The clinical biomechanics award paper 1993 Posture and the compressive strength of the lumbar spine
The effect of posture on spinal compressive strength was examined in a series of three experiments on cadaveric material. Lumbar ‘motion segments’, consisting of two vertebrae and the intervening disc and ligaments, were compressed while positioned in various angles of flexion and extension. In the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical biomechanics (Bristol) 1994, Vol.9 (1), p.5-14 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 14 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 5 |
container_title | Clinical biomechanics (Bristol) |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Adams, M.A. McNally, D.S. Chinn, H. Dolan, P. |
description | The effect of posture on spinal compressive strength was examined in a series of three experiments on cadaveric material. Lumbar ‘motion segments’, consisting of two vertebrae and the intervening disc and ligaments, were compressed while positioned in various angles of flexion and extension. In the first experiment load sharing between the disc, the apophyseal joint surfaces, and the intervertebral ligaments was inferred from measurements of intradiscal pressure (IDP). Results showed that extension caused the apophyseal joints to become load-bearing, and damage could occur at compressive loads as low as 500 N. Flexion angles greater than about 75% of the full range of flexion (as defined by the posterior ligaments) generated high tensile forces in these ligaments, and caused substantial increases in IDP. The optimum range for resisting compression therefore appeared to be 0–75% flexion. The second experiment compared the distribution of compressive stress within the disc at the endpoints of this range, and showed that at 0% flexion high stress concentrations occur in the posterior annulus of many discs, whereas an even distribution of stress was usually found at 75% flexion. However, the third experiment showed that there was no significant difference in the compressive strength of motion segments positioned in 0% and 75% flexion. A comparison of the range of flexion/ extension movements in vivo and in vitro led us to conclude that in life a position of moderate flexion is to be preferred when the lumbar spine is subjected to high compressive forces. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0268-0033(94)90052-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1418365210</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0268003394900523</els_id><sourcerecordid>1418365210</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-b6f99e610a1027fe8f1f9d79cb363c4186d5fcf6809e0e3b28e16b7cf88797b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtP7DAMRiMEguHxD9BVlrAo2EknbTZXukK8JCRYwDpKU4fJVV8kLYh_T4cBlqwsy-ez5cPYMcIZAqpzEKrMAKQ80fmpBliKTG6xBZaFzlAUuM0WP8ge20_pPwDkYlnssj0hNSooxIK5xxVx14QuONvwKvQtuZWdu8Ttm401H-xAkaPWkj_0aZwicdvVfFzH-naIlFJ4JZ7GSN3zuOK9_5w1U1vZyNMQOjpkO942iY6-6gF7urp8vLjJ7u6vby_-3WVO5jhmlfJak0KwCKLwVHr0ui60q6SSLsdS1UvvvCpBE5CsREmoqsL5cn65qIQ8YCebvUPsXyZKo2lDctQ0tqN-SgbnHVItBcKM5hvUxT6lSN4MMbQ2vhsEs9Zr1u7M2p3RufnUa-Qc-_N1Yapaqn9C3z5n4O8GoPnP10DRJBeoc1SHSG40dR9-v_ABou6JJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1418365210</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The clinical biomechanics award paper 1993 Posture and the compressive strength of the lumbar spine</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Adams, M.A. ; McNally, D.S. ; Chinn, H. ; Dolan, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Adams, M.A. ; McNally, D.S. ; Chinn, H. ; Dolan, P.</creatorcontrib><description>The effect of posture on spinal compressive strength was examined in a series of three experiments on cadaveric material. Lumbar ‘motion segments’, consisting of two vertebrae and the intervening disc and ligaments, were compressed while positioned in various angles of flexion and extension. In the first experiment load sharing between the disc, the apophyseal joint surfaces, and the intervertebral ligaments was inferred from measurements of intradiscal pressure (IDP). Results showed that extension caused the apophyseal joints to become load-bearing, and damage could occur at compressive loads as low as 500 N. Flexion angles greater than about 75% of the full range of flexion (as defined by the posterior ligaments) generated high tensile forces in these ligaments, and caused substantial increases in IDP. The optimum range for resisting compression therefore appeared to be 0–75% flexion. The second experiment compared the distribution of compressive stress within the disc at the endpoints of this range, and showed that at 0% flexion high stress concentrations occur in the posterior annulus of many discs, whereas an even distribution of stress was usually found at 75% flexion. However, the third experiment showed that there was no significant difference in the compressive strength of motion segments positioned in 0% and 75% flexion. A comparison of the range of flexion/ extension movements in vivo and in vitro led us to conclude that in life a position of moderate flexion is to be preferred when the lumbar spine is subjected to high compressive forces.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-0033</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0268-0033(94)90052-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23916072</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>injury ; intervertebral disc ; lumbar spine ; mechanical loading ; Posture</subject><ispartof>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol), 1994, Vol.9 (1), p.5-14</ispartof><rights>1994</rights><rights>Copyright © 1994. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-b6f99e610a1027fe8f1f9d79cb363c4186d5fcf6809e0e3b28e16b7cf88797b23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-b6f99e610a1027fe8f1f9d79cb363c4186d5fcf6809e0e3b28e16b7cf88797b23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0268-0033(94)90052-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23916072$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adams, M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNally, D.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chinn, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolan, P.