Modular neck femoral stems
Following the recall of modular neck hip stems in July 2012, research into femoral modularity will intensify over the next few years. This review aims to provide surgeons with an up-to-date summary of the clinically relevant evidence. The development of femoral modularity, and a classification syste...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The bone & joint journal 2013-08, Vol.95-B (8), p.1011-1021 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1021 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1011 |
container_title | The bone & joint journal |
container_volume | 95-B |
creator | Krishnan, H Krishnan, S P Blunn, G Skinner, J A Hart, A J |
description | Following the recall of modular neck hip stems in July 2012, research into femoral modularity will intensify over the next few years. This review aims to provide surgeons with an up-to-date summary of the clinically relevant evidence. The development of femoral modularity, and a classification system, is described. The theoretical rationale for modularity is summarised and the clinical outcomes are explored. The review also examines the clinically relevant problems reported following the use of femoral stems with a modular neck. Joint replacement registries in the United Kingdom and Australia have provided data on the failure rates of modular devices but cannot identify the mechanism of failure. This information is needed to determine whether modular neck femoral stems will be used in the future, and how we should monitor patients who already have them implanted. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1302/0301-620x.95b8.31525 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1418141197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1418141197</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-913727087c4a74db6ee5d17c968957907462c72c951266f6c4d4d2586b03e8983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AQhhdRbKn9AyKSo5fEmf3eoxa_oOJFwduSbDZQTZq6m4D-e7e2dWCYObzvvMNDyAVCgQzoNTDAXFL4LoyodMFQUHFEphS4yTkHfXzYmeETMo_xA1JpQOR4SiaUGdAc2ZScP_f12JYhW3v3mTW-60PZZnHwXTwjJ03ZRj_fzxl5u797XTzmy5eHp8XNMndMsSE3yBRVoJXjpeJ1Jb0XNSpnpDZCGVBcUqeoMwKplI10vOY1FVpWwLw2ms3I1e7uJvRfo4-D7VbR-bYt174fo00v69RoVJLyndSFPsbgG7sJq64MPxbBbsHYLRibwLxbI261_QOTbJf7hLHqfP1vOmBgv57pWnw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1418141197</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modular neck femoral stems</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Krishnan, H ; Krishnan, S P ; Blunn, G ; Skinner, J A ; Hart, A J</creator><creatorcontrib>Krishnan, H ; Krishnan, S P ; Blunn, G ; Skinner, J A ; Hart, A J</creatorcontrib><description>Following the recall of modular neck hip stems in July 2012, research into femoral modularity will intensify over the next few years. This review aims to provide surgeons with an up-to-date summary of the clinically relevant evidence. The development of femoral modularity, and a classification system, is described. The theoretical rationale for modularity is summarised and the clinical outcomes are explored. The review also examines the clinically relevant problems reported following the use of femoral stems with a modular neck. Joint replacement registries in the United Kingdom and Australia have provided data on the failure rates of modular devices but cannot identify the mechanism of failure. This information is needed to determine whether modular neck femoral stems will be used in the future, and how we should monitor patients who already have them implanted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-4394</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-4408</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.95b8.31525</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23908413</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods ; Femur Neck ; Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects ; Humans ; Metals - adverse effects ; Prosthesis Design ; Prosthesis Failure ; Registries ; Reoperation - instrumentation ; Reoperation - methods ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The bone & joint journal, 2013-08, Vol.95-B (8), p.1011-1021</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-913727087c4a74db6ee5d17c968957907462c72c951266f6c4d4d2586b03e8983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-913727087c4a74db6ee5d17c968957907462c72c951266f6c4d4d2586b03e8983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23908413$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krishnan, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnan, S P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blunn, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skinner, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, A J</creatorcontrib><title>Modular neck femoral stems</title><title>The bone & joint journal</title><addtitle>Bone Joint J</addtitle><description>Following the recall of modular neck hip stems in July 2012, research into femoral modularity will intensify over the next few years. This review aims to provide surgeons with an up-to-date summary of the clinically relevant evidence. The development of femoral modularity, and a classification system, is described. The theoretical rationale for modularity is summarised and the clinical outcomes are explored. The review also examines the clinically relevant problems reported following the use of femoral stems with a modular neck. Joint replacement registries in the United Kingdom and Australia have provided data on the failure rates of modular devices but cannot identify the mechanism of failure. This information is needed to determine whether modular neck femoral stems will be used in the future, and how we should monitor patients who already have them implanted.