Influence of eugenol on the push-out bond strengths of fiber posts cemented with different types of resin luting agents
This study evaluated the influence of eugenol on the push-out bond strengths of fiber posts cemented with different types of resin luting agents. Seventy-two extracted maxillary single-rooted canine teeth were randomly divided into two groups of 36 teeth. Group 1, the control group, was filled with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Odontology 2013-07, Vol.101 (2), p.204-209 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 209 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 204 |
container_title | Odontology |
container_volume | 101 |
creator | Özcan, Erhan Çetin, Ali Riza Çapar, İsmail Davut Tunçdemir, Ali Riza Aydinbelge, Hale Ari |
description | This study evaluated the influence of eugenol on the push-out bond strengths of fiber posts cemented with different types of resin luting agents. Seventy-two extracted maxillary single-rooted canine teeth were randomly divided into two groups of 36 teeth. Group 1, the control group, was filled with gutta-percha only (i.e., did not receive eugenol), whereas group 2 was filled with a eugenol-containing sealer. All root canals were filled and each group was divided into three subgroups. The posts in each subgroup were cemented with the following materials: subgroup 1 with a 2-step self-etching adhesive system (Clearfil Liner Bond 2V + Panavia F); subgroup 2 with a 1-step self-etching adhesive (Panavia F); and subgroup 3 with a self-adhesive (Clearfil SA Cement). Dislodgement resistance was measured using a universal testing machine. All data were subjected to ANOVA using a factorial design and Tukey test (
α
= 0.05). The use of the eugenol-containing sealer significantly reduced the push-out bond strength of the fiber post (
P
|
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10266-012-0082-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1418148863</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3035997821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-b5916e9f3746de7042811b6876004e921aa8ad3bbdffade3553bd51e4bf286a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10U1rHSEUBmApDc1H-wO6KUI33UzjUceZuyyhH4FAN-ladDzeO2GuTv0g5N_Hm5uGUuhKwee8R3gJeQ_sMzA2XGZgXKmOAe8YG3kHr8gZKBg74H3_-uUuh1NynvMdY3yQgr0hp1wwADmIM3J_HfxSMUxIo6dYtxjiQmOgZYd0rXnXxVqojcHRXBKGbdnlg_SzxUTXmEumE-4xFHT0fi476mbvsclCy8OKTzhhngNdapnDlpq2ouS35MSbJeO75_OC_Pr29fbqR3fz8_v11ZebbpK8L53tN6Bw48UglcOBST4CWDUOijGJGw7GjMYJa533xqHoe2FdDyit56Myvbggn465a4q_K-ai93OecFlMwFizBgkjyHFUotGP_9C7WFNovzuoQTIh1aYpOKopxZwTer2meW_SgwamD63oYyu6taIPrWhoMx-ek6vdo3uZ-FNDA_wIcnsKW0x_rf5v6iPNnZgy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1417403469</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of eugenol on the push-out bond strengths of fiber posts cemented with different types of resin luting agents</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Özcan, Erhan ; Çetin, Ali Riza ; Çapar, İsmail Davut ; Tunçdemir, Ali Riza ; Aydinbelge, Hale Ari</creator><creatorcontrib>Özcan, Erhan ; Çetin, Ali Riza ; Çapar, İsmail Davut ; Tunçdemir, Ali Riza ; Aydinbelge, Hale Ari</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluated the influence of eugenol on the push-out bond strengths of fiber posts cemented with different types of resin luting agents. Seventy-two extracted maxillary single-rooted canine teeth were randomly divided into two groups of 36 teeth. Group 1, the control group, was filled with gutta-percha only (i.e., did not receive eugenol), whereas group 2 was filled with a eugenol-containing sealer. All root canals were filled and each group was divided into three subgroups. The posts in each subgroup were cemented with the following materials: subgroup 1 with a 2-step self-etching adhesive system (Clearfil Liner Bond 2V + Panavia F); subgroup 2 with a 1-step self-etching adhesive (Panavia F); and subgroup 3 with a self-adhesive (Clearfil SA Cement). Dislodgement resistance was measured using a universal testing machine. All data were subjected to ANOVA using a factorial design and Tukey test (
α
= 0.05). The use of the eugenol-containing sealer significantly reduced the push-out bond strength of the fiber post (
P
< 0.05). The push-out bond strength of Panavia F was significantly higher than those of the other groups filled with the eugenol-containing sealer (
P