</creatorcontrib><title>The clinical biomechanics award paper 1993 Posture and the compressive strength of the lumbar spine</title><title>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)</title><addtitle>Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)</addtitle><description>The effect of posture on spinal compressive strength was examined in a series of three experiments on cadaveric material. Lumbar ‘motion segments’, consisting of two vertebrae and the intervening disc and ligaments, were compressed while positioned in various angles of flexion and extension. In the first experiment load sharing between the disc, the apophyseal joint surfaces, and the intervertebral ligaments was inferred from measurements of intradiscal pressure (IDP). Results showed that extension caused the apophyseal joints to become load-bearing, and damage could occur at compressive loads as low as 500 N. Flexion angles greater than about 75% of the full range of flexion (as defined by the posterior ligaments) generated high tensile forces in these ligaments, and caused substantial increases in IDP. The optimum range for resisting compression therefore appeared to be 0–75% flexion. The second experiment compared the distribution of compressive stress within the disc at the endpoints of this range, and showed that at 0% flexion high stress concentrations occur in the posterior annulus of many discs, whereas an even distribution of stress was usually found at 75% flexion. However, the third experiment showed that there was no significant difference in the compressive strength of motion segments positioned in 0% and 75% flexion. A comparison of the range of flexion/ extension movements in vivo and in vitro led us to conclude that in life a position of moderate flexion is to be preferred when the lumbar spine is subjected to high compressive forces.</description><subject>injury</subject><subject>intervertebral disc</subject><subject>lumbar spine</subject><subject>mechanical loading</subject><subject>Posture</subject><issn>0268-0033</issn><issn>1879-1271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtP7DAMRiMEguHxD9BVlrAo2EknbTZXukK8JCRYwDpKU4fJVV8kLYh_T4cBlqwsy-ez5cPYMcIZAqpzEKrMAKQ80fmpBliKTG6xBZaFzlAUuM0WP8ge20_pPwDkYlnssj0hNSooxIK5xxVx14QuONvwKvQtuZWdu8Ttm401H-xAkaPWkj_0aZwicdvVfFzH-naIlFJ4JZ7GSN3zuOK9_5w1U1vZyNMQOjpkO942iY6-6gF7urp8vLjJ7u6vby_-3WVO5jhmlfJak0KwCKLwVHr0ui60q6SSLsdS1UvvvCpBE5CsREmoqsL5cn65qIQ8YCebvUPsXyZKo2lDctQ0tqN-SgbnHVItBcKM5hvUxT6lSN4MMbQ2vhsEs9Zr1u7M2p3RufnUa-Qc-_N1Yapaqn9C3z5n4O8GoPnP10DRJBeoc1SHSG40dR9-v_ABou6JJA</recordid><startdate>1994</startdate><enddate>1994</enddate><creator>Adams, M.A.</creator><creator>McNally, D.S.</creator><creator>Chinn, H.</creator><creator>Dolan, P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1994</creationdate><title>The clinical biomechanics award paper 1993 Posture and the compressive strength of the lumbar spine</title><author>Adams, M.A. ; McNally, D.S. ; Chinn, H. ; Dolan, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-b6f99e610a1027fe8f1f9d79cb363c4186d5fcf6809e0e3b28e16b7cf88797b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>injury</topic><topic>intervertebral disc</topic><topic>lumbar spine</topic><topic>mechanical loading</topic><topic>Posture</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adams, M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNally, D.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chinn, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolan, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adams, M.A.</au><au>McNally, D.S.</au><au>Chinn, H.</au><au>Dolan, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The clinical biomechanics award paper 1993 Posture and the compressive strength of the lumbar spine</atitle><jtitle>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)</addtitle><date>1994</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>5-14</pages><issn>0268-0033</issn><eissn>1879-1271</eissn><abstract>The effect of posture on spinal compressive strength was examined in a series of three experiments on cadaveric material. Lumbar ‘motion segments’, consisting of two vertebrae and the intervening disc and ligaments, were compressed while positioned in various angles of flexion and extension. In the first experiment load sharing between the disc, the apophyseal joint surfaces, and the intervertebral ligaments was inferred from measurements of intradiscal pressure (IDP). Results showed that extension caused the apophyseal joints to become load-bearing, and damage could occur at compressive loads as low as 500 N. Flexion angles greater than about 75% of the full range of flexion (as defined by the posterior ligaments) generated high tensile forces in these ligaments, and caused substantial increases in IDP. The optimum range for resisting compression therefore appeared to be 0–75% flexion. The second experiment compared the distribution of compressive stress within the disc at the endpoints of this range, and showed that at 0% flexion high stress concentrations occur in the posterior annulus of many discs, whereas an even distribution of stress was usually found at 75% flexion. However, the third experiment showed that there was no significant difference in the compressive strength of motion segments positioned in 0% and 75% flexion. A comparison of the range of flexion/ extension movements in vivo and in vitro led us to conclude that in life a position of moderate flexion is to be preferred when the lumbar spine is subjected to high compressive forces.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23916072</pmid><doi>10.1016/0268-0033(94)90052-3</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-0033 |
ispartof | Clinical biomechanics (Bristol), 1994, Vol.9 (1), p.5-14 |
issn | 0268-0033 1879-1271 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1418365210 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | injury intervertebral disc lumbar spine mechanical loading Posture |
title | The clinical biomechanics award paper 1993 Posture and the compressive strength of the lumbar spine |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A51%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20clinical%20biomechanics%20award%20paper%201993%20Posture%20and%20the%20compressive%20strength%20of%20the%20lumbar%20spine&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20biomechanics%20(Bristol)&rft.au=Adams,%20M.A.&rft.date=1994&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=5-14&rft.issn=0268-0033&rft.eissn=1879-1271&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0268-0033(94)90052-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1418365210%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1418365210&rft_id=info:pmid/23916072&rft_els_id=0268003394900523&rfr_iscdi=true |