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</subject><subject>Femur Neck</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Metals - adverse effects</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Reoperation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Reoperation - methods</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>2049-4394</issn><issn>2049-4408</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AQhhdRbKn9AyKSo5fEmf3eoxa_oOJFwduSbDZQTZq6m4D-e7e2dWCYObzvvMNDyAVCgQzoNTDAXFL4LoyodMFQUHFEphS4yTkHfXzYmeETMo_xA1JpQOR4SiaUGdAc2ZScP_f12JYhW3v3mTW-60PZZnHwXTwjJ03ZRj_fzxl5u797XTzmy5eHp8XNMndMsSE3yBRVoJXjpeJ1Jb0XNSpnpDZCGVBcUqeoMwKplI10vOY1FVpWwLw2ms3I1e7uJvRfo4-D7VbR-bYt174fo00v69RoVJLyndSFPsbgG7sJq64MPxbBbsHYLRibwLxbI261_QOTbJf7hLHqfP1vOmBgv57pWnw</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Krishnan, H</creator><creator>Krishnan, S P</creator><creator>Blunn, G</creator><creator>Skinner, J A</creator><creator>Hart, A J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Modular neck femoral stems</title><author>Krishnan, H ; Krishnan, S P ; Blunn, G ; Skinner, J A ; Hart, A J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-913727087c4a74db6ee5d17c968957907462c72c951266f6c4d4d2586b03e8983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</topic><topic>Femur Neck</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Metals - adverse effects</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Reoperation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Reoperation - methods</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krishnan, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnan, S P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blunn, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skinner, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, A J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The bone & joint journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krishnan, H</au><au>Krishnan, S P</au><au>Blunn, G</au><au>Skinner, J A</au><au>Hart, A J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modular neck femoral stems</atitle><jtitle>The bone & joint journal</jtitle><addtitle>Bone Joint J</addtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>95-B</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1011</spage><epage>1021</epage><pages>1011-1021</pages><issn>2049-4394</issn><eissn>2049-4408</eissn><abstract>Following the recall of modular neck hip stems in July 2012, research into femoral modularity will intensify over the next few years. This review aims to provide surgeons with an up-to-date summary of the clinically relevant evidence. The development of femoral modularity, and a classification system, is described. The theoretical rationale for modularity is summarised and the clinical outcomes are explored. The review also examines the clinically relevant problems reported following the use of femoral stems with a modular neck. Joint replacement registries in the United Kingdom and Australia have provided data on the failure rates of modular devices but cannot identify the mechanism of failure. This information is needed to determine whether modular neck femoral stems will be used in the future, and how we should monitor patients who already have them implanted.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>23908413</pmid><doi>10.1302/0301-620x.95b8.31525</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2049-4394 |
ispartof | The bone & joint journal, 2013-08, Vol.95-B (8), p.1011-1021 |
issn | 2049-4394 2049-4408 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1418141197 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods Femur Neck Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects Humans Metals - adverse effects Prosthesis Design Prosthesis Failure Registries Reoperation - instrumentation Reoperation - methods Treatment Outcome |
title | Modular neck femoral stems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T12%3A26%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modular%20neck%20femoral%20stems&rft.jtitle=The%20bone%20&%20joint%20journal&rft.au=Krishnan,%20H&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=95-B&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1011&rft.epage=1021&rft.pages=1011-1021&rft.issn=2049-4394&rft.eissn=2049-4408&rft_id=info:doi/10.1302/0301-620x.95b8.31525&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1418141197%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1418141197&rft_id=info:pmid/23908413&rfr_iscdi=true |