< 0.05). The Panavia F group was less susceptible to the inhibiting effect of eugenol than were the other evaluated groups when the fiber post was cemented in the canals filled with the eugenol-containing sealer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1618-1247</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-1255</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10266-012-0082-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23011473</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tokyo: Springer Japan</publisher><subject>Adhesive bonding ; Chemical bonds ; Cuspid ; Dental Bonding ; Dental research ; Dentistry ; Endodontics ; Epoxy Resins ; Eugenol - chemistry ; Humans ; Medicine ; Odontology ; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery ; Original Article ; Resins</subject><ispartof>Odontology, 2013-07, Vol.101 (2), p.204-209</ispartof><rights>The Society of The Nippon Dental University 2012</rights><rights>The Society of The Nippon Dental University 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-b5916e9f3746de7042811b6876004e921aa8ad3bbdffade3553bd51e4bf286a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-b5916e9f3746de7042811b6876004e921aa8ad3bbdffade3553bd51e4bf286a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10266-012-0082-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10266-012-0082-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912,41475,42544,51306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23011473$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Özcan, Erhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çetin, Ali Riza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çapar, İsmail Davut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tunçdemir, Ali Riza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aydinbelge, Hale Ari</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of eugenol on the push-out bond strengths of fiber posts cemented with different types of resin luting agents</title><title>Odontology</title><addtitle>Odontology</addtitle><addtitle>Odontology</addtitle><description>This study evaluated the influence of eugenol on the push-out bond strengths of fiber posts cemented with different types of resin luting agents. Seventy-two extracted maxillary single-rooted canine teeth were randomly divided into two groups of 36 teeth. Group 1, the control group, was filled with gutta-percha only (i.e., did not receive eugenol), whereas group 2 was filled with a eugenol-containing sealer. All root canals were filled and each group was divided into three subgroups. The posts in each subgroup were cemented with the following materials: subgroup 1 with a 2-step self-etching adhesive system (Clearfil Liner Bond 2V + Panavia F); subgroup 2 with a 1-step self-etching adhesive (Panavia F); and subgroup 3 with a self-adhesive (Clearfil SA Cement). Dislodgement resistance was measured using a universal testing machine. All data were subjected to ANOVA using a factorial design and Tukey test (
α
= 0.05). The use of the eugenol-containing sealer significantly reduced the push-out bond strength of the fiber post (
P
< 0.05). The push-out bond strength of Panavia F was significantly higher than those of the other groups filled with the eugenol-containing sealer (
P
< 0.05). The Panavia F group was less susceptible to the inhibiting effect of eugenol than were the other evaluated groups when the fiber post was cemented in the canals filled with the eugenol-containing sealer.</description><subject>Adhesive bonding</subject><subject>Chemical bonds</subject><subject>Cuspid</subject><subject>Dental Bonding</subject><subject>Dental research</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Endodontics</subject><subject>Epoxy Resins</subject><subject>Eugenol - chemistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Odontology</subject><subject>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Resins</subject><issn>1618-1247</issn><issn>1618-1255</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp10U1rHSEUBmApDc1H-wO6KUI33UzjUceZuyyhH4FAN-ladDzeO2GuTv0g5N_Hm5uGUuhKwee8R3gJeQ_sMzA2XGZgXKmOAe8YG3kHr8gZKBg74H3_-uUuh1NynvMdY3yQgr0hp1wwADmIM3J_HfxSMUxIo6dYtxjiQmOgZYd0rXnXxVqojcHRXBKGbdnlg_SzxUTXmEumE-4xFHT0fi476mbvsclCy8OKTzhhngNdapnDlpq2ouS35MSbJeO75_OC_Pr29fbqR3fz8_v11ZebbpK8L53tN6Bw48UglcOBST4CWDUOijGJGw7GjMYJa533xqHoe2FdDyit56Myvbggn465a4q_K-ai93OecFlMwFizBgkjyHFUotGP_9C7WFNovzuoQTIh1aYpOKopxZwTer2meW_SgwamD63oYyu6taIPrWhoMx-ek6vdo3uZ-FNDA_wIcnsKW0x_rf5v6iPNnZgy</recordid><startdate>20130701</startdate><enddate>20130701</enddate><creator>Özcan, Erhan</creator><creator>Çetin, Ali Riza</creator><creator>Çapar, İsmail Davut</creator><creator>Tunçdemir, Ali Riza</creator><creator>Aydinbelge, Hale Ari</creator><general>Springer Japan</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130701</creationdate><title>Influence