional Studies Delivery, Obstetric Female Humans Parity Parturition Patient Preference Pregnancy Prospective Studies Young Adult |
title | Preference in the process of parturition: a comparison between primiparous and nulliparous women |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T05%3A58%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preference%20in%20the%20process%20of%20parturition:%20a%20comparison%20between%20primiparous%20and%20nulliparous%20women&rft.jtitle=Revista%20Brasileira%20de%20ginecologia%20e%20obstetr%C3%ADcia&rft.au=Benute,%20Gl%C3%A1ucia%20Rosana%20Guerra&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=281&rft.epage=285&rft.pages=281-285&rft.eissn=1806-9339&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1419341867%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1419341867&rft_id=info:pmid/23929202&rfr_iscdi=true |