of eugenol on the push-out bond strengths of fiber posts cemented with different types of resin luting agents</title><author>Özcan, Erhan ; Çetin, Ali Riza ; Çapar, İsmail Davut ; Tunçdemir, Ali Riza ; Aydinbelge, Hale Ari</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-b5916e9f3746de7042811b6876004e921aa8ad3bbdffade3553bd51e4bf286a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adhesive bonding</topic><topic>Chemical bonds</topic><topic>Cuspid</topic><topic>Dental Bonding</topic><topic>Dental research</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Endodontics</topic><topic>Epoxy Resins</topic><topic>Eugenol - chemistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Odontology</topic><topic>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Resins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Özcan, Erhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çetin, Ali Riza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çapar, İsmail Davut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tunçdemir, Ali Riza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aydinbelge, Hale Ari</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Odontology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Özcan, Erhan</au><au>Çetin, Ali Riza</au><au>Çapar, İsmail Davut</au><au>Tunçdemir, Ali Riza</au><au>Aydinbelge, Hale Ari</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of eugenol on the push-out bond strengths of fiber posts cemented with different types of resin luting agents</atitle><jtitle>Odontology</jtitle><stitle>Odontology</stitle><addtitle>Odontology</addtitle><date>2013-07-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>204</spage><epage>209</epage><pages>204-209</pages><issn>1618-1247</issn><eissn>1618-1255</eissn><abstract>This study evaluated the influence of eugenol on the push-out bond strengths of fiber posts cemented with different types of resin luting agents. Seventy-two extracted maxillary single-rooted canine teeth were randomly divided into two groups of 36 teeth. Group 1, the control group, was filled with gutta-percha only (i.e., did not receive eugenol), whereas group 2 was filled with a eugenol-containing sealer. All root canals were filled and each group was divided into three subgroups. The posts in each subgroup were cemented with the following materials: subgroup 1 with a 2-step self-etching adhesive system (Clearfil Liner Bond 2V + Panavia F); subgroup 2 with a 1-step self-etching adhesive (Panavia F); and subgroup 3 with a self-adhesive (Clearfil SA Cement). Dislodgement resistance was measured using a universal testing machine. All data were subjected to ANOVA using a factorial design and Tukey test (
α
= 0.05). The use of the eugenol-containing sealer significantly reduced the push-out bond strength of the fiber post (
P
< 0.05). The push-out bond strength of Panavia F was significantly higher than those of the other groups filled with the eugenol-containing sealer (
P
< 0.05). The Panavia F group was less susceptible to the inhibiting effect of eugenol than were the other evaluated groups when the fiber post was cemented in the canals filled with the eugenol-containing sealer.</abstract><cop>Tokyo</cop><pub>Springer Japan</pub><pmid>23011473</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10266-012-0082-1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1618-1247 |
ispartof | Odontology, 2013-07, Vol.101 (2), p.204-209 |
issn | 1618-1247 1618-1255 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1418148863 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Adhesive bonding Chemical bonds Cuspid Dental Bonding Dental research Dentistry Endodontics Epoxy Resins Eugenol - chemistry Humans Medicine Odontology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Original Article Resins |
title | Influence of eugenol on the push-out bond strengths of fiber posts cemented with different types of resin luting agents |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T19%3A35%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20eugenol%20on%20the%20push-out%20bond%20strengths%20of%20fiber%20posts%20cemented%20with%20different%20types%20of%20resin%20luting%20agents&rft.jtitle=Odontology&rft.au=%C3%96zcan,%20Erhan&rft.date=2013-07-01&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=204&rft.epage=209&rft.pages=204-209&rft.issn=1618-1247&rft.eissn=1618-1255&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10266-012-0082-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3035997821%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1417403469&rft_id=info:pmid/23011473&rfr_iscdi=true |